[Federal Register: November 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 223)]
[Notices]
[Page 60307-60310]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20no09-116]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed
Intermodal Transit Improvements in Hercules, CA
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60308]]
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in cooperation with
the City of Hercules, CA (City) is planning to prepare a joint
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)
for the construction of a proposed intermodal transit center project
which includes a new passenger train station on the existing Capitol
Corridor line, a transit bus terminal, access roadways, and parking
facilities, located in Hercules, California. The project would serve
commuters, visitors and recreational users who desire an alternative
way to travel to and from the City of Hercules and the San Francisco
Bay area and the Sacramento area to access employment, entertainment,
and recreational destinations. This EIS/EIR will not study a ferry
terminal as part of the proposed project. Any future ferry terminal
will be evaluated under a separate environmental document. However, the
potential for a future ferry terminal will be considered in the
cumulative impact analysis for this project. The purpose of this Notice
of Intent (NOI) is to alert interested parties on the preparation of an
EIS/EIR, to provide information on the proposed transit project, to
invite participation in the EIS/EIR process, including comments on the
scope of the EIS/EIR, and to announce the public scoping meeting that
will be conducted.
DATES: The City of Hercules has already initiated coordination with
Federal, State and local agencies. On November 18th, 2009, the City of
Hercules participated in an interagency meeting hosted at the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers office in San Francisco, California and presented an
overview of the project and invited agency comment on the proposed
project. Through the development of a public and agency coordination
plan, coordination with responsible and cooperating agencies will
continue throughout the review of the EIR/EIS and through permit
coordination.
A scoping meeting will be held on December 8th, 2009 at 5:30 p.m.
at the Hercules Library, Large Conference Room, 109 Civic Drive,
Hercules, CA. Written comments on the scope of the EIS/EIR including
the project's purpose and need, the alternatives to be considered, the
impacts to be evaluated, and the methodologies to be used in the
evaluations should be sent to Lisa Hammon, Assistant City Manager, City
of Hercules, 111 Civic Drive, Hercules CA 94547 by December 23, 2009.
Comments may also be offered at the scoping meeting.
The general public and agency representatives with an interest in
the proposed project are encouraged to attend this public meeting. The
project's purpose and need and the description of alternatives for the
proposed project will be presented at this meeting. Representatives of
Native American Tribal governments and all Federal, State, regional and
local agencies that may have an interest in any aspect of the project
will be invited to be participating or cooperating agencies, as
appropriate.
ADDRESSES: The scoping meeting will be held on December 8th, 2009 at
5:30 p.m. at the Hercules Library, Large Conference Room, 109 Civic
Drive, Hercules, CA. The meeting facilities will be accessible to
persons with disabilities. If special translation or signing services
or other special accommodations are needed, please contact Lisa Hammon,
Assistant City Manager, at (510) 799-8251, or by e-mail at:
LHammon@ci.hercules.ca.us at least 48 hours before the scoping meeting.
Paper copies of scoping materials may be obtained from Lisa Hammon.
Also, scoping materials will be available at the meetings and on the
City of Hercules Web site [http://www.ci.hercules.ca.us].
Written comments on proposed project should be sent to Lisa Hammon,
Assistant City Manager, City of Hercules, 111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA
94547 by December 23, 2009.
Further Information: For further information contact Paul Page,
Federal Transit Administration, San Francisco Regional Office at (415)
744-3133.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scoping: The FTA and the City of Hercules
invite all interested individuals, and organizations, public agencies
and Native American Tribes to comment on the scope of the EIS,
including the project's purpose and need, the alternatives to be
studied, the impacts to be evaluated and the evaluation methods to be
used. Comments should focus on: alternatives that may be less costly or
have fewer environmental or community impacts while achieving similar
transportation objectives, and the identification of any significant
social, economic or environmental issues related to alternatives. This
is not considered a transit project of unusual complexity. Therefore,
in line with CEQ 1502.7 (page limits) FTA is setting a limit of 250
pages (exclusive of technical appendices) for this EIS. The document
should emphasize graphics, maps and visual simulations, minimize
technical jargon and be accessible to members of the public with
limited technical expertise.
Description of Study Area and Proposed Project: The project site is
located in Hercules, California, on the shoreline of San Pablo Bay (a
part of San Francisco Bay), approximately 1 mile northwest of
Interstate 80 (I-80). This is the City's Waterfront District which has
been planned for transit oriented development. Project components would
include: (1) Grade separation and realignment of a portion of the
existing Union Pacific railroad tracks, including the construction of a
rail platform, retaining walls and the replacement of a bridge crossing
Refugio Creek; (2) construction of a station building; (3) extension of
John Muir Parkway, including the construction of Bayfront Boulevard
over Refugio Creek, a new Transit Loop Drive, Civic Plaza and surface
parking; (4) realignment and restoration of a portion of Refugio Creek
from San Pablo Bay upstream approximately 1000 feet to the existing
restored segment; (5) construction of segments of the East Bay Park
Regional District's recreational trail along the shoreline from Pinole
trail to Victoria by the Bay; and, (6) a pedestrian walkway over the
railroad tracks to provide a connection to the Hercules Point open
space area. The project will also require the relocation of existing
utility and gas lines and an outfall to Refugio Creek.
Purpose and Need for the Project: Residents of the San Francisco
Bay Area depend heavily on region wide and transbay commuting. Despite
the use of existing public transit services, particularly rail and
buses, traffic congestion continues to increase, affecting hundreds of
thousands of Bay Area residents and creating both economic and
environmental costs. The severity of congestion will increase in the
future as population and employment in the Bay Area increase. The
purpose of the proposed project is to increase local and regional
mobility and transportation options by providing new and expanded
transit services with intermodal connections that will encourage use of
public transit. The project would provide bus-to-train connections, in
addition to providing car commuters with access to new transit options
that would divert traffic from I-80, the most congested corridor in the
Bay Area for the past six years. An expanded and more convenient
transit system with new train connections to existing bus services
would provide commuters with more options and would primarily decrease
car usage and its associated impacts, rather than divert riders from
existing
[[Page 60309]]
buses, BART, or Capitol Corridor. Key project objectives are to:
1. Reduce vehicle trips on Interstate 80, the most congested
freeway in the Bay Area, by providing alternatives to commuting in
single occupant vehicles.
2. Provide coordinated, intermodal transit connections by bus,
train, and a potential future ferry and human-powered connections by
bicycling and walking for transport to/from jobs, recreational uses,
educational opportunities, etc.
3. Improve emergency response by having rail and (ultimately) ferry
service available in case of a natural or man-made disaster that
disables the Bay Bridge or other highways/roadways. Ferry and rail
service could also deliver goods and services in an emergency.
4. Support transit-oriented development and ``new urbanist''
standards by providing the transportation links within the 43-acre
waterfront development which also includes housing (including
affordable housing), retail, office, and commercial space.
5. Improve safety along the railroad corridor by providing
completely grade-separated access to the railroad tracks from the
adjacent development by constructing a series of retaining walls and
fences for approximately one mile along the waterfront and by
constructing over-crossings to Hercules Point and the future ferry
terminal.
6. Implement the Goals, Policies and Programs in the City of
Hercules General Plan to:
Develop transportation facilities to provide access to the
region, particularly public transit systems (buses, ridesharing, rail
transit, as well as potential over-water transit) (Land Use Policy 3A,
Circulation Policy e).
Establish trail linkage between Pinole and Rodeo as part
of the regional bay access trail system (Land Use Program 14A.2 and
Open Space/Conservation Policy 1b) and continue to improve and protect
Refugio Creek as a major environmental amenity (Program 14.A.3).
7. Improve Refugio Creek to allow adequate flows into the Bay
without resulting in flooding.
8. Implement the City of Hercules Waterfront Master Plan Initiative
and its directive to construct an intermodal transit center on Block I.
Alternatives: The EIS/EIR will include a Build alternative.
Included in the Build analysis will be design alternatives to the
proposed project that will meet both NEPA and CEQA requirements and are
intended to reduce potential environmental effects, including impacts
to sensitive biological habitat. A No Action (No Build) alternative
will also be evaluated in the EIS/EIR which would continue with the
existing bus services without the construction of a train station and a
new bus terminal at the same location. This alternative serves as the
baseline against which the environmental effects of the proposed
project and other alternatives will be evaluated.
Traffic congestion is an ongoing and steadily increasing problem in
the Bay Area, regardless of economic conditions. Alternatives to reduce
traffic congestion have been explored in numerous previous studies.
According to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), the Bay
Bridge approach corridor along Interstate 80 (I-80) from State Route 4
(SR-4) in Hercules to the Bay Bridge experiences the worst congestion
in the Bay Area. Caltrans' Bay Area monitoring program found that
between 1992 and 2005, traffic delay in the region as a whole more than
doubled from 64,100 hours to 135,700 hours. According to Caltrans' 2006
report, between 2001 and 2005, traffic delay on the I-80 segment from
SR-4 to the Bay Bridge metering lights increased by 16 percent, from
9,410 hours to 10,930 hours (MTC 2007). This segment includes the
stretch of I-80 that passes near the proposed HITC project. MTC
projects that traffic congestion will continue to worsen; by 2020, MTC
expects that Bay Bridge traffic will increase by 50 percent and be ``at
capacity'' for nearly five hours a day during the morning and afternoon
peak hours. MTC also predicts that many more Bay Area workers, due to
high housing costs, will be living far from their jobs, demanding that
they spend more time commuting and polluting on roadways. Even during
an economic downturn, BART runs at capacity through the Transbay Tube
during peak hours. Improvements in commuter bus service are dependent
upon traffic flow, and are limited by the need for more road capacity
and more dedicated High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes for significant
expansion. Increased train and transit services would provide expanded
commute capacity while avoiding corresponding increases in traffic
congestion.
Additionally, the San Francisco Bay Area Water Transit Authority
(WTA), now the Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA), is a
regional agency authorized by the State of California to operate a
comprehensive San Francisco Bay Area public water transit system. In
2003, the WTA's plan, ``A Strategy to Improve Public Transit with an
Environmentally Friendly Ferry System'' (the Plan) was approved by
statute (Senate Bill 915, Ch. 714, stats of 2003). The Plan drew on
extensive technical studies that examined ridership demand, cost
effectiveness, vessel design, environmental impacts, safety, and
operations. A Hercules-San Francisco route was identified in the Plan
as a potential future ferry route. The potential environmental effects
of proposed new ferry service on San Francisco Bay under the WTA Plan
were studied at a program planning level in the Program Environmental
Impact Report (Program EIR) prepared in 2003. The 2003 Program EIR
included analysis of a Hercules/Rodeo location and seven other
potential new ferry service locations around the Bay and Delta. While
ferry service is anticipated for the city of Hercules, current planning
for the ferry is still in development and is considered a future
project. The current project proposes only to construct a rail and bus
transit facility.
As part of the General Plan for the City of Hercules, the proposed
project is intended to be the central element of a transit-oriented
development (TOD) project that will include residential and commercial
development clustered around transit facilities to enable local
residents to use public transit and reduce the need for automobile use.
The planned TOD, known as Hercules Bayfront, is not part of the project
considered in this EIR/EIS, and will be the subject of a separate
environmental review.
Probable Effects/Potential Impacts for Analysis: The purpose of the
EIS process is to explore in a public setting potentially significant
effects of implementing the proposed project and alternatives on the
physical, human, and natural environment.
Implementation of the project components will result in direct
effects to the physical environment and may include the loss of special
aquatic sites such as tidal wetlands, mudflats, and riparian areas.
Mitigation will be incorporated into the project design by first
avoiding and minimizing impacts to resources. Compensatory mitigation
will be provided for unavoidable impacts. Based on preliminary
investigations for special status species the project may affect, but
is unlikely to adversely affect, any species listed as threatened or
endangered under the State or Federal endangered species acts.
The proposed project would extend the John Muir Parkway, provide
parking for short-term and long-term parking, and develop a new access
point to commuter rail. Each of these activities may encourage
automobile traffic in the
[[Page 60310]]
area that could adversely affect levels of service at nearby
intersections.
FTA Procedures: Regulations implementing NEPA, as well as
provisions of SAFETEA-LU, call for public involvement in the EIS
process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU requires that FTA do the following:
(1) Extend an invitation to other Federal and non-Federal agencies and
Indian Tribes that may have an interest in the proposed project to
become participating agencies; (2) provide an opportunity for
involvement by participating agencies and the public in helping to
define the purpose and need for a proposed project, as well as the
range of alternatives for consideration; and (3) establish a plan for
coordinating public and agency participation in and comment on the
environmental review process. An invitation to become a participating
agency will be extended to other Federal and non-Federal agencies and
Indian Tribes that may have an interest in the proposed project. It is
possible that we may not be able to identify all Federal and non-
Federal agencies and Indian Tribes that may have such an interest. Any
Federal or non-Federal agency or Indian Tribe interested in the
proposed project that does not receive an invitation to become a
participating agency should notify, at the earliest opportunity, the
City at the ADDRESSES or phone number above.
A comprehensive public involvement program has been developed. A
technical advisory committee called the Project Development Team,
consisting of representatives of State, regional and local agencies, is
in place. The program also includes a public scoping process, a public
review/comment period and public hearing on the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement, development and distribution of project newsletters
and posting of information on the project Web site. The purposes of and
need for the proposed project have been preliminarily identified in
this notice. We invite the public and participating agencies to
consider the preliminary statement of purposes of and need for the
proposed project, as well as potential alternatives, and the public is
welcome to use the public scoping process to further define the issues
of concern among all parties interested in the project. Comments on
potential significant environmental impacts that may be associated with
the proposed project are also welcomed. All comments and suggestions
will be given serious consideration. Comments on potentially
significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the
proposed project are also welcomed. There will be additional
opportunities to participate in the scoping process at the public
meetings announced in this notice. In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a)
and 771.133, FTA will comply with all Federal environmental laws,
regulations and executive orders applicable to the proposed project
during the environmental review process to the maximum extent
practicable. These requirements include, but are not limited to, the
regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality implementing NEPA
(40 CFR parts 1500-1508 and 23 CFR part 771), the project-level air
quality conformity regulation of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) (40 CFR part 93), section 404(b)(1) guidelines of EPA (40
CFR part 230), Executive Orders 11988, 11990 and 12898 regarding
floodplains, wetlands, and environmental justice, respectively; Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR Part 800);
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (50 CFR part 402); and Section
4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (23 CFR 774). The EIR
portion of the document will be prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, section 15000 et seq.
Dated: November 13, 2009.
Leslie T. Rogers,
Federal Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-27896 Filed 11-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P