[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 16, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34279-34281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 12, 13, 14, 15, and 52

[FAC 2005-42; FAR Case 2009-011; Item VI; Docket 2009-0012, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AL20


Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR Case 2009-011, American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act)--GAO/IG Access

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense 
Acquisition Regulations Council (the Councils) have adopted as final, 
with changes, the interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation (FAR) to implement the American Recovery and Reinvestment 
Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) with respect to sections 902, 1514, and 
1515.

DATES: Effective Date: July 16, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact 
Mr. Edward N. Chambers, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501-3221. For 
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the 
FAR Secretariat at (202) 501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-42, FAR Case 
2009-011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    The Councils published an interim rule in the Federal Register at 
74 FR 14646 on March 31, 2009, to implement the Recovery Act with 
respect to sections 902, 1514, and 1515. Technical amendments to the 
interim rule were published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 22810 on 
May 14, 2009. The interim rule added alternate clauses to FAR 52.214-26 
``Audit and Records--Sealed Bidding'', FAR 52.212-5 ``Contract Terms 
and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders--
Commercial Items'', and FAR 52.215-2 ``Audit and Records--
Negotiation''.
    Further, the interim rule amended FAR 12.504(a)(7) for contracts 
using Recovery Act funds to apply 41 U.S.C. 254d(c) and 10 U.S.C. 
2313(c), Examination of Records of Contractor, to commercial item 
subcontracts which are otherwise exempt when subcontractors are not 
required to provide cost or pricing data.
    Comments were received from 5 respondents. The Councils considered 
the comments received and concluded that the interim rule, as revised 
by the technical amendments, should be converted to a final rule with 
minor changes to the clause prescriptions.
    The comments received are addressed as follows:

1. Scope of records that can be examined.

    Comment: A respondent states that the language in FAR 52.212-
5(d)(i) and FAR 52.212-5(d)(ii) is unnecessarily broad by not limiting 
the scope of records that can be examined by the

[[Page 34280]]

Inspector General (IG) to only those records related or funded with 
Recovery Act funds. The respondent made the same comment with regard to 
the scope of the IG examination of records in FAR 52.214-26(c)(2) 
Alternate I and 52.215-2(d)(1) Alternate I. Likewise, a respondent 
expressed concern that the interim rule is not clear whether it applies 
only to task orders that are funded with Recovery Act funds.
    Response: Section 902 of the Recovery Act provides that each 
contract awarded using funds made available by the Recovery Act shall 
provide the Comptroller General, and his representatives, with the 
access specified in the statutory provision. Section 1515 provides that 
each contract awarded using covered funds shall provide the appropriate 
IG with the access specified in the statutory provision. The Councils 
have revised the clause prescriptions to clarify that ``contract,'' as 
defined in FAR 2.101, may mean bilateral contract modification or an 
individual task or delivery order. In the case of a bilateral 
modification that will use funds appropriated or otherwise made 
available by the Recovery Act, the contracting officer shall specify 
the applicability of the Recovery Act to that modification. In the case 
of a task- or delivery-order contract in which not all orders will use 
funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the Recovery Act, the 
contracting officer will specify the task or delivery orders to which 
the Recovery Act applies.

2. Advance notice.

    Comment: A respondent states that they believe an IG must provide 
reasonable advance notice to contractors and their employees before a 
review of contractor transactions to include when and where the review 
and interviews will occur; the topics to be covered; the employees 
affected; and the total amount of time required to conduct the review.
    Response : The Councils disagree. The purpose of this rule is to 
put contractors on notice that they may need to make their records and 
employees available in the event a review is requested. The FAR is an 
acquisition regulation and the exact review procedures that the 
Comptroller General or his authorized representatives use to execute 
such procedures are not required to be detailed in the FAR.

3. Rights of contractor employees.

    Comment: A respondent is concerned that the rule is silent on the 
protection of the rights of employees subject to an interview. The 
respondent recommends clearly outlining the rights of contractor 
employees to include prescribing the right to have counsel present 
during the interviews and clearly spelling out the process that the 
Government Accountability Office (GAO)/IG will use in both notifying 
employees of the intent to interview and the process to be followed.
    Response: The Councils disagree. The FAR does not prescribe GAO 
processes or grant legal rights to contractors regarding GAO/IG 
interview processes.

4. IG authority to interview subcontractor employees.

    Comment: A respondent commented that while they generally support 
the rule, they feel that the rule failed to include an IG authority to 
interview subcontractor employees.
    Response: The Councils disagree. The FAR rule follows the statute. 
The Councils do not find evidence that there was an inadvertent 
omission in the statute with reference to allowing an IG to interview 
subcontractor employees.

5. Technical amendments.

    Comment: A respondent believes that there are overlapping changes 
between this case and the Whistleblower case, FAR 2009-012, with 
respect to FAR clause 52.212-5, Alternate II. This same comment was 
made by a second respondent recommending the inclusion of the 
Whistleblower case in FAR clause 52.212-5, Alternate II.
    Response: The Councils agree. FAC 2005-032, Technical Amendments, 
reconciled this issue by adding the Whistleblower reference to 
Alternate II of FAR 52.212-5.

6. Outside scope of this case.

    a. Comment: A respondent commented that the application of 
reporting requirements is overly broad and recommends exempting 
contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, commercial 
item contracts, and Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) 
contracts from the reporting requirements.
    Response: Reporting requirements are covered under FAR Case 2009-
009.
    b. Comment: A respondent commented that FAR 12.504(a)(7) 
incorrectly states that 41 U.S.C. 254(c) and 10 U.S.C. 2313(c) are 
required ``when a subcontractor is not required to provide cost or 
pricing data''.
    Response: This comment does not address a change made by this rule. 
The comment may be taken under consideration for appropriateness as a 
future case.
    c. Comment: A respondent notes that if FAR 52.203-15 is intended to 
be flowed down to commercial item subcontractors, then it should also 
be included in the list of clauses under FAR 52.244-6.
    Response: This comment is not directed at changes made under this 
rule and does not require a change to FAR Case 2009-011.
    This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject 
to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review under Section 6(b) of 
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 
30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.

B. Applicability to Commercial Item contracts

    Section 8003 of Pub. L. 103-355, the Federal Acquisition 
Streamlining Act (FASA) (41 U.S.C. 430), governs the applicability of 
laws to commercial items, and is intended to limit the applicability of 
laws to commercial items. The FASA provides that if a provision of law 
contains criminal or civil penalties, or if the Federal Acquisition 
Regulatory Council makes a written determination that it is not in the 
best interest of the Federal Government to exempt commercial item 
contracts, the provision of law will apply to contracts for commercial 
items. The same applies for subcontracts for commercial items.
    Therefore, given sections 902 and 1515 of the Recovery Act, which 
requires Comptroller General and agency inspector general access to 
contractor and subcontractor records, the FAR Council has determined 
that the rule should apply to commercial items, as defined at FAR 
2.101, both at the prime and subcontract levels.

C. Applicability to commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item 
contracts

    Section 4203 of Pub. L. 104-106, the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (41 
U.S.C. 431), governs the applicability of laws to the procurement of 
COTS items, and is intended to limit the applicability of laws to them. 
The Clinger-Cohen Act provides that if a provision of law contains 
criminal or civil penalties, or if the Administrator for Federal 
Procurement Policy makes a written determination that it is not in the 
best interest of the Federal Government to exempt COTS item contracts, 
the provision of law will apply.
    Therefore, given sections 902 and 1515 of the Recovery Act, which 
requires Comptroller General and agency IG access to contractor and 
subcontractor records, the Administrator for Federal Procurement 
Policy, has determined that the rule

[[Page 34281]]

should apply to COTS item contracts, as defined at FAR 2.101.

D. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition 
Threshold

    Section 4101 of Pub. L. 103-355, the Federal Acquisition 
Streamlining Act (FASA) (41 U.S.C. 429), governs the applicability of 
laws to contracts or subcontracts in amounts not greater than the 
simplified acquisition threshold. It is intended to limit the 
applicability of laws to them. The FASA provides that if a provision of 
law contains criminal or civil penalties, or if the Federal Acquisition 
Regulatory Council (FARC) makes a written determination that it is not 
in the best interest of the Federal Government to exempt contracts or 
subcontracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, the law 
will not apply to them. Therefore, given sections 902 and 1515 of the 
Recovery Act, which requires Comptroller General and agency IG access 
to contractor and subcontractor records, the FARC has determined that 
this rule should apply to contracts or subcontracts at or below the 
simplified acquisition threshold, as defined at FAR 2.101.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this 
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because it merely requires 
contractors to make available existing records of transactions covered 
by the Recovery Act. Contractors are not obligated to create additional 
records.

F. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to 
the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require 
the approval of the OMB under 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, et seq.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 12, 13, 14, 15, and 52

    Government procurement.

    Dated: June 2, 2010.
Edward Loeb,
Acting Director, Acquisition Policy Division.

0
Accordingly, the interim rule published in the Federal Register at 74 
FR 14646 on March 31, 2009, is adopted as a final rule with the 
following changes:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 12, 13, 14, 15, and 52 
continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
U.S.C. 2473(c).

PART 12--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

0
2. Amend section 12.301 by revising paragraph (b)(4)(ii) to read as 
follows:


12.301  Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the 
acquisition of commercial items.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii)(A) If the acquisition will use funds appropriated or otherwise 
made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
(Pub. L. 111-5), the contracting officer shall use the clause with its 
Alternate II.
    (B)(1) In the case of a bilateral contract modification that will 
use funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the contracting officer shall 
specify applicability of Alternate II to that modification.
    (2) In the case of a task- or delivery-order contract in which not 
all orders will use funds appropriated or otherwise made available by 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the contracting 
officer shall specify the task or delivery orders to which Alternate II 
applies.
    (C) The contracting officer may not use Alternate I when Alternate 
II applies.
* * * * *

PART 14--SEALED BIDDING

0
3. Amend section 14.201-7 by revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as 
follows:


  14.201-7 Contract clauses.

    (a) * * *
    (2)(i) If the acquisition will use funds appropriated or otherwise 
made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, 
use the clause with its Alternate I in all solicitations and contracts.
    (ii)(A) In the case of a bilateral contract modification that will 
use funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the contracting officer shall 
specify applicability of Alternate I to that modification.
    (B) In the case of a task- or delivery-order contract in which not 
all orders will use funds appropriated or otherwise made available by 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the contracting 
officer shall specify the task or delivery orders to which Alternate I 
applies.
* * * * *

PART 15--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

0
4. Amend section 15.209 by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as 
follows:


15.209  Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2)(i) When using funds appropriated or otherwise made available by 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5)--
    (A) The exceptions in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iii) are 
not applicable; and
    (B) Use the clause with its Alternate I.
    (ii)(A) In the case of a bilateral contract modification that will 
use funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the contracting officer shall 
specify applicability of Alternate I to that modification.
    (B) In the case of a task- or delivery-order contract in which not 
all orders will use funds appropriated or otherwise made available by 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the contracting 
officer shall specify the task or delivery orders to which Alternate I 
applies.
* * * * *

PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES


52.214-26  [Amended]

0
5. Amend section 52.214-26 in the introductory text by removing 
``14.201-7(a)'' and adding ``14.201-7(a)(1)'' in its place; and 
removing from Alternate I introductory text ``14.201-7(a)(2)'' and 
adding ``14.201-7(a)(2),'' in its place.
[FR Doc. 2010-14170 Filed 6-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S