[Federal Register: February 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 29)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7194-7196]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13fe09-9]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
[[Page 7194]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0124; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-004-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; EADS SOCATA Model TBM 700 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
A damaged wiring harness which caused the air conditioning
system circuit breaker to trip and evidencing a local overheating
has been found on an in-service aircraft.
The investigation revealed that the damage (chafed wires) found
on the wiring harness resulted from an interference with the under-
floor attachment fittings of the cabin partition net which was due
to an incorrect routing of the harness while on the production line.
Such conditions could result in an electrical short and
potential loss of several functions essential for the safety of
flight.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 16, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4119; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0124;
Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-004-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No.: 2009-0006, dated January 13, 2009 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
A damaged wiring harness which caused the air conditioning
system circuit breaker to trip and evidencing a local overheating
has been found on an in-service aircraft.
The investigation revealed that the damage (chafed wires) found
on the wiring harness resulted from an interference with the under-
floor attachment fittings of the cabin partition net which was due
to an incorrect routing of the harness while on the production line.
Such conditions could result in an electrical short and
potential loss of several functions essential for the safety of
flight.
For the reason stated above, this AD mandates inspection of the
electrical wiring harness, and if necessary a rework of its routing.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
EADS SOCATA has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-163, dated
November 2008. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
[[Page 7195]]
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 45 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Where the service information
lists required labor that is covered under warranty, we have assumed
that there will be no charge for this labor. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $3,600, or $80 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 1.5 work-hours, for a cost of $120 per product. We have no
way of determining the number of products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
EADS SOCATA: Docket No. FAA-2009-0124; Directorate Identifier 2009-
CE-004-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 16, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to TBM 700 airplanes, serial numbers 434
through 478, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 92: Wiring
Elements.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
A damaged wiring harness which caused the air conditioning
system circuit breaker to trip and evidencing a local overheating
has been found on an in-service aircraft.
The investigation revealed that the damage (chafed wires) found
on the wiring harness resulted from an interference with the under-
floor attachment fittings of the cabin partition net which was due
to an incorrect routing of the harness while on the production line.
Such conditions could result in an electrical short and
potential loss of several functions essential for the safety of
flight.
For the reason stated above, this AD mandates inspection of the
electrical wiring harness, and if necessary a rework of its routing.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service after the
effective date of this AD or within the next 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, inspect the
electrical wiring harness at frame C14 and between frames C16 and
C17 for wire chafing and incorrect routing following EADS SOCATA
Service Bulletin SB 70-163, dated November 2008.
(2) If any wire chafing and/or incorrect routing are found,
before further flight, repair and reroute the electrical harness
following EADS SOCATA Service Bulletin SB 70-163, dated November
2008.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4119; fax: (816) 329-4090. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2009-0006, dated January 13, 2009; and EADS SOCATA Service Bulletin
SB 70-163, dated November 2008, for related information.
[[Page 7196]]
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 6, 2009.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-3104 Filed 2-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P