[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 82 (Thursday, April 29, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22540-22543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9996]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 22540]]
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
5 CFR Parts 2425 and 2429
Review of Arbitration Awards; Miscellaneous and General
Requirements
AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations Authority.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Chairman and Members of the Federal Labor Relations
Authority (the Authority) seek public comment on proposed revisions to
its regulations concerning review of arbitration awards and the
Authority's miscellaneous and general requirements to the extent that
they set forth procedural rules that apply to the review of arbitration
awards. The purpose of the proposed revisions is to improve and
expedite review of such awards.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: E-mail written comments to [email protected], or
deliver written comments to the Chief, Case Intake and Publication
Office, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Suite 200, 1400 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20424-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Whittle Spooner, Counsel for
Regulatory and External Affairs, (202) 218-7791.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Chairman and Members of the Authority
established an internal workgroup to study and evaluate the policies
and procedures in effect concerning the review of arbitration awards.
In order to solicit the input of arbitrators and practitioners, the
workgroup held several focus groups, specifically: One focus group in
Washington, DC with arbitrators; two focus groups in Washington, DC
with practitioners; and focus groups in Chicago, Illinois and Oakland,
California with both arbitrators and practitioners. In addition,
through a survey, the Authority solicited input from parties to recent
Authority decisions; the Authority also solicited general input through
[email protected].
The proposed revisions are intended to improve and expedite the
review of arbitration awards. The proposed revisions include:
Changing the Authority's existing practice for calculating
the date for filing timely exceptions, so that the thirty-day period
begins on the day after, not the day of, service of the arbitration
award;
Clarifying how the date of service of an arbitrator's
award is determined;
Clarifying the information and documents that must be
filed with exceptions and oppositions;
Clarifying existing grounds for review of an arbitration
award and the consequence of failing to raise an existing ground;
Adding an option to request an expedited decision from the
Authority in certain arbitration cases that do not involve unfair labor
practices;
Adding an option to request voluntary alternative dispute
resolution services;
Providing various methods of resolving unclear disputes or
records; and
Clarifying the issues that must be raised before an
arbitrator in order to be considered by the Authority.
The Authority reproduces proposed 5 CFR part 2425 in its entirety,
and amends 5 CFR 2429.5, 2429.21 and 2429.22. Sectional analyses of the
proposed regulations are as follows.
Part 2425--Review of Arbitration Awards
Section 2425.1. Establishes October 1, 2010, as the effective date
of the revised regulations.
Section 2425.2. Establishes who may file exceptions, the time
limits for filing exceptions, and rules for determining the date of
service of the arbitration award. It also refers to the procedural and
other requirements for filing exceptions that are set forth in 5 CFR
part 2429.
Section 2425.3. Establishes who may file an opposition to
arbitration exceptions, as well as the time limits for filing an
opposition. It also refers to the procedural and other requirements for
filing an opposition that are set forth in 5 CFR part 2429.
Section 2425.4. Specifies the information and documentation to be
filed with exceptions, and provides for the optional use of an
Authority-provided form.
Section 2425.5. Specifies the information and documentation to be
filed with oppositions to exceptions, and provides for the optional use
of an Authority-provided form.
Section 2425.6. Establishes grounds on which the Authority may
review an arbitration award, including the private-sector grounds that
the Authority currently recognizes as well as a statement that a party
may raise additional private-sector grounds if those grounds are
supported.
Lists the types of arbitration awards over which the
Authority lacks jurisdiction.
Provides for dismissal of exceptions that fail to raise
and support an established ground or involve an award over which the
Authority lacks jurisdiction.
Section 2425.7. Permits parties to jointly request an expedited,
short-form Authority decision in arbitration matters that do not
involve unfair labor practices.
Section 2425.8. Permits parties to jointly request assistance from
the Authority's Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Program.
Section 2425.9. Provides that, when necessary, the Authority may,
among other things, direct parties to provide documentary evidence,
respond to requests for further information, or meet with the Authority
or its representative(s).
Section 2425.10. Renumbers current Sec. 2425.4.
Part 2429--Miscellaneous and General Requirements
Amends three existing sections of part 2429, specifically:
Sec. 2429.5 to clarify the types of matters that parties
are required to raise in proceedings before the Regional Director,
Hearing Officer, Administrative Law Judge, or arbitrator;
Sec. 2429.21 to delete the reference to exceptions to
arbitration awards being exempt from the general rules regarding
calculating filing periods; and
Sec. 2429.22 to specify that the rules set forth in that
section are subject to the rules established in proposed new rule Sec.
2425.2.
[[Page 22541]]
Executive Order 12866
The Authority is an independent regulatory agency, and as such, is
not subject to the requirements of E.O. 12866.
Executive Order 13132
The Authority is an independent regulatory agency, and as such, is
not subject to the requirements of E.O. 13132.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the Chairman of the Authority has determined that this
regulation, as amended, will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities, because this rule applies only to
Federal employees, Federal agencies, and labor organizations
representing Federal employees.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule change will not result in the expenditure by state,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This action is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The amended regulations contain no additional information
collection or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 2425 and 2429
Administrative practice and procedure, Government employees, Labor
management relations.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Authority proposes to
amend 5 CFR chapter XIV as follows:
1. Revise part 2425 to read as follows:
PART 2425--REVIEW OF ARBITRATION AWARDS
Sec.
2425.1 Applicability of this part.
2425.2 Exceptions--who may file; time limits for filing, including
determining date of service of arbitration award for the purpose of
calculating time limits; procedural and other requirements for
filing.
2425.3 Oppositions--who may file; time limits for filing; procedural
and other requirements for filing.
2425.4 Content and format of exceptions.
2425.5 Content and format of opposition.
2425.6 Grounds for review; potential dismissal for failure to raise
grounds.
2425.7 Requests for expedited, short-form decisions in certain
arbitration matters that do not involve unfair labor practices.
2425.8 Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Program.
2425.9 Means of clarifying records or disputes.
2425.10 Authority decision.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134.
Sec. 2425.1 Applicability of this part.
This part is applicable to all arbitration cases in which
exceptions are filed with the Authority, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7122, on
or after October 1, 2010.
Sec. 2425.2 Exceptions--who may file; time limits for filing,
including determining date of service of arbitration award for the
purpose of calculating time limits; procedural and other requirements
for filing.
(a) Who may file. Either party to arbitration under the provisions
of chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States Code may file an
exception to an arbitrator's award rendered pursuant to the
arbitration.
(b) Timeliness requirements--general. The time limit for filing an
exception to an arbitration award is thirty (30) days. This thirty
(30)-day time limit may not be extended or waived. In computing the
thirty (30)-day period, the first day counted is the day after, not the
day of, service of the arbitration award. Example: If an award is
served on May 1, then May 2 is counted as day 1, and May 31 is day 30;
an exception filed on May 31 would be timely, and an exception filed on
June 1 would be untimely. In order to determine the date of service of
the award, see the rules set forth in paragraph (c) of this section,
and for additional rules regarding computing the filing date, see 5 CFR
2429.21 and 2429.22.
(c) Methods of service of arbitration award; determining date of
service of arbitration award for purposes of calculating time limits
for exceptions. If the parties have reached an agreement as to what is
an appropriate method(s) of service of the arbitration award, then that
agreement--whether expressed in a collective bargaining agreement or
otherwise--is controlling for purposes of calculating the time limit
for filing exceptions. If the parties have not reached such an
agreement, then the arbitrator may use any commonly used method--
including, but not limited to, electronic mail (hereinafter ``e-
mail''), facsimile transmission (hereinafter ``fax''), regular mail,
commercial delivery, or personal delivery--and the arbitrator's
selected method is controlling for purposes of calculating the time
limit for filing exceptions. The following rules apply to determine the
date of service for purposes of calculating the time limits for filing
exceptions, and assume that the method(s) of service discussed are
either consistent with the parties' agreement or chosen by the
arbitrator absent such an agreement:
(1) If the award is served by regular mail, then the date of
service is the postmark date, and the excepting party will receive an
additional five days for filing the exceptions under 5 CFR 2492.22.
(2) If the award is served by commercial delivery, then the date of
service is the date on which the award was deposited with the
commercial delivery service, and the excepting party will receive an
additional five days for filing the exceptions under 5 CFR 2429.22.
(3) If the award is served by e-mail or fax, then the date of
service is the date of transmission, and the excepting party will not
receive an additional five days for filing the exceptions.
(4) If the award is served by personal delivery, then the date of
personal delivery is the date of service, and the excepting party will
not receive an additional five days for filing the exceptions.
(5) If the award is served by more than one method, then the first
method of service is controlling when determining the date of service
for purposes of calculating the time limits for filing exceptions.
However, if the award is served by e-mail, fax, or personal delivery on
one day, and by mail or commercial delivery on the same day, the
excepting party will not receive an additional five days for filing the
exceptions, even if the award was postmarked or deposited with the
commercial delivery service before the e-mail or fax was transmitted.
(d) Procedural and other requirements for filing. Exceptions must
comply with
[[Page 22542]]
the requirements set forth in 5 CFR 2429.24 (Place and method of
filing; acknowledgment), 2429.25 (Number of copies and paper size),
2429.27 (Service; statement of service), and 2429.29 (Content of
filings).
Sec. 2425.3 Oppositions--who may file; time limits for filing;
procedural and other requirements for filing.
(a) Who may file. Any party to arbitration under the provisions of
chapter 71 of title 5 of the United States Code may file an opposition
to an exception that has been filed under Sec. 2425.2 of this part.
(b) Timeliness requirements. Any opposition must be filed within
thirty (30) days after the date the exception is served on the opposing
party. For additional rules regarding computing the filing date, see 5
CFR 2425.8, 2429.21, and 2429.22.
(c) Procedural requirements. Oppositions must comply with the
requirements set forth in 5 CFR 2429.24 (Place and method of filing;
acknowledgment), 2429.25 (Number of copies and paper size), 2429.27
(Service; statement of service), and 2429.29 (Content of filings).
Sec. 2425.4 Content and format of exceptions.
(a) What is required. An exception must be dated, self-contained,
and set forth in full:
(1) A statement of the grounds on which review is requested, as
discussed in Sec. 2425.6 of this part;
(2) Arguments in support of the stated grounds, including specific
references to the record, citations of authorities, and any other
relevant documentation;
(3) Legible copies of any documents referenced in the arguments
discussed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, except as provided in
paragraph (b) of this section;
(4) A legible copy of the award of the arbitrator; and
(5) The arbitrator's name, mailing address, and, if available and
authorized for use by the arbitrator, the arbitrator's e-mail address
or facsimile number.
(b) What is not required. Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, exceptions are not required to include actual copies of
documents that are readily accessible to the Authority, such as
Authority decisions, decisions of Federal courts, current provisions of
the United States Code, and current provisions of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
(c) What is prohibited. Consistent with 5 CFR 2429.5, an exception
may not rely on any material evidence, factual assertions, arguments
(including affirmative defenses), requested remedies, or challenges to
an awarded remedy that could have been, but were not, presented to the
arbitrator.
(d) Format. The exception may be filed on an optional form provided
by the Authority, or in any other format that is consistent with
paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section. A party's failure to use, or
properly fill out, an Authority-provided form will not, by itself,
provide a basis for dismissing an exception.
Sec. 2425.5 Content and format of opposition.
If a party chooses to file an opposition, then the party should
address any assertions from the exceptions that the opposing party
disputes, including any assertions that any material evidence, factual
assertions, arguments (including affirmative defenses), requested
remedies, or challenges to an awarded remedy were raised before the
arbitrator. The party filing the opposition must provide copies of any
documents upon which it relies unless the documents were provided with
the exceptions. The opposition may be filed on an optional form
provided by the Authority, or in any other format that is consistent
with this section. A party's failure to use, or properly fill out, an
Authority-provided form will not, by itself, provide a basis for
dismissing an opposition.
Sec. 2425.6 Grounds for review; potential dismissal for failure to
raise grounds.
(a) The Authority will review an arbitrator's award to which an
exception has been filed to determine whether the award is deficient--
(1) Because it is contrary to any law, rule or regulation; or
(2) On other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in
private sector labor-management relations.
(b) If a party argues that an award is deficient on private-sector
grounds under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, then the excepting
party must explain how, under standards set forth in the decisional law
of the Authority or Federal courts:
(1) The arbitrator:
(i) Exceeded his or her authority; or
(ii) Was biased; or
(iii) Denied the excepting party a fair hearing; or
(2) The award:
(i) Fails to draw its essence from the parties' collective
bargaining agreement; or
(ii) Is based on a nonfact; or
(iii) Is incomplete, ambiguous, or contradictory; or
(iv) Is contrary to public policy; or
(v) Is deficient on the basis of a private-sector ground not listed
in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section.
(c) If a party argues that the award is deficient on a private-
sector ground raised under paragraph (b)(2)(v) of this section, the
party must provide sufficient citation to legal authority that
establishes the grounds upon which the party filed its exceptions.
(d) The Authority does not have jurisdiction over an award relating
to:
(1) An action based on unacceptable performance covered under 5
U.S.C. 4303;
(2) A removal, suspension for more than fourteen (14) days,
reduction in grade, reduction in pay, or furlough of thirty (30) days
or less covered under 5 U.S.C. 7512; or
(3) Matters similar to those covered under 5 U.S.C. 4303 and 5
U.S.C. 7512 which arise under other personnel systems.
(e) An exception may be subject to dismissal if:
(1) The excepting party fails to raise and support a ground as
required in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, or otherwise
fails to demonstrate a legally recognized basis for setting aside the
award; or
(2) The exception concerns an award described in paragraph (d) of
this section.
Sec. 2425.7 Requests for expedited, short-form decisions in certain
arbitration matters that do not involve unfair labor practices.
Where an arbitration matter before the Authority does not involve
allegations of unfair labor practices under 5 U.S.C. 7116, and the
parties wish to receive an expedited Authority decision, the parties
may jointly request the Authority to issue a decision (hereinafter a
``short-form decision'') that briefly resolves the parties' arguments
without a full explanation of the background, arbitration award,
parties' arguments, and analysis of those arguments. Such request must
be signed by the designated representative of each party and filed by
either party with the Authority within thirty (30) days after the
exception is filed. In determining whether a short-form decision is
appropriate, the Authority will consider all of the circumstances of
the case, including, but not limited to, its complexity, potential for
precedential value, and similarity to other, fully detailed decisions
involving the same or similar issues. Even absent the parties' joint
request, the Authority may issue short-form decisions in appropriate
cases.
[[Page 22543]]
Sec. 2425.8 Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Program.
The parties may request assistance from the Collaboration and
Alternative Dispute Resolution Program (CADR) to attempt to resolve the
dispute before or after an opposition is filed. Upon request, and as
agreed to by the parties, CADR representatives will attempt to assist
the parties to resolve these disputes. If the parties have agreed to
CADR assistance, and the time for filing an opposition has not expired,
then the Authority will toll the time limit for filing an opposition
until the CADR process is completed. Parties seeking information or
assistance under this part may call or write the CADR Office at 1400 K
Street NW., Washington, DC, 20424. A brief summary of CADR activities
is available on the Internet at http://www.flra.gov.
Sec. 2425.9 Means of clarifying records or disputes.
When required to clarify a record or when it would otherwise aid in
disposition of the matter, the Authority, or its designated
representative, may, as appropriate:
(a) Direct the parties to provide specific documentary evidence,
including the arbitration record as discussed in 5 CFR 2429.3;
(b) Direct the parties to respond to requests for further
information;
(c) Meet with parties, either in person or via telephone or other
electronic communications systems, to attempt to clarify the dispute or
matters in the record;
(d) Direct the parties to provide oral argument; or
(e) Take any other appropriate action.
Sec. 2425.10 Authority decision.
The Authority shall issue its decision and order taking such action
and making such recommendations concerning the award as it considers
necessary, consistent with applicable laws, rules, or regulations.
PART 2429--MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
2. The authority citation for part 2429 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134; Sec. 2429.18 also issued under 28
U.S.C. 2122(a).
3. Revise Sec. 2429.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 2429.5 Matters not previously presented; official notice.
The Authority will not consider any material evidence, factual
assertions, arguments (including affirmative defenses), requested
remedies, or challenges to an awarded remedy that could have been, but
were not, presented in the proceedings before the Regional Director,
Hearing Officer, Administrative Law Judge, or arbitrator. The Authority
may, however, take official notice of such matters as would be proper.
4. In Sec. 2429.21, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 2429.21 Computation of time for filing papers.
(a) In computing any period of time prescribed by or allowed by
this subchapter, except in agreement bar situations described in Sec.
2422.12(c), (d), (e), and (f) of this subchapter, the day of the act,
event, or default from or after which the designated period of time
begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so
computed is to be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or a
Federal legal holiday in which event the period shall run until the end
of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal legal
holiday. Provided, however, in agreement bar situations described in
Sec. 2422.12(c), (d), (e), and (f), if the 60th day prior to the
expiration date of an agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a
Federal legal holiday, a petition, to be timely, must be filed by the
close of business on the last official workday preceding the 60th day.
When the period of time prescribed or allowed is 7 days or less,
intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal legal holidays shall be
excluded from the computations.
* * * * *
5. Revise Sec. 2429.22 to read as follows:
Sec. 2429.22 Additional time after service by mail or commercial
delivery.
Except as to the filing of an application for review of a Regional
Director's Decision and Order under Sec. 2422.31 of this subchapter,
and subject to the rules set forth in Sec. 2425.2 of this subchapter,
whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act pursuant
to this subchapter within a prescribed period after service of a notice
or other paper upon such party, and the notice or paper is served on
such party by mail or commercial delivery, 5 days shall be added to the
proscribed period: Provided, however, that 5 days shall not be added in
any instance where an extension of time has been granted.
Dated: April 26, 2010.
Carol Waller Pope,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2010-9996 Filed 4-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6727-01-P