[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17827-17828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7874]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2008-0213; Notice 2]
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), has determined that
certain passenger car tires manufactured during the period January 25,
2007, through July 24, 2008, do not fully comply with paragraph S5.5(e)
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) No. 139, New
Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. Goodyear has filed an
appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, Goodyear has
petitioned for an exemption from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Notice of
receipt of the petition was published, with a 30-day public comment
period, on January 13, 2009, in the Federal Register (74 FR 1760). No
comments were received. To view the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System Web site at:
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov/ then follow the online search
instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2008-0213.''
For further information on this decision, contact Mr. George
Gillespie, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5299,
facsimile (202) 366-7002.
Affected are approximately 9,864 size 245/45R17 95H Fierce HP brand
passenger car tires manufactured during the period January 25, 2007,
through July 24, 2008.
Paragraph S5.5(e) of FMVSS No. 139 requires in pertinent part:
S5.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in paragraphs (a)
through (i) of S5.5, each tire must be marked on each sidewall with
the information specified in S5.5(a) through (d) and on one sidewall
with the information specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this standard. The markings
must be placed between the maximum section width and the bead on at
least one sidewall, unless the maximum section width of the tire is
located in an area that is not more than one-fourth of the distance
from the bead to the shoulder of the tire. If the maximum section
width falls within that area, those markings must appear between the
bead and a point one-half the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire, on at least one sidewall. The markings must be in
letters and numerals not less than 0.078 inches high and raised
above or sunk below the tire surface not less than 0.015 inches * *
*
(e) The generic name of each cord material used in the plies
(both sidewall and tread area) of the tire; * * *
Goodyear explains that the noncompliance is that the sidewall
marking incorrectly identifies the generic material of the plies in the
body of the tire as Nylon when they are in fact polyester.
Specifically, the tires in question were inadvertently manufactured
with ``Tread: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel Cords + 1 Nylon Cord. The labeling
should have been ``Tread: 1 Polyester Cord + 2 Steel Cords + 1
Polyester Cord'' (emphasis added).
Goodyear states that it discovered the mold labeling error that
caused the non-compliance during a routine quality audit.
Goodyear argues that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety because the tires meet or exceed all applicable Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety performance standards. All of the markings related
to tire service (load capacity, corresponding inflation pressure, etc.)
are correct. The mislabeling of these tires creates no unsafe
condition.
Goodyear states that the affected tire molds have been modified and
all future production will have the correct material information shown
on the sidewall.
[[Page 17828]]
Goodyear also points out that NHTSA has previously granted
petitions for sidewall marking noncompliances that it believes are
similar to the present noncompliance.
In summation, Goodyear states that it believes that because the
noncompliances are inconsequential to motor vehicle safety that no
corrective action is warranted.
NHTSA Decision
The agency agrees with Goodyear that the noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. The agency believes that the
true measure of inconsequentiality to motor vehicle safety in this case
is that there is no effect of the noncompliance on the operational
safety of vehicles on which these tires are mounted. The safety of
people working in the tire retread, repair, and recycling industries
must also be considered. Although tire construction affects the
strength and durability, neither the agency nor the tire industry
provides information relating tire strength and durability to the
number of plies and types of ply cord material in the tread and
sidewall. Therefore, tire dealers and customers should consider the
tire construction information along with other information such as the
load capacity, maximum inflation pressure, and tread wear, temperature,
and traction ratings, to assess performance capabilities of various
tires. In the agency's judgment, the incorrect labeling of the tire
construction information will have an inconsequential effect on motor
vehicle safety because most consumers do not base tire purchases or
vehicle operation parameters on the ply material in a tire.
The agency also believes the noncompliance will have no measurable
effect on the safety of the tire retread, repair, and recycling
industries. The use of steel cord construction in the sidewall and
tread is the primary safety concern of these industries. In this case,
since the tire sidewalls are marked correctly for the number of steel
plies, this potential safety concern does not exist.
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that Goodyear
has met its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 139
labeling noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, Goodyear's petition is granted and the petitioner is
exempted from the obligation of providing notification of, and a remedy
for, the subject noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: April 1, 2010.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2010-7874 Filed 4-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P