[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39076-39078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16407]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-62413; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2010-61]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change by NYSE Arca, Inc. Amending NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11 To Add
Additional Securities to the Pilot Rule
June 30, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on June 30, 2010, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11 to add
additional securities to the pilot rule. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Exchange, the Commission's Web site at
http://www.sec.gov, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11 to add
[[Page 39077]]
securities included in the Russell 1000[supreg] Index (``Russell
1000'') and specified Exchange Traded Products (``ETP'') to the pilot
rule. For purposes of this filing, ETPs include Exchange Traded Funds
(``ETF''),\4\ Exchange Traded Vehicles (``ETV''),\5\ and Exchange
Traded Notes (``ETN'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ An ETF is an open-ended registered investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 that has received certain
exemptive relief from the SEC to allow secondary market trading in
the ETF shares. ETFs are generally index-based products, in that
each ETF holds a portfolio of securities that is intended to provide
investment results that, before fees and expenses, generally
correspond to the price and yield performance of the underlying
benchmark index.
\5\ An ETV tracks the underlying performance of an asset or
index, allowing investors exposure to underlying assets such as
futures contracts, commodities, and currency without actually
trading futures or taking physical delivery of the underlying asset.
An ETV is traded intraday like an ETF. An ETV is an open-ended trust
or partnership unit that is registered under the Securities Act of
1933.
\6\ An ETN is a senior unsecured debt obligation designed to
track the total return of an underlying index, benchmark or
strategy, minus investor fees. ETNs are registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 and are redeemable to the issuer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11 was approved by the Commission on June
10, 2010 on a pilot basis to end on December 10, 2010.\7\ As the
Exchange noted in its filing to adopt NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11,
during the pilot period, the Exchange would continue to assess whether
additional securities need to be added and whether the parameters of
the rule would need to be modified to accommodate trading
characteristics of different securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62252 (June 10,
2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-41).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the pilot list of securities is all securities included
in the S&P 500[supreg] Index (``S&P 500''). As noted in comment letters
to the original filing to adopt NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11, concerns
were raised that including only securities in the S&P 500 in the pilot
rule was too narrow. In particular, commenters noted that securities
that experienced volatility on May 6, 2010, including ETFs, should be
included in the pilot. The Exchange agrees with the commenters that the
pilot list of securities should be expanded.
In consultation with other markets, the Exchange proposes to add
the securities included in the Russell 1000 and specified ETPs to the
pilot beginning in July 2010, subject to Commission approval. The
Exchange believes that adding these securities would begin to address
concerns that the scope of the pilot may be too narrow, while at the
same time recognizing that during the pilot period, the markets will
continue to review whether and when to add additional securities to the
pilot and whether the parameters of the rule should be adjusted for
different securities.
In particular, the Exchange proposes to add securities included in
the Russell 1000 because the Exchange believes that the securities
included in that index have similar trading characteristics to
securities included in the S&P 500 (many of which are the same
securities) and therefore the existing 10% price movement applicable
before invoking a trading pause would be appropriate for the Russell
1000 securities. Because the Exchange does not propose to modify the
10% price movement at this time, the Exchange believes that expanding
to the Russell 1000 is an appropriate next step. Based on our analysis,
the number of times that the Trading Pause would be triggered for
Russell 1000 securities would be similar to the instances for the S&P
500 securities.
In addition, the Exchange, in consultation with other markets,
proposes to add to the pilot a selected list of ETPs. The Exchange
developed the proposed pilot list of ETPs first by identifying all ETPs
across multiple asset classes and issuers, including domestic equity,
international equity, fixed income, currency, and commodities and
futures. The Exchange next excluded the leveraged ETPs and sorted the
list by notional consolidated average daily volume (``CADV'') using
year-to-date CADV ending May 5, 2010, multiplied by the closing price
on May 5, 2010. The Exchange then selected those symbols, including
inverse ETPs, that trade over $2,000,000 CADV year to date through May
5, 2010. To ensure that ETPs that track similar benchmarks but that do
not meet this volume criterion do not become subject to pricing
volatility when a component security is the subject of a trading pause,
the Exchange proposes to include certain non-leveraged ETPs that have
traded below this volume criterion, but that track the same benchmark
as an ETP that does meet the volume criterion.
The Exchange believes that the proposed list of ETPs is appropriate
because it identifies those ETPs that have component securities that
largely track the securities included in the S&P 500 and Russell 1000.
Accordingly, if an S&P 500 or Russell 1000 security experiences a
trading pause, any resulting price volatility in a related ETP,
regardless of the CADV of the ETP, would also be subject to a trading
pause trigger. As with the proposal to add the Russell 1000 securities,
the Exchange selected the proposed ETPs because it believes that the
existing 10% price movement would be an appropriate price movement
before invoking a trading pause for ETPs with these characteristics.
The Exchange does not believe that the 10% price movement is an
appropriate threshold for leveraged ETPs because by definition,
leveraged ETPs are based on multiples of price movements in the
underlying index. Accordingly, a 10% percent price movement in a
leveraged ETP may not signify extraordinary volatility. Because the
Exchange is not proposing to adopt revised price movement thresholds at
this time, the Exchange is therefore not proposing to include leveraged
ETPs for now.
As proposed, the list includes broad-based ETPs, which the Exchange
recognizes has raised some debate. In particular, concerns have been
raised about whether halting an index-based ETP may impact an index-
based option or future. However, the Exchange believes that including
broad-based ETPs is appropriate so that ETP investors are protected
should the component securities experience such volatility that trading
in the broad-based ETP is impacted, as it was on May 6, 2010. Because
this is a pilot rule, the markets can continue to assess whether it is
appropriate to have a trading pause in broad-based ETPs when there is
not a similar trading pause in related index-based options or futures.
As noted above, during the pilot, the Exchange will continue to re-
assess whether specific ETPs should be added or removed from the pilot
list. The Exchange will also assess whether the parameters for invoking
a trading pause continue to be the appropriate standard and whether the
parameters should be modified.
To effect this change, the Exchange proposes to amend supplementary
material .10 to Rule 7.11 to provide that the pilot applies to all
securities in the S&P 500, securities in the Russell 1000, as well as
specified ETPs. The pilot list of ETPs is identified in Exhibit 3. The
Exchange further proposes to amend the rule to conform to the style of
NYSE Arca Equities rules to provide that the ``supplementary material''
is referenced as ``Commentary'' and the commentary rule numbering is
``.01'', rather than ``.10.''
2. Statutory Basis
The statutory basis for the proposed rule change is Section 6(b)(5)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\8\ which requires
the rules of an exchange to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
[[Page 39078]]
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed
rule change also is designed to support the principles of Section
11A(a)(1) \9\ of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair competition
among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule meets these requirements in that it
promotes uniformity across markets concerning decisions to pause
trading in a security when there are significant price movements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
A. By order approve such proposed rule change, or
B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The Commission notes that the Exchange has requested
accelerated approval of the filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
The Commission notes that ETF trades constituted a substantial
majority of the trades that were cancelled on May 6, and the proposed
amendments would bring certain ETFs within the scope of the trading
pause pilot for the first time. The Commission solicits comment
regarding the inclusion of ETFs within the trading pause pilot. The
Commission requests comment in particular on the implications of
including in the trading pause pilot ETFs on broad-based indices that
also underlie options and futures products. What are the potential
benefits and risks of including those ETFs in the pilot under
circumstances where other products based on the same index may not be
subject to any trading pause, or may be subject to a different type of
trading pause? Are existing mechanisms available in the markets for
those other products sufficient to address any cross-market linkage
concerns? What are the potential effects on price discovery and trading
behavior in the different markets?
Similarly, the Commission solicits comments on the potential
benefits and risks of excluding such ETFs from the pilot, particularly
under circumstances where the securities underlying the ETF are
included in the pilot. If there are trading pauses for the component
securities of an index but not for an ETF based on that index, what
consequences might that have for the ETF or for other products based on
that index? If there are trading pauses in an ETF but not in the stocks
that underlie that ETF, what consequences might that have for the
underlying stocks or other products? What are the potential effects on
price discovery for the ETF, the underlying stocks and other products?
Are there other market-based characteristics or metrics that should
be considered for purposes of determining which ETFs should be included
in the trading pause pilot, or for re-calibrating particular features
of the trading pause?
In addition, the Commission solicits comments regarding the
operation of the trading pause pilot to date with respect to stocks in
the S&P 500.
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2010-61 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2010-61. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2010-61, and should be submitted on or before
July 19, 2010.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The Commission believes that a 10-day comment period is
reasonable, given the urgency of the matter. It will provide
adequate time for comment.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-16407 Filed 7-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P