[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 137 (Monday, July 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41891-41892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-669]


In the Matter of Certain Optoelectronic Devices, Components 
Thereof, and Products Containing the Same Issuance of a Limited 
Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order; and Termination of the 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has terminated the above-captioned investigation with a 
finding of violation of section 337, and has issued a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist order directed against respondent Emcore 
Corporation (``Emcore'') of Albuquerque, New Mexico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 10, 2009 based on a complaint filed on February 3, 2009, by 
Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; Avago 
Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; and Avago 
Technologies Ltd. of San Jose, California (collectively, ``Avago''). 74 
FR 10278-79 (March 10, 2009). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain optoelectronic devices, components thereof, or products 
containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent Nos. 5,359,447 (``the '447 patent'') and 5,761,229 (``the '229 
patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The 
complaint names a single respondent, Emcore Corporation (``Emcore'') of 
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
    On December 7, 2009, the Commission issued notice of its 
determination not to review the presiding administrative law judge's 
(``ALJ's'') initial determination (``ID'') granting Avago's motion for 
summary determination on ownership of the asserted patents.
    On March 12, 2010, the ALJ issued his final ID finding a violation 
of section 337 by Emcore by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the '447 patent. The ALJ found no violation of 
section 337 with respect to the '229 patent. He also issued his 
recommendation on remedy and bonding during the period of Presidential 
review. On March 29, 2010, Emcore filed a petition for review of the 
final ID. The Commission investigative attorney (``IA'') and Avago 
filed responses to the petition on April 6, 2010. On May 13, 2010, the 
Commission issued notice of its determination not to review the ALJ's 
final ID finding a violation of section 337, and requested written 
submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding 
from the parties and interested non-parties. 75 FR 28060-61 (May 19, 
2010).
    On May 24 and June 1, 2010, respectively, complainant Avago, 
respondent Emcore, and the IA filed briefs and reply briefs on the 
issues for which the Commission requested written submissions.
    The Commission has made its determination on the issues of remedy, 
the public interest, and bonding. The Commission has determined that 
the appropriate form of relief is both: (1) A limited exclusion order 
prohibiting the unlicensed entry of optoelectronic devices, components 
thereof, and products containing the same that are covered by one or 
more of claims 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the '447 patent, where the infringing 
optoelectronic devices, components thereof, and products containing the 
same are manufactured

[[Page 41892]]

abroad by or on behalf of, or are imported by or on behalf of, Emcore, 
or any of its affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, licensees, 
contractors, or other related business entities, or successors or 
assigns; and (2) a cease and desist order prohibiting Emcore from 
conducting any of the following activities in the United States: 
importing, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing, offering for 
sale, transferring (except for exportation), and soliciting U.S. agents 
or distributors for, optoelectronic devices, components thereof, and 
products containing the same that are covered by one or more of claims 
1, 2, 3, and 5 of the '447 patent.
    The Commission further determined that the public interest factors 
enumerated in section 337(d)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)) do not preclude 
issuance of the limited exclusion order or the cease and desist order. 
Finally, the Commission determined that a three (3) percent bond of the 
entered value of the covered products is required to permit temporary 
importation during the period of Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 
*1337(j)). The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the 
President and to the United States Trade Representative on the day of 
their issuance.
    The Commission has terminated this investigation. The authority for 
the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Sec.  210.50 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.50).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 12, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-17471 Filed 7-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P