[Federal Register: October 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 204)]
[
Proposed Rules]               
[Page 54773-54775]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23oc09-16]                         

=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE



National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration



50 CFR Part 648



RIN 0648-AW72



 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast (NE) 

Multispecies Fishery; Amendment 16



AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.



ACTION: Notice of availability of a fishery management plan amendment; 

request for comments.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the New England Fishery Management Council 

(Council) has submitted Amdnement 16 to the NE Multispecies Fishery 

Management Plan (FMP) and its associated draft Final Environmental 

Impact Statement (FEIS) for Secretarial review and is requesting 

comments from the public. Amendment 16 was developed by the Council as 

part of the biennial adjustment process in the FMP to update status 

determination criteria for all regulated NE multispecies or ocean pout 

stocks; to adopt rebuilding programs for NE multispecies stocks newly 

classified as being overfished and subject to overfishing; and to 

revise management measures, including significant revisions to the 

Sector management and allocation measures, necessary to end 

overfishing, rebuild overfished regulated NE multispecies or ocean pout 

stocks, and mitigate the adverse economic impacts of increased effort 

controls. Amendment 16 would also implement new requirements for 

establishing allowable biological catch (ABC), annual catch limits 

(ACLs), and accountability measures (AMs) for each stock managed by the 

FMP, pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). Finally, this action would add 

Atlantic wolffish to the list of species managed by the FMP. This 

action is necessary to address the results of the most recent stock 

assessment, which indicate that several additional NE multispecies 

regulated species are overfished and subject to overfishing and that 

some stocks currently classified as overfished require additional 

reductions in fishing mortality to rebuild by the end of their 

rebuilding periods.



[[Page 54774]]





DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 22, 2009.



ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-AW72, by any of 

the following methods:

     Email: MultsA16FEIS@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line 

RIN or text that identifies the subject Federal Register document open 

for comment.

     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

     Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Douglas Christel.

     Mail or hand-delivery: Paper, disk, or CD-ROM comments 

should be sent to Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, National 

Marine Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 

01930. Mark the outside of the envelope, ``Comments on the NE 

Multispecies Amendment 16 FEIS.''

    Instructions: All comments received are part of the public record 

and will generally be posted to http://regulations.gov without change. 

All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name, address, etc.) 

voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do 

not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or 

protected information.

    NMFS will accept anonymous comments (either N/A in the required 

fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to 

electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF 

file formats only.

    Copies of Amendment 16, its Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), and the 

draft of the FEIS are available from Paul J. Howard, Executive 

Director, New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 

2, Newburyport, MA 01950. Copies of the Initial Regulatory Flexibility 

Analysis (IRFA) are available from the Regional Administrator at the 

address above. The EIS/RIR/IRFA is also accessible via the Internet at 

http://www.nefmc.org/nemulti/index.html.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Christel, Fishery Policy 

Analyst, phone: 978-281-9141, fax: 978-281-9135.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Amendment 13 to the FMP, which became 

effective May 1, 2004 (April 27, 2004; 69 FR 22906), established two 

different strategies for rebuilding (an adaptive strategy and a phased 

rebuilding strategy), and a rebuilding plan for each overfished stock 

was developed in accordance with one of the two strategies. Under the 

``adaptive'' rebuilding strategy, the fishing mortality rate (F) is 

held at a level that would produce maximum sustainable yield 

(FMSY) from 2004 through 2008, and then is subsequently 

reduced to the level required to rebuild by the selected end-date of 

the rebuilding period. In contrast, under the ``phased'' rebuilding 

strategy, F was allowed to remain above FMSY at the start of 

the rebuilding period in 2004, and then was reduced sequentially in 

2006 and 2009. Eight stocks (Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod, Georges Bank (GB) 

haddock, GOM haddock, Southern New England (SNE)/Mid-Atlantic (MA) 

winter flounder, GB yellowtail flounder, redfish, windowpane flounder 

(southern stock), and ocean pout) are managed under the adaptive 

rebuilding strategy, while five stocks (GB cod, Cape Cod (CC)/GOM 

yellowtail flounder, SNE/MA yellowtail flounder, American plaice, and 

white hake) are managed under the phased rebuilding strategy.

    Amendment 13 also established a biennial adjustment process whereby 

the Council reviews the FMP and makes any changes to management 

measures necessary to achieve the goals and objectives of the FMP. This 

adjustment process provides an update of the scientific information 

regarding the status of the stocks and an evaluation of the 

effectiveness of the regulations. The biennial review scheduled to 

occur in 2008, with necessary changes to the FMP implemented in 2009, 

included a peer-reviewed benchmark assessment and a review of the 

biological reference points (stock status determination criteria) for 

each stock. This planned assessment of the biological reference points 

(Groundfish Assessment Review Meeting, (GARM III)) was also part of the 

adaptive rebuilding strategy described above, which sought to evaluate 

the more fundamental scientific information mid-way through the 

rebuilding period for most stocks. GARM III, completed in August 2008, 

included a series of meetings over the course of one year. GARM III 

evaluated the underlying data and models utilized for assessment of the 

groundfish stocks, evaluated the biological reference points, 

established new reference points, assessed the biomass and fishing 

mortality status of the groundfish stocks in 2007, and provided 

examples of the Fs that would be expected to rebuild overfished stocks.

    GARM III concluded that 11 stocks were still subject to overfishing 

(i.e., fishing above the FMSY) and that 12 stocks were 

overfished (i.e., biomass levels were less than one half of the biomass 

at MSY (BMSY)), with 10 stocks classified as both 

overfished and subject to overfishing. A final determination on the 

status of pollock could not be made until the fall 2008 survey data 

made available, as the status of this species is based on the 3-year 

centered average of the fall biomass indices. Such data became 

available in January 2009, and indicated that pollock is overfished.

    The Council began development of Amendment 16 in 2006, with the 

intent of implementing any necessary revisions to management measures 

by the start of fishing year (FY) 2009 on May 1, 2009. On November 6, 

2006, a notice of intent to prepare a supplemental EIS and hold scoping 

meetings designed to solicit public input on any revisions to 

management measures necessary to continue rebuilding overfished 

groundfish stocks was published in the Federal Register (71 FR 64941). 

The Council continued to develop Amendment 16 for implementation in FY 

2009 until a presentation by the Northeast Fisheries Science Center 

NMFS (NEFSC) regarding preliminary estimates of 2006 stock size and F 

at the June 2008 Council meeting indicated that draft effort control 

measures under development for Amendment 16 were not targeting the 

correct stocks. Based on this information, the Council decided to wait 

until the receipt of the final GARM III assessment results in September 

2008 to continue the development of appropriate management measures 

under Amendment 16. The Council subsequently developed a revised 

schedule of development for Amendment 16, which postponed 

implementation of Amendment 16 until the start of FY 2010 on May 1, 

2010. In addition, the Council voted on September 4, 2008, to request 

that NMFS implement an interim action for the duration of FY 2009 (May 

1, 2009-April 30, 2010), and recommended a specific suite of management 

measures for the interim action. A proposed rule to implement interim 

management measures published on January 16, 2009 (74 FR 2959), with 

final interim measures published on April 13, 2009 (74 FR 17030) and 

effective on May 1, 2009.

    Based upon the final results of GARM III, the Council adopted draft 

management measures and an associated draft EIS (DEIS) at its February 

2009 meeting. A notice of availability for the DEIS, which analyzed the 

impacts of all of the measures under consideration in Amendment 16, was 

published on April 24, 2009 (74 FR 18705), with public comments 

accepted through June 8, 2009. Final measures under Amendment 16 were 

adopted by the



[[Page 54775]]



Council at its June 2009 meeting. In addition to the implementing 

management measures to reduce F for overfished stocks, Amendment 16 

contains changes to status determination criteria and other aspects of 

the management program, such as an ABC control rule and potential 

sector contributions, that are not reflected in regulations. The 

proposed measures include: Revisions to biological reference points for 

most stocks; incorporation of Atlantic wolffish into the list of NE 

multispecies managed by the FMP; new reporting measures to increase 

timeliness and accuracy of catch data; changes in the allocation of 

days-at-sea (DAS) between Category A DAS and Category B DAS; changes to 

the way NE multispecies DAS are allocated and counted; gear restricted 

areas; modifications to the DAS Leasing and Transfer Programs; changes 

in minimum fish size for two stocks; revisions to special access 

programs (SAPs); modifications to existing trip limits, including 

increased trip limits for some stocks and landings prohibitions for 

other stocks; changes to Sector allocation procedures; modifications to 

Sector eligibility requirements; revisions to Sector operation plan 

requirements, including new and revised monitoring and reporting 

requirements and allowable exemptions; approval of 17 new Sectors; 

revisions to recreational gear, seasonal, and possession restrictions; 

establishment of a process to set and distribute ABCs and ACLs for all 

managed stocks among fishery subcomponents; and AMs for both commercial 

and recreational fisheries.

    A proposed rule that would implement Amendment 16, if approved, 

will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, following 

NMFS's evaluation of the proposed rule under the procedures of the 

Magnuson-Stevens Act. Public comments on the proposed rule must be 

received by the end of the comment period on Amendment 16 to be 

considered in the approval/disapproval decision on the amendment. All 

comments received by December 22, 2009, whether specifically directed 

to Amendment 16 or the proposed rule, will be considered in the 

approval/disapproval decision on the amendment. Any comments on the 

proposed rule received after that date will not be considered in the 

decision to approve or disapprove Amendment 16. To be considered, 

comments must be received by the close of business on the last day of 

the comment period; that does not mean postmarked or otherwise 

transmitted by that date.



    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.



    Dated: October 19, 2009.

Emily H. Menashes,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 

Fisheries Service

[FR Doc. E9-25546 Filed 10-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S