[Federal Register: April 25, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 81)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22273-22277]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25ap08-2]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2007-0012; T.D. TTB-69; Re: Notice No. 63]
RIN 1513-AB20
Establishment of the Swan Creek Viticultural Area (2005R-414P)
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Treasury decision establishes the ``Swan Creek''
viticultural area in Wilkes, Yadkin, and Iredell Counties, North
Carolina. We designate viticultural areas to allow vintners to better
describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N. A. Sutton, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 925 Lakeville
Street, No. 158, Petaluma, CA 94952; telephone 415-271-1254.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the
regulations promulgated under the FAA Act.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains
the list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries
of which have been recognized and defined in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given
quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes
grown in an area to its geographical origin. The establishment of
viticultural areas allows vintners to describe more accurately the
origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify
wines they may purchase. Establishment of a viticultural area is
neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in
that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure
for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as a viticultural area. Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations requires
the petition to include--
Evidence that the proposed viticultural area is locally
and/or nationally known by the name specified in the petition;
Historical or current evidence that supports setting the
boundary of the proposed viticultural area as the petition specifies;
Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as
climate, elevation, physical features, and soils, that distinguish the
proposed viticultural area from surrounding areas;
A description of the specific boundary of the proposed
viticultural area, based on features found on United States Geological
Survey (USGS) maps; and
A copy of the appropriate USGS map(s) with the proposed
viticultural area's boundary prominently marked.
Swan Creek Viticultural Area
Background
Raffaldini Vineyards submitted a petition to establish the 96,000-
acre ``Swan Creek'' viticultural area on behalf of the Vineyards of
Swan Creek, a trade association representing a group of vineyards and
wineries in northwestern North Carolina. Three wineries and 75 acres of
vineyards are located within the proposed Swan Creek viticulture area.
The boundary of the proposed viticultural area incorporates portions of
Wilkes, Yadkin, and Iredell Counties and includes a portion of the
established Yadkin Valley viticultural area (27 CFR 9.174). We
summarize below the evidence submitted in support of the petition.
Name and Boundary Evidence
The petitioner explains that the geographical name ``Swan Creek''
refers to a village in the approximate center of the proposed
viticultural area, as well as a Yadkin River tributary creek system. As
shown in the southwest portion of the provided 1:100,000-scale USGS
Winston-Salem, North Carolina topographic map, Swan Creek village sits
in the Brushy Mountains south of the Yadkin River. East and West Swan
Creeks run north from the mountains before joining together as Swan
Creek to the northwest of the village. The creek then empties into the
Yadkin River approximately three miles west of Jonesville. Also, an
undated State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources document lists Swan Creek, West Swan Creek, and East
Swan Creek as streams in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin.
The DeLorme North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer identifies the
village as ``Swancreek,'' with East Swan Creek and West Swan Creek to
its northwest. The petitioner explains that both names, ``Swan Creek''
and ``Swancreek,'' reference the proposed viticultural area region.
However, the two-word spelling is the more common usage for businesses,
roads, creeks, and historical documents, which led the petitioner to
identify the proposed viticultural area as ``Swan Creek.''
As further evidence of the significance of the ``Swan Creek'' name
within the proposed area, the local Wilkes Telephone Membership Corp.
telephone book, which covers the region that includes the proposed
viticultural area, lists an airport, a church, and three
[[Page 22274]]
businesses using ``Swan Creek'' in their names. Also, the September 7,
2004, minutes of a Yadkin County Commission meeting includes a
reference to the Swan Creek area and improvements to Swan Creek Road.
Additionally, a National Weather Service bulletin from January 13,
2005, warns of the possibility of a tornado in the Swan Creek area. The
name is also repeatedly used in the ``Vineyards of Swan Creek Wine
Trail'' Web site (http://www.swancreekvineyards.com).
The petitioner relies on geographical and man-made elements
identifiable on the supplied USGS maps to define and draw the boundary
for the proposed viticultural area. Climate data and historic evidence
that documents the breadth of the ``Swan Creek'' name also legitimize
the proposed boundary line, according to the petitioner.
From the regional history of the Yadkin Valley, the petitioner
connects the ``Swan Creek'' name to stories of Revolutionary War
soldiers traveling along the Yadkin River, the proposed Swan Creek
viticultural area's northern boundary line, while en route to the
pivotal battle at King's Mountain in South Carolina. Also, during the
Civil War, Union Major General George Stoneman led troops through the
Swan Creek region to Virginia. Historic manuscripts maintain that
frontiersman Daniel Boone homesteaded in the Swan Creek region in the
1750s.
According to the petition, farming become more prominent in the
Swan Creek area after the Civil War, the Swan Creek area, and
agriculture continues to characterize this rural region. Today,
agriculture in the Swan Creek region includes viticulture, with 75
acres within the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area currently
dedicated to grape growing.
The geology of the Swan Creek region, along with its minor climatic
variation, also creates distinguishing viticultural features upon which
to base the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area's boundary. The
entire proposed viticultural area lies within the Yadkin River Basin.
The general uniformity in the Swan Creek region's soils is attributable
to the natural weathering process of the Brushy Mountains and the
Brevard Shear Zone, a major fault system that also defines the Blue
Ridge Escarpment in the area. The homogeneous soil within the proposed
viticultural area is unlike the varied soils and rock types found in
other parts of the Yadkin Valley viticultural area.
The proposed Swan Creek viticultural area boundary overlaps the
established Yadkin Valley viticultural area as shown in the table
below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overlapping Percent
Viticultural areas Total acres acres overlapping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yadkin Valley............................................. 1,416,000 57,600 4
Swan Creek (Proposed)..................................... 96,000 57,600 60
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The northern 60 percent of the proposed Swan Creek viticultural
area sits within the Yadkin Valley viticultural area, with the
remaining 40 percent south of the Yadkin Valley viticultural area
boundary line, according to the petition maps. The discussion below
includes evidence regarding the differences between the established
Yadkin Valley viticultural area and the proposed Swan Creek
viticultural area, which, according to the petitioner, justifies the
proposed boundary line.
Distinguishing Features
Situated in the moderate elevations of the Brushy Mountains, and
bordering the Yadkin River on the north, the proposed Swan Creek
viticultural area's geographical location is responsible for the area's
temperate climate and homogenous soil as compared to surrounding areas,
according to the petitioner.
Topography
The Brushy Mountains run through the center of the Swan Creek
region, with elevations in the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area
varying between 1,000 feet and 2,000 feet, according to the USGS maps
submitted with the petition. Within the proposed viticultural area the
Brushy Mountains have elevations lower than the Blue Ridge Mountains to
the west but higher than the other surrounding areas. The Blue Ridge
Mountain region to the immediate west of the proposed boundary line
rises to elevations of 3,000 to 5,000 feet. To the east and south of
the proposed viticultural area, the elevation drops to between 500 and
1,000 feet.
Climate
Both the Yadkin River, which serves as the proposed Swan Creek
viticultural area's northern boundary line, and that portion of the
Brushy Mountains located within the proposed viticultural area serve as
climatically moderating influences.
The Swan Creek region has an average annual high temperature of
68.9 [deg]F and an average annual low temperature of 42.8 [deg]F. The
table below shows the contrasting temperatures in the regions beyond
the proposed viticultural area's boundary line, as collected by the
Southeast Regional Climate Center (SERCC) of the National Climatic Data
Center.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average annual Average annual
maximum minimum
Region temperature in temperature in
degrees degrees
Fahrenheit Fahrenheit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Swan Creek........................ 68.9 42.8
West and northwest................ 59.8 40.4
South and east.................... 70.6 46.6
Yadkin Valley..................... 69.5 44.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SERCC data shows that the Swan Creek area is generally warmer
than the regions to the west and northwest, cooler than the regions to
the south and east, and slightly cooler than the Yadkin Valley as a
whole. Also, average January temperatures of 20[deg] F to 25[deg] F
make the Swan Creek region less prone to Pierce's Disease, which
adversely affects vineyards, than the majority of the Yadkin Valley
viticultural area.
[[Page 22275]]
The proposed Swan Creek viticultural area averages 3,576 degree
days of heat accumulation annually, which puts it in climatic region
IV, according to temperature data collected by the SERCC. (As a
measurement of heat accumulation during the growing season, one degree
day accumulates for each degree Fahrenheit that a day's mean
temperature is above 50 degrees, which is the minimum temperature
required for grapevine growth. (See ``General Viticulture,'' by Albert
J. Winkler, University of California Press, 1974.)
The surrounding areas, based on Amerine and Winkler heat summation
definitions, include climatic regions IV and V to the east, region V to
the south, and region I to the west-northwest.
The frost-free season of the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area
extends on average from April 19 to October 17 annually, according to
the ``Average Last Spring Frost Dates for Selected North Carolina
Locations,'' horticulture information leaflets (published December 1996
and revised December 1998), by Katharine Perry, North Carolina State
University. According to the petition, this frost-free season is nearly
identical to Surry County, which is part of the Yadkin Valley
viticultural area located immediately northeast of the proposed Swan
Creek viticultural area. However, southeast of the proposed
viticultural area, but also within the Yadkin Valley viticultural area,
the Davidson County frost-free season runs on average from March 31 to
October 31, resulting in a month less frost than in the proposed Swan
Creek viticultural area. The frost-free season varies in counties
outside the Yadkin Valley viticultural area and the proposed Swan Creek
viticultural area, extending three weeks longer to the east and lasting
four to six weeks less in regions to the west and northwest.
The growing season of the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area
averages 170 to 190 days annually, according to Perry's ``Average
Growing Seasons for Selected North Carolina Locations,'' horticulture
information leaflets (published December 1996 and revised December
1998). Again, this growing season is almost identical to Surry County,
located immediately northeast within the Yadkin Valley viticultural
area. However, according to Perry's data, Davidson County averages a
214-day growing season annually, or between 24 and 44 more growing days
than the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area. Similarly, the petition
shows that Guilford County to the east has an annual growing season of
between 199 and 210 days. Counties to the west and northwest of the
Swan Creek region have a significantly shorter growing season, lasting
an average of 139 to 162 days.
Precipitation
The petitioner attributes the moderate rainfall within the proposed
viticultural area to the protective influence of the Brushy Mountains.
Rainfall within the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area averages 48.6
inches annually, based on SERCC data, with the local grape growers
surveyed by the petitioner recording less rainfall at their own weather
stations. The areas to the west and northwest of the proposed
viticultural area average 57 inches each year, while regions to the
south and east average 44.4 inches of rain annually.
Furthermore, snowfall within the proposed Swan Creek viticultural
area averages 6.3 inches annually, based on SERCC records, which is far
less than the data recorded at weather stations in surrounding areas.
Geology
The documentation and evidence provided for the petition by Matthew
Mayberry of the Mayberry Land Company, Elkin, North Carolina, indicate
that the geology of the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area is shaped
by plate tectonics and a spectrum of uplift and erosion for the entire
Appalachian Mountains building cycle. The Swan Creek region is part of
the larger Appalachian Mountain Range area that has gone through at
least three cycles of uplift and erosion, with each cycle lasting
around 300 million years. Also, the weathering and erosion cycles
created the resulting Piedmont and Blue Ridge surfaces found in the
proposed viticultural area today.
Mr. Mayberry explains that the four predominant rock types in the
proposed viticultural area are Henderson Gneiss, Granite, Biotite
Gneiss and Biotite Amphibolite Gneiss, and Sillimanite Mica Schist.
These types underlay more than 90 percent of the Swan Creek area, with
the latter three predominant in the southern half of the area. Along
the proposed north boundary line at the Yadkin River the predominant
rock types include Ashe Formation, Utramafics, and Granitic Rocks of
the Crossnore Group.
Soil
The soil information in the Swan Creek viticultural area petition
is compiled from the published soil surveys of Wilkes, Yadkin, and
Iredell Counties in North Carolina. Roy Mathis, Soil Specialist for
Correlations, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States
Department of Agriculture, provided the soil information included in
the petition.
The areas surrounding the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area
have soils with differing characteristics, Mr. Mathis explains. The
areas to the south and east have high shrink-swell clayey soils, which
are less desirable for agriculture. To the west and north are the
mountainous rocks and soils of the encroaching Blue Ridge Mountains.
Also, the Yadkin Valley viticultural area, which surrounds the proposed
Swan Creek viticultural area to the west, north, and east, has a
greater variety of soil types and temperature regimes.
The proposed Swan Creek viticultural area mesic temperature regime
has soil temperatures of 47 [deg]F to 59 [deg]F at the depth of 20
inches, according to Mr. Mathis. In comparison, the Yadkin Valley
viticultural area is in both the mesic and thermic temperature regimes,
with much warmer soil temperatures at the same depth that range from 59
[deg]F to 72 [deg]F at the same soil depth.
Mr. Mathis explains that the soils in the proposed Swan Creek
viticultural area are primarily saprolite, a soft, clay-rich soil
derived from weathered felsic (acidic) metamorphic rocks of the Inner
Piedmont Belt such as granites, schists, and gneisses. The region
includes a small area of Sauratown Belt with the rocks being primarily
metagraywacke. In contrast, the surrounding west and north areas
include residuum (saprolite) weathered from felsic metamorphic rocks
such as gneisses, schists, and phyllites of the Blue Ridge Geologic
Belt and Smith River Allochothon. The saprolite in the surrounding area
to the east is composed of weathered igneous intrusive rocks like
granites, gabbros, and diorites, as well as some gneisses and schists
of the Charlotte Belt.
Evard and Cowee soils, which have moderate permeability and are
well-drained with a loamy surface and sub-soil layer, predominate in
the Brushy Mountains. The dominant ridge top soils of the proposed Swan
Creek viticultural area also include the Fairview and Clifford series.
These soils have sandy clay loam or clay loam surface layers with red
clayey sub-soils, and are well-drained with moderate permeability.
Rhodhiss series is the dominant soil on the steep side slopes
within the proposed viticultural area boundary. This well-drained soil
has a loamy surface and moderate permeability at the sub-soil level.
Mr. Mathis notes that Fairview, Clifford, and Rhodhiss soils all have
bedrock deeper than 60 inches.
The Yadkin River, at the northern boundary of the proposed Swan
Creek
[[Page 22276]]
viticultural area, has alluvial soil diversity with textures and
drainage. In general, most of the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area
soils are acidic and low in natural fertility.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 63 regarding the proposed Swan Creek
viticultural area in the Federal Register on September 12, 2006 (71 FR
53612). In response to that notice, we received one comment supporting
establishment of the proposed Swan Creek viticultural area from U.S.
Representative Virginia Foxx of North Carolina.
TTB Finding
After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the evidence
submitted supports the establishment of the proposed viticultural area.
Although a portion of the proposed viticultural area falls within the
boundary of the existing Yadkin Valley viticultural area, and
notwithstanding the fact that the two areas share some common features,
we believe that the submitted evidence regarding climate and soil type
and temperature supports the conclusion that the proposed new
viticultural area is sufficiently different from the rest of the Yadkin
Valley viticultural area. We also believe that establishment of the new
viticultural area without changing the boundary of the existing
viticultural area to exclude the overlap area would best protect labels
and other commercial interests of existing viticultural entities within
the overlap area. Accordingly, under the authority of the Federal
Alcohol Administration Act and part 4 of our regulations, we establish
the ``Swan Creek'' American viticultural area in Wilkes, Yadkin, and
Iredell Counties, North Carolina, effective 30 days from the
publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary description of the viticultural area in
the regulatory text published at the end of this document.
Maps
The maps for determining the boundary of the viticultural area are
listed below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. With the establishment of this viticultural area and
its inclusion in part 9 of the TTB regulations, its name, ``Swan
Creek,'' is recognized under 27 CFR 4.39(i)(3) as a name of
viticultural significance. The text of the new regulation clarifies
this point. Consequently, wine bottlers using ``Swan Creek'' in a brand
name, including a trademark, or in another label reference as to the
origin of the wine, must ensure that the product is eligible to use the
viticultural area's name as an appellation of origin.
For a wine to be labeled with a viticultural area name or with a
brand name that includes a viticultural area name or other term
specified as having viticultural significance in part 9 of the TTB
regulations, at least 85 percent of the wine must be derived from
grapes grown within the area represented by that name or other term,
and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible to use the viticultural area
name or other term of viticultural significance as an appellation of
origin and that name or other term appears in the brand name, then the
label is not in compliance and the bottler must change the brand name
and obtain approval of a new label. Similarly, if the viticultural area
name or other term of viticultural significance appears in another
reference on the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have
to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing a
viticultural area name or other term of viticultural significance that
was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986. See
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of a
viticultural area name is the result of a proprietor's efforts and
consumer acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, it requires no regulatory assessment.
Drafting Information
N. A. Sutton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this
notice.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, we amend title 27 CFR,
chapter 1, part 9, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Amend subpart C by adding Sec. 9.211 to read as follows:
Sec. 9.211 Swan Creek.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Swan Creek''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
``Swan Creek'' is a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved Maps. The appropriate maps for determining the
boundaries of the Swan Creek viticultural area are three United States
Geological Survey (USGS) 1:100,000 scale topographic maps. They are
titled:
(1) Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 1984, photoinspected 1982;
(2) Boone, North Carolina-Tennessee, 1985; and
(3) Salisbury, North Carolina, 1985, photoinspected 1983.
(c) Boundary. The Swan Creek viticultural area is located in
Wilkes, Yadkin, and Iredell Counties, North Carolina. The boundary of
the Swan Creek viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the Winston-Salem, North Carolina map
at the intersection of the Yadkin River and U.S. Highway 21, along the
Surry-Yadkin county line, between Elkin and Jonesville;
(2) From the beginning point, proceed 24.6 miles generally south on
U.S. Highway 21, crossing onto the Salisbury, North Carolina map, to
the intersection of U.S. Highway 21 with Rocky Creek at Turnersburg;
then
(3) Proceed 12.3 miles generally north and west along Rocky Creek,
returning to the Winston-Salem map, to the intersection of Rocky Creek
with State Highway 115 at New Hope in the southwest corner of the map;
then
(4) Proceed 15.5 miles generally northwest along State Highway 115,
crossing onto the Boone, North Carolina-Tennessee map, to the
intersection of State Highway 115 and the Yadkin River, at North
Wilkesboro; and
(5) Proceed 16.7 miles generally east-northeast along the Yadkin
River,
[[Page 22277]]
crossing onto the Winston-Salem map, and return to the beginning point.
Signed: January 18, 2008.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: March 13, 2008.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. E8-9106 Filed 4-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P