[Federal Register: April 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 72)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 20008-20015]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14ap08-27]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 080310411-7566-01]
RIN 0648-AU14
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence Fishing
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to amend the subsistence fishery
rules for Pacific halibut in waters in and off Alaska. These
regulations are necessary to address subsistence halibut management
concerns in densely populated areas. This action is intended to support
the conservation and management provisions of the Northern Pacific
Halibut Act of 1982.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than May 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN
0648-AU14'' by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal website at http://
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586-7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, Alaska.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will be
posted to http://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal
Identifying Information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats to be accepted.
Copies of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Regulatory Impact Review
(RIR), and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) prepared for
this action, as well as the environmental assessment (EA) prepared for
the original subsistence halibut action (68 FR 18145; April 15, 2003)
may be obtained from the North Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) at 605 West 4th, Suite 306, Anchorage, Alaska 99501-2252,
907-271-2809; by mail from NMFS, Alaska Region, P. O. Box 21668,
Juneau, AK 99802-1668, Attn: Ellen Sebastian, Records Officer; in
person at NMFS, Alaska Region, 709 West 9th Street, Room 420A, Juneau,
Alaska; or via the Internet at the NMFS Alaska Region website at http:/
/www.fakr.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to NMFS at the above address and by e-
mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Carls, 907-586-7228 or
becky.carls@noaa.gov, or Peggy Murphy, 907-586-7228 or
peggy.murphy@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for Action
Management of the Pacific halibut (hereafter halibut) fishery in
and off Alaska is based on an international agreement between Canada
and the United States. This agreement, entitled the ``Convention
between the United States of America and Canada for the Preservation of
the Halibut Fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea''
(Convention), was signed at Ottawa, Canada, on March 2, 1953, and
amended by the ``Protocol Amending the Convention,'' signed at
Washington, D.C., March 29, 1979. The Convention, administered by the
International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), is given effect in the
United States by the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut
Act).
The IPHC promulgates regulations pursuant to the Convention. The
IPHC's regulations are subject to approval by the Secretary of State
with concurrence from the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary). After
approval by the Secretary of State and the Secretary, the IPHC
regulations are published in the Federal Register as annual management
measures pursuant to 50 CFR 300.62. NMFS published the IPHC's current
annual management measures on March 7, 2008 (73 FR 12280).
The Halibut Act also authorizes the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) to develop halibut fishery regulations,
including limited access regulations, in its geographic area of concern
that would apply to nationals or vessels of the United States (Halibut
Act, section 773(c)). Such an action by the Council is limited to only
those regulations that are in addition to, and not in conflict with,
IPHC regulations. Council-developed regulations must be approved and
implemented by the Secretary. Any allocation of halibut fishing
privileges must be fair and equitable and consistent with other
applicable Federal law. The Council used its authority under the
Halibut Act to recommend a subsistence halibut program in October 2000
to recognize and manage the subsistence fishery for halibut.
The Secretary approved the Council's recommended subsistence
halibut program and published implementing regulations on April 15,
2003 (68 FR 18145), and codified the program in 50 CFR part 300-subpart
E, authorizing a subsistence fishery for halibut in Convention waters
off Alaska. In April 2002, the Council proposed a suite of amendments
to its original subsistence halibut program while postponing several
proposed amendments to be included in a separate action. Regulations
implementing the initial suite of amendments to the original
subsistence halibut program were published on April 1, 2005 (70 FR
16742). These regulations (1) changed the boundaries of the Anchorage/
Matsu/Kenai non-subsistence area; (2) eliminated gear restrictions in
Areas 4C, 4D, and 4E; (3) increased gear and harvest restrictions in
Area 2C; (4) allowed retention of legal-sized subsistence halibut with
Community Development Quota halibut in Areas 4C, 4D, and 4E; (5)
created a Community Harvest Permit (CHP) system to mitigate increased
gear and harvest restrictions in affected areas; (6) created a
Ceremonial and Educational Permit system to recognize customary and
traditional tribal practices; and (7) included the subsistence halibut
program in the federal appeals process at 50 CFR 679.43.
The Council revisited the postponed amendments in October 2004, and
took final action on them in December 2004. This action proposes
implementing regulations for the postponed amendments. Specifically,
this action
[[Page 20009]]
proposes six changes to the subsistence halibut regulations that would:
(1) revise the subsistence gear restrictions in Kodiak and add seasonal
gear and vessel limits in Sitka Sound; (2) add the village of Naukati
to the list of eligible subsistence halibut communities; (3) implement
a possession limit to enhance enforcement; (4) revise the definition of
charter vessel; (5) revise regulations regarding customary trade; and
(6) allow the use of special permits within non-subsistence use areas
by tribes eligible for the permits. Additional administrative revisions
to regulations include converting the gear and harvest restrictions
from text to table format and revising language to consistently refer
to Sitka Sound, rather than Sitka LAMP, and its defined area. None of
the proposed actions are intended to change the amount of halibut
harvested for subsistence. Information on alternatives considered and
rejected may be found in the RIR and IRFA prepared for this action (see
ADDRESSES).
Subsistence Halibut Gear Restrictions
The Council recommended increasing gear restrictions in two
subareas of IPHC Regulatory Areas 2C and 3A. In Area 3A, the Council
recommended lowering the maximum hook limit per vessel in the Kodiak
Road Zone and Chiniak Bay (together referred to hereafter as Chiniak
Bay) from 90 to 60 hooks. In Area 2C, the Council proposed additional
seasonal gear and harvest restrictions in Sitka Sound. The Council
recommended each of these provisions to address localized depletion
concerns in those subareas.
This proposed action would reduce the allowable hook limit in
Chiniak Bay to no more than two times the per person limit of 30,
except when fishing under a Ceremonial, Educational, or Community
Harvest Permit. If one registered fisher is onboard the vessel, the
maximum number of hooks on the gear set or retrieved in the course of
fishing would be 30. If two registered fishers are onboard, the maximum
number of hooks on gear set or retrieved in the course of fishing would
be 60. However, unlike other parts of Area 3A that would be allowed up
to 90 hooks if three registered fishers are onboard, at no time may the
maximum number of hooks on gear set or retrieved in the course of
fishing exceed 60 hooks per vessel in Chiniak Bay, except that under a
Ceremonial, Educational, or Community Harvest Permit the limit would be
90 hooks per vessel.
Under this action, NMFS would define Chiniak Bay based on the State
of Alaska's definition of the Kodiak Road Zone found at 05 AAC 64.005.
NMFS would define Chiniak Bay as all waters bounded by the shoreline
and straight lines extending from Cape Chiniak (57[deg]37.22' N. lat.,
152[deg]9.36' W. long.), to Buoy 1 at Williams Reef
(57[deg]50.36' N. lat., 152[deg]8.82' W. long.), to East Cape on Spruce
Island (57[deg]54.89' N. lat., 152[deg]19.45' W. long.), to Termination
Point on Kodiak Island (57[deg]51.31' N. lat., 152[deg]24.01' W.
long.), and connecting to a line running counterclockwise along the
shoreline of Kodiak Island to Cape Chiniak (57[deg]37.22' N. lat.,
152[deg]9.36' W. long.). NMFS proposes this definition because latitude
and longitude reference points do not vary and can be easily drawn on
paper and electronic charting systems. The proposed area also includes
the vast majority of local small-vessel sport and subsistence grounds
historically fished for halibut, while maintaining consistency with the
area targeted by the Council's proposed Kodiak Road Zone
recommendation.
Consistent with previous applications of the Community Harvest
Permit (CHP) Program, the Council recommended allowing the use of a CHP
in Area 3A, including Chiniak Bay, to mitigate the proposed increased
restrictions. The CHP Program allows a community or Alaska Native tribe
to select individual harvesters who may possess particular expertise in
halibut fishing to harvest halibut on behalf of the community or Alaska
Native tribe. Possession of a CHP in Area 3A would allow an eligible
tribe or community to use 30 hooks per person up to a maximum of 90
hooks per vessel.
The Council also recommended additional gear restrictions and
seasonal periods for gear restrictions in Sitka Sound to further
address localized depletion concerns. This proposed action would reduce
the allowable gear from 30 hooks to 15 hooks per vessel and prohibit
power hauling during the summer months from June 1 through August 31.
From September 1 through May 31 gear restrictions would remain at 30
hooks per vessel and power hauling would be allowed.
The gear restrictions in this proposed rule would apply only to
gear in use by eligible subsistence fishermen. By applying the gear
restrictions to gear ``set or retrieved'' from a vessel, the gear
restrictions apply only to gear actively engaged in subsistence fishing
for halibut. A subsistence fisherman may possess any amount of gear
onboard the vessel as long as that amount of gear actively being used
does not exceed the prescribed limits. For instance, a box of extra
hooks stored onboard a vessel or a fully rigged set of spare gear in a
vessel would not count toward the subsistence gear restriction because
the gear is not in use. This proposed rule also intends to further
clarify any ambiguity in the gear restrictions by converting the
original text of the gear restrictions to a table format. Because of
this conversion to a table format, information in the regulatory text
at Sec. 300.65(h)(1)(i)(D) concerning the use of setline gear in Sitka
Sound would be moved to Sec. 300.65(e)(5).
Eligible Subsistence Halibut Communities
Persons eligible to conduct subsistence halibut fishing include (1)
residents of rural places with customary and traditional uses of
halibut and (2) all identified members of federally recognized Alaska
Native tribes with a finding of customary and traditional uses of
halibut. A list of rural communities and Alaska Native tribes eligible
to fish for subsistence halibut may be found at Sec. 300.65(g).
The list of rural places recommended by the Council and approved by
the Secretary was derived from customary and traditional findings for
halibut and bottomfish made by the Alaska State Board of Fisheries
(Board) prior to the Alaska Supreme Court decision, McDowell v. State,
785 P.2d 1 (Alaska 1989). Following McDowell, State regulations
directed the Board to determine whether each fish stock in subsistence
use areas of the State is subject to customary and traditional uses.
Therefore, the customary and traditional use determination process does
not focus on communities or areas that conduct the use, but on the
pattern of use of a fish stock. Although the Council engages in a
community-based approach, nothing prevents the Board from nominating
areas, such as remote homesteads, for eligibility for subsistence
halibut.
The Council and Secretary retain exclusive authority to recommend
changes to the list of rural places in Sec. 300.65(g)(1). The Council
initially recognized that some rural communities not explicitly named
in the list may seek a finding of customary and traditional use of
halibut, and established a policy to include those communities if
customary and traditional findings were made. Residents who believed
that their rural place was incorrectly omitted from the eligibility
listing for rural places, or who were seeking eligibility for the first
time, were encouraged to seek a customary and traditional finding from
the Board before petitioning the Council.
In October 2003, the Board received seven appeals from communities
and
[[Page 20010]]
individuals requesting positive customary and traditional use findings
for halibut. The Board forwarded only two proposals to the Council:
Port Tongass Village and Naukati. The remaining petitions failed
because the petitioners were located within non-subsistence use areas
and did not fit the stated criteria.
In December 2004, the Council recommended a provision to include
Naukati as an eligible rural community for subsistence halibut purposes
based on the Board's recommendation. The Council declined including
Port Tongass Village following testimony and evidence that indicated
the proposed rural community consists of only one individual. The
Council determined that this was an insufficient number of residents to
qualify as a community. However, the Council affirmed the Board's
determination that Naukati is a rural community with customary and
traditional use of halibut and recommended adding Naukati as a rural
community for subsistence halibut purposes consistent with the
Council's policy to include communities for which customary and
traditional findings are made by the Board. Therefore, under this
proposed rule, NMFS would add only Naukati to the list of eligible
communities found at Sec. 300.65(g)(1).
Subsistence Halibut Harvest Restrictions
In general, eligible subsistence fishermen may retain up to 20
halibut per day as a daily bag limit, except in Area 2C where only 20
halibut per vessel per day may be retained, and Areas 4C, 4D, and 4E
where no limits on retention apply. In October 2003, the IPHC staff
suggested that subsistence regulations allowed a substantial increase
in harvest that necessitated more effective monitoring. The IPHC
specifically expressed concern with overall enforcement of the
subsistence program and the allowable possession of halibut. The IPHC
identified that enforcement officers currently possess no means to
verify time on the water for subsistence halibut fishermen who possess
more than one daily bag limit, thereby hampering accurate accounting of
halibut removals. The Council subsequently recommended implementing a
possession limit to restrict potential abuses of the daily bag limit
and enhance enforcement of daily harvest limits.
Based on the recommendation of the IPHC, the Council recommended
that the proposed possession limit apply to Areas 2C, 3A, and 3B, which
have experienced increased fishing effort due to higher population
density. The Council determined that no possession limit was necessary
for Areas 4A and 4B because those areas were not experiencing
corresponding increases in fishing effort and population density.
This proposed action would implement a possession limit of one
daily bag limit for Areas 2C, 3A, and 3B. For instance, current
regulations restrict a fisherman in Area 2C to 20 halibut per vessel
per day, thus that fisherman's possession limit would be equal to his
or her daily bag limit. Likewise, current regulations restrict a
fisherman in Areas 3A and 3B to 20 halibut per person per day, so that
fisherman's possession limit would be equal to his or her daily bag
limit. Bag limits within Sitka Sound in Area 2C also would be subject
to this action. Therefore, the possession limit within Sitka Sound
would be 10 halibut per vessel from September 1 to May 31 and 5 halibut
per vessel from June 1 through August 31. This proposed action would
not apply in Areas 4A and 4B. This proposed action would have no effect
in Areas 4C, 4D, or 4E because no daily bag limit exists in those
areas. This proposed action also would have no effect on the retention
limits allowed for CHPs, Ceremonial Permits, or Educational Permits.
Charter Vessel Prohibition
Current regulations prohibit the retention of subsistence halibut
harvested using a charter vessel, which is defined at Sec. 300.61 as
``a vessel used for hire in sport fishing for halibut, but not
including a vessel without a hired operator.'' NOAA Enforcement
expressed difficulty enforcing the prohibition under the current
definition because of problems associated with determining whether a
vessel operator is ``for hire.'' The Council subsequently clarified
that the prohibition was meant only to prohibit subsistence fishers
from hiring someone to take them subsistence fishing, but not to
prohibit the use of vessels registered as charter vessels from being
used for subsistence fishing. NOAA Enforcement recommended revising the
definition of charter vessel to improve enforcement of the prohibition
consistent with the Council's intent.
The Council adopted NOAA Enforcement's recommendation and provided
additional guidance to ensure the prohibition continued to restrict
subsistence fishing on charter vessels. In December 2004, the Council
recommended revising the definition of charter vessel to ``a vessel
registered as such with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.'' NOAA
Enforcement believed this definition would improve the identification
of vessels used illegally as charter vessels for subsistence halibut
and the enforcement of other charter vessel restrictions. NOAA
Enforcement has since recommended using the term ``sport fishing guide
vessel'' in the regulatory definition for a charter vessel because this
is the term used in State of Alaska regulations at 05 AAC 75.077.
The Council further recommended, and NMFS proposes, a provision
that would allow a charter vessel to be used for subsistence halibut
fishing, but use for that purpose must be restricted to the owner of
record as indicated on the State of Alaska vessel registration,
provided the owner is eligible to fish for subsistence halibut, and the
owner's immediate family. This provision would allow qualified
subsistence halibut fishers who also engage in charter fishing to use
their vessels to conduct subsistence fishing, but limit such fishing to
the vessel owner and his or her immediate family. The Council
recommended not defining ``immediate family'' in regulation.
The Council recommended, and NMFS proposes, the prohibition of the
use of a charter vessel for subsistence halibut fishing while charter
clients are onboard the vessel and prohibiting the transfer of
subsistence halibut to charter clients to prevent abuses of the
proposed charter vessel allowance. The prohibition against subsistence
fishing while charter clients are onboard would prevent the vessel
owner or any other person onboard the vessel from engaging in
subsistence fishing at any time while a charter client is onboard the
vessel. This would preclude the use of any gear not classified as sport
fishing gear or retaining any halibut in excess of the sport limits
while charter clients are onboard any vessel. Additionally, a
prohibition of the transfer of subsistence halibut to charter clients
would apply at all times, meaning that at no time may subsistence
halibut be provided by a charter operator to any person who has
chartered a sportfishing trip with that charter operator.
Customary and Traditional Trade Restrictions
Current regulations at Sec. 300.66(j) specify that it is unlawful
for any person to retain or possess subsistence halibut for commercial
purposes; cause subsistence halibut to be sold, bartered, or otherwise
entered into commerce; or solicit exchange of subsistence halibut for
commercial purposes, except that a qualified subsistence fisherman may
engage in the customary trade of subsistence halibut through monetary
exchange of no more than $400 per year.
[[Page 20011]]
The Council originally intended that the $400 annual limit would allow
a person who receives subsistence halibut from an eligible subsistence
halibut fisherman, to help defer the donating fisherman's costs of
harvesting subsistence halibut.
The Council was concerned that continuing the $400 customary trade
limit would confound Council intent by allowing de facto ``sale'' of
subsistence halibut outside customary and traditional trade. In June
2003, the Council's Enforcement Committee reviewed issues related to
customary trade and determined that (1) despite the Council's intent to
not create a new commercial fishery, current regulations essentially
allow the sale of subsistence halibut up to the $400 annual limit; (2)
the $400 annual limit lacks enforceability because enforcement officers
cannot easily distinguish between sale and customary and traditional
exchange for cash; and (3) current regulations do not clearly prohibit
advertising and solicitation for commercial sale. The Enforcement
Committee recommended the Council revise the customary trade
restrictions to meet the original intent of allowing customary and
traditional trade.
On the suggestion of the Enforcement Committee, the Council
recommended revising the regulations to eliminate customary trade for
cash. The Council additionally determined that the identification of a
dollar amount for the allowance of customary trade in the regulations
resulted in some subsistence users ``selling'' halibut to other
subsistence users outside of customary and traditional practices, and
that the dollar amount effectively served as a target rather than a
limit. NOAA Enforcement also reported subsistence halibut illegally
entering the commercial market, due in part to the difficulty of
enforcing the $400 annual limit.
This proposed action would eliminate the $400 customary trade limit
and restrict any monetary exchange for subsistence halibut specifically
to reimbursement of actual trip expenses directly related to the
harvest of subsistence halibut. Actual trip expenses would be limited
to ice, bait, food, or fuel only. Additional restrictions would be
applied separately to rural community residents and Alaska Native
tribal members.
Under this proposed action, persons who qualify as rural residents
under Sec. 300.65(g)(1) and hold a subsistence halibut registration
certificate (SHARC) in their name under Sec. 300.65(i) may be
reimbursed only by residents of the same rural community listed on his
or her subsistence halibut registration certificate. For example, a
rural community resident in Hoonah may be reimbursed for actual trip
expenses directly related to subsistence halibut fishing by another
resident of Hoonah but may not be reimbursed by a resident of Sitka.
The Council proposed this restriction as an additional measure to
discourage the entry of subsistence halibut into commerce.
Additionally, under this proposed action, persons who qualify as
Alaska Native tribal members under Sec. 300.65(g)(2) and hold a SHARC
in their name under Sec. 300.65(i) would be eligible for reimbursement
only from an Alaska Native tribe or its members. For example, a tribal
SHARC holder from the Kenaitze Indian Tribe may be reimbursed by a
member of the Gwichin Athabascan Indian Tribe. However, persons
possessing a SHARC designated as tribal would be ineligible to receive
reimbursement from anyone other than another Alaska Native tribe or its
members.
Special Permits in Non-subsistence Areas
Generally, eligible persons may harvest subsistence halibut in all
Convention waters in and off Alaska except for the four designated non-
subsistence marine areas: the Ketchikan non-subsistence marine waters
area, the Juneau non-subsistence marine waters area, the Anchorage-
Matsu-Kenai non-subsistence marine waters area, and the Valdez non-
subsistence marine waters area (Sec. 300.65(h)(3) and Figures 2-5 to
subpart E).
In December 2004, the Council recommended allowing the use of
Ceremonial Permits and Educational Permits in non-subsistence marine
areas by tribes whose traditional fishing grounds are located within
Areas 2C and 3A. This proposed action would allow twelve Alaska Native
tribes whose traditional fishing grounds fall within Areas 2C and 3A to
conduct subsistence halibut fishing in areas currently designated as
non-subsistence marine areas. Therefore, if persons on a vessel possess
a Ceremonial Permit or an Educational Permit, they would be allowed to
conduct subsistence fishing in the non-subsistence marine areas subject
to other existing regulations.
Use of Ceremonial Permits and Educational Permits within non-
subsistence marine areas would remain subject to gear and harvest
restrictions for those permits consistent with the IPHC regulatory area
in which they are used. Ceremonial Permits and Educational Permits
allow Alaska Native tribes in Areas 2C and 3A as listed in Sec.
300.65(g)(2) to harvest up to 25 halibut per permit. Ceremonial Permits
and Educational Permits in non-subsistence marine areas maintain the
same gear limitations as those required when fishing under a SHARC in
Areas 2C and 3A (i.e., 30 hooks per vessel in Area 2C and 30 hooks per
person or up to 90 hooks per vessel in Area 3A). Ceremonial Permits and
Educational Permits also have unique application and reporting
requirements (Sec. 300.65(j) and (k)).
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed
rule is necessary for the conservation and management of the halibut
fishery and that it is consistent with the Halibut Act and other
applicable law, subject to further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866. This proposed rule also complies
with the Secretary's authority under the Halibut Act to implement
management measures for the halibut fishery.
An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is
being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained at
the beginning of this section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY
section of the preamble. A summary of the analysis follows. Copies of
this analysis are available from the Council or NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule would implement six actions to amend the
subsistence halibut regulations: (1) revise the subsistence gear
restrictions in Kodiak and add seasonal gear and vessel limits in the
Sitka Sound area; (2) add the village of Naukati to the list of
eligible subsistence halibut communities; (3) implement a possession
limit equal to one daily bag limit to enhance enforcement; (4) revise
the definition of charter vessel; (5) revise regulations regarding
customary trade; and (6) allow the use of special permits within non-
subsistence use areas by tribes eligible for the permits. Only actions
1 and 6 would directly regulate ``small entities,'' as defined by the
RFA. The remaining four actions are not addressed because they affect
individuals, rather than ``entities,'' as defined by RFA. All
attributable impacts on directly regulated small entities, accruing
from either action, appear to be beneficial.
[[Page 20012]]
Action 1 would directly regulate Alaska Native tribes, or
governmental entities in the absence of a tribe, that are eligible to
participate in the subsistence halibut program off Kodiak and Chiniak
Bay. Action 1 would govern nine Alaska Native tribes. Action 6 would
affect thirteen Alaska Native tribes, but no governmental entities.
It is NMFS policy to consider only adverse impacts when preparing
an IRFA, consistent with the intent of Congress to minimize effects on
small entities. No such adverse impacts appear to be associated with
Actions 1 and 6. However, detailed information and empirical data about
the operational structures, strategies, and fiscal conditions of the
various Alaska Native tribes, which are likely to be directly regulated
by the proposed actions, are not presently available to the analysts to
support preparation of a factual basis upon which to certify, under RFA
provisions. Therefore, the Council prepared an IRFA to fulfill the
requirements of the RFA, despite the high probability that the actions
will not have a substantial adverse effect on a substantial number of
small entities, as these terms are defined under the RFA.
Proposed actions 1 and 6 aim to enhance management of the
subsistence halibut fishery as it pertains to use by Alaska Native
tribes for the purpose of recognizing and appropriately accommodating
subsistence practices. These actions are taken under the authority of
the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982.
The principal decisions in the preferred alternatives for actions 1
and 6 address changes to (1) gear limits and the use of Community
Harvest Permits (CHPs) by Alaska Native tribes in Kodiak and Chiniak
Bay, and seasonal gear and vessel limits in Sitka Sound; and (2)
fishing in non-subsistence use areas. The preferred alternatives to
implement CHPs for Alaska Native tribes in Kodiak and Chiniak Bay (CHPs
are not allowed in Sitka Sound) under action 1, and to allow ceremonial
and educational permits to be used by Alaska Native tribes in non-
subsistence use areas under action 6, directly regulate small entities.
The Council addressed multiple alternatives for each action under
the RFA. Under action 1, the Council analyzed three alternatives: (1)
no action; (2) change gear restrictions and annual limits in Kodiak,
Prince William Sound, Cook Inlet, and the Sitka LAMP; and (3) change
gear restrictions and annual limits only in Kodiak and the Sitka LAMP.
The Council selected alternative 3 as the preferred alternative for
action 1. For action 6, the Council analyzed three alternatives: (1) no
action; (2) allow the use of CHPs, educational permits, and ceremonial
permits in non-subsistence use areas by tribes whose traditional
fishing grounds are located within IPHC Areas 2C and 3A, with the
associated daily bag limit; and (3) allow the use of educational
permits and ceremonial permits, but not CHPs, in non-subsistence use
areas by tribes whose traditional fishing grounds are located within
IPHC Areas 2C and 3A, with the associated daily bag limit. The Council
selected alternative 3 as the preferred alternative for action 6.
Based on the best available scientific data and information, the
IRFA (including the RIR) reveals that none of the significant
alternatives to the proposed action, other than the preferred
alternatives, have the potential to accomplish the objectives of the
Council consistent with the Halibut Act, the RFA, and other applicable
statutes, and minimize the adverse economic impacts of the proposed
rule on directly regulated small entities.
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and which have been
approved by OMB. These collections are listed by control number.
OMB Control Number 0648-0460
Public reporting burden is estimated to average ten minutes for
Subsistence halibut registration certificate (SHARC) for rural or
individual use and ten minutes for SHARC for tribal use.
OMB Control Number 0648-0512
Public reporting burden for a Subsistence Halibut Special Permit
Application for ceremonial harvest, education harvest, or community
harvest is estimated to average ten minutes per response.
These estimates include the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding this burden estimate, or any other aspect of
this data collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to
NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or
fax to 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
NMFS is not aware of any other Federal rules that would duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with these actions.
Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), the
Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), and the
American Indian and Alaska Native Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the responsibilities of the National
Marine Fisheries Service in matters affecting tribal interests. Section
161 of Public Law 108-199 (188 Stat 452), as amended by section 518 of
Public Law 108-447 (118 Stat 3267), extends the consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13175 to Alaska Native corporations.
Consultations with the Alaska Native Subsistence Halibut Working
Group, under Executive Order 13175, resulted in recommendations to
allow the use of special permits in non-subsistence use areas. NMFS
will contact tribal governments and Alaska Native corporations which
may be affected by the proposed action, provide them with a copy of
this proposed rule, and offer them an opportunity to consult.
List of Subjects for 50 CFR Part 300
Pacific halibut fisheries, Alaska, Alaska Natives, Fisheries,
Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: April 8 2008.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300, subpart E as follows:
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
Subpart E--Pacific Halibut Fisheries
1. The authority citation for part 300, subpart E continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773-773k.
2. In Sec. 300.61 add definitions of ``Chiniak Bay'' and ``Power
hauling'' in alphabetical order and revise the definition of ``Charter
vessel'' to read as follows:
Sec. 300.61 Definitions.
* * * * *
Charter vessel means a vessel registered as a sport fishing guide
vessel with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
Chiniak Bay means all waters bounded by the shoreline and straight
lines connecting the coordinates in the order listed:
[[Page 20013]]
north from Cape Chiniak (57[deg]37.22' N. lat., 152[deg]9.36' W.
long.);
to Buoy 1 at Williams Reef (57[deg]50.36' N. lat.,
152[deg]8.82' W. long.);
to East Cape on Spruce Island (57[deg]54.89' N. lat.,
152[deg]19.45' W. long.);
to Termination Point on Kodiak Island (57[deg]51.31' N. lat.,
152[deg]24.01' W. long.); and connecting to a line running
counterclockwise along the shoreline of Kodiak Island to Cape Chiniak
(57[deg]37.22' N. lat., 152[deg]9.36' W. long.).
* * * * *
Power hauling means using electrically, hydraulically, or
mechanically powered devices or attachments or other assisting devises
or attachments to deploy and retrieve fishing gear. Power hauling does
not include the use of hand power, a hand powered crank, a fishing rod,
a downrigger, or a hand troll gurdy.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 300.65:
A. Revise paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) introductory text, (h)(1)(i),
(h)(2), (j) introductory text, (j)(1)(ii), (j)(1)(iii), (j)(3)(i)
introductory text, (j)(3)(i)(A), (k)(3)(i), and (k)(3)(ii).
B. Add paragraph (e)(5).
C. In paragraph (g)(1) in the table entitled ``Halibut Regulatory
Area 2C'' an entry for ``Naukati'' is added in alphabetical order.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 300.65 Catch sharing plan and domestic management measures in
waters in and off Alaska.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) With respect to paragraphs (e)(3), (e)(4), and (e)(5) of this
section, that part of the Commission regulatory area 2C that is
enclosed on the north and east:
* * * * *
(5) Setline gear may not be used in a 4 nm radius extending south
from Low Island at 57[deg]00.70' N. lat., 135[deg]36.57' W. long.
within Sitka Sound, as defined in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section,
from June 1 through August 31.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Halibut Regulatory Area 2C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rural Community Organized Entity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * .............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naukati Municipality
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * .............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Subsistence fishing gear set or retrieved from a vessel while
engaged in subsistence fishing for halibut must not have more than the
allowable hooks per vessel, or per personregistered in accordance with
paragraph (i) of this section and aboard the vessel, whichever is less,
according to the regulatory area and permit type indicated in the
following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Area Permit Type Gear Restrictions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2C (Except Sitka Sound) SHARC 30 hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 30 hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 30 hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest 30 hooks per person
Permit onboard up to 90
hooks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sitka Sound SHARC September 1 through
May 31: 30 hooks per
vessel
-----------------------
.................. June 1 through August
31: 15 hooks per
vessel; no power
hauling
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit September 1 through
May 31: 30 hooks per
vessel
-----------------------
.................. June 1 through August
31: fishing under
Ceremonial Permit not
allowed
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 30 hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest fishing under
Permit Community Harvest
Permit not allowed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3A (Except Chiniak Bay) SHARC 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 30 hooks per person
onboard
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest 30 hooks per person
Permit onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chiniak Bay SHARC 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest 30 hooks per person
Permit onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3B SHARC 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4A and 4B SHARC 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4C, 4D, and 4E SHARC no hook limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20014]]
* * * * *
(2) The retention of subsistence halibut is limited per person
eligible to conduct subsistence fishing for halibut and onboard the
vessel according to the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Area Permit Type Retention Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2C (Except Sitka Sound) SHARC 20 halibut per day per
vessel and in
possession
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest no daily or possession
Permit limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sitka Sound SHARC September 1 through
May 31: 10 halibut
per day per vessel
and in possession
-----------------------
.................. June 1 through August
31: 5 halibut per day
per vessel and in
possession
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit September 1 through
May 31: 25 halibut
per permit
-----------------------
.................. June 1 through August
31: fishing under
Ceremonial Permit not
allowed
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest fishing under
Permit Community Harvest
Permit not allowed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3A, including Chiniak Bay SHARC 20 halibut per person
per day and in
possession
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest no daily or possession
Permit limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3B SHARC 20 halibut per person
per day and in
possession
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4A and 4B SHARC 20 halibut per person
per day; no
possession limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4C, 4D, and 4E SHARC no daily or possession
limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(j) Community Harvest Permit (CHP). An Area 2C or Area 3A community
or Alaska Native tribe listed in paragraphs (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this
section may apply for a CHP, which allows a community or Alaska Native
tribe to appoint one or more individuals from its respective community
or Alaska Native tribe to harvest subsistence halibut from a single
vessel under reduced gear and harvest restrictions. The CHP consists of
a harvest log and up to five laminated permit cards. A CHP is a permit
subject to regulation under Sec. 679.4(a) of this title.
(1) * * *
(ii) NMFS will issue a CHP to a community in Area 2C or Area 3A
only if:
(A) The applying community is listed as eligible in Area 2C or Area
3A according to paragraph (g)(1) of this section; and
(B) No Alaska Native tribe listed in paragraph (g)(2) of this
section exists in that community.
(iii) NMFS will issue a CHP to an Alaska Native tribe in Area 2C or
Area 3A only if the applying tribe is listed as eligible in Area 2C or
Area 3A according to paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) In Area 2C or Area 3A, except that a CHP may not be used:
(A) Within Sitka Sound as defined in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this
section (see Figure 1 to this subpart E); or
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) In Area 3A;
(ii) In Area 2C, except a Ceremonial Permit may not be used within
Sitka Sound from June 1 through August 31;
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 300.66:
A. Redesignate paragraphs (j) through (m) as paragraphs (k) through
(n), respectively.
B. Revise paragraph (i) and newly redesignated paragraph (k).
C. Add new paragraph (j).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 300.66 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(i) Fish for subsistence halibut from a charter vessel or retain
subsistence halibut onboard a charter vessel if anyone other than the
owner of record, as indicated on the State of Alaska vessel
registration, or the owner's immediate family is aboard the charter
vessel and unless each person engaging in subsistence fishing onboard
the charter vessel holds a subsistence halibut registration certificate
in the person's name pursuant to Sec. 300.65(i) and abides by the gear
and harvest restrictions found at Sec. 300.65(h).
(j) Transfer subsistence halibut to charter vessel anglers.
(k) Retain or possess subsistence halibut for commercial purposes;
cause subsistence halibut to be sold, bartered, or otherwise entered
into commerce; or solicit exchange of subsistence halibut for
commercial purposes, except that a person who qualified to conduct
subsistence fishing for halibut under Sec. 300.65(g), and who holds a
subsistence halibut registration certificate in the person's name under
Sec. 300.65(i), may be
[[Page 20015]]
reimbursed for the expense of fishing for subsistence halibut under the
following conditions:
(1) Persons who qualify as rural residents under Sec. 300.65(g)(1)
and hold a subsistence halibut registration certificate in the
persons's name under Sec. 300.65(i) may be reimbursed for actual
expenses directly related to subsistence fishing for halibut, including
only ice, bait, food, or fuel, by residents of the same rural community
listed on the person's subsistence halibut registration certificate; or
(2) Persons who qualify as Alaska Native tribal members under Sec.
300.65(g)(2) and hold a subsistence halibut registration certificate in
the person's name under Sec. 300.65(i) may be reimbursed for actual
expenses directly related to subsistence fishing for halibut, including
only ice, bait, food, or fuel, by any Alaska Native tribe or its
members.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-7902 Filed 4-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S