[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 13, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18778-18781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-8374]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0153]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Ocean City Air Show 2010, Atlantic Ocean, Ocean
City, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
on the Atlantic Ocean in the vicinity of Ocean City, Maryland to
support the Ocean City Air Show. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic movement on the Atlantic Ocean to protect mariners and
the public from the hazards associated with air show events.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0153 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail LT Tiffany Duffy, Chief, Waterways Management
Division, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone 757-668-5580, e-
mail [email protected]. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 18779]]
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0153), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0153'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0153'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact LT Tiffany Duffy at the telephone number or e-mail address
indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
Background and Purpose
On June 4, 5, and 6, 2010 Ocean City, Maryland will host an air
show event on the Atlantic Ocean between Talbot Street and 33rd Street
in Ocean City, MD. In recent years, there have been unfortunate
instances of jets and planes crashing during performances at air shows.
Along with the jet or plane crash, there is typically a wide area of
scattered debris that also damages property and could cause significant
injury or death to mariners observing the air shows. Due to the need to
protect mariners and the public transiting the Atlantic Ocean
immediately below the air show from hazards associated with the air
show, the Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone,
restricting access to the area for public safety purposes.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone on
specified waters of the Atlantic Ocean bound by the following
coordinates: 38[deg]-21'-38'' N / 075[deg]-04'-04'' W, 38[deg]-21'-27''
N / 075[deg]-03'-29'' W, 38[deg]-19'-35'' N / 075[deg]-04'-19'' W,
38[deg]-19'-45'' N / 075[deg]-04'-54'' W (NAD 1983), in the vicinity of
Ocean City, Maryland. The safety zone forms a box, beginning 500 feet
seaward from the shoreline out 2000 feet and extends 6000 feet from
Talbot St. to 33rd St. The NE corner, SE corner, NW corner, and SW
corner will be marked with buoys in accordance with (IAW) Coast Guard
District 5. This safety zone is proposed in the interest of public
safety during the Ocean City Air Show and will be enforced daily from
10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on June 4, 5, and 6, 2010. Access to the safety zone
will be restricted during the specified date and times. Except for
vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port or his Representative, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in the safety zone.
The Coast Guard expects the temporary final rule will be effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because
delaying the effective date would be contrary to the public interest
due to the need to protect the public from the dangers associated with
air shows.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. Although this proposed
regulation restricts access to the safety zone, the effect of this rule
will not be significant because: (i) The safety zone will be in effect
for a limited duration; (ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii) the
Coast Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 18780]]
The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor on the Atlantic
Ocean in the vicinity of Ocean City, MD from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on June
4 through June 6, 2010.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: (i) The
safety zone will only be in place for a limited duration. (ii) Before
the effective period of June 4, 2010 to June 6, 2010, maritime
advisories will be issued allowing mariners to adjust their plans
accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LT Tiffany Duffy, Chief
Waterways Management Division, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone 757-668-5580, e-mail [email protected]. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded under section 2.B.2. Figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g), of the
Instruction and neither an environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is required. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination is available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule involves a
temporary safety zone to protect the public from
[[Page 18781]]
the dangers associated with air show activities. We seek any comments
or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-XXXX to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-XXXX Safety Zone; Ocean City Air Show 2010, Atlantic
Ocean, Ocean City, MD.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: specified
waters of the Atlantic Ocean bound by the following coordinates:
38[deg]-21'-38'' N / 075[deg]-04'-04'' W, 38[deg]-21'-27'' N /
075[deg]-03'-29'' W, 38[deg]-19'-35'' N / 075[deg]-04'-19'' W, 38[deg]-
19'-45'' N / 075[deg]-04'-54'' W (NAD 1983), in the vicinity of Ocean
City, Maryland. The safety zone forms a box, beginning 500 feet seaward
from the shoreline out 2000 feet and extends 6000 feet from Talbot St.
to 33rd St. The NE corner, SE corner, NW corner, and SW corner will be
marked with buoys IAW USCG District 5.
(b) Definition. For the purposes of this part, Captain of the Port
Representative: means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Hampton Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel
that is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast
Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads in Portsmouth, Virginia
at telephone Number (757) 668-5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz)and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Effective Period. This regulation will be in effect from 10
a.m. to 4 p.m. on June 4 through June 6, 2010.
Dated: March 17, 2010.
M.S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2010-8374 Filed 4-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P