[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66007-66008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27164]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
[Docket Nos. PRM-50-93 and PRM-50-95; NRC-2009-0554]
Mark Edward Leyse; Mark Edward Leyse and Raymond Shadis, on
Behalf of the New England Coalition; Petitions for Rulemaking
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of consolidation of petitions for rulemaking and re-
opening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is publishing for
public comment a notice of consolidation of petitions for rulemaking
(PRM). The PRMs to be consolidated are PRM-50-93 filed by Mark Edward
Leyse on November 17, 2009, and PRM-50-95 filed on June 7, 2010, by
Mark Edward Leyse and Raymond Shadis, on behalf of the New England
Coalition (the Petitioners). PRM-50-95 was docketed by the NRC on
September 30, 2010. In PRM-50-95, the Petitioners request that the NRC
order Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (Vermont Yankee) to lower
the licensing basis peak cladding temperature in order to provide a
necessary margin of safety in the event of a loss-of-coolant accident
(LOCA). The NRC is considering PRM-50-95 in conjunction with existing
PRM-50-93 that the NRC is reviewing on the same issues, and is re-
opening the public comment period to consider the matters raised by
PRM-50-95.
DATES: Submit comments by November 26, 2010. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC
is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID NRC-2009-0554 in the subject line
of your comments. For instructions on submitting comments and accessing
documents related to this action, see ``Submitting Comments and
Accessing Information'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. You may submit comments by any one of the following
methods.
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and
search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC-2009-0554. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher, 301-492-3668, e-mail
[email protected].
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
E-mail comments to: [email protected]. If you do not
receive a reply e-mail confirming that we have received your comments,
contact us directly at 301-415-1677.
Hand-deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays (telephone 301-
415-1677).
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at
301-415-1101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules,
Announcements, and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative
Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, Telephone: 301-492-3667 or Toll Free: 800-
368-5642.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments and Requesting Information
Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be posted
on the NRC Web site and on the Federal Rulemaking Web site, http://www.regulations.gov. Because your comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information, the NRC cautions you against
including any information in your submission that you do not want to be
publicly disclosed. The NRC requests that any party soliciting or
aggregating comments received from other persons for submission to the
NRC inform those persons that the NRC will not edit their comments to
remove any identifying or contact information, and therefore, they
should not include any information in their comments that they do not
want publicly disclosed.
You can access publicly available documents related to this action
using the following methods:
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have
copied for a fee publicly available documents by the NRC's PDR, Room O-
1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS):
[[Page 66008]]
Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC, including
petitions for rulemaking PRM-50-93 (ADAMS Accession No. ML093290250)
and PRM-50-95 (ADAMS Accession No. ML101610121), are available
electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain
entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of NRC's public
documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems
in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's PDR
Reference staff at 800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to
[email protected].
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public comments and supporting
materials related to this action, including the petitions for
rulemaking, can be found at http://www.regulations.gov by searching on
Docket ID NRC-2009-0554.
Summary of PRM-50-93
Mark Edward Leyse submitted a petition for rulemaking dated
November 17, 2009. Mr. Leyse states that he is aware that data from
multi-rod (assembly) severe fuel damage experiments indicates that the
current regulations in 10 CFR Part 50 are non-conservative in their
peak cladding temperature limit of 2200 [deg]F, and that the Baker-Just
and Cathcart-Pawel equations are also non-conservative for calculating
the metal-water reaction rates that would occur in the event of a LOCA.
As a result, Mr. Leyse requests that the NRC revise its regulations in
10 CFR 50.46(b)(1) and Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50 based on this data.
Mr. Leyse also requests that the NRC promulgate a regulation that will
stipulate minimum allowable core reflood rates in the event of a LOCA.
The NRC determined that the petition met the threshold sufficiency
requirements for a petition for rulemaking under 10 CFR 2.802, and the
petition was docketed as PRM-50-93. The NRC published a notice of
receipt on January 25, 2010 (75 FR 3876), and requested public comment
on PRM-50-93. The comment period closed on April 12, 2010.
Summary of PRM-50-95
On June 7, 2010, Mark Edward Leyse and Raymond Shadis, on behalf of
the New England Coalition, submitted a petition requesting
consideration under the NRC's requirements for a petition for an
enforcement action, which are in 10 CFR 2.206. The Petitioners request
that enforcement action be taken against Vermont Yankee, and that the
NRC order the licensee of Vermont Yankee to lower the licensing basis
peak cladding temperature in order to provide a necessary margin of
safety (to help prevent a meltdown) in the event of a LOCA. The
Petitioners represent the New England Coalition, a non-profit
educational organization based in Brattleboro, Vermont.
The Petitioners offer the following as the basis for their request:
(1) The emergency core cooling system evaluation calculations that
helped qualify the 20 percent uprate for Vermont Yankee are non-
conservative;
(2) The peak cladding temperature limit of 2200 [deg]F used in the
NRC's regulations in Sec. 50.46(b)(1) is non-conservative; and
(3) Experiments indicate that Vermont Yankee's licensing basis peak
cladding temperature of 1960 [deg]F for GE14 fuel would not provide a
necessary margin of safety to help prevent a partial or complete
meltdown in the event of a LOCA.
The petition discusses at length a number of experiments, including
several multi-rod severe fuel damage experiments and a multi-rod
thermal hydraulic experiment, and states that the data indicates that
the licensing basis peak cladding temperature for Vermont Yankee should
be decreased to a temperature lower than 1832 [deg]F in order to
provide a necessary margin of safety. The petition attachments include
additional data in support of the discussion on these experiments.
The NRC's Consideration and Conclusion
The petition request was referred to the NRC's Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation's enforcement Petition Review Board (PRB) and on
June 23, 2010, the Petitioners participated in a teleconference with
the PRB to provide information in support of the petition. A transcript
of this teleconference is available at ADAMS Accession No. ML101890014.
The PRB's initial recommendation was that the petition did not meet the
criteria for reviewing petitions under 10 CFR 2.206, because there is
another NRC proceeding in which the Petitioners could be a party and
through which the NRC could address their concerns.
On July 26, 2010, the Petitioners participated in another
teleconference with the PRB during which the initial recommendation was
discussed and the Petitioners provided additional information. The
transcript of this teleconference is available at ADAMS Accession No.
ML102140405. The PRB's final recommendation was that the petition did
not meet the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206 because the
petition submitted generic concerns that would require revisions to
existing NRC regulations. Such concerns are handled through the
petition for rulemaking process in accordance with 10 CFR 2.802. The
PRB noted that Mr. Leyse had previously submitted a petition for
rulemaking on this topic, dated November 17, 2009, and docketed as PRM-
50-93. Therefore, the PRB forwarded the 10 CFR 2.206 petition so that
any additional information contained in the petition could be included
in the review of PRM-50-93. The NRC has determined that the petition
filed by Mr. Leyse and Mr. Shadis on behalf of the New England
Coalition meets the threshold sufficiency requirements for a petition
for rulemaking under 10 CFR 2.802, and the petition has been docketed
as PRM-50-95. The NRC is requesting public comments on the petition for
rulemaking, and has decided to consider any comments received on PRM-
50-95 in conjunction with comments received on the related petition,
PRM-50-93. In order that both petitions for rulemaking can be
considered and resolved in a timely manner, the NRC is limiting the
public comment period for PRM-50-95 to 30 days, and will only be
accepting comments on matters raised in PRM-50-95 during this time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of October 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-27164 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P