[Federal Register: February 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 33)]
[Notices]
[Page 7889-7890]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20fe09-59]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-8590-7]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7146.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR
19833).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20080072, ERP No. D-IBR-J39038-C0, Southern Delivery System
Project, Water Supply Development, Execution of up to 40-year Contracts
for Use of Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Facilities, Special Use Permit,
El Paso County, CO.
Summary: EPA raised environmental concerns about potential impacts
to water quality, including the potential to exacerbate existing water
quality impairments to water bodies within the Arkansas River Basin and
the lack of mitigation for these impacts. EPA also raised concerns over
the potential for increased flooding and erosion due to return flows
into Fountain Creek. EPA strongly encouraged Reclamation to include
mitigation commitments to offset the water quality impacts in the Final
EIS and Record of Decision. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20080333, ERP No. D-IBR-J39040-CO, Windy Gap Firming Project,
Construct a New Water Storage Reservoir to Deliver Water to Front Range
and West Slope Communities and Industries, Funding, NPDES and U.S. Army
COE Section 404 Permit, Grand and Larimer Counties, CO.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections to this proposal
because of the potential for the project to worsen water quality in
already impaired waters without the assurance of adequate mitigation.
EPA also requested additional information regarding impacts to water
quality and stream morphology. Rating EO2.
EIS No. 20080343, ERP No. D-FRC-L03014-OR, Jordan Cove Energy and
Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline Project, Construction and Operation,
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Import
[[Page 7890]]
Terminal and Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities, Coos, Douglas, Jackson
and Klamath Counties, OR.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential
degradation of in-bay resources associated with the preferred
alternative pipeline route identified in the DEIS and the level of
analysis devoted to key resources. Rating EO2.
EIS No. 20080386, ERP No. D-COE-K39116-CA, SanPedro Waterfront Project,
Proposed Specific Development Project and Associated Infrastructure
Improvements on Approximately 400 Acres, Currently Operated by Los
Angeles Harbor Department (LAHD), Located along the West Side of Los
Angeles Harbor's Main Channel, from the Vincent Thomas Bridge to
Cabrillo Beach, U.S. Army Section 10 and 404 and Section 103 Marine
Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act Permits, (MPRSA) City of Los
Angeles, CA.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about significant and
unavoidable impacts to air quality and environmental justice
communities, and planned ocean disposal of sediments. EPA recommended
commitments to conduct an already planned port-wide health risk
assessment, coordination with the environmental justice community to
identify additional measures to offset health impacts, implementation
of a port-wide health impacts assessment to inform mitigation, and
identification of beneficial reuse opportunities for sediment. Rating
EC2.
EIS No. 20080461, ERP No. D-FRC-B03007-00, Hubline/East to West
Project, Proposes to Modify its Existing Natural Gas Transmission
Pipeline System in MA, CT, RI and NJ.
Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed project. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20080462, ERP No. D-FRC-K03031-CA, South Feather Power Project,
(Project No. 2088-068), Application to Relicense its 104-megawatt,
South Fork Feather River, Lost Creek and Slate Creek, Butte, Yuba and
Plumas Counties, CA.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about water quality
and construction impacts, and requested additional information on the
impacts of climate change on the project and the analysis of cumulative
impacts. Rating EC2.
Dated: February 17, 2009.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E9-3661 Filed 2-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P