[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49370-49375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19327]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0281; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-184-AD;
Amendment 39-16390; AD 2010-16-13]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and
F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F airplanes
(Collectively Called A300-600 series airplanes); and A310 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of an
[Airbus] A319 and an A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the handling qualities and reduces
the controllability of the aeroplane.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective September 17, 2010. The Director of
the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD as of September 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
[[Page 49371]]
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 2, 2010 (75 FR
16685). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of an
[Airbus] A319 and an A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the handling qualities and reduces
the controllability of the aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this EASA AD] requires
inspections of specific areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those rudders where production
reworks have been identified.
This * * * [EASA] AD * * * [also] requires for the vacuum loss
hole restoration:
--A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced area instead of the
local thermographic inspection, which is maintained for non-
reinforced areas, and
--additional work performance for rudders on which this
thermographic inspection has been performed in the reinforced area.
The inspections include vacuum loss inspections and elasticity laminate
checker inspections for defects including de-bonding between the skin
and honeycomb core of the rudder, and ultrasonic inspections for
rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or permanent vacuum
loss hole restoration has been performed. The corrective action is
contacting the manufacturer for repair instructions and doing the
repair. We are considering similar rulemaking action on Model A319 and
A321 airplanes. You may obtain further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received. FedEx comments that the
proposed compliance times fit within their planned scheduled
maintenance check.
Request for Clarification Regarding the Requirement To Contact Airbus
for New Instructions for Rudders Installed on Other Airplanes
American Airlines requests clarification concerning the requirement
to contact Airbus for new instructions if rudders are installed on
other airplanes. American Airlines states that the NPRM identifies
rudders by rudder serial number only and does not require verification
of airplane serial number; however, Airbus All Operators Telexes (AOT)
A310-55A2048 and A300-55A6047, both Revision 02, both dated October 12,
2009, request contacting Airbus for additional instructions for an
affected rudder if the data in Table 1 of the referenced Technical
Disposition TD/K4/S1/27583/2009, Issue E, does not match the airplane.
American Airlines states that since the rudder is a removable
structural component, it may be moved to a new airplane. American
Airlines states that since inspections are required only on the rudder,
they agree with the NPRM to not include the airplane serial numbers in
Table 1 of the NPRM as there is no value in obtaining new instructions
simply because the rudder has been installed on a different airplane.
We agree that clarification is needed to explain the requirement
described previously. In the NPRM, we referred to the Airbus AOTs for
accomplishment of the inspections. We have added notes to paragraphs
(g) and (h) of this AD to state that verification of the airplane
serial numbers is not required.
Request To Change Compliance Time
American Airlines requests that the compliance time for the initial
inspections (specified in the NPRM as ``within 8 months of the
effective date of the AD'') be revised to represent 8 months in-service
time. American Airlines' fleet of Model A300-600 series airplanes has
been retired from active service and is in long-term storage. American
Airlines states that previous investigations of the Model A300-600/A310
series airplanes rudders suggest that disbonding damage grows under
vacuum air-ground cycling and that a previous study on a Model A310
airplane had shown no reduction in stiffness due to age. American
Airlines suggests that it is unlikely that additional disbonding or
degradation will occur on the affected rudders in storage, therefore
requests that the compliance time represent 8 months in-service time.
American Airlines states that this will allow for more efficient
planning and will relieve the burden of obtaining special flight
permits to move re-activated airplanes to facilities where the
inspections are to be performed.
We agree to revise the proposed compliance time for the reason
stated by the commenter. We have added a compliance time of within 840
flight hours after the effective date of this AD to paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), (g)(4), (g)(6), (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD.
We have determined that 840 flight hours represents approximately 8
months given average utilization.
Request To Include Costs of Special Equipment
American Airlines requests that the cost of the elasticity laminate
checker and the vacuum loss inspection equipment be included in the
proposed cost estimate. American Airlines considers the equipment for
both inspections to be special tooling and the inspection methods to be
of limited application.
We agree that the cost of this special equipment should be included
in the cost estimate specified in this AD. The Cost Estimate section of
the final rule has been changed accordingly.
Request To Remove Reporting Requirement for Negative Responses
American Airlines requests that the reporting requirement for a
negative response be removed from the NPRM. American Airlines states
that Airbus All Operators Telexes A310-55A2048 and A300-55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, request reporting both
positive and negative findings. American Airlines states that reporting
negative findings has no effect on airplane safety and merely adds
administrative burden to the operator, which could create compliance
issues due to delays in the processing of paperwork.
We agree that negative responses need not be reported. We have
removed the requirement to report if no defects are found from this AD
(paragraphs (g)(11) and (h)(11) of the NPRM specified reporting if no
defects are found).
Change to Cost of Compliance
We have revised the Costs of Compliance section of this AD. The
work-hour estimate has been changed from 4 work-hours to 12 work-hours
to match the work-hours specified in the service information, which
increases the costs accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously.
[[Page 49372]]
We determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden
on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 194 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 12 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Tooling costs for each operator will cost about
$24,602. There are three affected US operators. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $197,880,
or $1,020 per product, plus the tooling costs of $24,602 for each
operator.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-16-13 Airbus: Amendment 39-16390. Docket No. FAA-2010-0281;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-184-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 17, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620,
B4-622, B4-605R, B4-622R, F4-605R, F4-622R, and C4-605R Variant F
airplanes; and Model A310-203, -204, -221, -222, -304, -322, -324,
and -325 airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with
carbon fiber reinforced plastic rudders having part numbers and
serial numbers listed in Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1--Rudder Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affected
Rudder part No. rudder Serial Core density
No. 24kg/m\3\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1017 Yes.
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1020 No.
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1059 No.
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1061 No.
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1064 No.
A554-71500-014-00....................... HF-1087 Yes.
A554-71500-014-00....................... HF-1119 Yes.
A554-71500-016-00....................... HF-1189 Yes.
A554-71500-016-00....................... HF-1203 Yes.
A554-71500-016-00....................... HF-1266 Yes.
A554-71500-026-00....................... TS-1405 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2001 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2004 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2007 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2009 No.
[[Page 49373]]
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2011 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2012 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2013 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2014 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2016 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2017 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2018 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2020 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2021 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2022 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2024 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2025 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2026 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2028 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2029 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2031 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2032 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2035 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2040 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2041 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2044 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2046 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2050 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2056 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2058 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2060 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2062 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2065 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2066 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2074 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2075 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2076 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2079 No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55:
Stabilizers.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of an
[Airbus] A319 and an A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the handling qualities and reduces
the controllability of the aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this EASA AD] requires
inspections of specific areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those rudders where production
reworks have been identified. This * * * [EASA] AD * * * [also]
requires for the vacuum loss hole restoration:
--A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced area instead of the
local thermographic inspection, which is maintained for non-
reinforced areas, and
--Additional work performance for rudders on which this
thermographic inspection has been performed in the reinforced area.
The inspections include vacuum loss inspections and elasticity
laminate checker inspections for defects including de-bonding
between the skin and honeycomb core of the rudder, and ultrasonic
inspections for rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or
permanent vacuum loss hole restoration has been performed. The
corrective action is contacting the manufacturer for repair
instructions and doing the repair. We are considering similar
rulemaking action on Model A319 and A321 airplanes.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions and Compliance
(g) For rudders with a honeycomb core density of 24 kg/m\3\, as
identified in Table 1 of this AD, do the actions required in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(10) of this AD, in accordance with
Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) A310-55A2048 or A300-55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as applicable.
Note 1: Verification of the airplane serial numbers is not
required.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8 months or 840 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
do a vacuum loss inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24 months or 840
flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, do an elasticity laminate checker inspection to detect
defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g)(2) of this
AD two times at intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles, but not
fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading edge/other
locations): Within 8 months or 840 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do an elasticity laminate
checker inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4) of this
AD at intervals not to exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months or 840 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do a vacuum loss inspection
on the other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading edge/other
locations) to detect defects including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph
(g)(6) of this AD
[[Page 49374]]
terminates the initial and repetitive inspections required by
paragraphs (g)(4) and (g)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(4), or (g)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(9) If no defects are found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(6) of this AD, before further flight,
restore the vacuum loss holes with temporary restoration with self-
adhesive patches, temporary restoration with resin, or permanent
restoration with resin and surface protection, and repeat the
inspection required by paragraph (g)(3) of this AD at intervals not
to exceed 4,500 flight cycles until permanent restoration is
completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(4), and (g)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(10)(i) or (g)(10)(ii) of
this AD: Report the inspection results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/SEER2/
SEER3, Customer Services, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or e-mail to
[email protected],
[email protected], or
[email protected].
(i) Inspections done before the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after accomplishment of the inspection.
(h) For rudders not having a honeycomb core density of 24 kg/
m\3\, as identified in Table 1 of this AD, do the actions required
in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(10) of this AD, in accordance with
Airbus AOT A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both Revision 02, both
dated October 12, 2009, as applicable.
Note 2: Verification of the airplane serial numbers is not
required.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8 months after the rudder
has accumulated 13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 8 months after the effective date of this AD, or within 840
flight hours after the effective date of this AD; whichever occurs
latest, do a vacuum loss inspection to detect defects including de-
bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24 months after the
rudder has accumulated 13,000 flight cycles since first
installation, or within 24 months after the effective date of this
AD, or within 840 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs latest, do an elasticity laminate checker
inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (h)(2) of this
AD two times at intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles, but not
fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading edge/other
locations): Within 8 months after the rudder has accumulated 13,000
flight cycles since first installation, or within 8 months after the
effective date of this AD, or within 840 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs latest; do an elasticity
laminate checker inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (h)(4) of this
AD at intervals not to exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months after the rudder has accumulated 13,000
flight cycles since first installation, or within 24 months after
the effective date of this AD, or within 840 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs latest, do a vacuum loss
inspection on the other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading
edge/other location) to detect defects including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph
(h)(6) of this AD terminates the initial and repetitive inspections
required by paragraphs (h)(4) and (h)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), or (h)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(9) If no defects are found during the inspections required by
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(6) of this AD, before further flight,
restore the vacuum loss holes with the temporary restoration with
self adhesive patches, temporary restoration with resin, or
permanent restoration with resin and surface protection, and repeat
the inspection required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD at intervals
not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles until permanent restoration is
completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(10)(i) or (h)(10)(ii) of
this AD: Report the inspection results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/SEER2/
SEER3, Customer Services, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or e-mail to
[email protected],
[email protected], or
[email protected].
(i) Inspections done before the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after accomplishment of the inspection.
(i) Actions done before the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with the service information listed in Table 2 of this
AD, are acceptable for compliance with the requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD for the areas inspected, for any
rudder listed in Table 1 of this AD.
(j) Additional areas requiring inspection for all airplanes are
defined in Airbus AOT A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as applicable. For these
additional areas, do the actions required in paragraphs (g) and (h)
of this AD, as applicable, at the times specified in those
paragraphs. For all areas, do the repetitive inspections required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD as applicable at the times
specified in those paragraphs.
Table 2--Credit Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus AOT-- Revision-- Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300-55A6047................. Original....... May 11, 2009.
A300-55A6047................. 01............. July 8, 2009.
A310-55A2048................. Original....... May 11, 2009.
A310-55A2048................. 01............. July 8, 2009.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(k) For rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or
permanent vacuum loss hole restoration has been done in accordance
with the applicable service bulletin specified in Table 2 of this
AD, as required in paragraph (g)(9) or (h)(9) of this AD, before the
effective date of this AD: Within 4,500 flight cycles from the
restoration date, do an ultrasonic inspection for defects, including
debonding of the reinforced area, in accordance with Airbus AOT
A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both Revision 02, both dated
October 12, 2009, as applicable. If any defect is found, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(l) After the effective date of this AD, no person may install
any rudder listed in Table 1 of this AD on any airplane, unless the
rudder has been inspected and all applicable corrective actions have
been done in accordance with paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(m) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested
[[Page 49375]]
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(n) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0002, dated January 5, 2010; Airbus AOT
A310-55A2048, Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; and Airbus AOT
A300-55A6047, Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Airbus All Operators Telex A300-55A6047,
Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; or Airbus All Operators Telex
A310-55A2048, Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; as applicable; to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. (The document number, revision level, and date appear
only on page 1 of the AOTs; no other page of these documents
contains this information)
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail: [email protected];
Internet: http://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 28, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-19327 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P