[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8297-8299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3587]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Huron-Manistee National Forests, Michigan, USA and State South
Branch 1-8 Well
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Huron-Manistee National Forests (Forest Service) and the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as a Cooperating Agency will prepare an
environmental impact statement (ETS) to assess the environmental
impacts of an industry proposal to drill one exploratory natural gas
well (the USA & State South Branch 1-8 (SB 1-8) well) on National
Forest System lands. The EIS will also assess the impacts of
constructing necessary infrastructure including production facility and
flowline, to develop the well should it be capable of producing
hydrocarbons in commercial quantities. This analysis will allow the
agencies to make their respective decisions on this proposal in
accordance with Federal regulations.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by April 12, 2010. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
in December, 2010 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected by July 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Lauri Hogeboom, Interdisciplinary
Team Leader, Huron-Manistee National Forests, 1755 S. Mitchell Street,
Cadillac, MI, 49601; fax: 231-775-5551. Send electronic comments to:
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Arbogast, Huron-Manistee National
Forests; telephone: 231-775-2421; fax: 231-775-5551. See address above
under Addresses. Copies of documents may be requested at the same
address. Another means of obtaining information is to visit the Forest
Web page at http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/hmnf then click on ``Project and
Planning,'' then ``Mio District,'' and then ``USA and State South
Branch 1-8.'' Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the
deaf (TTY) may call 1-231-775-3183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose for action is to respond to the proponent, Savoy
Energy, LP's (Savoy) proposal to exercise its rights under Federal
leases to drill for, extract, remove and dispose of all the oil and gas
from leased lands. The Huron-
[[Page 8298]]
Manistee National Forests (Forest Service) and the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) received an Application for Permit to Drill (APD)
including a Surface Use Plan of Operation (SUPO) from Savoy.
A response to the application is needed because Savoy has lawful
oil and gas rights to three State and three Federal leases in a 640
acre drilling unit and the Forest Supervisor (FS) and the Milwaukee
Field Office Manager (BLM) are required by regulation to evaluate and
decide upon operating plans received from industry for exploration and
development of Federal leases. The agencies must ensure Savoy's
operating plan is consistent with the terms and stipulations of the
Federal mineral leases, applicable laws and regulations, the Huron-
Manistee's Land and Resource Management Plan, and identify any
additional conditions needed to protect Federal resources.
The BLM ultimately renders a decision on the APD, and the Forest
Service must review and decide upon the SUPO before the BLM can make
its APD decision.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to authorize Savoy to conduct surface
operations associated with accessing, drilling, testing, and completing
the USA and State South Branch 1-8 Well, as described in detail under
Alternative 2: The Proposed Action and described in the Surface Use
Plan of Operations (SUPO) and Application for Permit to Drill (APD)
submitted to the BLM. The Forest Service would approve the Surface Use
Plan of Operations for the USA and State South Branch 1-8 Well.
The BLM proposes to authorize Savoy to conduct operations to drill
test and complete the proposed exploratory well on the subject leases
and approve the APD submitted for this well.
The Forest Service and BLM authorization would include reasonable
and necessary mitigation to ensure Savoy's operations would be in
compliance with law, regulation, and policy.
Savoy holds six subsurface mineral leases included in a 640 acre
drilling unit in South Branch Township (T25N, R1W), Crawford County,
Michigan, Section 7 E \1/2\, Section 8 W \1/2\. This 640 acre drilling
unit includes three State and three Federal oil and gas leases. Savoy
is proposing to drill directionally from National Forest System lands
within the boundaries of the Huron-Manistee National Forests to the
bottomhole located in Federal mineral lease MIES 50521 approximately
2,200 feet NW of the surface hole and construct associated
infrastructure including a production facility and flowline if Savoy
determines the well could produce a commercial product.
Savoy's proposal includes: Leveling of the well pad (approximately
3.5 acres) for the drilling rig, equipment, and pit, including some
minor cut and fill using a bulldozer to level the surface. It also
includes the use, reconstruction and maintenance of existing roads for
year-round access, including snow plowing along portions of River Lake
Road (aka Hickey Creek Road), FSR 4209 (Mason Chapel Road), and FSR
4208, to access the well site; construction and maintenance of 50 feet
of new road, 14 feet wide with three feet of clearing on each side of
the new road (approximately 0.05 acre of disturbance) to access the
well pad from FSR 4208; and drilling a water well at the well pad site
to provide water for drilling and future well maintenance, if needed.
Following these activities drilling equipment would be moved in and
rigged up.
Drilling and well completion would be expected to take 45 days.
Drilling operations would be restricted to a time period of December 1
to April 15. The well pad would be approximately 3.5 acres in size.
Standard and accepted drilling techniques and practices would be used
and must comply with mininum operating standards approved by Michigan
Department of Natural Resouces and Environment and the BLM. This
includes a casing program, pressure control equipment, and proposed
drilling fluids program. Hazardous materials, including stimulation and
completion fluids, would be contained in steel tanks and disposed of by
a licensed waste hauler.
Additional actions proposed if the well is productive include:
construction of a production facility located in SE, Section 9, T25N,
Ri W, (approximately 1.5 miles from the well pad) on approximately 2.0
acres, including intallation of a gas/water separator, oil and brine
tanks, dehydrator, compressor, volume bottle, and measurement
(monitoring) equipment; installation of flowlines from the well site to
the production facility site, buried along side the road bed and a
pipeline to the Michigan Consolidated Gas transmission line, totaling
approximately 1.7 miles, and reclamation of the well pad, following
drilling and completion, leaving \1/3\ acre used for well operations.
If the well is not capable of commercial production, the operator
plug and abandon the well under applicable State and BLM rules.
Reclamation of the site according to the reclamation plan included with
the SUPO would occur within six months of completion of well plugging.
This would include: Recontouring and stabilizing all excavations,
topsoil removed during leveling will be spread evenly over the site
except the roads; the site would be seeded with a Forest Service
approved mix; the flowline route would be restored and the 50 foot
access road would be obliterated.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment's Water
Management Practices on Forest Land will be used to manage the roads.
Additionally, prior to reconstructing FSR 4209, approximately 150 feet
of silt fence would be placed per FS direction adjacent to the south
side of the road for wetland protection.
The operator would maintain a dike around the condensate and brine
tanks at the production facility of sufficient size and height so as to
contain 150% of the total capacity of the tanks.
The width of the reconstucted roads would not exceed 14 feet. An
additional 3 feet of clearing would be done on each side of the road.
Clearing width would not exceed 20 feet.
Soil disturbed with the placement of the flowline/pipeline would be
seeded with mix specified by the Forest Service.
Roads into the well pad and production facility would be gated and
locked.
Road design and construction would take into account visual
quality.
Minimization of noise is to be emphasized during drilling,
completion, and production operations. Hospital-type engine mufflers
would be used on drilling, completion, and work over rigs, mud pumps,
and compressors. No pumps or motors would be placed on the surface of
the well or at the well site. The total sound level for the production
facility would not exceed 36 dBA at 1,320 feet if more than one well is
being processed. If the production facility is processing gas from one
well, the sound level would not exceed 33 dBA at 1,320 feet. The
production facility would be constructed to meet these sound levels.
Off-road equipment would be inspected by a Forest Service
representative and washed if needed to prevent introduction of non-
native invasive plants that are not already present in the project
area.
Protection will be provided for Endangered, Threatened and
Sensitive Species in accordance with law, regulation and policy.
The Forest Service, the BLM, and MDNRE will coordinate inspections
to ensure compliance with requirements.
[[Page 8299]]
Possible Alternatives
No Action alternative: The Forest Service would not approve the
SUPO and br the BLM would not approve the APD. Current direction would
continue to guide management of the project area. The USA and State
South Branch 1-8 well would not be drilled, no flow lines would be
installed, and no production facility would be constructed.
Alternative 2: Modification of Savoy's Proposal--The Forest Service
would approve the SUPO and the BLM would approve the APD subject to
additional conditions of approval necessary for resource protection.
Alternative 2 would be the same as the proposed action except with
additional conditions of approval to the SUPO and APD based on
mitigation developed to respond to the issues raised.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The BLM and the Forest Service entered into an Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) in April 2006 ``to establish procedures for the
coordinated dministration of oil and gas operations on Federal leases
within the National Forest System (NFS).'' The MOU identifies the
responsibilities of the agencies to provide efficient, effective
adherence to rules and regulations for each. Specifically, the MOU
states,
``111A3. `* * * the Forest Service has the full responsibility
and authority to approve and regulate all suface -disturbing
activities associated with oil and gas exploration and development
through analysis and approval of the SUPO component of an APD.' ''
VB] Forest Service will: Serve as lead agency for oil and gas * * *
environmental analyses required for APD: * * *''
``111A2. The BLM has the authority and responsibility to provide
final approval of all APDs, including those for operations on
Federals leases on NFS lands * * * The BLM has the authority and
responsibility to regulate all down-hole operations and directly
related surface activities and use, and provide approval of the
drilling plan and final approval of the APD on NFS lands.''
This MOU is consistent with the NEPA regulations, 40 CFR 1501.5
Lead Agency and 1501.6 Cooperating Agencies, identifying the Forest
Service as the lead agency and the BLM as the cooperating agency.
Responsible Official for Lead Agency
Barry Paulson, Forest Supervisor, Huron-Manistee National Forests,
1755 S. Mitchell Street, Cadillac, MI 49601.
Responsible Official for Cooperating Agency
Mark Storzer, Field Manager, Bureau of Land Management, Milwaukee
Field Office, 626 E Wisconsin Ave. Suite 200, Milwaukee, WI 53202-46
17.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor of the Huron-Manistee National Forests will
issue a decision on whether to approve, approve subject to specified
conditions, or disapprove for stated reasons, the proposed Surface Use
Plan of Operations or development of the well and construction and
operation of the flowline/pipeline and production facilities.
Similarly, the BLM Field Manager in Milwaukee will issue a decision on
whether to approve the Application for Permit to Drill as submitted,
approve subject to appropriate modifications or conditions, or
disapprove for stated reasons.
Preliminary Issues
We expect issues to include possible effects of noise, odor and
changes to the visual quality from the project on anglers and visitors
to the Semi-Primitive Nonmotorized area and Mason Tract, as well as the
possible effects of the project on tourism in the county.
Permits and Licenses Required
Savoy will be required to obtain a State permit for drilling from
the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. The Forest
Service plans to scope for information by contacting persons and
organizations interested or potentially affected by the proposed action
by using mailings, public announcements, and personal contacts.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.
We are especially interested in information that might identify a
specific undesired result of implementing the proposed action. Comments
will be used to help formulate alternatives to the proposed action.
Please make your written comments as specific as possible as they
relate to the proposed action, and include your name, address, and if
possible, telephone number and e-mail address.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposed action and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent decisions under 36 CFR part 215.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any persons may request the
agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how
the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) permits such confidentiality.
Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that under FOIA
confidentiality may be granted in only very limited circumstances, such
as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service will inform the
requester of the agency's decision regarding the request for
confidentiality and, should the request be denied, return the
submission and notify the requester that the comments may be
resubmitted with or without name and address within 90 days.
Dated: February 16, 2010.
Barry Paulson,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-3587 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M