[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62765-62766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-838]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Changed-Circumstances Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) has determined, 
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), that Meghmani Pigments is the successor-in-interest to Alpanil 
Industries.

DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerrold Freeman or Richard Rimlinger, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; (202) 482-0180 or (202) 
482-4477, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 30, 2010, and in accordance with section 751(b) of the 
Act, 19 CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3), we preliminarily found 
that Meghmani Pigments is the successor-in-interest to Alpanil 
Industries. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed-Circumstances Review, 75 FR 52930 
(August 30, 2010). Although we gave interested parties an opportunity 
to comment on the preliminary results, we received no comments.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is carbazole violet pigment 23 
identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-30-
1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3',2'-m] \1\ 
triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, 15-diethyl-5, 15-dihydro-, and 
molecular formula of 
C34H22Cl2N4O2. 
The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., 
dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the form of 
presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., pigment 
dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included 
within the scope of the order. The merchandise subject to the order is 
classifiable under subheading 3204.17.90.40 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description 
of the scope of the order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-
b:3',2'-m], is not business-proprietary information. In this case, 
the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review

    For the reasons stated in the preliminary results, we continue to 
find that Meghmani Pigments is the successor-in-interest to Alpanil 
Industries and, as a result, should be accorded the same antidumping 
duty treatment as Alpanil Industries. Accordingly, effective on the 
date of publication of these final results in the Federal Register, we 
will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect cash 
deposits for estimated

[[Page 62766]]

antidumping duties of 58.90 percent, the weighted-average percentage 
dumping margin we found for Alpanil Industries in the most recently 
completed review. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 38076 (July 1, 
2010).
    Notification
    This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written notification of 
the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective 
order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216 and 19 CFR 351.221.

    Dated: October 6, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-25777 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P