[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77524-77528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31188]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. SW023; Special Conditions No. 29-023-SC]
Special Conditions: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-92A
Helicopter; Installation of a Search and Rescue (SAR) Automatic Flight
Control System (AFCS)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation (Sikorsky) model S-92A helicopter. This helicopter, as
modified by Sikorsky, will have novel or unusual design features
associated with installing an optional SAR AFCS. The applicable
airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards the Administrator considers necessary to
show a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is December 3,
2010. We must receive your comments by February 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You must mail or deliver two copies of your comments to:
Federal
[[Page 77525]]
Aviation Administration, Rotorcraft Directorate, Attn: Special
Conditions Docket (ASW-111), Docket No. SW023, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137. You must mark your comments: Docket No. SW023. You
can inspect comments in the Docket on weekdays, except Federal
holidays, between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FAA, Aircraft Certification Service,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group (ASW-111), Attn:
John VanHoudt, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222-5167, facsimile (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Discussion
On July 30, 2007, Sikorsky applied for a change to Type Certificate
(TC) No. R00024BO to install an optional SAR AFCS in the model S-92A
helicopter. These special conditions were recently developed due to the
intended function of the S-92A SAR AFCS not being completely defined
until late in the certification program. The model S-92A is a transport
category helicopter certified to Category A requirements when
configured for more than nine passengers and Category A or B
requirements when configured for nine or less passengers. This
helicopter is also certified for instrument flight under the
requirements of Appendix B of 14 CFR part 29, Amendment 29-47.
The use of dedicated AFCS upper modes, in which a fully coupled
autopilot provides operational SAR profiles, is needed for SAR
operations conducted over water in offshore areas clear of
obstructions. The SAR modes enable the helicopter pilot to fly fully
coupled maneuvers, to include predefined search patterns during cruise
flight, and to transition from cruise flight to a stabilized hover and
departure (transition from hover to cruise flight). The SAR AFCS also
includes an auxiliary crew control that allows another crewmember (such
as a hoist operator) to have limited authority to control the
helicopter's longitudinal and lateral position during hover operations.
Flight operations conducted over water at night may have an
extremely limited visual horizon with little visual reference to the
surface even when conducted under Visual Meteorological Conditions
(VMC). Consequently, the certification requirements for SAR modes must
meet Appendix B to 14 CFR part 29. While Appendix B to 14 CFR part 29
prescribes airworthiness criteria for instrument flight, it does not
consider operations below instrument flight minimum speed
(VMINI), whereas the SAR modes allow for coupled operations
at low speed, all-azimuth flight to zero airspeed (hover).
Since SAR operations have traditionally been a public use mission,
the use of SAR modes in civil operations requires special airworthiness
standards (special conditions) to ensure that a level of safety
consistent with Category A and Instrument Flight Rule (IFR)
certification is maintained. In this regard, 14 CFR part 29 lacks
adequate airworthiness standards for AFCS SAR mode certification to
include flight characteristics, performance, and installed equipment
and systems.
Type Certification Basis
Under 14 CFR 21.101, Sikorsky must show the S-92A, as changed,
continues to meet the applicable provisions of the rules incorporated
by reference in TC No. R00024BO or the applicable regulations in effect
on the date of application for the change. The regulations incorporated
by reference in the TC are commonly referred to as the ``original type
certification basis.'' The regulations incorporated by reference in
R00024BO are as follows:
(a) 14 CFR part 29 Amendments 29-1 to 29-47, inclusive.
(b) 14 CFR part 36 Amendment 20.
(c) Equivalent Safety Findings:
(1) Number TC0309BO-R/F-1.
(i) 14 CFR 29.173 Static longitudinal stability.
(ii) 14 CFR 29.175 Demonstration of static longitudinal stability.
(2) Number TC0309BO-R/F-4.
(i) 14 CFR 29.177 Static directional stability.
(3) Number TC0309BO-R/P-1.
(i) 14 CFR 29.1305(a)(24) Power Plant Instruments.
(4) Number TC0309BO-R/P-5.
(i) 14 CFR 29.1181(a)(4) Designated Fire Zones; Regions Included.
(d) Special Conditions:
(1) No. 29-011-SC for Dual-Engine 30 Minute Power.
(2) No. 29-008-SC for High Intensity Radiated Frequency.
(e) Noise Control Act of 1972.
(f) Compliance with the following optional requirements has been
established: Ditching provisions Sec. 29.563 including Sec. Sec.
29.801 and 29.807(d), and excluding Sec. Sec. 29.1411, 29.1415, and
29.1561 when emergency flotation system is installed. For extended
over-water operations, compliance with the operating rules and
Sec. Sec. 29.1411, 29.1415, and 29.1561 must be shown.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness standards and special
conditions, the Sikorsky model S-92A must comply with the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
Regulatory Basis for Special Conditions
If the Administrator finds the applicable airworthiness standards
(that is, 14 CFR part 29) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for the Sikorsky model S-92A helicopter because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under Sec.
21.16.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38 and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.101.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the TC for that model be amended later to
include any other model that incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other model already included on the same
TC be modified to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also apply to the other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Sikorsky model S-92A helicopter will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design features:
The SAR system is composed of a navigation computer with SAR modes,
an AFCS that provides coupled SAR functions, hoist operator control, a
hover speed reference system, and two radio altimeters. The AFCS
coupled SAR functions include:
(a) Hover hold at selected height above the surface.
(b) Ground speed hold.
(c) Transition down and hover to a waypoint under guidance from the
navigation computer.
(d) SAR pattern, transition down, and hover near a target over
which the helicopter has flown.
(e) Transition up, climb, and capture a cruise height.
(f) Capture and track SAR search patterns generated by the
navigation computer.
(g) Monitor the preselected hover height with automatic increase in
collective if the aircraft height drops below the safe minimum height.
These SAR modes are intended to be used over large bodies of water
in areas clear of obstructions. Further, use of the modes that
transition down from cruise to hover will include operation at
airspeeds below VMINI.
The SAR system only entails navigation, flight control, and coupled
AFCS operation of the helicopter. The system does not include the extra
equipment that may be required for over
[[Page 77526]]
water flight or external loads to meet other operational requirements.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will file in the special conditions docket all comments we
receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel about these special conditions. You can
inspect the docket before and after the comment closing date. If you
wish to review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES
section of this document between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring additional expense or delay. We may change these
special conditions based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we received your mailed comments on
these special conditions, send us a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on
which the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the postcard
and mail it back to you.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of helicopter. It is not a rule of general applicability.
Normally, in adopting special conditions, the FAA provides notice
and an opportunity for comment before issuing the final special
conditions. However, because the delivery date of the Sikorsky model S-
92A helicopter is imminent, we find that it is impracticable to provide
prior notice because a delay would be contrary to the public interest.
The FAA therefore finds that good cause exists for making these special
conditions effective upon issuance.
Applicability
These special conditions apply to the Sikorsky model S-92A
helicopters. Should Sikorsky apply at a later date for a change to the
TC to include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions would apply to that model as
well.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29
Aircraft, Aviation safety.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation model S-
92A helicopters when the optional Search and Rescue (SAR) Automatic
Flight Control System (AFCS) is installed:
In addition to the part 29 certification requirements for Category
A and helicopter instrument flight (Appendix B), the following
additional requirements must be met for certification of the SAR AFCS:
(a) SAR Flight Modes. The coupled SAR flight modes must provide:
(1) Safe and controlled flight in three axes (lateral and
longitudinal position/speed and height/vertical speed) at all airspeeds
from instrument flight minimum speed (VMINI) to a hover
(within the maximum demonstrated wind envelope).
(2) Automatic transition to the helicopter instrument flight
(Appendix B) envelope as part of the normal SAR mode sequencing.
(3) A pilot-selectable Go-Around mode that safely interrupts any
other coupled mode and automatically transitions to the helicopter
instrument flight (Appendix B) envelope.
(4) A means to prevent unintended flight below a safe minimum
height. Pilot-commanded descent below the safe minimum height is
acceptable provided the alerting requirements in (b)(7)(i) are
sufficient to alert the pilot of this descent below safe minimum
height.
(b) SAR Mode System Architecture. To support the integrity of the
SAR modes, the following system architecture is required:
(1) A system for limiting the engine power demanded by the AFCS
when any of the automatic piloting modes are engaged, so FADEC power
limitations, such as torque and temperature, are not exceeded.
(2) A system providing the aircraft height above the surface and
final pilot-selected height at a location on the instrument panel in a
position acceptable to the FAA that will make it plainly visible to and
usable by any pilot at their station.
(3) A system providing the aircraft heading and the pilot-selected
heading at a location on the instrument panel in a position acceptable
to the FAA that will make it plainly visible to and usable by any pilot
at their station.
(4) A system providing the aircraft longitudinal and lateral ground
speeds and the pilot-selected longitudinal and lateral ground speeds
when used by the AFCS in the flight envelope where airspeed indications
become unreliable. This information must be presented at a location on
the instrument panel in a position acceptable to the FAA that is
plainly visible to and usable by any pilot at their station.
(5) A system providing wind speed and wind direction when automatic
piloting modes are engaged or transitioning from one mode to another.
(6) A system that monitors for flight guidance deviations and
failures with an appropriate alerting function that enables the flight
crew to take appropriate corrective action.
(7) The alerting system must provide visual or aural alerts, or
both, to the flight crew under any of the following conditions:
(i) When the stored or pilot-selected safe minimum height is
reached.
(ii) When a SAR mode system malfunction occurs.
(iii) When the AFCS changes modes automatically from one SAR mode
to another.
Note: For normal transitions from one SAR mode to another, a
single visual or aural alert may suffice. For a SAR mode malfunction
or a mode having a time-critical component, the flight crew alerting
system must activate early enough to allow the flight crew to take
timely and appropriate action. The alerting system means must be
designed to alert the flight crew in order to minimize crew errors
that could create an additional hazard.
(8) The SAR system hoist operator control is considered a flight
control with limited authority and must comply with the following:
(i) The hoist operator control must be designed and located to
provide for convenient operation and to prevent confusion and
inadvertent operation.
(ii) The helicopter must be safely controllable by the hoist
operator control throughout the range of that control.
(iii) The hoist operator control may not interfere with the safe
operation of the helicopter.
(iv) Pilot and copilot flight controls must be able to smoothly
override the control authority of the hoist operator control, without
exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and without the
danger of exceeding any other limitation because of the override.
(9) The reliability of the AFCS must be related to the effects of
its failure.
[[Page 77527]]
The occurrence of any failure condition that would prevent continued
safe flight and landing must be extremely improbable. For any failure
condition of the AFCS which is not shown to be extremely improbable:
(i) The helicopter must be safely controllable and capable of
continued safe flight without exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or
strength. Additional unrelated probable failures affecting the control
system must be evaluated.
(ii) The AFCS must be designed so that it cannot create a hazardous
deviation in the flight path or produce hazardous loads on the
helicopter during normal operation or in the event of a malfunction or
failure, assuming corrective action begins within an appropriate period
of time. Where multiple systems are installed, subsequent malfunction
conditions must be evaluated in sequence unless their occurrence is
shown to be improbable.
(10) A functional hazard assessment (FHA) and a system safety
assessment must be provided to address the failure conditions
associated with SAR operations. For SAR catastrophic failure
conditions, changes may be required to the following:
(i) System architecture.
(ii) Software and complex electronic hardware design assurance
levels.
(iii) HIRF test levels.
(iv) Instructions for continued airworthiness.
The assessments must consider all the systems required for SAR
operations to include the AFCS, all associated AFCS sensors (for
example, radio altimeter), and primary flight displays. Electrical and
electronic systems with SAR catastrophic failure conditions (for
example, AFCS) must comply with the Sec. 29.1317(a)(4) High Intensity
Radiated Field (HIRF) requirements.
(c) SAR Mode Performance Requirements.
(1) The SAR modes must be demonstrated in the requested flight
envelope for the following minimum sea-state and wind conditions:
(i) Sea State: Wave height of 2.5 meters (8.2 feet), considering
both short and long swells.
(ii) Wind: 25 knots headwind; 17 knots for all other azimuths.
(2) The selected hover height and hover velocity must be captured
(to include the transition from one captured mode to another captured
mode) accurately and smoothly and not exhibit any significant overshoot
or oscillation.
(3) For any single failure or any combination of failures of the
AFCS that is not shown to be extremely improbable, the recovery must
not result in a loss of height greater than half of the minimum use
height (MUH) with a minimum margin of 15 feet above the surface. MUH is
the minimum height at which any SAR AFCS mode can be engaged.
(4) The SAR mode system must be usable up to the maximum certified
gross weight of the aircraft or to the lower of the following weights:
(i) Maximum emergency flotation weight.
(ii) Maximum hover Out-of-Ground Effect (OGE) weight.
(iii) Maximum demonstrated weight.
(d) Flight Characteristics.
(1) The basic aircraft must meet all the part 29 airworthiness
criteria for helicopter instrument flight (Appendix B).
(2) For SAR mode coupled flight below VMINI, at the
maximum demonstrated winds, the helicopter must be able to maintain any
required flight condition and make a smooth transition from any flight
condition to any other flight condition without requiring exceptional
piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and without exceeding the limit
load factor. This requirement also includes aircraft control through
the hoist operator's control.
(3) For SAR modes at airspeeds below VMINI the following
requirements of Appendix B to part 29 must be met and will be used as
an extension to the IFR certification envelope of the basic aircraft:
(i) Static Longitudinal Stability: the requirements of paragraph IV
of Appendix B are not applicable.
(ii) Static Lateral-Directional Stability: The requirements of
paragraph V of Appendix B are not applicable.
(iii) Dynamic Stability: The requirements of paragraph VI of
Appendix B are replaced with the following two paragraphs:
(A) Any oscillation must be damped and any aperiodic response must
not double in amplitude in less than 10 seconds. This requirement must
also be met with degraded upper mode(s) of the AFCS. An ``upper mode''
is a mode that utilizes a fully coupled autopilot to provide an
operational SAR profile.
(B) After any upset, the AFCS must return the aircraft to the last
commanded position within 10 seconds or less.
(4) With any of the upper mode(s) of the AFCS engaged the pilot
must be able to manually recover the aircraft and transition to the
normal (Appendix B) IFR flight profile envelope without exceptional
skill, alertness, or strength.
(e) One-Engine Inoperative (OEI) Performance Information.
(1) The following performance information must be provided in the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual Supplement (RFMS):
(i) OEI performance information and emergency procedures, providing
the maximum weight that will provide a minimum clearance of 15 feet
above the surface, following failure of the critical engine in a hover.
The maximum weight must be presented as a function of the hover height
for the temperature and pressure altitude range requested for
certification. The effects of wind must be reflected in the hover
performance information.
(ii) Hover OGE performance with the critical engine inoperative for
OEI continuous and time-limited power ratings for those weights,
altitudes, and temperatures for which certification is requested.
Note: These OEI performance requirements do not replace
performance requirements that may be needed to comply with the
airworthiness or operational standards (Sec. 29.865 or 14 CFR part
133) for external loads or human external cargo.
(f) RFMS.
(1) The RFMS must contain, at a minimum:
(i) Limitations necessary for safe operation of the SAR system to
include:
(A) Minimum crew requirements.
(B) Maximum SAR weight.
(C) Engagement criteria for each of the SAR modes to include MUH
(as determined in subparagraph (c)(3)).
(ii) Normal and emergency procedures for operation of the SAR
system (to include operation of the hoist operator control), with AFCS
failure modes, AFCS degraded modes, and engine failures.
(iii) Performance information:
(A) OEI performance and height-loss.
(B) Hover OGE performance information, utilizing OEI continuous and
time-limited power ratings.
(C) The maximum wind envelope demonstrated in flight test.
(g) Flight Demonstration.
(1) Before approval of the SAR system, an acceptable flight
demonstration of all the coupled SAR modes is required.
(2) The AFCS must provide fail-safe operations during coupled
maneuvers. The demonstration of fail-safe operations must include a
pilot workload assessment associated with manually flying the aircraft
to an altitude greater than 200 feet above the surface and an airspeed
of at least the best rate of climb airspeed (Vy).
(3) For any failure condition of the SAR system not shown to be
extremely improbable, the pilot must be able to
[[Page 77528]]
make a smooth transition from one flight mode to another without
exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength.
(4) Failure conditions that are not shown to be extremely
improbable must be demonstrated by analysis, ground testing, or flight
testing. For failures demonstrated in flight, the following normal
pilot recovery times are acceptable:
(i) Transition modes (Cruise-to-Hover/Hover-to-Cruise) and Hover
modes: Normal pilot recognition plus 1 second.
(ii) Cruise modes: Normal pilot recognition plus 3 seconds.
(5) All AFCS malfunctions must include evaluation at the low-speed
and high-power flight conditions typical of SAR operations.
Additionally, AFCS hard-over, slow-over, and oscillatory malfunctions,
particularly in yaw, require evaluation. AFCS malfunction testing must
include a single or a combination of failures (for example, erroneous
data from and loss of the radio altimeter, attitude, heading, and
altitude sensors) which are not shown to be extremely improbable.
(6) The flight demonstration must include the following
environmental conditions:
(i) Swell into wind.
(ii) Swell and wind from different directions.
(iii) Cross swell.
(iv) Swell of different lengths (short and long swell).
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 3, 2010.
Kimberly K. Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-31188 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P