[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 11, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48608-48613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19771]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 594
[Docket No. NHTSA 2010-0035; Notice 2]
RIN 2127-AK70
Schedule of Fees Authorized by 49 U.S.C. 30141
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document adopts fees for Fiscal Year 2011 and until
further notice, as authorized by 49 U.S.C. 30141, relating to the
registration of importers and the importation of motor vehicles not
certified as conforming to the Federal motor vehicle safety standards
(FMVSS). These fees are needed to maintain the registered importer (RI)
program.
We are increasing the fees for the registration of a new RI from
$760 to $795 and the annual fee for renewing an existing registration
from $651 to $670. The fee to reimburse Customs for conformance bond
processing costs will decrease from $10.23 to $9.93 per bond. We are
decreasing the fees for the importation of a vehicle covered by an
import eligibility decision made on an individual model and model year
basis. For vehicles determined eligible based on their substantial
similarity to a U.S. certified vehicle, the fee will decrease from $198
to $158. For vehicles determined eligible based on their capability of
being modified to comply with all applicable FMVSS, the fee will also
decrease from $198 to $158. The fee for the inspection of a vehicle
will remain $827. The fee for processing a conformity package will
increase to $17 from $14. If the vehicle has been entered
electronically with Customs through the Automated Broker Interface
(ABI) and the RI has an e-mail address, the fee for processing the
conformity package will continue to be $6, provided the fee is paid by
credit card. However, if NHTSA finds that the information in the entry
or the conformity package is incorrect, the processing fee will be $57,
representing a $9 increase in the fee that is currently charged when
there are one or more errors in the ABI entry or omissions in the
statement of conformity.
DATES: The amendments established by this final rule will become
effective on October 1, 2010. Petitions for reconsideration must be
received by NHTSA not later than September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration of this final rule should
refer to the docket and notice numbers identified above and be
submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, Washington,
DC 20590. It is requested, but not required, that 10 copies of the
petition be submitted. The petition must be received not later than 45
days after publication of this final rule in the Federal Register.
Petitions filed after that time will be considered petitions filed by
interested persons to initiate rulemaking pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Chapter
301.
The petition must contain a brief statement of the complaint and an
explanation as to why compliance with the final rule is not
practicable, is unreasonable, or is not in the public interest. Unless
otherwise specified in the final rule, the statement and explanation
together may not exceed 15 pages in length, but necessary attachments
may be appended to the submission without regard to the 15-page limit.
If it is requested that additional facts be considered, the petitioner
must state the reason why they were not presented to the Administrator
within the prescribed time. The Administrator does not consider
repetitious petitions and unless the Administrator otherwise provides,
the filing of a petition does not stay the effectiveness of the final
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Lindsay, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5291). For legal issues, you may call
Nicholas Englund, Office of Chief Counsel, NHTSA (202-366-5263).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
This rule was preceded by a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that NHTSA published on May 7, 2010 (75 FR 25169).
The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, as amended by
the
[[Page 48609]]
Imported Vehicle Safety Compliance Act of 1988, and recodified at 49
U.S.C. 30141-30147 (``the Act''), provides for fees to cover the costs
of the importer registration program, the cost of making import
eligibility decisions, and the cost of processing the bonds furnished
to Customs. Certain fees became effective on January 31, 1990, and have
been in effect, with modifications, since then. On June 24, 1996, we
published a notice in the Federal Register at 61 FR 32411 that
discussed the rulemaking history of 49 CFR Part 594 and the fees
authorized by the Act. The reader is referred to that notice for
background information relating to this rulemaking action.
We last amended the fee schedule in 2008. See final rule published
on September 24, 2008 at 73 FR 54981. Those fees apply to Fiscal Years
2009 and 2010.
The fees adopted in this final rule are based on time expenditures
and costs associated with the tasks for which the fees are assessed.
They reflect the increase in hourly costs in the past two fiscal years
attributable to the approximately 4.78 and 2.42 percent raises
(including the locality adjustment for Washington, DC) in salaries of
employees on the General Schedule that became effective on January 1,
2009, and on January 1, 2010, respectively.
Comments
There were no comments in response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking.
Requirements of the Fee Regulation
Section 594.6--Annual Fee for Administration of the Importer
Registration Program
Section 30141(a)(3) of Title 49, U.S. Code provides that RIs must
pay the annual fee the Secretary of Transportation establishes ``* * *
to pay for the costs of carrying out the registration program for
importers * * *.'' This fee is payable both by new applicants and by
existing RIs. To maintain its registration, each RI, at the time it
submits its annual fee, must also file a statement affirming that the
information it furnished in its registration application (or in later
submissions amending that information) remains correct. 49 CFR
592.5(f).
In compliance with the statutory directive, we reviewed the
existing fees and their bases in an attempt to establish fees that
would be sufficient to recover the costs of carrying out the
registration program for importers for at least the next two fiscal
years. The initial component of the Registration Program Fee is the fee
attributable to processing and acting upon registration applications.
We will increase this fee from $295 to $320 for new applications. We
have also determined that the fee for the review of the annual
statement submitted by existing RIs who wish to renew their
registrations will be increased from $186 to $195. These fee
adjustments reflect our time expenditures in reviewing both new
applications and annual statements with accompanying documentation, as
well as the inflation factor attributable to Federal salary increases
and locality adjustments in the two years since the regulation was last
amended.
We must also recover costs attributable to maintenance of the
registration program that arise from the need for us to review a
registrant's annual statement and to verify the continuing validity of
information already submitted. These costs also include anticipated
costs attributable to the possible revocation or suspension of
registrations and reflect the amount of time that we have devoted to
those matters in the past two years.
Based upon our review of these costs, the portion of the fee
attributable to the maintenance of the registration program is
approximately $475 for each RI, an increase of $10. When this $475 is
added to the $320 representing the registration application component,
the cost to an applicant comes to $795, which is the fee we are
adopting. This represents an increase of $35 over the existing fee.
When the $475 is added to the $195 representing the annual statement
component, the total cost to an RI renewing its registration comes to
$670, which represents an increase of $19.
Section 594.6(h) enumerates indirect costs associated with
processing the annual renewal of RI registrations. The provision states
that these costs represent a pro rata allocation of the average salary
and benefits of employees who process the annual statements and perform
related functions, and ``a pro rata allocation of the costs
attributable to maintaining the office space, and the computer or word
processor.'' The indirect costs that were previously calculated and are
now being applied at $20.31 per man-hour (73 FR 54983, Sep. 24, 2008)
are being increased by $0.36, to $20.67. This increase is based on the
difference between enacted budgetary costs within the Department of
Transportation for the last two fiscal years, which were higher than
the estimates used when the fee schedule was last amended, and takes
account of further projected increases over the next two fiscal years.
Sections 594.7, 594.8--Fees To Cover Agency Costs in Making Importation
Eligibility Decisions
Section 30141(a)(3) also requires RIs to pay other fees the
Secretary of Transportation establishes to cover the costs of ``* * *
(B) making the decisions under this subchapter.'' This includes
decisions on whether the vehicle sought to be imported is substantially
similar to a motor vehicle that was originally manufactured for
importation into and sale in the United States and certified by its
original manufacturer as complying with all applicable FMVSS, and
whether the vehicle is capable of being readily altered to meet those
standards. Alternatively, where there is no substantially similar U.S.-
certified motor vehicle, the decision is whether the safety features of
the vehicle comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply
with, the FMVSS based on destructive test information or such other
evidence that NHTSA deems to be adequate. These decisions are made in
response to petitions submitted by RIs or manufacturers, or on the
Administrator's own initiative.
The fee for a vehicle imported under an eligibility decision made
in response to a petition is payable in part by the petitioner and in
part by other importers. The fee to be charged for each vehicle is the
estimated pro rata share of the costs in making all the eligibility
decisions in a fiscal year. Inflation and General Schedule raises must
also be taken into account in the computation of costs.
The agency believes that the volume of petition-based imports for
the next two fiscal years should not be projected on the basis of any
single year. The agency estimates the number of vehicles that will be
imported under an import eligibility petition in each year for Fiscal
Years 2011 and 2012 will equal the average number of such imports over
that past five years. Further, the agency estimates the number of
import eligibility petitions that will be filed in each year for Fiscal
Years 2011 and 2012 will equal the average number of petitions filed
each year since 2000. Based on these estimates, we project that 554
vehicles would be imported under petition-based eligibility decisions
and that 25 petition-based import eligibility decisions would be made.
Based on these estimates, we project that for Fiscal Years 2011 and
2012, the agency's costs for processing these 25 petitions will be
$95,479. The petitioners will pay $8,125 of that amount in the
processing fees that accompanied the filing of their
[[Page 48610]]
petitions, leaving the remaining $87,354 to be recovered from the
importers of the 554 vehicles imported under petition-based import
eligibility decisions. Dividing $87,354 by 554 yields a pro rata fee of
$158 for each vehicle imported under an eligibility decision that
resulted from the granting of a petition. We are therefore decreasing
the pro rata share of petition costs that are to be assessed against
the importer of each vehicle by $40, from $198 to $158. The same $158
fee would be paid regardless of whether the vehicle was petitioned
under 49 CFR 593.6(a), based on the substantial similarity of the
vehicle to a U.S.-certified model, or was petitioned under 49 CFR
593.6(b), based on the safety features of the vehicle complying with,
or being capable of being modified to comply with, all applicable
FMVSS.
We are not increasing the current fee of $175 that covers the
initial processing of a ``substantially similar'' petition. We are also
maintaining the existing fee of $800 to cover the initial costs for
processing petitions for vehicles that have no substantially similar
U.S.-certified counterparts.
In the event that a petitioner requests an inspection of a vehicle,
the fee for such an inspection will remain $827 for vehicles that are
the subject of either type of petition.
The importation fee varies depending upon the basis on which the
vehicle is determined to be eligible. For vehicles covered by an
eligibility decision on the agency's own initiative (other than
vehicles imported from Canada that are covered by import eligibility
numbers VSA-80 through 83, for which no eligibility decision fee is
assessed), the fee remains $125. NHTSA determined that the costs
associated with previous eligibility decisions on the agency's own
initiative will be fully recovered by October 1, 2010. We will apply
the fee of $125 per vehicle only to vehicles covered by determinations
made by the agency on its own initiative on or after October 1, 2010.
Section 594.9--Fee for Reimbursement of Bond Processing Costs and Costs
for Processing Offers of Cash Deposits or Obligations of the United
States in Lieu of Sureties on Bonds
Section 30141(a)(3) also requires an RI to pay any other fees the
Secretary of Transportation establishes ``* * * to pay for the costs
of--(A) processing bonds provided to the Secretary of the Treasury * *
*.'' Under Section 30141(d), the bond is provided at the time a
nonconforming vehicle is imported to ensure that the vehicle will be
brought into compliance within 120 days, as required by 49 CFR
591.8(d)(1), or if the vehicle is not brought into compliance within
such time, that it be exported, without cost to the United States, or
abandoned to the United States. See Section 30141(d)(1)(B).
The Department of Homeland Security (Customs) administers the
functions associated with the processing of these bonds. The statute
contemplates that we will make a reasonable determination of the cost
that Customs incurs in processing the bonds. In essence, the cost to
Customs is based upon an estimate of the time that a GS-9, Step 5
employee spends on each entry, which Customs has judged to be 20
minutes.
Based on General Schedule salary and locality raises that were
effective in January 2009 and 2010 and the inclusion of costs for
benefits, we are decreasing the processing fee by $0.30, from $10.23
per bond to $9.93. This decrease reflects the fact that GS-9 salaries
were increased by a smaller amount than we previously projected when we
last amended the fee schedule in 2008. This fee will reflect the direct
and indirect costs that are actually associated with processing the
bonds.
In lieu of sureties on a DOT conformance bond, an importer may
offer United States money, United States bonds (except for savings
bonds), United States certificates of indebtedness, Treasury notes, or
Treasury bills (collectively referred to as ``cash deposits'') in an
amount equal to the amount of the bond. 49 CFR 591.10(a). The receipt,
processing, handling, and disbursement of the cash deposits that have
been tendered by RIs cause the agency to consume a considerable amount
of staff time and material resources. NHTSA has concluded that the
expense incurred by the agency to receive, process, handle, and
disburse cash deposits may be treated as part of the bond processing
cost, for which NHTSA is authorized to set a fee under 49 U.S.C.
30141(a)(3)(A). We first established a fee of $459 for each vehicle
imported on and after October 1, 2008, for which cash deposits or
obligations of the United States are furnished in lieu of a conformance
bond. See final rule published on July 11, 2008 at 73 FR 39890.
The agency considered its direct and indirect costs in calculating
the fee for the review, processing, handling, and disbursement of cash
deposits submitted by importers and RIs in lieu of sureties on a DOT
conformance bond. We are increasing the fee $55, from $459 to $514. The
factors that the agency has taken into account for this fee include
time expended by agency personnel, the increase in General Schedule
salary raises that were effective in January 2009 and 2010, and
increased contractor and overhead costs.
Section 594.10--Fee for Review and Processing of Conformity Certificate
Each RI is currently required to pay $14 per vehicle to cover the
costs the agency incurs in reviewing a certificate of conformity. We
have found that these costs have increased to an average of $17 per
vehicle because of increased contractor and overhead costs. Based on
these costs, we are increasing the fee charged for vehicles for which a
paper entry and fee payment is made, from $14 to $17, a difference of
$3 per vehicle. However, if an RI enters a vehicle through the ABI
system, has an e-mail address to receive communications from NHTSA, and
pays the fee by credit card, the cost savings that we realize allow us
to significantly reduce the fee to $6. We are maintaining the fee of $6
per vehicle if all the information in the ABI entry is correct.
Errors in ABI entries not only eliminate any time savings, but also
require additional staff time to be expended in reconciling the
erroneous ABI entry information with the conformity data that is
ultimately submitted. Our experience with these errors has shown that
staff members must examine records, make time-consuming long distance
telephone calls, and often consult supervisory personnel to resolve the
conflicts in the data. We have calculated this staff and supervisory
time, as well the telephone charges, to amount to approximately $57 for
each erroneous ABI entry. Adding this to the $6 fee for the review of
conformity packages on automated entries yields a total of $63,
representing a $9 increase in the fee that is currently charged when
there are one or more errors in the ABI entry or omissions in the
statement of conformity.
Statutory Basis for the Final Rule and Effective Date
NHTSA is required under 49 U.S.C. 30141(e) to ``review and make
appropriate adjustments at least every 2 years in the amounts of the
fees'' relating to the registration of importers, the processing of
bonds, and making decisions concerning the importation of nonconforming
vehicles. The statute further requires the agency to ``establish the
fees for each fiscal year before the beginning of that year.'' This
final rule implements the statutory provisions. In the NPRM, we
proposed to make this rule effective October 1, 2010, and did not
receive any comments on this issue.
[[Page 48611]]
Accordingly, the effective date of this final rule is October 1, 2010.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR
51735, Oct. 4, 1993), provides for making determinations whether a
regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) review and to the requirements of the
Executive Order. The Order defines a ``significant regulatory action''
as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
NHTSA has considered the impact of this rulemaking action under
Executive Order 12866 and the Department of Transportation's regulatory
policies and procedures. This rulemaking is not significant.
Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this
rulemaking document under Executive Order 12886. Based on the level of
the fees and the volume of affected vehicles, NHTSA currently
anticipates that the costs of the final rule would be so minimal as not
to warrant preparation of a full regulatory evaluation. The action does
not involve any substantial public interest or controversy. There would
be no substantial effect upon State and local governments. There would
be no substantial impact upon a major transportation safety program. A
regulatory evaluation analyzing the economic impact of the final rule
establishing the registered importer program, adopted on September 29,
1989, was prepared, and is available for review in the docket.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBFEFA) of 1996, whenever an agency is required to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and
make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis
that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions).
The Small Business Administration's regulations at 13 CFR Part 121
define a small business, in part, as a business entity ``which operates
primarily within the United States.'' (13 CFR 121.105(a). No regulatory
flexibility analysis is required if the head of an agency certifies
that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to provide a statement of
the factual basis for certifying that a rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The agency has considered the effects of this rulemaking under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, and certifies that the adopted amendments
will not have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number
of small entities.
The following is NHTSA's statement providing the factual basis for
the certification (5 U.S.C. 605(b)). The adopted amendments will
primarily affect entities that currently modify nonconforming vehicles
and which are small businesses within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act; however, the agency has no reason to believe that
these companies would be unable to pay the fees adopted in this
rulemaking action. In most instances, these fees would not be changed
or be only modestly increased (and in some instances decreased) from
the fees previously being paid by these entities. Moreover, consistent
with prevailing industry practices, these fees should be passed through
to the ultimate purchasers of the vehicles that are altered and, in
most instances, sold by the affected registered importers. The cost to
owners or purchasers of nonconforming vehicles that are altered to
conform to the FMVSS may be expected to increase (or decrease) to the
extent necessary to reimburse the registered importer for the fees
payable to the agency for the cost of carrying out the registration
program and making eligibility decisions, and to compensate Customs for
its bond processing costs.
Governmental jurisdictions will not be affected at all since they
are generally neither importers nor purchasers of nonconforming motor
vehicles.
C. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Executive Order 13132 on ``Federalism'' requires NHTSA to develop
an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
Federalism implications.'' Executive Order 13132 defines the term
``policies that have federalism implications'' to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, NHTSA may not issue a
regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless
the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or NHTSA
consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation.
The amendments adopted in this final rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government as specified in
Executive Order 13132. Moreover, NHTSA is required by statute to impose
fees for the administration of the RI program and to review and make
necessary adjustments in those fees at least every two years. Thus, the
requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order do not apply to this
rulemaking action.
D. National Environmental Policy Act
NHTSA has analyzed this action for purposes of the National
Environmental Policy Act. The action would not have a significant
effect upon the environment because it is solely concerned with the
adjustment of fees associated with the agency's vehicle importation
program. On account of those fee adjustments, the annual volume of
motor vehicles imported through registered importers is not anticipated
to vary significantly from that existing before promulgation of the
rule.
E. Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice Reform)
Pursuant to Executive Order 12988 ``Civil Justice Reform,'' this
agency has considered whether the amendments adopted in this final rule
will have any
[[Page 48612]]
retroactive effect. NHTSA concludes that those amendments will not have
any retroactive effect. Judicial review of the final rule may be
obtained pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 702. That section does not require that a
petition for reconsideration be filed prior to seeking judicial review.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs,
benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a
Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more
than $100 million annually (adjusted for inflation with the base year
of 1995). Before promulgating a rule for which a written assessment is
needed, Section 205 of the UMRA generally requires NHTSA to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and to
adopt the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of
Section 205 do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable
law. Moreover, Section 205 allows NHTSA to adopt an alternative other
than the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome
alternative if the agency publishes with the final rule an explanation
why that alternative was not adopted. Because this final rule will not
require the expenditure of resources beyond $100 million annually, this
action is not subject to the requirements of Sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information by a Federal agency unless
the collection displays a valid OMB control number. Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information by a Federal agency unless the collection
displays a valid OMB control number. Part 594 includes collections of
information for which NHTSA has obtained OMB Clearance No. 2127-0002, a
consolidated collection of information for ``Importation of Vehicles
and Equipment Subject to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety, Bumper and
Theft Prevention Standards,'' approved through 11/30/2010. This final
rule would not affect the burden hours associated with Clearance No.
2127-0002 because we are only adjusting the fees associated with
participating in the registered importer program. These proposed new
fees will not impose new collection of information requirements or
otherwise affect the scope of the program.
H. Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045 applies to any rule that (1) is determined to
be ``economically significant'' as defined under Executive Order 12866,
and (2) concerns an environmental, health, or safety risk that NHTSA
has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children.
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, we must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on children,
and explain why the planned rule is preferable to other potentially
effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by us. This
rulemaking is not economically significant and does not concern an
environmental, health, or safety risk.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272)
directs NHTSA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies, such as the Society of Automotive
Engineers (SAE). The NTTAA directs the agency to provide Congress,
through the OMB, explanations when we decide not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus standards.
In this final rule, we are adjusting the fees associated with the
registered importer program. We are making no substantive changes to
the program nor do we adopt any technical standards. For these reasons,
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA would not apply.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all submissions
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment or petition (or signing the comment or petition,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-78).
K. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
The Department of Transportation assigns a regulation identifier
number (RIN) to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service Center
publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year. You may
use the RIN that appears in the heading on the first page of this
document to find this action in the Unified Agenda.
In consideration of the foregoing, Part 594, Schedule of Fees
Authorized by 49 U.S.C. 30141, in Title 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended as follows:
List of Subjects in 49 CFR part 594
Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor vehicles.
PART 594--SCHEDULE OF FEES AUTHORIZED BY 49 U.S.C. 30141
0
1. The authority citation for part 594 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141, 31 U.S.C. 9701; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
0
2. Amend Sec. 594.6 by:
0
(a) Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a);
0
(b) Revising paragraph (b);
0
(c) Revising the first sentence of paragraph (d);
0
(d) Revising the second sentence of paragraph (h); and
0
(e) Revising paragraph (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 594.6 Annual fee for administration of the registration program.
(a) Each person filing an application to be granted the status of a
Registered Importer pursuant to part 592 of this chapter on or after
October 1, 2010, must pay an annual fee of $795, as calculated below,
based upon the direct and indirect costs attributable to:
* * * * *
(b) That portion of the initial annual fee attributable to the
processing of the application for applications filed on and after
October 1, 2010, is $320. The sum of $320, representing this portion,
shall not be refundable if the application is denied or withdrawn.
* * * * *
(d) That portion of the initial annual fee attributable to the
remaining activities of administering the registration program on and
after October 1, 2010, is set forth in paragraph (i) of this section. *
* *
* * * * *
[[Page 48613]]
(h) * * * This cost is $20.67 per man-hour for the period beginning
October 1, 2010.
(i) Based upon the elements and indirect costs of paragraphs (f),
(g), and (h) of this section, the component of the initial annual fee
attributable to administration of the registration program, covering
the period beginning October 1, 2010, is $475. When added to the costs
of registration of $320, as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section,
the costs per applicant to be recovered through the annual fee are
$795. The annual renewal registration fee for the period beginning
October 1, 2010, is $670.
0
3. Amend Sec. 594.7 by revising the first sentence of paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
Sec. 594.7 Fee for filing petitions for a determination whether a
vehicle is eligible for importation.
* * * * *
(e) For petitions filed on and after October 1, 2010, the fee
payable for seeking a determination under paragraph (a)(1) of this
section is $175. * * *
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 594.8 by revising the first sentence of paragraph (b)
and the first sentence of (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 594.8 Fee for importing a vehicle pursuant to a determination by
the Administrator.
* * * * *
(b) If a determination has been made pursuant to a petition, the
fee for each vehicle is $158. * * *
(c) If a determination has been made on or after October 1, 2010,
pursuant to the Administrator's initiative, the fee for each vehicle is
$125. * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 594.9 by revising paragraph (c) and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 594.9 Fee for reimbursement of bond processing costs and costs
for processing offers of cash deposits or obligations of the United
States in lieu of sureties on bonds.
* * * * *
(c) The bond processing fee for each vehicle imported on and after
October 1, 2010, for which a certificate of conformity is furnished, is
$9.93.
* * * * *
(e) The fee for each vehicle imported on and after October 1, 2010,
for which cash deposits or obligations of the United States are
furnished in lieu of a conformance bond, is $514.
0
6. Amend Sec. 594.10 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 594.10 Fee for review and processing of conformity certificate.
* * * * *
(d) The review and processing fee for each certificate of
conformity submitted on and after October 1, 2010 is $17. However, if
the vehicle covered by the certificate has been entered electronically
with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through the Automated
Broker Interface and the registered importer submitting the certificate
has an e-mail address, the fee for the certificate is $6, provided that
the fee is paid by a credit card issued to the registered importer. If
NHTSA finds that the information in the entry or the certificate is
incorrect, requiring further processing, the processing fee shall be
$57.
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator for The National Center for Statistics and
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2010-19771 Filed 8-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P