[Federal Register: April 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 64)]
[Notices]
[Page 17989-17991]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02ap08-71]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0183]
Third-Party Certification Programs for Foods and Feeds; Request
for Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting comments
on the use of third-party certification programs for foods and feeds,
including pet foods. An increasing number of firms that sell foods to
the public, such as retailers and food service providers, are
requesting that their suppliers become certified as meeting food (and
feed) safety and quality standards as a condition of doing business.
FDA seeks more information on the existence and use of these types of
programs to better understand how they can help to ensure that food
products are safe, secure, and meet FDA requirements.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments by May 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to http://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Lindan Mayl, Office of Policy
(HF-11), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD
20857, 301-827-3360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Ensuring the safety of food for human and animal use is a shared
responsibility between the public and private sectors. FDA has the
authority to establish regulatory standards, inspect facilities, and
take action if there are violations, but it is ultimately the
responsibility of industry to ensure that food and feed intended for
consumption in the United States meet applicable FDA standards. An
increasing number of firms that sell foods and feeds (hereinafter
foods) to the public, such as retailers and food service providers, are
requesting that their suppliers, both foreign and domestic, become
certified as meeting food safety and quality standards as a condition
of doing business. In addition, domestic and foreign suppliers (such as
producers, co-manufacturers, or re-packers) are increasingly looking to
third parties to assist them in meeting U.S. requirements. FDA is
seeking comment on current practices of third-party certification
programs that work with food products and to ensure the supply chain is
safe, secure, and meet FDA requirements.
A. Current Use of Voluntary Third-Party Certification Programs for
Foods
A growing number of food firms require their suppliers to ensure
their products are produced using ``best practices'' for food safety,
quality, and security and that the supply chain is safe and secure.
These firms often require their suppliers to meet nationally or
globally recognized food safety standards and to verify that these
standards are met through a third-party certification program. For
example, the Global Food Safety Initiative requires food suppliers to
have a factory audit certification against internationally recognized
standards, which include the Safe Quality Food, British Retail
Consortium, International Food Standard, and GlobalGAP. The Global
Aquaculture Alliance has also established standards for aquaculture
production and processing and created an accrediting body for
certifiers from 30 countries. These types of private sector developed
programs are being used in many foreign countries, as well as the
United States.
B. Interagency Working Group on Import Safety
On July 18, 2007, the President issued Executive Order 13439 to
establish the Interagency Working Group on Import Safety (Working
Group). On November 6, 2007, the Working Group released an ``Action
Plan for Import Safety: A Roadmap for Continual Improvement'' (Action
Plan) (http://www.importsafety.gov/report/actionplan.pdf). The Action
Plan contains 14 broad recommendations and 50 specific short- and long-
term action steps to better protect consumers and enhance the safety of
the increasing volume of imports entering the United States. The Action
Plan stresses the importance of the private sector's responsibility for
the safety of its products and the importance of ongoing private-sector
mechanisms and experience as a basis for ongoing, substantive public-
private collaboration. The public and private sectors have a shared
interest in import safety, and substantive improvement will require the
careful collaboration of the entire importing community.
[[Page 17990]]
Recommendation 2 of the Action Plan is to ``verify compliance of
foreign producers with United States safety and security standards
through certification.'' Third-party certification can augment the
Federal Government's and the importing community's ability to ensure
that products imported into the United States meet U.S. safety and
security standards. The Action Plan states ``[f]or foreign producers,
the ability to participate in voluntary certification programs could
allow products from firms that comply with U.S. safety and security
standards to enter the United States more quickly. This would
facilitate trade, while allowing federal departments and agencies to
focus their resources on products from non-certified firms or for which
information suggests there may be safety or security concerns. This
would allow federal departments and agencies to more effectively target
their resources. It may not be necessary to establish certification
programs for low-risk products.''
Action Steps 2.2 and 2.4 of the Action Plan call for the
development of voluntary third-party certification programs based on
risk for foreign producers of certain products who export to the United
States and the creation of incentives for foreign firms to participate
in voluntary certification programs and for importers to purchase only
from certified firms.
In conjunction with the Action Plan, on November 6, 2007, FDA
released its Food Protection Plan (FPP), a comprehensive initiative
designed to bolster efforts to better protect the Nation's food supply
(http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/advance/food/plan.html).
Although certification by an independent third party would not
replace an FDA inspection, and FDA would continue to inspect a firm
itself, as appropriate based on risk, third-party certification could
provide additional assurances of safety. In addition, third-party
certification could provide FDA with important information about the
ability of specific food suppliers to meet FDA requirements and to
better focus the use of our resources based on risk. FDA believes that
eligible third parties should include other Federal government, State
government, and foreign government agencies and officials.
If FDA were to develop or recognize (or accredit) one or more
independent third-party certification programs, we would provide an
opportunity for both foreign and domestic firms to voluntarily
participate. However, FDA would need sufficient confidence in the
quality of the audits performed and the validity of the decisions to
certify by the third parties as well as the independence of the third
parties from the firms they certify before we would consider
recognizing a third-party certification program.
One action FDA will take to implement the Action Plan and the FPP
is to accredit independent third parties, or to recognize entities that
accredit, to evaluate compliance with FDA requirements. This notice
represents FDA's first step in soliciting public input in the design
and development or recognition of third-party certification programs.
II. Request for Information
FDA is seeking information on the use of third-party certification
programs. In addition to general information, we are posing several
specific questions related to these types of programs.
1. What domestic and foreign third-party certification programs for
suppliers are currently in use by U.S. companies?
FDA is aware of several third-party certification programs that are
currently being used in the United States. We would like more
information regarding these and other certification programs, the
standards on which they are based, and who is currently using these
third-party programs. In addition, we would like information on the
standards and procedures used to ensure that the third parties used are
independent (i.e., without conflicts of interest), the standards used
to accredit third parties, who accredits these third parties, and how
and by whom these third parties are audited and evaluated for
performance. We would also like to know how national government bodies
interface with or recognize these certification programs.
2. Do the current third-party certification programs ensure compliance
with FDA requirements?
Third-party certification programs for foods are used widely in
Europe. These types of certification programs are becoming more popular
in other parts of the world, including the United States. FDA solicits
comment on whether the requirements for certification used by these
programs encompass FDA requirements. If not, what modifications need to
be made for the U.S. marketplace? Should FDA recognize (or accredit)
any of these programs? Should FDA participate in future modifications
to any of these programs? If so, in what capacity?
3. What are the obstacles to private sector participation in these
third-party certification programs?
Although the use of third-party certification programs is growing,
they are not used by the majority of U.S. food firms. FDA seeks
information about any barriers that may exist to using third-party
certification programs. Are retailers and suppliers aware of these
programs? Are these programs widely available? Are they cost effective?
Are there particular obstacles for small businesses?
4. What incentives would increase participation in these third-party
certification programs?
FDA recognizes that there are business and legal incentives to
using third-party certification programs. We would like to know what
incentives could increase participation in these certification
programs. For example, would expedited treatment at U.S. ports of entry
significantly encourage foreign suppliers to participate or domestic
firms to make participation by foreign or domestic suppliers a
condition of doing business with them? Would making the names of
certified firms publicly available, such as through a publicly
accessible database, significantly encourage participation in these
programs by foreign or domestic suppliers? Would FDA considering
certification as one factor in determining inspection priorities
provide a significant incentive for foreign or domestic firms to
participate? Are there other incentives that would increase
participation for imported foods? For domestic foods?
III. How to Submit Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments to http://
www.regulations.gov or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except
that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic
[[Page 17991]]
comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA through FDMS only.
Dated: March 27, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-6705 Filed 4-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S