[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 131 (Friday, July 9, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39460-39462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16780]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 131 / Friday, July 9, 2010 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 39460]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AM21
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the Chicago, IL; Fort
Wayne-Marion, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA,
Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing a proposed
rule that would redefine the geographic boundaries of the Chicago, IL;
Fort Wayne-Marion, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh,
PA, appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. The
proposed rule would redefine Benton County, IN, from the Chicago wage
area to the Indianapolis wage area; Carroll and Howard Counties, IN,
from the Fort Wayne-Marion wage area to the Indianapolis wage area; and
Carroll County, OH, from the Pittsburgh wage area to the Cleveland wage
area. These changes are based on recent consensus recommendations of
the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee to best match the
counties proposed for redefinition to a nearby FWS survey area. No
other changes are proposed for the Chicago, Fort Wayne-Marion,
Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh FWS wage areas.
DATES: We must receive comments on or before August 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Jerome D. Mikowicz, Deputy
Associate Director for Pay and Leave, Employee Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC
20415-8200; email [email protected]; or FAX: (202) 606-
4264.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; e-
mail [email protected]; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) is issuing a proposed rule to redefine the Chicago, IL; Fort
Wayne-Marion, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA,
appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. This proposed
rule would redefine Benton County, IN, from the Chicago wage area to
the Indianapolis wage area; Carroll and Howard Counties, IN, from the
Fort Wayne-Marion wage area to the Indianapolis wage area; and Carroll
County, OH, from the Pittsburgh wage area to the Cleveland wage area.
OPM considers the following regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211
when defining FWS wage area boundaries:
(i) Distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features;
(ii) Commuting patterns; and
(iii) Similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds
and sizes of private industrial establishments.
In addition, OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit
splitting Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for the purpose of
defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances (e.g.,
organizational relationships among closely located Federal activities).
OPM recently completed reviews of the definitions of the Kokomo,
IN; Lafayette, IN; and Canton-Massillon, OH MSAs and, based on analyses
of the regulatory criteria for defining wage areas, is proposing the
changes described below. The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee
(FPRAC), the national labor-management committee responsible for
advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees,
recommended these changes by consensus. These changes would be
effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning
on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations.
FPRAC recommended no other changes in the geographic definitions of the
Chicago, Fort Wayne-Marion, Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh
wage areas.
Kokomo, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area
Howard and Tipton Counties, IN, comprise the Kokomo, IN MSA. The
Kokomo MSA is currently split between the Fort Wayne-Marion and
Indianapolis, IN, wage areas. Howard County is part of the area of
application of the Fort Wayne-Marion wage area and Tipton County is
part of the area of application of the Indianapolis wage area.
Based on an analysis of the regulatory criteria for Howard County,
the core county in the Kokomo MSA, we recommend that the entire Kokomo
MSA be defined to the Indianapolis area of application. The distance
criterion for Howard County favors the Indianapolis wage area more than
the Fort Wayne-Marion wage area. The commuting patterns criterion
slightly favors the Indianapolis wage area. All other criteria are
inconclusive. Based on this analysis, OPM proposes to redefine Howard
County to the Indianapolis area of application so that the entire
Kokomo MSA is in one wage area. There are currently no FWS employees
working in Howard County.
Lafayette, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area
Benton, Carroll, and Tippecanoe Counties, IN, comprise the
Lafayette, IN MSA. The Lafayette MSA is currently split between the
Chicago, IL; Fort Wayne-Marion, IN; and Indianapolis, IN, wage areas.
Benton County is part of the area of application of the Chicago wage
area, Carroll County is part of the area of application of the Fort
Wayne-Marion wage area, and Tippecanoe County is part of the area of
application of the Indianapolis wage area.
Based on an analysis of the regulatory criteria for Tippecanoe
County, the location of the main population center in the Lafayette
MSA, we recommend that the entire Lafayette MSA be defined to the
Indianapolis area of application. The distance criterion for Tippecanoe
County favors the Indianapolis wage area more than the Chicago or Fort
Wayne-Marion wage areas. All other criteria are inconclusive. However,
more than twice as many people currently commute from Tippecanoe County
into the Indianapolis survey area (2%) than into the Chicago survey
area (0.11%) or the Fort Wayne-Marion survey area (0.14%). Based on
this analysis, we believe Tippecanoe County is appropriately defined to
the Indianapolis wage area. Since there appear to be no unusual
circumstances
[[Page 39461]]
that would permit splitting the Lafayette MSA, OPM proposes to redefine
Benton and Carroll Counties to the Indianapolis wage area so that the
entire Lafayette MSA is in one wage area. There are currently no FWS
employees working in Benton or Carroll Counties.
Canton-Massillon, OH Metropolitan Statistical Area
Carroll and Stark Counties, OH, comprise the Canton-Massillon, OH
MSA. The Canton-Massillon MSA is currently split between the Cleveland,
OH, and Pittsburgh, PA, wage areas. Carroll County is part of the area
of application of the Pittsburgh wage area and Stark County is part of
the area of application of the Cleveland wage area.
Based on an analysis of the regulatory criteria for Stark County,
the core county in the Canton-Massillon MSA, we recommend that the
entire Canton-Massillon MSA be defined to the Cleveland wage area. The
distance criterion for Stark County favors the Cleveland wage area more
than the Pittsburgh wage area. All other criteria are inconclusive.
However, more than twice as many people currently commute from Stark
County into the Cleveland survey area (2%) than into the Pittsburgh
survey area (0.07%). Based on this analysis, we believe Stark County is
appropriately defined to the Cleveland wage area. Since there appear to
be no unusual circumstances that would permit splitting the Canton-
Massillon MSA, OPM proposes to redefine Carroll County to the Cleveland
wage area. There are two Army Corps of Engineers FWS employees
currently working in Carroll County.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
would affect only Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is proposing
to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
2. Appendix C to subpart B is amended by revising the wage area
listings for the Chicago, IL; Fort Wayne-Marion, IN; Indianapolis, IN;
Cleveland, OH; and Pittsburgh, PA, wage areas to read as follows:
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532--Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
* * * * *
ILLINOIS
* * * * *
Chicago
Survey Area
Illinois:
Cook
Du Page
Kane
Lake
McHenry
Will
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Illinois:
Boone
De Kalb
Grundy
Iroquois
Kankakee
Kendall
La Salle
Lee
Livingston
Ogle
Stephenson
Winnebago
Indiana:
Jasper
Lake
La Porte
Newton
Porter
Pulaski
Starke
Wisconsin:
Kenosha
* * * * *
INDIANA
* * * * *
Fort Wayne-Marion
Survey Area
Indiana:
Adams
Allen
DeKalb
Grant
Huntington
Wells
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Indiana:
Blackford
Cass
Elkhart
Fulton
Jay
Kosciusko
LaGrange
Marshall
Miami
Noble
St. Joseph
Steuben
Wabash
White
Whitley
Ohio:
Allen
Defiance
Fulton
Henry
Mercer
Paulding
Putnam
Van Wert
Williams
INDIANAPOLIS
Survey Area
Indiana:
Boone
Hamilton
Hancock
Hendricks
Johnson
Marion
Morgan
Shelby
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Indiana:
Bartholomew
Benton
Brown
Carroll
Clay
Clinton
Decatur
Delaware
Fayette
Fountain
Henry
Howard
Madison
Montgomery
Parke
Putnam
Rush
Sullivan
Tippecanoe
Tipton
Vermillion
Vigo
Warren
* * * * *
OHIO
* * * * *
Cleveland
Survey Area
Ohio:
Cuyahoga
Geauga
Lake
Medina
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Ohio:
Ashland
Ashtabula
Carroll
Columbiana
Erie
[[Page 39462]]
Huron
Lorain
Mahoning
Ottawa
Portage
Sandusky
Seneca
Stark
Summit
Trumbull
Wayne
* * * * *
PENNSYLVANIA
* * * * *
Pittsburgh
Survey Area
Pennsylvania:
Allegheny
Beaver
Butler
Washington
Westmoreland
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Pennsylvania:
Armstrong
Bedford
Blair
Cambria
Cameron
Centre
Clarion
Clearfield
Clinton
Crawford
Elk (Does not include the Allegheny National Forest portion)
Erie
Fayette
Forest (Does not include the Allegheny National Forest portion)
Greene
Huntingdon
Indiana
Jefferson
Lawrence
Mercer
Potter
Somerset
Venango
Ohio:
Belmont
Harrison
Jefferson
Tuscarawas
West Virginia:
Brooke
Hancock
Marshall
Ohio
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-16780 Filed 7-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P