[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51027-51030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20458]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. IC10-917-001 and IC10-918-001]
Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-917 and FERC-
918) \1\; Comment Request; Submitted for OMB Review
August 12, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This Notice in Docket Nos. IC10-917 and IC10-918 and the
corresponding clearance package and request to OMB for a three-year
extension of the existing regulations are separate activities from
pending Docket No. RM10-23 and the associated OMB clearance package.
FERC has a separate, pending Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NOPR) in Docket No. RM10-23, that includes proposals affecting the
FERC-917. The NOPR in Docket No. RM10-23 and the corresponding OMB
clearance package were submitted to OMB (ICR No. 201006-1902-001)
for review on 6/30/2010. Comments on Docket No. RM10-23 should be
submitted in that docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) has submitted the
information collections described below to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review of the information collection requirements. Any
interested person may file comments directly with OMB and should
address a copy of those comments to the Commission as explained below.
The Commission issued a Notice in the Federal Register (75 FR 30008, 5/
28/2010) requesting public comments. FERC received no comments on the
FERC-917 and FERC-918 and has made this notation in its submission to
OMB.\1\
[[Page 51028]]
DATES: Comments on the collections of information are due by September
17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address comments on the collections of information to the
Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Desk Officer.
Comments to OMB should be filed electronically, c/o [email protected] and include OMB Control Number 1902-0233 for
reference. For comments that pertain to only one of the collections,
specify the appropriate collection. The Desk Officer may be reached by
telephone at 202-395-4638.
A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission and should refer to Docket Nos. IC10-917-001 and
IC10-918-001. (If comments apply to only one of the collections,
indicate the docket and the collection number.) Comments may be filed
either electronically or in paper format. Those persons filing
electronically do not need to make a paper filing. Documents filed
electronically via the Internet must be prepared in an acceptable
filing format and in compliance with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission submission guidelines. Complete filing instructions and
acceptable filing formats are available at http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide/electronic-media.asp. To file the document
electronically, access the Commission's Web site and click on Documents
& Filing, E-Filing (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp), and
then follow the instructions for each screen. First time users will
have to establish a user name and password. The Commission will send an
automatic acknowledgement to the sender's e-mail address upon receipt
of comments.
For paper filings, the comments should be submitted to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, and should refer to Docket Nos.
IC10-917-001 and IC10-918-001.
Users interested in receiving automatic notification of activity in
FERC Docket Numbers IC10-917 and IC10-918 may do so through
eSubscription at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp. All
comments may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the Internet
through FERC's homepage using the ``eLibrary'' link. For user
assistance, contact [email protected], or call toll-free at
(866) 208-3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at [email protected], by telephone at (202) 502-8663, and by fax
at (202) 273-0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 17, 2007, the Commission issued
Order No. 890 to address and remedy opportunities for undue
discrimination under the pro forma Open Access Transmission Tariff
(OATT) adopted in 1996 by Order No. 888.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-
discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery
of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities,
Order No. 888, 61 FR 21540 (May 10, 1996), FERC Stats. & Regs. ]
31,036 (1996), order on reh'g, Order No. 888-A, 62 FR 12274 (Mar.
14, 1997), FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,048 (1997), order on reh'g,
Order No. 888-B, 81 FERC ] 61,248 (1997), order on reh'g, Order No.
888-C, 82 FERC ] 61,046 (1998), aff'd in relevant part sub nom.
Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. FERC, 225 F.3d 667 (D.C.
Cir. 2000), aff'd sub nom. New York v. FERC, 535 U.S. 1 (2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through Order No. 890, the Commission:
(1) Adopted pro forma OATT provisions necessary to keep imbalance
charges closely related to incremental costs;
(2) Increased nondiscriminatory access to the grid by requiring
public utilities, working through the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation (NERC), to develop consistent methodologies for
available transfer capability (ATC) calculation and to publish those
methodologies to increase transparency.
(3) Required an open, transparent, and coordinated transmission
planning process, thereby increasing the ability of customers to access
new generating resources and promote efficient utilization of
transmission.
(4) Required both the transmission provider's merchant function and
network customers to include a statement with each application for
network service or to designate a new network resource that attests,
for each network resource identified, that the transmission customer
owns or has committed to purchase the designated network resource and
the designated network resource comports with the requirements for
designated network resources.
(5) Gave the right to customers to request from transmission
providers studies addressing congestion and/or integration of new
resource loads in areas of the transmission system where they have
encountered transmission problems due to congestion or where they
believe upgrades and other investments may be necessary to reduce
congestion and to integrate new resources. The network customer
includes this attestation in the customer's comment section of the
request when it confirms the request on the Open Access Same-Time
Information System (OASIS).
(6) Required with regard to capacity reassignment that: (a) All
sales or assignments of capacity be conducted through or otherwise
posted on the transmission provider's OASIS on or before the date the
reassigned service commences; (b) assignees of transmission capacity
execute a service agreement prior to the date on which the reassigned
service commences; and (c) transmission providers aggregate and
summarize in an electric quarterly report the data contained in these
service agreements.
(7) Adopted an operational penalties annual filing that provides
information regarding the penalty revenue the transmission provider has
received and distributed.
(8) Required creditworthiness information to be included in a
transmission provider's OATT. Attachment L must specify the qualitative
and quantitative criteria that the transmission provider uses to
determine the level of secured and unsecured credit required.
The Commission required a NERC/NAESB \3\ team to draft and review
Order No. 890 reliability standards and business practices. The team
was to solicit comment from each utility on developed standards and
practices and utilities were to implement each, after Commission
approval. Public utilities, working through NERC, were to revise
reliability standards to require the exchange of data and coordination
among transmission providers and, working through NAESB, were to
develop complementary business practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ NAESB is the North American Energy Standards Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Required OASIS postings included:
(1) Explanations for changes in ATC values;
(2) Capacity benefit margin (CBM) reevaluations and quarterly
postings;
(3) OASIS metrics and accepted/denied requests;
(4) Planning redispatch offers and reliability redispatch data;
(5) Curtailment data;
(6) Planning and system impact studies;
(7) Metrics for system impact studies; and
(8) All rules.
Incorporating the Order No. 890 standards into the Commission's
[[Page 51029]]
regulations benefits wholesale electric customers by streamlining
utility business practices, transactional processes, and OASIS
procedures, and by adopting a formal ongoing process for reviewing and
upgrading the Commission's OASIS standards and other electric industry
business practices. These practices and procedures benefit from the
implementation of generic industry standards.
The Commission's Order No. 890 regulations can be found in 18 CFR
35.28 (pro forma tariff requirements), and 37.6 and 37.7 (OASIS
requirements).
Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current FERC-917 and FERC-918 reporting requirements, with no change.
Burden Statement: FERC-917 and FERC-918 are both included in OMB
Control Number 1902-0233. The estimated annual public reporting burdens
for FERC-917 (requirements in 18 CFR 35.28) and FERC-918 (requirements
in 18 CFR 37.6 and 37.7) are reduced from the original estimates made
three years ago. The reductions are due to the incorporation and
completion of: (1) One-time pro forma tariff changes by utilities in
existence at that time; (2) completed development and comment
solicitation of the required NERC/NAESB reliability standards and
business practices; and (3) the transfer of burden associated with the
implementation of some of the NERC/NAESB business practices, in Order
No. 729, issued November 11, 2009,\4\ to the Commission's FERC-725A
information collection (OMB Control Number 1902-0244). The estimated
annual figures follow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Calculation of
Available Transfer Capability, Capacity Benefit Margins,
Transmission Reliability Margins, Total Transfer Capability, and
Existing Transmission Commitments and Mandatory Reliability
Standards for the Bulk-Power System, Order No. 729, 74 FR 64884
(Dec. 3, 2009) 129 FERC ] 61,155.
The FERC-725A requirements (Mandatory Reliability Standards for
the Bulk-Power System, which now includes the utilities'
implementation) are separate and are not a subject of this Notice in
Docket Nos. IC10-917 and IC10-918. The FERC-725A reporting and
recordkeeping requirements in Order 729 (Docket No. RM08-19, et al.)
were approved by OMB (in ICR Number 200912-1902-005) on 3/12/2010.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual number of Average number Average burden Total annual
FERC Information collection respondents of responses per hours per burden hours (1)
(1) respondent (2) response (3) x (2) x (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18 CFR 35.28 (FERC-917)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conforming tariff changes............... 6 1 25 150
Revision of Imbalance Charges........... 6 1 5 30
ATC revisions........................... 6 1 40 240
Planning (Attachment K)................. 134 1 100 13,400
Congestion studies...................... 134 1 300 40,200
Attestation of network resource 134 1 1 134
commitment.............................
Capacity reassignment................... 134 1 100 13,400
Operational Penalty annual filing....... 134 1 10 1,340
Creditworthiness--include criteria in 6 1 40 240
the tariff.............................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-917--Sub Total Part 35......... ................ ................ ................ 69,134
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18 CFR 37.6 & 37.7 (FERC-918)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATC-related standards:
NERC/NAESB Team to develop.......... 0 0 0 0
Review and comment by utility....... 0 0 0 0
Implementation by each utility \4\.. 0 0 0 \4\ 0
Mandatory data exchanges................ 134 1 80 10,720
Explanation of change of ATC values..... 134 1 100 13,400
Reevaluate CBM and post quarterly....... 134 1 20 2,680
Post OASIS metrics; requests accepted/ 134 1 90 12,060
denied.................................
Post planning redispatch offers and 134 1 20 2,680
reliability redispatch data............
Post curtailment data................... 134 1 10 1,340
Post Planning and System Impact Studies. 134 1 5 670
Posting of metrics for System Impact 134 1 100 13,400
Studies................................
Post all rules to OASIS................. 134 1 5 670
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-918--Sub Total of Part 37 ................ ................ ................ 57,620
Reporting Requirements.............
FERC-918--Recordkeeping Requirements.... 134 1 40 5,360
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-918--Sub Total of Reporting and ................ ................ ................ 62,980
Recordkeeping Requirements.........
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total FERC-917 and FERC-918 ................ ................ ................ 132,114
(Part 35 + Part 37, Reporting
and Recordkeeping Requirements)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total combined annual burden for FERC-917 and FERC-918 is 132,114 hours
(126,754 reporting hours + 5,360 recordkeeping hours). This is a
reduction of 24,922 hours from the combined FERC-917 and FERC-918
burden OMB previously approved.
[[Page 51030]]
Total combined estimated annual cost for FERC-917 and FERC-918 is
$21,941,076.\5\ This includes:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Using the hourly rate figures of the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, occupational series and market rates as applicable, the
hourly rate is a composite of the respondents who will be
responsible for implementing and responding to the collection of
information (support staff, engineering, and legal).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Reporting costs of $14,449,956; (126,754 hours @ $114 an hour
(average cost of attorney ($200 per hour), consultant ($150), technical
($80), and administrative support ($25)) and
(2) Recordkeeping (labor and storage) costs of $7,491,120 (labor =
$91,120 [for 5,360 hours x $17/hour (file/record clerk @ $17 an hour)]
and off-site storage costs = $7,400,000 (8,000 sq. ft. x $925/sq.
ft.)).
The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to the collections of information;
(5) searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the
collections of information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise
disclosing the information.
The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
any one particular function or activity.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimates of the
burden of the proposed collections of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collections of information
on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-20458 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P