[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 146 (Friday, July 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45008-45010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18703]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for a
Proposed Light Rail Transit Line in Detroit, MI
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), as the federal lead
agency, and the City of Detroit (the City) intend to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Woodward Avenue
Light Rail Transit (LRT) project in Detroit, Michigan. The proposed
project, described more completely within, is an LRT line that would
begin in downtown Detroit near the Detroit River and extend northwest
along Woodward Avenue (M-1), terminating near Eight-Mile Road (M-102)
in Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan. The purpose of this notice is to
alert interested parties regarding the intent to prepare the EIS, to
provide information on the nature of the proposed project and possible
alternatives, and to invite public participation in the EIS process.
DATES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS, including the
project's purpose and need, the alternatives to be considered, the
impacts to be evaluated, and the methodologies to be used in the
evaluations should be sent to the Headquarters office of FTA on or
before September 13, 2010. See ADDRESSES below for the address to which
written comments may be sent. A public scoping meeting, at which
questions about the project will be addressed and written comments will
be accepted, will be held on the following date:
Saturday, August 14, 2010; 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.; at the
Considine Little Rock Family Life Center (Auditorium), 8904 Woodward
Avenue, Detroit, MI 48202. Telephone (313) 876-0131
Saturday, August 14, 2010; 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.; at the
Considine Little Rock Family Life Center (Auditorium), 8904 Woodward
Avenue, Detroit, MI 48202. Telephone (313) 876-0131
The building used for the scoping meetings is accessible to persons
with disabilities. Any individual who requires special assistance, such
as a sign language interpreter, to participate in the scoping meeting
should contact Linnette Phillips, Public Involvement Coordinator, at
Pierce, Monroe & Associates, LLC at (313)-961-1940 or monroe.com">lphillips@pierce-monroe.com, five days prior to the meeting.
Information describing the project purpose and need and the
alternatives proposed for analysis will be available at the meetings
and on the project Web site at http://www.woodwardlightrail. com. Paper
copies of the information materials may also be obtained from Mr. Tim
Roseboom, Manager, Strategic Planning & Scheduling Division, City of
Detroit Department of Transportation at (313)-833-1196 or
[email protected]. Representatives of Native American tribal
governments and of all federal, state, regional and local agencies that
may have an interest in any aspect of the project will be invited to be
participating or cooperating agencies, as appropriate.
[[Page 45009]]
ADDRESSES: Written comments will be accepted at the public scoping
meetings or they may be sent to: Ms. Tricia Harr, AICP, Federal Transit
Administration Headquarters, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, e-mail [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tricia Harr, AICP, Federal Transit
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., E43-105, Washington, DC
20590, phone 202-366-0486, e-mail [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scoping
FTA and the City of Detroit invite all interested individuals and
organizations, public agencies, and Native American Tribes to comment
on the scope of the EIS for the proposed LRT line, including the
project's purpose and need, the alternatives to be studied, the impacts
to be evaluated, and the evaluation methods to be used. Comments should
address (1) feasible alternatives that may better achieve the project's
purpose and need with fewer adverse impacts, and (2) any significant
environmental impacts relating to the alternatives.
``Scoping'' as described in the regulations implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) 1501.7) has specific and fairly limited
objectives, one of which is to identify the significant issues
associated with alternatives that will be examined in detail in the
document, while simultaneously limiting consideration and development
of issues that are not truly significant. It is in the NEPA scoping
process that potentially significant environmental impacts--those that
give rise to the need to prepare an environmental impact statement--
should be identified; impacts that are deemed not to be significant
need not be developed extensively in the context of the impact
statement, thereby keeping the statement focused on impacts of
consequence consistent with the ultimate objectives of the NEPA
implementing regulations--``to make the environmental impact statement
process more useful to decision makers and the public; and to reduce
paperwork and the accumulation of extraneous background data, in order
to emphasize the need to focus on real environmental issues and
alternatives * * * [by requiring] impact statements to be concise,
clear, and to the point, and supported by evidence that agencies have
made the necessary environmental analyses'' (Executive Order 11991, of
May 24, 1977). Transit projects may also generate environmental
benefits; these should be highlighted as well--the impact statement
process should draw attention to positive impacts, not just negative
impacts.
Once the scope of the environmental study, including significant
environmental issues to be addressed, is settled, an annotated outline
of the document will be prepared and shared with participating agencies
and posted on the project Web site. The outline serves at least three
worthy purposes, including (1) documenting the results of the scoping
process; (2) contributing to the transparency of the process; and (3)
providing a clear roadmap for concise development of the environmental
document.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of the LRT project is to improve public transit service
and provide greater mobility options for the Woodward Avenue Corridor;
improve transportation equity among all travelers; improve transit
capacity along the Corridor; improve linkages to major activity centers
along the Corridor; and support the City's economic development goals
and encourage reinvestment in Detroit's urban core.
The need for the project is based on the following considerations:
Strong existing bus ridership and large potential ridership due to
major activity centers along the Corridor; a heavily transit-dependent
population along the Corridor; overcrowding, reliability issues, and
lack of rapid transit alternatives with the current bus system; air
quality issues due to the region's nonattainment status; and focus of
local policy on transit improvements rather than roadway improvements
as part of a more balanced and sustainable approach to future growth.
The proposed LRT system represents a major step to promote regional
and local rapid transit improvements in Southeast Michigan.
Project Location and Environmental Setting
The proposed project area lies along Woodward Avenue in central
Detroit. The limits of the project area are the Detroit River in the
south and Eight Mile Road (M-102) in the north. The project area is
highly developed, with significant industrial and commercial (retail
and office) and residential (single- and multi-family) developments.
The project area includes the City of Highland Park within the City of
Detroit.
As the LRT extends northwest, it would cross I-75, Warren Avenue,
I-94, Grand Boulevard, West Chicago Boulevard/Arden Park Boulevard,
East Davison Road (M-8), and enter Highland Park. It would continue to
extend northwest, passing the former Ford Motor Company Model T site on
the east, cross McNicholas Road, run adjacent to the eastern boundary
of Palmer Park, cross Seven Mile Road, run adjacent to the eastern
boundary of Woodlawn Cemetery, run adjacent to the western boundary of
the State Fair grounds, and terminate near Eight Mile Road. The
extension would include 9.3 new route miles of rapid transit with new
transit stations, parking facilities, and a vehicle storage and
maintenance facility.
Possible Alternatives
The Detroit Department of Transportation (DDOT) completed the
Detroit Transit Options for Growth Study (DTOGS) Alternative Analysis
(AA) in 2008, which evaluated potential corridors, technology, and
alignment alternatives. This AA Study is posted on the project Web
site. The City selected Woodward Avenue as the Locally Preferred
Alternative (LPA) with Light Rail Transit as the preferred modal option
in April 2008. The LPA was amended into the Southeast Michigan Council
of Government's (SEMCOG's) long-range transportation plan,
Direction2035: The Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan
(Direction2035), in June 2008, and the current fiscally constrained FY
2008-2011 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Accordingly, the
following alternatives are proposed to be evaluated in the DEIS:
No Build Alternative: The No Build Alternative is defined as the
existing transportation system, plus any committed transportation
improvements. Committed transportation improvements include the highway
and transit projects in SEMCOG's current fiscally constrained long-
range transportation plan, Direction2035, as amended, except for the
proposed Woodward Avenue LRT. The No Build Alternative serves as the
NEPA baseline against which the environmental effects of other
alternatives, including the proposed project, are measured. Under the
No Build Alternative, the transit network within the project area is
projected to be substantially the same as it is now, with bus service
adjusted to meet anticipated demand. All elements of the No Build
Alternative are included in each of the other alternatives.
LRT Alternatives: The LRT Alternatives would utilize LRT technology
and operate along the
[[Page 45010]]
Woodward Avenue alignment as described above. LRT is an electric
railway that may use shared (street) or exclusive rights-of-way with
multi-car trains or single cars powered electrically by overhead wire,
boarding passengers at track level or car floor level.
Other refinements to the LRT alternatives will be considered as
part of the Draft EIS alternatives' evaluation process, which includes
refinement of the proposed alignment, project termini, operating plans,
station locations, and/or design alternatives, such as median-running
vs. curb-running location within the preferred alignment. While the
environmental process will examine the entire 9.3 mile project, the
first 3.4 miles of the project (from the Detroit River to Grand
Boulevard) may be constructed and operated as an initial phase, with
the remainder being constructed as a second phase.
In addition to the alternatives described above, other transit
alternatives identified through the public and agency scoping process
will be evaluated for potential inclusion in the EIS.
Possible Effects
The purpose of this EIS process is to study, in a public setting,
the potentially significant effects of the proposed project and its
alternatives on the quality of the human environment, as well as the
natural environment. The AA Study and recent reviews of the study area
suggest that the impact areas of investigation for this proposed
transit project include, but are not limited to: Traffic and parking;
historic and cultural resources; noise and vibration; community
impacts; and business impacts. Investigation will reveal if and to what
degree the proposed project would affect those areas. Measures to
avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse impacts will be identified and
presented.
FTA Procedures
The regulations implementing NEPA, as well as provisions of the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), call for public involvement in the EIS
process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU (23 U.S.C. 139) requires that FTA
and the City do the following: (1) Extend an invitation to other
Federal and non-Federal agencies and Native American tribes that may
have an interest in the proposed project to become ``participating
agencies;'' (2) provide an opportunity for involvement by participating
agencies and the public to help define the purpose and need for a
proposed project, as well as the range of alternatives for
consideration in the EIS; and (3) establish a plan for coordinating
public and agency participation in, and comment on, the environmental
review process. Any Federal or non-Federal agency or Native American
tribe interested in the proposed project that does not receive an
invitation to become a participating agency should notify at the
earliest opportunity the Project Manager identified above under
ADDRESSES.
A comprehensive public involvement program and a Coordination Plan
for public and interagency involvement will be developed for the
project and posted on the project's Web site at http://www.woodwardlightrail.com. The public involvement program includes a
full range of activities including maintaining the project Web site and
outreach to local officials, community and civic groups, and the
public. Specific activities or events for involvement will be detailed
in the project's public participation plan.
Paperwork Reduction
The Paperwork Reduction Act seeks, in part, to minimize the cost to
the taxpayer of the creation, collection, maintenance, use,
dissemination, and disposition of information. Consistent with this
goal and with principles of economy and efficiency in government, it is
FTA policy to limit insofar as possible distribution of complete
printed sets of environmental documents. Accordingly, unless a specific
written request for a complete printed set of environmental documents
is received by the close of the scoping process by the Project Manager
identified under ADDRESSES, FTA and its grantees will distribute only
the executive summary and a Compact Disc (CD) of the complete
environmental document. A complete printed set of the environmental
document will be available for review at the project sponsor's offices
and elsewhere; an electronic copy of the complete environmental
document will also be available on the project Web site.
Other
The City is expecting to seek New Starts funding for the proposed
project under 49 United States Code 5309 and will, therefore, be
subject to New Starts regulations (49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Part 611). The New Starts regulations also require the submission of
certain project-justification and local financial commitment
information to support a request to FTA for approval into the
Preliminary Engineering phase of the New Starts review process.
Pertinent New Starts evaluation criteria will be included in the EIS.
The EIS will be prepared in accordance with NEPA and its
implementing regulations issued by the Council on Environmental Quality
(40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) and with the FTA/Federal Highway
Administration regulations ``Environmental Impact and Related
Procedures'' (23 CFR Part 771). Related environmental procedures to be
addressed during the NEPA process include, but are not limited to,
Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice; Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act; and Section 4(f) of the DOT Act (49
U.S.C. 303).
Issued on: July 23, 2010.
Marisol Simon,
Regional Administrator, Federal Transit Administration Region V,
Chicago, Illinois.
[FR Doc. 2010-18703 Filed 7-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P