[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61356-61358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24925]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 261
[EPA-R06-RCRA-2008-0418; SW-FRL-9209-8]
Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On July 31, 2009, EPA published a direct final action granting
a petition submitted by WRB Refining, LLC Company to exclude (or
delist) the thermal desorber residual solids with Hazardous Waste
Numbers: F037, F038, K048, K049, K050, and K051. In the July 31, 2009
rule, EPA inadvertently recorded the arsenic delisting level as 0.0129
mg/l. The arsenic delisting limit should be 1.29 mg/l. We are making
this correction in this document.
DATES: This action is effective October 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Peace (214) 665-7430, or e-
mail her at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA published an approval for 5,000 cubic
yards of thermal desorber residual solids. The arsenic delisting
exclusion limit in the direct final rule is incorrect. Therefore, in
this correction notice we are correcting the arsenic value limit and
correcting it in Table 1 of appendix IX to part 261--Waste Excluded
Under Sec. Sec. 260.20 and 260.22. Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for
good cause finds that notice and public procedures are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a
rule without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is such good cause for making today's rule
final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because we are
merely correcting the error which was included in a previous action.
Thus, notice and public procedure are unnecessary.
[[Page 61357]]
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this rule is not of general applicability
and therefore is not a regulatory action subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) because it applies to a
particular facility only. Because this rule is of particular
applicability relating to a particular facility, it is not subject to
the regulatory flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or to sections 202, 204, and 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Because
this rule will affect only a particular facility, it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as specified in
section 203 of UMRA. Because this rule will affect only a particular
facility, this proposed rule does not have federalism implications. It
will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply
to this rule. Similarly, because this rule will affect only a
particular facility, this proposed rule does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. This
rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant as
defined in Executive Order 12866, and because the Agency does not have
reason to believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed by
this action present a disproportionate risk to children. The basis for
this belief is that the Agency used the DRAS program, which considers
health and safety risks to infants and children, to calculate the
maximum allowable concentrations for this rule. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001)), because it is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866. This rule does not involve technical
standards; thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform,'' (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule,
EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take
effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report
which includes a copy of the rule to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 804 exempts from
section 801 the following types of rules (1) Rules of particular
applicability; (2) rules relating to agency management or personnel;
and (3) rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice that do
not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not required to submit a rule report
regarding this action under section 801 because this is a rule of
particular applicability. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to make
a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. As stated
previously, we made such a good cause finding, including the reasons
therefore and established an effective date of October 5, 2010. This
correction to the WRB Refining, LLC, located in Borger, TX exclusion is
not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804 et seq (2).
Lists of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 261
Environmental protection, Hazardous waste, Recycling, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: Sec. 3001(f) RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6921(f).
Dated: September 23, 2010.
Bill Luthans,
Acting Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 261 is amended as
follows:
PART 261--IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
0
1. The authority citation for Part 261 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921, 6922, and 6938.
0
2. In Tables 1 of Appendix IX to Part 261 revise paragraph (1) of the
entry for ``WRB Refining LLC'' the following waste stream in
alphabetical order by facility to read as follows:
Appendix IX to Part 261--Wastes Excluded Under Sec. Sec. 260.20 and
260.22
Table 1--Waste Excluded From Non-Specific Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility Address Waste description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
WRB Refining, LLC............. Borger, TX....... (1) Delisting Levels:
All concentrations
for those
constituents must
not exceed the
maximum allowable
concentrations in mg/
l specified in this
paragraph.
Thermal Desorber
Residual Solid
Leachable
Concentrations (mg/
l): Antimony--0.165;
Arsenic--1.29;
Barium--54.8;
Beryllium--0.119;
Cadmium--0.139;
Chromium--3.23;
Chromium,
Hexavalent--3.23;
Cobalt--20.7;
Copper--38.6;
Cyanide--4.69; Lead--
1.07; Mercury--
0.104; Nickel--20.6;
Selenium--1.0;
Silver--5.0; Tin--
3790.00; Vanadium--
1.46; Zinc--320.0.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 61358]]
[FR Doc. 2010-24925 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P