[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45663-45664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-730]


In the Matter of: Certain Inkjet Ink Supplies and Components 
Thereof; Corrected Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on June 25, 2010, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California and Hewlett-Packard 
Development Company, L.P. of Houston, Texas. Letters supplementing the 
complaint were filed on July 15, 2010 and July 27, 2010. The complaint 
alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain inkjet ink supplies and components 
thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 
6,959,985 (``the `985 patent'') and U.S. Patent No. 7,104,630 (``the 
`630

[[Page 45664]]

patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 
(202) 205-2574.

    Authority:  The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on July 26, 2010, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain inkjet ink 
supplies or components thereof that infringe one or more of claims 1-5, 
7, 22-25, and 27-28 of the `985 patent and claims 1-7, 11-12, 14, 26-
30, 32, and 34-35 of the `630 patent, and whether an industry in the 
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are:

Hewlett-Packard Company, 3000 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, California 
94304;

Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., 11455 Compaq Center Drive 
West, Houston, Texas 77070.

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Mipo International Ltd., 1600 Atlanta Financial Center, 3343 Peachtree 
Road, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30326;

Mextec Group Inc., c/o The Law Office of Hongwei Shang, LLC, 9100 S. 
Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1500, Miami, Florida 33156;

Shanghai Angel Printer Supplies Co. Ltd., Room 1208, No. 495, Jiangning 
Road, Shanghai, China 200233;

Shenzhen Print Media Co., Ltd., 310, Huayuan Business 
Building, Xixiang Town, Baoan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 
518102;

Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Imaging, Products Co., Ltd., No. 1 
Industrial Building, Pingdong 2 Road, Nanping S&T Industrial Community, 
Zhuhai, Guangdong, China 519060;

Tatrix International, 10 C, Garden Building, No. 1083 JiuZhou Road, 
Jida, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China 519015;

Ourway Image Co., Ltd., 15F, No. 125 Renmin East Road, Xiangzhong, 
Zhuhai, Guangdong, China 33156.

    (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this 
investigation, is Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 28, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-19006 Filed 8-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P