[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6689-6693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2979]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5396-N-01]
Sustainable Communities Planning Grant Program Advance Notice and
Request for Comment
AGENCY: Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities, Office of the
Deputy Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Advance notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces HUD's intention to offer funding through
a competition made available as a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)
under its Sustainable Communities Planning Grant Program (Program).
[[Page 6690]]
As part of the Administration's efforts to increase transparency in
government operations and to expand opportunities for stakeholders to
engage in decision-making, HUD is seeking comments on the Program
through this Advance Notice. Feedback received through this process
will permit HUD and its partners to better understand how this Program
can support cooperative regional planning efforts that integrate
housing, transportation, environmental impact, and economic
development. HUD is seeking input from State and local governments,
regional bodies, community development entities, and a broad range of
other stakeholders on how the Program should be structured in order to
have the most meaningful impact on regional planning for sustainable
development.
The goal of the Program is to support multi-jurisdictional regional
planning efforts that integrate housing, economic development, and
transportation decision-making in a manner that empowers jurisdictions
to consider the interdependent challenges of economic growth, social
equity and environmental impact simultaneously. Three funding
categories are being considered:
(1) Funding to support the preparation of Regional Plans for
Sustainable Development that address housing, economic development,
transportation, and environmental quality in an integrated fashion
where such plans do not currently exist;
(2) Funding to support the preparation of more detailed execution
plans and programs to implement existing regional sustainable
development plans (that address housing, economic development,
transportation, and environmental quality in an integrated fashion);
and
(3) Implementation funding to support regions that have regional
sustainable development plans and implementation strategies in place
and need support for a catalytic project or program that demonstrates
commitment to and implementation of the broader plan.
This Program is being initiated in close coordination with the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).
DATES: All comments, to be considered in response to this Advance
Notice, must be received no later than midnight Eastern Standard Time
on Friday, March 12, 2010. Comments will not be accepted after that
date.
ADDRESSES: Electronic responses are preferred and should be addressed
to: [email protected] or may be submitted through the
http://www.hud.gov/sustainability Web site. Written comments may also
be submitted and post-marked by the deadline and addressed to Office of
Sustainable Housing and Communities, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 10180, Washington, DC 20410. HUD
is expanding the opportunity for comment by establishing a Wiki to
encourage public dialogue at the following link: http://www.hud.gov/OSHCwiki.
Outreach Sessions: HUD and its partner agencies will conduct a
series of listening sessions and webcasts to ensure the broadest
possible dissemination of information about the Program and to receive
feedback from interested parties. Further information will be available
at http://www.hud.gov/sustainability shortly after the publication of
this Advance Notice, and through such interactive forums that will be
described on http://www.hud.gov/sustainability.
Availability of Funding and Timelines: This notice invites comments
on the proposed award of funding for the Sustainable Communities
Planning Grant Program. This notice is not a solicitation of proposals
for the Program.
The Program was authorized by the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2010 (Pub. L. 111-117) (the Appropriations Act, approved December 16,
2009). For the Program, $100,000,000 will be made available, through
the NOFA that will follow this Advance Notice, to support the
integration of housing, transportation and land use planning.
The following maximum funding levels are proposed:
Small metropolitan or rural areas. The grant amount
awarded under the Program to an eligible entity that represents a small
metropolitan or rural area with a population of not more than 499,999
may not exceed $2,000,000.
Large metropolitan areas. The grant amount awarded under
the Program to an eligible entity that represents a large metropolitan
area with a population of 500,000 or more may not exceed $5,000,000.
HUD will expect that at least 20 percent of the overall costs of
the projects awarded under this grant will include leveraged funding
from other public, philanthropic and private sources including in-kind
contributions.
Pursuant to the Appropriations Act, not less than $25,000,000 shall
be awarded in the Small Metropolitan Area category.
HUD will award funding by soliciting proposals through a final NOFA
for the Program that will be developed after consideration of comments
obtained through this Advance Notice and in outreach sessions. The
final NOFA will be broadly announced through appropriate and familiar
means and will provide further details on the finalized requirements
and application process, pursuant to and in compliance with all
applicable statutes and regulations, including, but not limited to, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
HUD will set aside approximately $2,000,000 for technical
assistance services to assist the awardees in implementing their
proposals. A separate NOFA will be released describing the process for
obtaining these technical assistance funds. The Appropriations Act also
appropriates $40,000,000 for a Community Planning Challenge (CPC)
Grants Program. HUD will publish a separate NOFA for the CPC program.
It is HUD's intent to meet the following schedule in developing the
NOFA for the Program:
February 16-March 1, 2010--Regional Listening Sessions (locations
and dates to be posted at http://www.hud.gov/sustainability);
Week of March 1, 2010--Web cast Briefings;
March 12, 2010--Comments on Draft Description due C.O.B. to HUD;
Week of April 12, 2010--NOFA published;
Approx. June 5, 2010--Applications due to HUD;
Approx. August 2, 2010--Announcement of Awardees.
I. Background
A top priority of the Administration is to build economically
competitive, healthy, opportunity-rich communities. In the
Appropriations Act, Congress provided a total of $150,000,000 to HUD
for a Sustainable Communities Initiative to improve regional planning
efforts that integrate housing and transportation decisions, and
increase State, regional and local capacity to incorporate livability,
sustainability, and social equity principles into land use and zoning.
Of that total, $100,000,000 is available for regional integrated
planning initiatives, which is the subject of this Advance Notice.
The Sustainable Communities Initiative was conceived to advance
development patterns that achieve improved economic prosperity,
environmental sustainability, and social equity in metropolitan regions
and rural communities. Recognizing the fundamental role that public
investment plays in achieving these outcomes, the
[[Page 6691]]
Administration charged three agencies whose programs impact the
physical form of communities--HUD, DOT, and EPA--to lead the way in
reshaping the role of the Federal government in helping communities
obtain the capacity to embrace a more sustainable future. As a result,
HUD, DOT, and EPA have formed the Partnership for Sustainable
Communities (the Partnership). HUD will take the lead in funding,
evaluating and otherwise supporting integrative regional planning for
sustainable development. DOT will focus on (a) building the capacity of
transportation agencies to integrate their planning and investments
into broader plans and action to promote sustainable development; and
(b) investing in transportation infrastructure that directly supports
sustainable development and livability principles, as discussed below.
EPA will enhance its role as a provider of technical assistance and
developer of environmental sustainability metrics and practices. The
three agencies have made a commitment to coordinate activities,
integrate funding requirements and adopt a common set of performance
metrics for use by grantees. The Partnership is a commitment by these
three Federal agencies to work together to coordinate policies and
programs in support of six Livability Principles:
1. Provide more transportation choices. Develop safe, reliable and
economical transportation choices to decrease household transportation
costs, reduce our nation's dependence on foreign oil, improve air
quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote public health.
2. Promote equitable, affordable housing. Expand location- and
energy-efficient housing choices for people of all ages, incomes, races
and ethnicities to increase mobility, and lower the combined cost of
housing and transportation.
3. Enhance economic competitiveness. Improve economic
competitiveness through reliable and timely access to employment
centers, educational opportunities, services, and other basic needs by
workers as well as expanded business access to markets.
4. Support existing communities. Target Federal funding toward
existing communities--through such strategies as transit-oriented,
mixed-use development and land recycling--to increase community
revitalization, improve the efficiency of public works investments, and
safeguard rural landscapes.
5. Coordinate policies and leverage investment. Align Federal
policies and funding to remove barriers to collaboration, leverage
funding, and increase the accountability and effectiveness of all
levels of government to plan for future growth, including making smart
energy choices such as locally generated renewable energy.
6. Value communities and neighborhoods. Enhance the unique
characteristics of all communities by investing in healthy, safe, and
walkable neighborhoods--rural, urban, or suburban.
The Partnership for Sustainable Communities has observed that
regions that have already adopted a more integrated approach to
regional planning tend to exhibit a variety of desirable qualities
including: More diversified and resilient economies; improved employer
attraction and retention; more opportunities to lead healthier and more
affordable lifestyles; lower per capita public infrastructure costs;
lower vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita and, thus, reduced air
pollution; and lower rates of concentrated poverty. These regions have
built a shared vision for the future that allows greater and more
broad-based support of community development and investment decisions.
However, these effects are not guaranteed, and communities face a
number of competing objectives in these areas. In addition, the best
ways to measure progress are rightly debated as policy goals and
methodologies evolve.
While the benefits of integrated regional planning are numerous,
the incentives, institutions, and funding for such efforts are not
widely available. Decisions made by local jurisdictions about the
locations of housing, shopping, and employment are often disjointed
both within and across jurisdictions and are, therefore, unable to
incorporate either the impact on accessibility to different types of
destinations or the broader impact on mobility and livability in a
region. This fragmented approach results in a host of unintended
consequences including: Spatial mismatch between affordable housing and
opportunities for employment and education; long and expensive
commutes; permanent loss of agricultural land; reduced water quality in
streams, lakes, and other water bodies; higher emissions of greenhouse
gasses and other damaging pollutants.
Despite the presence of Metropolitan Planning Organizations,
Councils of Governments, and other regional planning entities, there is
too often a misalignment of transportation, housing, and infrastructure
systems due in part to the lack of coordination when plans by different
agencies are prepared separately. While separate resources may be
available for housing, economic development, water infrastructure, and
transportation planning, few funding sources help communities address
challenges and opportunities in an integrated fashion.
II. Sustainable Communities Planning Grant Program
The Sustainable Communities Planning Grant Program (the Program) is
intended to help build the capacity of communities to address the
complex challenges of growth and revitalization in the 21st century in
a comprehensive, multidisciplinary way. Funding from this Program will
support the development and implementation of Sustainable Regional
Development Plans. A priority will be placed on supporting regions that
demonstrate a commitment to take well-developed plans and move them
into implementation. The Appropriations Act directs the Secretary of
HUD to establish a regional planning grant program that provides grants
to assist regional entities and consortia of local governments with
integrated housing, transportation, economic development, water
infrastructure, and environmental planning. HUD's Office of Sustainable
Housing and Communities is working in partnership with DOT and EPA to
define all aspects of this Program. HUD will serve as the lead agency
for all grants and will consult with its agency partners throughout the
Program.
The final product of a Sustainable Communities Planning Grant will
be a Regional Plan for Sustainable Development and/or implementation
strategy that meet the requirements of existing HUD, DOT, and EPA
programs, such as Consolidated Plans, Long Range Transportation Plans
and Stormwater Master Plans. Building on these requirements, a Regional
Plan for Sustainable Development would be a plan that:
(A) Identifies housing, transportation, economic development, land
use, environmental, energy, green space and water infrastructure
priorities and goals in a region;
(B) Establishes locally appropriate performance goals and measures
the future outcomes of baseline and alternative growth and reinvestment
scenarios against those goals, and includes standardized metrics
developed by the Partnership;
(C) Provides strategies for meeting those priorities and goals;
(D) Prioritizes projects that facilitate the implementation of the
regional plan; and identifies responsible implementing
[[Page 6692]]
entities (public or private) and funding sources; and
(E) Engages residents and stakeholders substantively in the
development of the shared vision and its implementation plan early and
throughout the process.
III. Solicitation of Comments on Proposed Program Structure
As noted above, HUD and its partners are soliciting comments
through this Advance Notice on how the Program should be structured,
what funding categories and activities are most appropriate to support,
which entities should be eligible grantees, and how best to evaluate
regional needs, so that the Program has the most meaningful impact on
regional planning for sustainable development. The discussion below
outlines in general terms the key questions HUD is considering in
preparing the final NOFA for the Program and identifies some specific
issues for comment. HUD encourages meaningful input on the Program more
generally as well. HUD has provided the avenues for input in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice and highlights that it has established
a Wiki site to allow additional comment and dialogue regarding
addressing these issues.
A. Proposed Funding Categories and Eligible Activities
HUD and its partner agencies recognize that regions are at
different stages of readiness and capacity to engage in efforts to plan
for a sustainable future. Some regions have formed multi-jurisdictional
and multi-sector coalitions that are ready to embark on an effort to
envision a future to help direct growth or stimulate investment
sustainably. Other regions have already adopted a sustainable vision,
but lack the resources to put in place the specific strategies that
ensure follow-through and implementation of that vision. A few regions
are on the cutting edge and have demonstrated the capacity to plan for
the long-term, build broad-based coalitions in support of sustainable
communities and use an array of tools to incent investment in
development, land preservation, and infrastructure that implements
their sustainable vision.
Given this broad spectrum, the Partnership is considering
supporting activities to meet the needs of each of these three
categories of regions. In this comment period, HUD specifically seeks
feedback on the extent to which these categories are of benefit to
potential applicants, the types of activities that should be allowed in
each category, and the extent to which the Program should support
project-level implementation investments. HUD is also soliciting
feedback on appropriate common performance metrics for each funding
category.
Category 1: Regional Plans for Sustainable Development. Funds would
support stakeholder-driven visioning and scenario planning exercises
that will address and harmonize plans for the location, scale and type
of housing, education and job centers; identify appropriate
transportation and water infrastructure; and proactively consider risks
from disasters and climate change. Applicants would be expected to
identify a set of locally-appropriate performance metrics that are
consistent with the Partnership's Livability Principles, as well as the
Partnership's own metrics, and then measure the outcomes of proposed
growth/reinvestment scenarios against those metrics. Funding in this
category would support data analysis, urban design and outreach efforts
to achieve broad consensus among groups, citizens, and decisionmakers
for a single vision/scenario and to have that plan adopted by all
appropriate regional governmental bodies.
HUD seeks comments on the following questions:
--What specific types of eligible activities would support this effort
and which parties should be part of the regional planning process?
--What elements should be part of the plan, such as a region-wide
vision and statement of goals, long-term development and infrastructure
investment map, implementation strategy and/or funding plan?
--How can citizens best participate, such as through a requirement for
participation in a minimum number of public meetings to ensure broad
regional consensus?
--Should Regional Plans for Sustainable Development be expected to
harmonize and be consistent with HUD, DOT, and EPA-required plans and,
if so, how? Should Regional Plans for Sustainable Development show a
linkage to local formula-based programs supported by HUD, DOT, and EPA;
and, if so, to what extent should such linkage be required?
Category 2: Detailed Execution Plans and Programs. Funds in this
category would support the preparation and adoption of detailed plans
and programs to implement an adopted integrated regional sustainable
vision. Because implementation needs will vary significantly from
region to region depending on the goals of a sustainable plan and the
gaps that exist, the funds from this category would likely support a
wide range of implementation activities but still be measured against
the common and consistent metrics and outcome goals highlighted in the
previous section. For example, inter-jurisdictional affordable and fair
housing strategies, regional transportation investment programs,
corridor transit-oriented development plans, sector or area plans, land
banking and acquisition strategies, revenue sharing strategies,
economic development strategies, plans to improve access to community
amenities, and other specific activities that help ensure that the
goals of the regional vision are implemented. Regional coalitions would
be eligible to apply for this category on the basis of demonstrating
the adoption of a regional vision that is substantially consistent with
the Livability Principles, program goals and metrics identified in the
published NOFA.
HUD seeks comments on the following questions:
--What specific types of activities should be eligible for funding in
this category?
--What criteria should be used to evaluate whether a previously adopted
regional vision is consistent with the Livability Principles discussed
above?
--Should the amount of local and contributed resources to support,
expand, and enhance the development of implementation strategies be
rewarded in application scoring or are there other means to leverage
other funds and resources?
Category 3: Implementation Incentives. Recognizing that those
regions that have already fully embraced sustainable regional planning
provide important models to the nation, the Partnership is considering
ways in which the Program can reward and incent further action by
cutting edge regions.
First, HUD is evaluating the extent to which applicants that have
an adopted Regional Sustainable Development Plan and appropriate
implementation programs in place could be pre-certified as having met
HUD, DOT, and EPA's criteria for sustainability and livability factors
in other discretionary federal funding programs.
Second, HUD is considering providing a limited number of grants to
complete a financing package for projects that would accelerate the
implementation of a Regional Sustainable Development Plan. As
envisioned, this category would support
[[Page 6693]]
pre-development costs, capital costs for a regionally significant
development or infrastructure investment, or land acquisition
investments. We are considering how to make best use of new federal
dollars in the context of existing programs and their requirements--and
also in the context of innovative practices in the field. Applicants
would need to demonstrate that they have in place an adopted regional
vision that is substantially consistent with the Livability Principles,
metrics identified in the published NOFA to measure performance, and
have commitments from affected participating partners to initiate
implementation efforts, but have funding gaps that could be closed
within the grant limits for this program.
HUD seeks comments on the following questions:
--Would ``pre-certification'' be an added value and, if so, what
programs should this approach apply to? What criteria should be
considered for meeting the ``pre-certification'' status?
--Is the direct support of implementation activities appropriate within
this Program given the limited amount of resources and the expected
modest size of grants?
--What criteria should be used to judge that an applicant successfully
demonstrates that it has an adopted regional vision and that the
project for funding under this category is truly catalytic?
--Specifically, what criteria should be considered for a project to be
catalytic?
--What types of activities might be included, the timeframe by what
time the project should be completed, and how much leveraging should be
considered appropriate for demonstrating that the proposed investment
will serve as a region's commitment to a sustainable future?
B. Entities Eligible for Funding
In the Program, HUD is considering as an eligible entity a multi-
jurisdictional and multi-sector partnership consisting of a consortium
of units of general local government and all government, civic,
philanthropic and business entities with a responsibility for
implementing a Regional Plan for Sustainable Development.
HUD seeks input on the following questions:
--Should certain entities be required partners in multi-jurisdictional
regions such as a metropolitan planning organization as defined in 23
CFR 450.104, or a rural planning organization or network of rural
planning organizations in a rural area?
--What definitions should HUD use to define a rural multi-
jurisdictional region eligible for funding?
--What units of government should be allowed to serve as a lead agency
for funding purposes?
--What should demonstrate commitment on the part of each member
organization, and whether there should be a minimum number of member
organizations?
C. Selection Criteria
In evaluating an application for a grant, HUD, in partnership with
DOT and EPA, will evaluate whether the application furthers the
creation of livable communities by advancing regional planning that
integrates housing, transportation, and environmental decisions and the
extent to which the applicant represents a strong collaboration effort
for the region in question.
HUD seeks input on how to judge the capacity of the regional entity
to carry out the proposed Program, including the extent of technical
and organizational capacity to conduct the project in the proposed
timeframe, past experience in implementing a planning process, and/or
an implementation project as proposed, and the extent to which the
consortium has developed partnerships throughout an entire metropolitan
or rural area, including, as appropriate, partnerships with the
entities described above. Specifically, should a needs assessment be
required as an application submission requirement, and, if so, what
data elements should be mandatory in judging need and the scope of the
needs assessment to ensure that it addresses the comprehensive needs of
the region?
While HUD specifically seeks comment on the foregoing questions,
HUD welcomes additional information that will help inform the
Sustainable Communities Planning Grant Program.
Dated: February 4, 2010.
Ron Sims,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2979 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P