[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22614-22615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9740]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD-2008-OS-0053]
32 CFR Part 322
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: National Security Agency/Central Security Services, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Security Agency/Central Security Services (NSA/
CSS) is adding an exemption rule for the system of records GNSA 23,
``NSA/CSS Operations Security Support Program and Training Files'' when
an exemption has been previously claimed for the records in another
Privacy Act system of records. The exemption is intended to preserve
the exempt status of the record when the purposes underlying the
exemption for the original records are still valid and necessary to
protect the contents of the records.
DATES: Effective Date: April 22, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Anne Hill at (301) 688-6527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule was published on May 19,
2008 (73 FR 28767-29768). No comments were received.
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or Tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that this Privacy Act rule for the
Department of Defense does not have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it is concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
[[Page 22615]]
Public Law 95-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no additional information collection requirements on the
public under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that this Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the
Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rule
does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 322
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 322 is amended as follows:
PART 322--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 322 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
0
2. Section 322.7 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (r) and (s) as
paragraphs (s) and (t) and adding a new paragraph (r) to read as
follows:
Sec. 322.7 Exempt systems of records.
* * * * *
(r) GNSA 23.
(1) System name: NSA/CSS Operations Security Support and Program
Files.
(2) Exemption. All portions of this system of records which fall
within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(4) may be exempt from the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I) and (f).
(3) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(4).
(4) Reasons: (i) From subsection (c)(3) because the release of the
disclosure accounting would place the subject of an investigation on
notice that they are under investigation and provide them with
significant information concerning the nature of the investigation,
thus resulting in a serious impediment to law enforcement
investigations.
(ii) From subsections (d) and (f) because providing access to
records of a civil or administrative investigation and the right to
contest the contents of those records and force changes to be made to
the information contained therein would seriously interfere with and
thwart the orderly and unbiased conduct of the investigation and impede
case preparation. Providing access rights normally afforded under the
Privacy Act would provide the subject with valuable information that
would allow interference with or compromise of witnesses or render
witnesses reluctant to cooperate; lead to suppression, alteration, or
destruction of evidence; enable individuals to conceal their wrongdoing
or mislead the course of the investigation; and result in the secreting
of or other disposition of assets that would make them difficult or
impossible to reach in order to satisfy any Government claim growing
out of the investigation or proceeding.
(iii) From subsection (e)(1) because it is not always possible to
detect the relevance or necessity of each piece of information in the
early stages of an investigation. In some cases, it is only after the
information is evaluated in light of other evidence that its relevance
and necessity will be clear.
(iv) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H) because this system of
records is compiled for investigative purposes and is exempt from the
access provisions of subsections (d) and (f).
(v) From subsection (e)(4)(I) because to the extent that this
provision is construed to require more detailed disclosure than the
broad, generic information currently published in the system notice, an
exemption from this provision is necessary to protect the
confidentiality of sources of information and to protect privacy and
physical safety of witnesses and informants.
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-9740 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P