[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21003-21005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9120]
[[Page 21003]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[WO-300-1310-PP-OSHL]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and Possible Land Use Plan Amendments for Allocation of
Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resources on Lands Administered by the Bureau
of Land Management in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
intends to prepare a Programmatic EIS for Allocation of Oil Shale and
Tar Sands Resources on Lands Administered by the BLM in Colorado, Utah,
and Wyoming, and by this notice is announcing the beginning of the
scoping process to solicit public comments and identify issues.
DATES: This notice initiates the public scoping process for the EIS and
possible plan amendments. Comments on issues may be submitted in
writing until May 16, 2011. The BLM invites comments on potential
resource issues that should be discussed in the NEPA analysis,
including input on issues pertaining to historic and cultural resources
within the areas proposed for land use plan amendment. Such information
will inform consultation activities the BLM will conduct in furtherance
of the United States' government-to-government relationship with Indian
Tribes. The BLM will hold public scoping meetings at the following
locations: Salt Lake City, Utah; Price, Utah; Vernal, Utah; Rock
Springs, Wyoming; Rifle, Colorado; Denver, Colorado; and Cheyenne,
Wyoming. The BLM will announce exact times and locations for all public
meetings at least 15 days in advance through local media, newsletters,
and the project Web site at: http://blm.gov/st5c. The minutes and list
of attendees for each scoping meeting will be available to the public
and may be supplemented after the meeting should participants wish to
clarify their views. We will provide additional opportunities for
public participation upon publication of the Draft Programmatic EIS.
The first public meeting will be held in Salt Lake City, Utah on April
26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by the following methods:
Web site: http://blm.gov/st5c.
Mail: BLM Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resources Leasing
Programmatic EIS Scoping, Argonne National Laboratory, EVS, 240, 9700
S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information and/or to have
your name added to our mailing list, contact Sherri Thompson, Project
Manager, Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Office, telephone:
(303) 239-3758, address: 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado
80215, or Dan Haas, (for cultural issues), Cultural Resources Lead,
Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Office, telephone (303) 239-
3647, or visit the Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resources Programmatic EIS
Web site at: http://blm.gov/st5c. Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You
will receive a reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2008, the BLM amended eight land use
plans in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming to make public lands available for
potential leasing and development of oil shale resources, and two other
land use plans to expand the acreage available for potential tar sands
leasing in Utah, where these resources are located. These 2008
amendments, supported by the preparation of a Programmatic EIS required
under Section 369(d)(1) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, made
approximately 2,000,000 acres available for potential development of
oil shale. The 2008 Programmatic EIS and Record of Decision (ROD)
amending the land use plans are available at http://ostseis.anl.gov,
and include maps and more specific information about the geographic
area studied in 2008. Information specific to the individual RMPs
amended in 2008 can be found at the individual BLM Field Office Web
site, which can be accessed through http://www.blm.gov.
The BLM has decided to take a fresh look at the land use plan
allocation decisions made in the 2008 ROD associated with the
Programmatic EIS, in order to consider which lands should be open to
future leasing of oil shale and tar sands resources. The planning area
for the oil shale resource is the Piceance and Washakie Basins in
Colorado, the Uintah Basin in Utah, and the Green River and Washakie
Basins in Wyoming. For the tar sands resources, the planning area is
certain sedimentary provinces in the Colorado Plateau in Utah. As there
are no economically viable ways yet known to extract and process oil
shale for commercial purposes, and Utah tar sands deposits are not at
present a proven commercially-viable energy source, the BLM, through
its planning process, intends to take a hard look at whether it is
appropriate for approximately 2,000,000 acres to remain available for
potential development of oil shale, and approximately 431,224 acres of
public land to remain available for potential development of tar sands.
The Programmatic EIS will analyze amending the following Resource
Management Plans (RMP): The White River RMP, the Grand Junction RMP,
the Glenwood Springs RMP, the Vernal RMP, the Price RMP, the Richfield
RMP, the Monticello RMP, the Kemmerer RMP, the Rawlins RMP, and the
Green River RMP to identify areas that may be excluded from any future
oil shale and tar sands resources leasing in these three states. The
BLM will use the NEPA scoping process in part to meet the public
participation requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA), and information gathered about historic and
cultural resources will assist the BLM in meeting the requirements of
NHPA Section 106.
This new planning initiative will also provide the BLM an
opportunity to consider what public lands might be best suited for this
kind of development in light of information not available in 2008. For
example, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has recently completed an
in-place assessment of the oil shale and nahcolite resources of the
Green River Formation in the Piceance Basin of western Colorado (August
2010) and an assessment of in-place oil in oil shales of the Eocene
Green River Formation of the Uinta Basin of eastern Utah and western
Colorado (August 2010). The USGS also anticipates release of an
assessment of the Green River Formation in Wyoming later this year. On
March 23, 2010, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published a Notice
of Petition Findings Endangered Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-
Month Findings to List the Greater Sage-Grouse as Threatened or
Endangered in the Federal Register (75 FR 13910). Sage grouse (which
occurs on some lands allocated as open to oil shale and tar sands
leasing in the 2008 land use plan decisions) range-wide was warranted
for listing under the applicable provisions of the Endangered Species
Act, but that
[[Page 21004]]
such listing was precluded by higher priority listing actions.
The BLM has developed a preliminary purpose and need for the
proposed planning action. It is presented here to inform the public
scoping process and to facilitate collaboration with interested parties
to identify the planning issues important to local, regional, and
National needs and concerns that will assist the BLM in formulating
alternatives analyzed in the Programmatic EIS. The preliminary purpose
and need statement for this proposed planning action is to reassess the
appropriate mix of allowable uses with respect to oil shale and tar
sands leasing and potential development.
The BLM will decide whether any changes should be made to the
existing land use allocation decisions, in light of the nascent
character of technology for developing oil shale and tar sands
resources, and any relevant new information. Specifically, the BLM will
consider amending the applicable resource management plans to specify
whether any areas in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming currently open for
future leasing and development of oil shale or tar sands should not be
made available for such leasing and development.
The Programmatic EIS will analyze the no action alternative, which
would leave the current allocation decisions from the 2008 ROD in
place. It will also analyze an alternative that would remove all of the
following kinds of areas from oil shale and tar sands leasing, and one
or more alternatives that would remove some of the following kinds of
areas from oil shale and tar sands leasing:
(1) All areas that the BLM has identified or may identify as a
result of inventories conducted during this planning process, as lands
containing wilderness characteristics (preliminary information may be
found in chapters 2 and 3 of the 2008 Programmatic EIS, at http://ostseis.anl.gov);
(2) The whole of the Adobe Town ``Very Rare or Uncommon'' area, as
designated by the Wyoming Environment Quality Council on April 10, 2008
(http://deq.state.wy.us/eqc/orders/Rare%20or%20Closed%20Cases/UandI_Final_for_DEQ.pdf);
(3) Core or priority sage grouse habitat, as defined by such
guidance as the BLM or the Department of the Interior may issue;
(4) All areas of critical environmental concern (ACEC) located
within the areas analyzed in the September 2008 Oil Shale and Tar Sands
Resources Leasing Final EIS (2008 OSTS Programmatic EIS, chapter 2,
with further discussion in chapters 3 and 4, at http://ostseis.anl.gov); and
(5) All areas identified as excluded from commercial oil shale and
tar sands leasing in Alternative C of the September 2008 OSTS
Programmatic EIS (see http://ostseis.anl.gov).
Lands that the BLM identifies as having wilderness characteristics
will be considered during this planning initiative, as described above,
and consistent with Secretarial Order No. 3310, dated Dec. 22, 2010,
and BLM Manuals 6301 and 6302. Because this is a targeted plan
amendment addressing only the management of oil shale and tar sands
resources, this planning initiative will not consider designating Wild
Lands. Future leasing of lands determined by the BLM to have wilderness
characteristics, if compatible with the allocation decisions stemming
from this initiative, will subsequently be assessed in accordance with
BLM Manual 6303, as appropriate (i.e., where the BLM has not
determined, consistent with BLM Manual 6302, whether the lands with
wilderness characteristics at issue should be receive a wild lands
designation, BLM Manual 6303 will apply).
This planning initiative addresses the allocation of BLM-
administered lands as closed or open to the potential leasing and
development of oil shale and tar sands resources, but, as in the oil
shale and tar sands planning process completed in 2008, will not
disturb other management decisions contained in the RMPs governing the
areas to be included in the study area. Preliminary issues and
management concerns have been identified by BLM personnel, other
agencies, and in meetings with individuals and user groups. They
represent the BLM's knowledge to date regarding the issues and concerns
with current land management. The public is encouraged to help refine
these issues during the scoping phase, as well as identify additional
issues relevant to the management of oil shale and tar sands resources
in these areas that should be considered in the alternatives
referenced, or any other alternative(s) the BLM may develop for
consideration in this planning process.
In addition, the BLM anticipates including the mitigation measures
developed during the previous oil shale and tar sands planning
initiative completed in 2008, and may develop additional mitigation
measures. These measures may be applied, if appropriate, at the
discretion of the decision maker, at the time these resources are
leased and/or developed.
This Notice also serves as notification of the planning criteria
that the BLM is preliminarily considering as part of this planning
initiative. Planning criteria are the standards, rules, and other
factors used in formulating judgments about data collection, analysis,
and decision making associated with development of the planning process
and preparation of the Programmatic EIS. These criteria establish
parameters and help focus the planning process and preparation of the
Programmatic EIS. We welcome public comment on the following
preliminary planning criteria:
(1) The Programmatic EIS and plan amendments will be completed in
compliance with the FLPMA and all other applicable laws;
(2) The BLM will work collaboratively with the States of Colorado,
Utah, and Wyoming, Indian Tribal governments, county and municipal
governments, Federal agencies, and all other interested groups,
agencies and individuals. Public participation will be encouraged
throughout the process;
(3) The proposed plan amendments analyzed in the Programmatic EIS
would amend the appropriate individual land use plans specifically to
address allocation of BLM-administered lands as open or closed to
leasing and development of oil shale and tar sands resources;
(4) Preparation of the Programmatic EIS and plan amendments will
involve coordination with Indian Tribal governments and will provide
strategies for the protection of recognized traditional uses;
(5) The BLM will coordinate with local, State, and Federal agencies
in the planning process and development of the Programmatic EIS to
strive for consistency with their existing plans and policies, to the
extent practicable; and
(6) Any decisions made on the basis of the planning process and
development of the Programmatic EIS will take into account valid
existing rights.
The BLM will use an interdisciplinary approach to develop the
Programmatic EIS in order to consider the variety of resource issues
and concerns identified. Specialists with expertise in the following
disciplines will be involved in the planning process: Minerals and
geology, wildlife and fisheries, air quality, outdoor recreation,
archeology, paleontology, hydrology, soils, sociology, and economics.
As noted above, the BLM will use and coordinate public
participation opportunities offered consistent with the NEPA and land
use planning processes to assist the agency in satisfying any public
involvement requirements under Section 106 of the
[[Page 21005]]
NHPA and 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3). Further, the BLM seeks information about
historic and cultural resources within the area potentially affected by
the proposed land use amendments to assist in analyzing the potential
impacts in the context of both NEPA and Section 106 of the NHPA. In
addition, consistent with 36 CFR 800.8, the BLM anticipates
coordinating its compliance with NHPA with fulfilling its obligations
under NEPA to the extent possible. The BLM also may develop a
Programmatic Agreement that addresses how the agency will fulfill its
obligations under Section 106 of the NHPA with respect to the
development of oil shale and tar sands. To the extent possible, the BLM
intends to publish a draft of such Programmatic Agreement, if
developed, concurrently with publication of any Draft EIS.
Consistent with the Federal government's government-to-government
relationship with Indian Tribes, BLM consultation with these Tribes
will be conducted in accordance with Executive Order 13575, and Tribal
concerns, including impacts on Indian trust assets, will be given due
consideration. The BLM invites Federal, State, and local agencies,
along with Tribes and other stakeholders that may be interested or
affected by the BLM's decision on this project, to participate in the
scoping process. These entities, if eligible, may request or be
requested by the BLM to participate as a cooperating agency in the NEPA
process or consulting party in the NHPA process.
You may submit comments on issues and planning criteria in writing
to the BLM at any public scoping meeting, or by using one of the
methods listed in the ADDRESSES section above. After BLM has gathered
public input on issues the planning and NEPA process should address, we
will categorize comments received as follows:
(1) Issues to be resolved in the plan;
(2) Issues to be resolved through policy, regulation, or
administrative action; or
(3) Issues beyond the scope of this plan amendment process.
The BLM will provide an explanation in the Programmatic EIS as to
why we placed an issue in category two or three.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7, 43 CFR 1610.2.
Mike Nedd,
Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty, and Resource Protection.
[FR Doc. 2011-9120 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P