[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20846-20850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8867]
[[Page 20846]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2010-0998; FRL-9295-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a request submitted by the Indiana Department
of Environmental Management on November 24, 2010, to revise the Indiana
State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). These
revisions address sulfur dioxide (SO2) and particulate
matter (PM) limits for Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill) at its facility
in Hammond (Lake County), Indiana. Indiana's SO2 revisions
tighten emission limits for some existing units at Cargill's Hammond
facility and remove the references to other emission units that are no
longer in operation, in accordance with the terms of a September 2005
Federal consent decree. The PM revisions reflect the permanent shutdown
of, and changes in unit identification for other Cargill units.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective June 13, 2011, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by May 16, 2011. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule
in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not
take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2010-0998, by one of the following methods:
1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: [email protected].
3. Fax: (312) 408-2279.
4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Control Strategies
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2010-0998. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. We recommend that you telephone Matt Rau, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 886-6524 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What is EPA's analysis of the revision?
III. What are the environmental effects of this action?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this action?
a. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
Cargill entered into a Federal consent decree with EPA and a number
of states, including Indiana, to resolve a complaint filed against the
company in the United States District Court for the District of
Minnesota. The consent decree was lodged on September 1, 2005. It
covers 24 Cargill facilities in 13 states.
Paragraph 15 of the consent decree requires, among other things,
that Cargill submit permit applications to applicable permitting
authorities that will contain annual SO2 emission limits for
the facilities and boilers listed in Appendix B of the decree. Appendix
B lists four boilers at the Hammond facility--Numbers 6, 7, 8, and 10.
It requires the retirement of Boiler Number 7, while removing the
emission limits, recordkeeping requirements, and reporting requirements
for the other three boilers. All four boilers have been permanently
shutdown.
Paragraph 27 of the consent decree requires SO2 emission
reductions at the Hammond facility to be achieved through the
installation of pollution control technologies and the implementation
of emission reduction projects to meet a level of control specified for
the sources in Appendix L of the decree.
Indiana has revised SIP rule 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC)
7-4.1-5 to address these consent decree provisions.
b. Particulate Matter
Indiana revised Cargill's emission limits in 326 IAC 6.8-2-8 to
remove the emission units that are no longer in operation at the
Hammond facility. These revisions were not required by the consent
decree, but were made to reflect the permanent shutdown of Cargill
units--ten process sources and two natural gas-fired boilers. Those
units now have no emission limits and, as such, they cannot be
operated. In
[[Page 20847]]
addition, Indiana has made changes in unit identification to reflect
current operations.
II. What is EPA's analysis of the revision?
The revisions to the SO2 emission limits in 326 IAC 7-
4.1-5 should result in improved air quality. There will no longer be
emissions from the four boilers that Cargill has permanently shutdown,
as referenced in Appendix B of the consent decree. In addition, there
should be substantial SO2 emission reductions resulting from
the eight units required to be controlled in Appendix L of the consent
decree. The revisions to the PM emission rule, 326 IAC 6.8-2-8, help to
clarify the PM requirements for Cargill.
EPA, therefore, finds these revisions to the SO2 and PM
SIP rules acceptable.
III. What are the environmental effects of this action?
As a result of the SO2 emission reduction requirements
in the consent decree, Cargill shutdown eight units and tightened
emission limits on four other units. The total allowable SO2
emissions rate from all Cargill units is now 622 pounds per hour lower.
The revisions have the potential to reduce SO2 emissions by
2730 tons per year.
Sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere can aggravate respiratory and
cardiovascular disease. Sulfur dioxide emissions also contribute to
acid rain and fine particulate matter formation.
Indiana also removed the PM emission limits for ten units that are
permanently shutdown. The emission limit revisions do not cause a
reduction in PM emissions as the units have already ceased operation,
but they are indicative of the reduction in total allowable PM
emissions that has occurred at the Cargill facility. The facility's
cumulative allowable PM emissions are now 71 pounds per hour lower.
That yields a potential annual reduction of 311 tons of PM emissions.
Particulate matter interferes with lung function when inhaled.
Exposure to particulates can cause heart and lung disease. Particulate
matter also aggravates asthma. Airborne particulate matter or PM is the
main source of haze that causes a reduction in visibility.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to the Indiana SIP. This consists of
revisions of the PM emission rule, 326 IAC 6.8-2-8, and the
SO2 emission rule, 326 IAC 7-4.1-5.
We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective June 13, 2011
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by May 16, 2011. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw
this action before the effective date by publishing a subsequent
document that will withdraw the final action. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the
proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at
this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
If we do not receive any comments, this action will be effective June
13, 2011.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 13, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section
[[Page 20848]]
of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for
judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw
this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: April 4, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart P--Indiana
0
2. In Sec. 52.770 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries for ``Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations For Lake
County'' and ``Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.770 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indiana
Indiana citation Subject effective date EPA approval date Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 1. General Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-1-1................. Applicability........... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-1-1.5............... Definitions............. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-1-2................. Particulate emission 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
limitations; fuel 14383.
combustion steam
generators, asphalt
concrete plant, grain
elevators, foundries,
mineral aggregate
operations;
modification by
commissioner.
6.8-1-3................. Compliance determination 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-1-4................. Compliance schedules.... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-1-5................. Control strategies...... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-1-6................. State implementation 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
plan revisions. 14383.
6.8-1-7................. Scope................... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 2. Lake County: PM10 Emission Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-2-1................. General provisions and 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
definitions. 23356.
6.8-2-2................. Lake County: PM10 and 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
total suspended 23356.
particulates (TSP)
emissions.
6.8-2-4................. ASF-Keystone, Inc.-- 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Hammond. 23356.
6.8-2-6................. BP Products North 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
America, Inc.--Whiting 23356.
Refinery.
6.8-2-7................. Bucko Construction 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Company, Inc. 23356.
6.8-2-8................. Cargill, Inc............ 11/19/2010 4/14/2011, [Insert
page number where
the document
begins].
6.8-2-9................. W.R. Grace and Co.--Conn 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-13................ Hammond Group, Inc. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
(HGI) Halox Division, 23356.
Lead Products Division,
and Hammond Expander
Division.
6.8-2-14................ Hammond Group, Inc.-- 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Halstab Division. 23356.
6.8-2-16................ Resco Products, Inc..... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-17................ Mittal Steel--Indiana 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Harbor East Inc. 23356.
6.8-2-18................ Jupiter Aluminum 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Corporation. 23356.
6.8-2-19................ Dover Chemical 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Corporation--Hammond. 23356.
6.8-2-20................ LaSalle Steel Company... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-21................ Mittal Steel--Indiana 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Harbor West Inc. 23356.
6.8-2-22................ Carmeuse Lime Inc....... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-24................ Methodist Hospital Inc.. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-25................ National Recovery 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Systems. 23356.
6.8-2-26................ NIPSCo--Dean H. Mitchell 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Station. 23356.
6.8-2-27................ Praxair Inc............. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-28................ Premiere Candy Company.. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-29................ Reed Minerals--Plant 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
14. 23356.
6.8-2-30................ Rhodia, Inc............. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-31................ Silgan Containers 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Manufacturing 23356.
Corporation.
6.8-2-32................ Smith Ready Mix, Inc.... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-33................ State Line Energy, LLC.. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-2-34................ Huhtamaki Foodservice, 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Inc. 23356.
6.8-2-35................ Conopco, Inc. d/b/a 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Unilever HPC USA. 23356.
6.8-2-36................ Union Tank Car Company, 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Plant 1. 23356.
6.8-2-37................ United States Gypsum 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
Company. 23356.
[[Page 20849]]
6.8-2-38................ U.S. Steel--Gary Works.. 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 4. Lake County: Opacity Limits; Test Methods
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-4-1................. Test methods............ 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 8. Lake County: Continuous Compliance Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-8-1................. Applicability........... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-8-2................. Documentation; operation 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
and maintenance 14383.
procedures.
6.8-8-3................. Plan requirements....... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-8-4................. Plan; schedule for 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
complying with 326 IAC 14383.
6.8-7.
6.8-8-5................. Plan; source categories. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-8-6................. Plan; particulate matter 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
control equipment; 14383.
operation and
maintenance.
6.8-8-7................. Plan; particulate matter 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
control equipment; 14383.
recording; operation;
inspection.
6.8-8-8................. Plan; department review. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 9. Lake County: PM10 Coke Battery Emission Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-9-1................. Applicability........... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-9-2................. Definitions............. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-9-3................. Emission limitations.... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 10. Lake County: Fugitive Particulate Matter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-10-1................ Applicability........... 2/22/2008 4/30/2008, 73 FR
23356.
6.8-10-2................ Definitions............. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-10-3................ Particulate matter 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
emission limitations. 14383.
6.8-10-4................ Compliance requirements; 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
control plans. 14383.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 11. Lake County: Particulate Matter Contingency Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-11-1................ Applicability........... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-11-2................ ``Ambient monitoring 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
data'' defined. 14383.
6.8-11-3................ Exceedances............. 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
6.8-11-4................ Violation of 24-hour 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
standard. 14383.
6.8-11-5................ Violation of annual 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
standard. 14383.
6.8-11-6................ Reduction measures...... 9/9/2005 3/22/2006, 71 FR
14383.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 1.1. Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-1.1-1................. Applicability........... 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
56129.
7-1.1-2................. Sulfur dioxide emission 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
limitations. 56129.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 2. Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-2-1................... Reporting requirements; 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
methods to determine 56129.
compliance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 3. Ambient Monitoring
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-3-2................... Ambient monitoring...... .............. 5/13/1982, 47 FR
20583.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 4. Emission Limitations and Requirements by County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-4-2................... Marion County sulfur 3/11/1999 8/2/2000, 65 FR
dioxide emission 47336.
limitations.
7-4-3................... Vigo County sulfur 9/30/2004 2/28/2005, 70 FR
dioxide emission 9533.
limitations.
7-4-4................... Wayne County sulfur 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR
dioxide emission 33808.
limitations.
7-4-5................... LaPorte County sulfur 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR
dioxide emission 33808.
limitations.
7-4-6................... Jefferson County sulfur 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR
dioxide emission 33808.
limitations.
7-4-7................... Sullivan County sulfur 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR
dioxide emission 33808.
limitations.
7-4-8................... Vermillion County sulfur 4/10/1988 1/19/1989, 54 FR
dioxide emission 2112.
limitations.
7-4-9................... Floyd County sulfur 4/10/1988 9/1/1988, 53 FR
dioxide emission 33808.
limitations.
7-4-10.................. Warrick County sulfur 8/30/2008 11/10/2009, 74 FR
dioxide emission 57904.
limitations.
7-4-11.................. Morgan County sulfur 5/13/1988 12/16/1988, 53 FR
dioxide emission 50521.
limitations.
7-4-12.1................ Gibson County sulfur 12/5/1990 9/19/1994, 59 FR
dioxide emission 47804.
limitations.
7-4-13.................. Dearborn County sulfur 3/16/2005 2/28/2006, 71 FR
dioxide emission 9936.
limitations.
7-4-14.................. Porter County sulfur 10/23/1988 1/19/1989, 54 FR
dioxide emission 2112.
limitations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20850]]
Rule 4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-4.1-1................. Lake County sulfur 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-2................. Sampling and analysis 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
protocol. 56129.
7-4.1-3................. BP Products North 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
America Inc. sulfur 56129.
dioxide emission
limitations.
7-4.1-4................. Bucko Construction 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
sulfur dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-5................. Cargill, Inc. sulfur 11/19/2010 4/14/2011, [Insert
dioxide emission page number where
limitations. the document
begins].
7-4.1-6................. Carmeuse Lime sulfur 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-7................. Cokenergy Inc. sulfur 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-8................. Indiana Harbor Coke 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
Company sulfur dioxide 56129.
emission limitations.
7-4.1-9................. Ironside Energy, LLC 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
sulfur dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-10................ ISG Indiana Harbor Inc. 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
sulfur dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-11................ Ispat Inland Inc. sulfur 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-12................ Methodist Hospital 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
sulfur dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-13................ National Recovery 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
Systems sulfur dioxide 56129.
emission limitations.
7-4.1-14................ NIPSCO Dean H. Mitchell 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
Generating Station 56129.
sulfur dioxide emission
limitations.
7-4.1-15................ Rhodia sulfur dioxide 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
emission limitations. 56129.
7-4.1-16................ Safety-Kleen Oil 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
Recovery Company sulfur 56129.
dioxide emission
limitations.
7-4.1-17................ SCA Tissue North America 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
LLC sulfur dioxide 56129.
emission limitations.
7-4.1-18................ State Line Energy, LLC 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
sulfur dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-19................ Unilever HPC USA sulfur 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-20................ U.S. Steel--Gary Works 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
sulfur dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
7-4.1-21................ Walsh and Kelly sulfur 6/24/2005 9/26/2005, 70 FR
dioxide emission 56129.
limitations.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-8867 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P