[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 29, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37287-37288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15691]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 37287]]
RECOVERY ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY BOARD
4 CFR Part 200
RIN 0430-AA03
Privacy Act Regulations
AGENCY: Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (Board)
amends its regulations implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 (Privacy
Act), Public Law 93-579, 5 U.S.C. 552a. This final rule adds 4 CFR
200.17 to exempt certain systems of records from certain sections of
the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k).
These exemptions will help ensure that the Board may efficiently and
effectively compile investigatory material to prevent and detect fraud,
waste, and abuse and perform its other authorized duties and activities
relating to oversight of funds awarded pursuant to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law 111-5 (Feb. 17, 2009)
(Recovery Act).
DATES: Effective June 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Dure, General Counsel, (703)
487-5439.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule was published in the
Federal Register on April 19, 2010 (75 FR 20298) for a public comment
period to end on June 18, 2010. This rule amends the Board's Privacy
Act regulations, 4 CFR part 200, to exempt system of records ``RATB-11-
RATB Investigative Files'' and ``RATB-12-RATB Fraud Hotline Program
Files'' from certain provisions of the Privacy Act which require, among
other things, that the Board provide notice when collecting
information, account for certain disclosures, permit individuals access
to their records, and allow them to request that the records be
amended. These provisions would interfere with the Board's oversight
functions if applied to the Board's maintenance of these systems of
records.
Accordingly, these systems of records are exempt from specified
provisions of the Privacy Act, pursuant to sections 552a(j)(2), (k)(2),
and (k)(5):
Public Comments
The Board received one comment expressing an individual's opinion
that the Board's amendment to its Privacy Act regulations ``would allow
investigators to really come through and fully investigate in many
fraud cases.''
List of Subjects in 4 CFR Part 200
Privacy Act of 1974.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board amends Chapter II
of Title 4, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
CHAPTER II--RECOVERY ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY BOARD
PART 200--PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
0
1. The authority citation for Part 200 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)
0
2. Part 200 is amended by adding Sec. 200.17 as follows:
Sec. 200.17 Exemptions.
(a) General policy. The Privacy Act permits an agency to exempt
certain types of systems of records from some of the Privacy Act's
requirements. It is the policy of the Board to exercise authority to
exempt systems of records only in compelling cases.
(b) Specific systems of records exempted under (j)(2) and (k)(2).
The Board exempts the RATB Investigative Files (RATB-11) system of
records from the following provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a:
(1) From subsection (c)(3) because the release of accounting of
disclosure would inform a subject that he or she is under
investigation. This information would provide considerable advantage to
the subject in providing him or her with knowledge concerning the
nature of the investigation and the coordinated investigative efforts
and techniques employed by the cooperating agencies. This would greatly
impede the Board's criminal law enforcement duties.
(2) From subsection (c)(4) and (d) because notification would alert
a subject to the fact that an open investigation on that individual is
taking place, and might weaken the ongoing investigation, reveal
investigatory techniques, and place confidential informants in
jeopardy.
(3) From subsection (e)(1) because the nature of the criminal and/
or civil investigative function creates unique problems in prescribing
a specific parameter in a particular case with respect to what
information is relevant or necessary. Also, due to the Board's close
working relationship with other Federal, state and local law
enforcement agencies, information may be received which may relate to a
case under the investigative jurisdiction of another agency. The
maintenance of this information may be necessary to provide leads for
appropriate law enforcement purposes and to establish patterns of
activity which may relate to the jurisdiction of other cooperating
agencies.
(4) From subsection (e)(2) because collecting information to the
fullest extent possible directly from the subject individual may or may
not be practical in a criminal and/or civil investigation.
(5) From subsection (e)(3) because supplying an individual with a
form containing a Privacy Act Statement would tend to inhibit
cooperation by many individuals involved in a criminal and/or civil
investigation. The effect would be somewhat adverse to established
investigative methods and techniques.
(6) From subsection (e)(4)(G)-(I) because this system of records is
exempt from the access provisions of subsection (d).
(7) From subsection (e)(5) because the requirement that records be
maintained with attention to accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and
completeness would unfairly hamper the investigative process. It is the
nature of law enforcement for investigations to uncover the commission
of illegal acts at diverse stages. It is frequently impossible to
determine initially what information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
least of all complete. With the passage of time, seemingly irrelevant
or untimely information may acquire new significance as further
investigation brings new details to light.
[[Page 37288]]
(8) From subsection (e)(8) because the notice requirements of this
provision could present a serious impediment to law enforcement by
revealing investigative techniques, procedures, and existence of
confidential investigations.
(9) From subsection (f) because the agency's rules are inapplicable
to those portions of the system that are exempt and would place the
burden on the agency of either confirming or denying the existence of a
record pertaining to a requesting individual, which might in itself
provide an answer to that individual relating to an ongoing
investigation. The conduct of a successful investigation leading to the
indictment of a criminal offender precludes the applicability of
established agency rules relating to verification of record, disclosure
of the record to that individual, and record amendment procedures for
this record system.
(10) For comparability with the exemption claimed from subsection
(f), the civil remedies provisions of subsection (g) must be suspended
for this record system. Because of the nature of criminal
investigations, standards of accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and
completeness cannot apply to this record system. Information gathered
in an investigation is often fragmentary, and leads relating to an
individual in the context of one investigation may instead pertain to a
second investigation.
(c) Specific systems of records exempted under (k)(2) and (k)(5).
The Board exempts the RATB Fraud Hotline Program Files (RATB-12) system
of records from the following provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a:
(1) From subsection (c)(3) because disclosures from this system
could interfere with the just, thorough and timely resolution of the
complaint or inquiry, and possibly enable individuals to conceal their
wrongdoing or mislead the course of the investigation by concealing,
destroying or fabricating evidence or documents.
(2) From subsection (d) because disclosures from this system could
interfere with the just, thorough and timely resolution of the
complaint or inquiry, and possibly enable individuals to conceal their
wrongdoing or mislead the course of the investigation by concealing,
destroying or fabricating evidence or documents. Disclosures could also
subject sources and witnesses to harassment or intimidation which
jeopardize the safety and well-being of themselves and their families.
(3) From subsection (e)(1) because the nature of the investigatory
function creates unique problems in prescribing specific parameters in
a particular case as to what information is relevant or necessary. Due
to close working relationships with other Federal, state and local law
enforcement agencies, information may be received which may relate to a
case under the investigative jurisdiction of another government agency.
It is necessary to maintain this information in order to provide leads
for appropriate law enforcement purposes and to establish patterns of
activity which may relate to the jurisdiction of other cooperating
agencies.
(4) From subsection (e)(4)(G)-(H) because this system of records is
exempt from the access provisions of subsection (d).
(5) From subsection (f) because the agency's rules are inapplicable
to those portions of the system that are exempt and would place the
burden on the agency of either confirming or denying the existence of a
record pertaining to a requesting individual might in itself provide an
answer to that individual relating to an on-going investigation. The
conduct of a successful investigation leading to the indictment of a
criminal offender precludes the applicability of established agency
rules relating to verification of record, disclosure of the record to
that individual, and record amendment procedures for this record
system.
Ivan J. Flores,
Paralegal Specialist, Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-15691 Filed 6-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-GA-P