[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 10, Volume 3] [Revised as of January 1, 2001] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 10CFR435.101] [Page 405-408] TITLE 10--ENERGY CHAPTER II--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PART 435--ENERGY CONSERVATION VOLUNTARY PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR NEW BUILDINGS; MANDATORY FOR FEDERAL BUILDINGS--Table of Contents Subpart A--Voluntary Performance Standards for New Commercial and Multi- Family High Rise Residential Buildings; Mandatory for Federal Buildings Sec. 435.101 Implementation and compliance procedures for Federal agencies. Alternative methods of achieving compliance are illustrated in Figure 1.1-1. [[Page 406]] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TC04OC91.080 1.1 Compliance 1.1.1 The head of each Federal agency responsible for the construction of Federal buildings shall adopt such procedures as may be necessary to assure that the design of the building shall: [[Page 407]] 1.1.1.1 be undertaken in a manner that provides for appropriate consideration of the Principles of Effective Energy Building Design prescribed in Secs. 2.0, 3.2, 4.2, 5.2, 6.2, 7.2, 8.2, 9.2 and 10.2; 1.1.1.2 comply with the minimum requirements of Secs. 3.3, 4.3, 5.3, 6.3, 7.3, 8.3, 9.3 and 10.3; and 1.1.1.3 meet or exceed, based upon the analysis of life-cycle cost- effectiveness required by Sec. 1.1.2 below, the following additional requirements: 1.1.1.3.1 the lighting design shall meet either the prescriptive requirements of Sec. 3.4 or the system performance requirements of Sec. 3.5, 1.1.1.3.2 the building envelope design shall meet either the prescriptive requirements of section 5.4 or the system performance requirements of section 5.5, and 1.1.1.3.3 the heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems design shall meet the prescriptive requirements of section 7.4, and 1.1.1.3.4 the service water heating systems design shall meet the prescriptive requirements of section 9.4. 1.1.2 In lieu of meeting the provisions of section 1.1.1 above, the building design shall meet the criteria of the building energy method of section 11.0 or 12.0, Building Energy Compliance Alternatives I and II. 1.1.3 The head of each Federal agency responsible for the construction of Federal buildings shall also assure that the decision- making process for the design of the building shall employ the methodology for estimating and comparing the life-cycle cost of Federal buildings and for determining life-cycle cost-effectiveness prescribed in subpart A of 10 C.F.R. part 436. 1.2 General Approach to Compliance 1.2.1 The standards, in addition to minimum requirements, establish three alternate methods to determine whether the design has achieved compliance. 1.2.2 There are several alternative methods of achieving compliance provided for in the standards: 1.2.2.1 Prescriptive (Sections 3.4, 5.4, 7.4 and 9.4), 1.2.2.2 System Performance (Sections 3.5 and 5.5), or 1.2.2.3 Building Energy (Section 11.0 or 12.0). 1.2.2.4 The criteria established for each of the methods allow for designs that are roughly equivalent in terms of energy conservation. The equivalency of the methods can be demonstrated by designing a building using the Prescriptive approach, then modeling the building using either the System Performance or Building Energy criteria calculation procedures and comparing results. 1.2.3 Compliance with these standards shall be demonstrated by meeting the set of minimum requirements defined in Sections 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3, 5.2, 5.3, 6.2, 6.3, 7.2, 7.3, 8.2, 8.3, 9.2, 9.3, 10.2, and 10.3 and one of the alternative methods. 1.3 How To Select a Compliance Method 1.3.1 Use the Prescriptive method when the minimum amount of calculation and effort to achieve compliance is of primary concern. Its requirements can be readily specified in construction documents and are easily reviewed by building code enforcement authorities. The Prescriptive method permits few trade-offs or optimization procedures, but does permit several energy-effective and cost-effective alternate construction options to be used. See Figure 1.1-2. 1.3.2 Use the System Performance method when more innovative design is required, or when the Prescriptive method does not provide the necessary design flexibility. It requires more manual calculations than the Prescriptive method. See Figure 1.1-2 1.3.3 Use either of the Building Energy methods (Sections 11.0 or 12.0) when the most innovative design concepts are being considered. The Building Energy methods allow the trade-off of energy among the building systems as long as the total calculated design annual energy consumption does not exceed the limit prescribed. It will, in general, require the use of a computer program to simulate the operation of the various systems and to model building design energy use in accordance with the building loads and the proposed schedules of operation. See Figures 11-1 and 12-1. [[Page 408]] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TC04OC91.081 [[Page 409]]