[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21978-21984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9484]
[[Page 21977]]
Vol. 76
Tuesday,
No. 75
April 19, 2011
Part III
Department of Education
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applications for New Awards; Enhanced Assessment Instruments Grants
Program--Enhanced Assessment Instruments; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 76 , No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 /
Notices
[[Page 21978]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Enhanced Assessment Instruments
Grants Program--Enhanced Assessment Instruments
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Overview Information:
Enhanced Assessment Instruments Grants Program--Enhanced Assessment
Instruments
Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY)
2010 funds.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.368A.
Dates:
Applications Available: April 19, 2011.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: May 19, 2011.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 3, 2011.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 2, 2011.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the EAG program is to enhance
the quality of assessment instruments and systems used by States for
measuring the academic achievement of elementary and secondary school
students.
Priorities: This competition includes five absolute priorities and
one competitive preference priority. In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(iv), absolute priorities 1 through 4 (Statutory
Priorities) are based on section 6112 of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 7301a). Absolute
priority 5 (Regulatory Priority) and competitive preference priority 1
are from the notice of final priorities, requirements, definitions, and
selection criteria published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register (2011 NFP).
Absolute Priorities: For FY 2010 and any subsequent year in which
we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition, these priorities are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet: (a) one or more
of the Statutory Priorities and (b) the Regulatory Priority.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1--Collaboration. Collaborate with institutions
of higher education, other research institutions, or other
organizations to improve the quality, validity, and reliability of
State academic assessments beyond the requirements for these
assessments described in section 1111(b)(3) of the ESEA.
Absolute Priority 2--Use of Multiple Measures of Student Academic
Achievement. Measure student academic achievement using multiple
measures of student academic achievement from multiple sources.
Absolute Priority 3--Charting Student Progress Over Time. Chart
student progress over time.
Absolute Priority 4--Comprehensive Academic Assessment Instruments.
Evaluate student academic achievement through the development of
comprehensive academic assessment instruments, such as performance- and
technology-based academic assessments.
Absolute Priority 5--English Language Proficiency Assessment
System.
To meet this priority, an applicant must propose a comprehensive
plan to develop an English language proficiency assessment system that
is valid, reliable, and fair for its intended purpose. Such a plan must
include the following features:
(a) Design. The assessment system must--
(1) Be designed for implementation in multiple States;
(2) Be based on a common definition of ``English learner'' adopted
by the applicant State and, if the applicant applies as part of a
consortium, adopted and held in common by all States in the consortium,
where common with respect to the definition of ``English learner''
means identical for purposes of the diagnostic (e.g., screener or
placement) assessments and associated achievement standards used to
classify students as English learners as well as the summative
assessments and associated achievement standards used to exit students
from English learner status;
(3) At a minimum, include diagnostic (e.g., screener or placement)
and summative assessments;
(4) Measure students' English proficiency against a set of English
language proficiency standards held by the applicant State and, if the
applicant applies as part of a consortium, held in common by all States
in the consortium;
(5) Measure students' English proficiency against a set of English
language proficiency standards that correspond to a common set of
college- and career-ready standards (as defined in this notice) in
English language arts and mathematics, are rigorous, are developed with
broad stakeholder involvement, are vetted with experts and
practitioners, and for which external evaluations have documented rigor
and correspondence with the common set of college- and career-ready
standards in English language arts and mathematics;
(6) Cover the full range of the English language proficiency
standards across the four language domains of reading, writing,
speaking, and listening, as required by section 3113(b)(2) of the ESEA;
(7) Ensure that the measures of students' English proficiency
consider the students' control over the linguistic components of
language (e.g., phonology, syntax, morphology);
(8) Produce results that indicate whether individual students have
attained the English proficiency necessary to participate fully in
academic instruction in English and meet or exceed college- and career-
ready standards;
(9) Provide at least an annual measure of English proficiency and
student progress in learning English for English learners in
kindergarten through grade 12 in each of the four language domains of
reading, writing, speaking, and listening;
(10) Assess all English learners, including English learners who
are also students with disabilities and students with limited or no
formal education, except for English learners with the most significant
cognitive disabilities who are eligible to participate in alternate
assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards in
accordance with 34 CFR 200.6(a)(2); and
(11) Be accessible to all English learners, including by providing
appropriate accommodations for English learners with disabilities,
except for English learners with the most significant cognitive
disabilities who are eligible to participate in alternate assessments
based on alternate academic achievement standards in accordance with 34
CFR 200.6(a)(2).
(b) Technical quality. The assessment system must measure students'
English proficiency in ways that--
(1) Are consistent with nationally recognized professional and
technical standards; and
(2) As appropriate, elicit complex student demonstrations of
comprehension and production of academic English (e.g., performance
tasks, selected responses, brief or extended constructed responses).
(c) Data. The assessment system must produce data that--
(1) Include student attainment of English proficiency and student
progress in learning English (including
[[Page 21979]]
data disaggregated by English learner subgroups such as English
learners by years in a language instruction educational program;
English learners whose formal education has been interrupted; students
who were formerly English learners by years out of the language
instruction educational program; English learners by level of English
proficiency, such as those who initially scored proficient on the
English language proficiency assessment; English learners by disability
status; and English learners by native language);
(2) Provide a valid and reliable measure of students' abilities in
each of the four language domains (reading, writing, speaking, and
listening) and a comprehensive English proficiency score based on all
four domains, with each language domain score making a significant
contribution to the comprehensive ELP score, at each proficiency level;
and
(3) Can be used for the--
(i) Identification of students as English learners;
(ii) Decisions about whether a student should exit from English
language instruction educational programs;
(iii) Determinations of school, local educational agency, and State
effectiveness for the purposes of accountability under Title I and
Title III of the ESEA;
(4) Can be used, as appropriate, as one of multiple measures, to
inform--
(i) Evaluations of individual principals and teachers in order to
determine their effectiveness;
(ii) Determinations of principal and teacher professional
development and support needs; and
(iii) Strategies to improve teaching, learning, and language
instruction education programs.
(d) Compatibility. The assessment system must use compatible
approaches to technology, assessment administration, scoring,
reporting, and other factors that facilitate the coherent inclusion of
the assessments within States' student assessment systems.
(e) Students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. The
comprehensive plan to develop an English language proficiency
assessment system must include the strategies the applicant State and,
if the applicant is part of a consortium, all States in the consortium,
plans to use to assess the English proficiency of English learners with
the most significant cognitive disabilities who are eligible to
participate in alternate assessments based on alternate academic
achievement standards in accordance with 34 CFR 200.6(a)(2) in lieu of
including those students in the operational administration of the
assessments developed for other English learners under a grant from
this competition.
Competitive Preference Priority: For FY 2010 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from
this competition, this priority is a competitive preference priority.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 15 points to
an application, depending on how well the application meets this
priority.
This priority is:
Competitive Preference Priority 1--Collaborative Efforts Among
States.
To meet this priority, an applicant must--
(a) Include a minimum of 15 States in the consortium;
(b) Identify in its application a proposed project management
partner and provide an assurance that the proposed project management
partner is not partnered with any other eligible applicant applying for
an award under this competition; \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In selecting a proposed project management partner, an
eligible applicant must comply with the requirements for procurement
in 34 CFR 80.36.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Provide a description of the consortium's structure and
operation. The description must include--
(1) The organizational structure of the consortium (e.g.,
differentiated roles that a member State may hold);
(2) The consortium's method and process (e.g., consensus, majority)
for making different types of decisions (e.g., policy, operational);
(3) The protocols by which the consortium will operate, including
protocols for member States to change roles in the consortium, for
member States to leave the consortium, and for new member States to
join the consortium;
(4) The consortium's plan, including the process and timeline, for
setting key policies and definitions for implementing the proposed
project, including, for any assessments developed through a project
funded by this grant, the common set of standards upon which to base
the assessments, a common set of performance-level descriptors, a
common set of achievement standards, common assessment administration
procedures, common item-release and test-security policies, and a
common set of policies and procedures for accommodations and student
participation; and
(5) The consortium's plan for managing grant funds received under
this competition; and
(d) Provide a memorandum of understanding or other binding
agreement executed by each State in the consortium that includes an
assurance that, to remain in the consortium, the State will adopt or
use any instrument, including to the extent applicable, assessments,
developed under the proposed project no later than the end of the
project period.
Requirements: The following requirements, which are from 2011 NFP,
apply to this competition. An eligible applicant awarded a grant under
this program must:
(a) Evaluate the validity, reliability, and fairness of any
assessments or other assessment-related instruments developed under a
grant from this competition, and make available documentation of
evaluations of technical quality through formal mechanisms (e.g., peer-
reviewed journals) and informal mechanisms (e.g., newsletters), both in
print and electronically;
(b) Actively participate in any applicable technical assistance
activities conducted or facilitated by the Department or its designees,
coordinate with the RTTA program in the development of assessments
under this program, and participate in other activities as determined
by the Department;
(c) Develop a strategy to make student-level data that result from
any assessments or other assessment-related instruments developed under
a grant from this competition available on an ongoing basis for
research, including for prospective linking, validity, and program
improvement studies; \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Eligible applicants awarded a grant under this program must
comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
and 34 CFR part 99, as well as State and local requirements
regarding privacy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Ensure that any assessments or other assessment-related
instruments developed under a grant from this competition will be
operational (ready for large-scale administration) at the end of the
project period;
(e) Ensure that funds awarded under the EAG program are not used to
support the development of standards, such as under the English
language proficiency assessment system priority or any other priority;
(f) Maximize the interoperability of any assessments and other
assessment-related instruments developed with funds from this
competition across technology platforms and the ability for States to
move their assessments from one technology platform to another by doing
the following, as applicable, for any assessments developed with funds
from this competition by--
[[Page 21980]]
(1) Developing all assessment items in accordance with an industry-
recognized open-licensed interoperability standard that is approved by
the Department during the grant period, without non-standard extensions
or additions; and
(2) Producing all student-level data in a manner consistent with an
industry-recognized open-licensed interoperability standard that is
approved by the Department during the grant period;
(g) Unless otherwise protected by law or agreement as proprietary
information, make any assessment content (i.e., assessments and
assessment items) and other assessment-related instruments developed
with funds from this competition freely available to States, technology
platform providers, and others that request it for purposes of
administering assessments, provided that those parties receiving
assessment content comply with consortium or State requirements for
test or item security; and
(h) For any assessments and other assessment-related instruments
developed with funds from this competition, use technology to the
maximum extent appropriate to develop, administer, and score the
assessments and report results.
Definitions: The following definitions, which are from 2011 NFP,
apply to this competition.
Common set of college-and career-ready standards means a set of
academic content standards for grades K-12 held in common by multiple
States, that (a) define what a student must know and be able to do at
each grade level; (b) if mastered, would ensure that the student is
college- and career-ready by the time of high school graduation; and
(c) for any consortium of States applying under the EAG program, are
substantially identical across all States in the consortium.
A State in a consortium may supplement the common set of college-
and career-ready standards with additional content standards, provided
that the additional standards do not comprise more than 15 percent of
the State's total standards for that content area.
English language proficiency assessment system, for purposes of the
English language proficiency assessment system priority, means a system
of assessments that includes, at a minimum, diagnostic (e.g., screener
or placement) and summative assessments at each grade level from
kindergarten through grade 12 that cover the four language domains of
reading, writing, speaking, and listening, as required by section
3113(b)(2) of the ESEA, and that meets all other requirements of the
priority.
English learner means a student who is an English learner as
defined by the applicant consistent with the definition of a student
who is ``limited English proficient'' as that term is defined in
section 9101(25) of the ESEA. If the applicant submits an application
on behalf of a consortium, member States must develop and adopt a
common definition of the term during the period of the grant.
Student with a disability means a student who has been identified
as a child with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act, as amended.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7301a and 7842.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,
82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The notice of final priorities,
requirements, definitions, and selection criteria published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions
of higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $10,700,000 in FY 2010 funds to be
awarded in 2011. Contingent upon the availability of funds and the
quality of applications, we may make additional awards with FY 2011
funds from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $5,000,000-$10,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $7,500,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 2.
Note: Applicants should submit a single budget request for a
single budget and project period of up to 48 months. Subject to the
availability of future years' funds, the Department intends to make
supplemental grant awards to the grants awarded with FY 2010 funds.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 48 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: State educational agencies (SEAs) as
defined in section 9101(41) of the ESEA and consortia of such SEAs.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Other: An application from a consortium of SEAs must designate
one SEA as the fiscal agent.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: You can access the
electronic grant application for the Enhanced Assessment Instruments
Grants Program at http://www.Grants.gov. You must search for the
downloadable application package for this competition by the CFDA
number. Do not include the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search
(e.g., search for 84.368, not 84.368A). You can also obtain a copy of
the application package by contacting the program contact persons
listed under Agency Contacts in section VII of this notice.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or computer diskette) by contacting the person listed under Accessible
Format in section VIII of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this competition. Page
Limit: The project narrative (Part 3 of the application) is where you,
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application and the absolute and competitive preference
priorities. You must limit the project narrative (Part 3) to the
equivalent of no more than 65 pages, using the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the project narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, and captions as well as all text in charts,
tables, figures, and graphs.
Times New Roman font no smaller than 11.0 point for all
text in the project narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes,
quotations, and captions as well as all text in charts, tables figures,
and graphs. (Font sizes that are smaller than 11 but round up to 11,
such as 10.7 point, will be considered smaller than 11.0.)
Any screen shots included as part of the narrative should
follow these standards or, if other standards are applied, be sized to
equal the equivalent amount of space if these standards were applied.
The page limit applies to the project narrative, including the
table of contents
[[Page 21981]]
(Part 3), which must include a discussion of how the application meets
one or more of the statutory absolute priorities and how well the
applicant meets the regulatory absolute priority; if applicable, how
the application meets the competitive preference priority; and how well
the application addresses each of the selection criteria. The page
limit also applies to any attachments to the project narrative other
than the references/bibliography. In other words, the entirety of Part
3 of the application, including the aforementioned discussion and any
attachments to the project narrative, must be limited to the equivalent
of no more than 65 pages. The only allowable attachments other than
those included in the project narrative are those outlined as ``Other
Attachments Forms'' for Part 6 in the application package. Any
attachments other than those included within the page limit of the
project narrative and those outlined for Part 6 will not be reviewed.
The 65-page limit, or its equivalent, does not apply to the
following sections of an application: Part 1 (including the response
regarding research activities involving human subjects); Part 2 (two-
page project abstract); Part 4 (the budget sections, including the
chart and narrative budget justification); Part 5 (standard assurances
and certifications); and Part 6 (other attachments forms, including:
References/bibliography for the project narrative, individual
r[eacute]sum[eacute]s for project director(s) and key personnel
[Applicants are encouraged to limit each r[eacute]sum[eacute] to no
more than five pages], [if applicable] memoranda of understanding or
other binding agreement, [if applicable] assurance regarding management
partner, copy of applicant's indirect cost rate agreement, and [if
applicable] letters of commitment and support from collaborating SEAs
and organizations.
Our reviewers will not read any pages of your project narrative
that exceed the page limit; or exceed the equivalent of the page limit
if you apply other standards.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: April 19, 2011.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: May 19, 2011.
We will be able to develop a more efficient process for reviewing
grant applications if we have a better understanding of the number of
applicants that intend to apply for funding under this competition.
Therefore, the Secretary strongly encourages each potential applicant
to notify us of the applicant's intent to submit an application for
funding by sending a short e-mail message. This short e-mail should
provide the applicant organization's name and address. The Secretary
requests that this e-mail be sent to [email protected] with
``Intent to Apply'' in the e-mail subject line. Applicants that do not
provide this e-mail notification may still apply for funding.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 3, 2011.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV. 7. Other Submission
Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under For Further Information Contact in section VII
in this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and Central Contractor Registry: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the Central
Contractor Registry (CCR), the Government's primary registrant
database; and
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active CCR registration with current information
while your application is under review by the Department and, if you
are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one business day.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow 2-5 weeks for your TIN to become active.
The CCR registration process may take five or more business days to
complete. If you are currently registered with the CCR, you may not
need to make any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN
associated with your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will
need to update your CCR registration on an annual basis. This may take
three or more business days to complete.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov,
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined in the
Grants.gov 3-Step Registration Guide (see http://www.grants.gov/section910/Grants.govRegistrationBrochure.pdf).
7. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this competition must be submitted electronically unless you qualify
for an exception to this requirement in accordance with the
instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for grants under the Enhanced Assessment Instruments
Grants Program, CFDA number 84.368A, must be submitted electronically
using the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at http://www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be able to download a copy
of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload and
submit your application. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a
grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under
[[Page 21982]]
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for the Enhanced
Assessment Instruments Grants Program at www.Grants.gov. You must
search for the downloadable application package for this competition by
the CFDA number. Do not include the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your
search (e.g., search for 84.368, not 84.368A).
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply
with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application
because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5
system home page at http://www.G5.gov.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms:
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications.
You must upload any narrative sections and all other
attachments to your application as files in a .PDF (Portable Document)
format only. If you upload a file type other than a .PDF or submit a
password-protected file, we will not review that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by e-mail. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
With the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under For Further Information Contact in section VII of this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether
your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system; and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevent you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Collette Roney, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room 3W210,
Washington, DC 20202. FAX: (202) 260-7764.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies
[[Page 21983]]
of your application, on or before the application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.368A), LBJ
Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.368A), 550 12th Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from the 2011 NFP, published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register and are listed in the application package.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
also requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Special Conditions: Under 34 CFR 74.14 and 80.12, the Secretary
may impose special conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is
not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management system that does not meet the
standards in 34 CFR parts 74 or 80, as applicable; has not fulfilled
the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN). We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c).
4. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department has developed four measures
to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the Enhanced Assessment
Instruments Grants program: (1) The number of States that participate
in Enhanced Assessment Instruments Grants projects funded by this
competition; (2) the percentage of grantees that, at least twice during
the period of their grants, make available to SEA staff in non-
participating States and to assessment researchers information on
findings resulting from the Enhanced Assessment Instruments Grants
through presentations at national conferences, publications in refereed
journals, or other products disseminated to the assessment community;
(3) for each grant cycle and as determined by an expert panel, the
percentage of Enhanced Assessment Instruments Grants that yield
significant research, methodologies, products, or tools regarding
assessment systems or assessments; and (4) for each grant cycle and as
determined by an expert panel, the percentage of Enhanced Assessment
Instruments Grants that yield significant research, methodologies,
products, or tools specifically regarding accommodations and alternate
assessments for students with disabilities and limited English
proficient students. Grantees will be expected to include in their
interim and final performance reports information about the
accomplishments of their projects because the Department will need data
on these measures.
VII. Agency Contact
For Further Information Contact: Collette Roney, Enhanced
Assessment Grants Program, Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education, U.S.
[[Page 21984]]
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3W210,
Washington, DC 20202-6132. Telephone: (202) 401-5245, or by e-mail:
[email protected].
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll-free, at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person listed under For Further
Information Contact in section VII in this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document,
as well as all other documents of this Department published in the
Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
Dated: April 14, 2011.
Thelma Mel[eacute]ndez de Santa Ana,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2011-9484 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P