[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 5, Volume 3] [Revised as of January 1, 2001] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 5CFR1701.9] [Page 302-304] TITLE 5--ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL CHAPTER VII--ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS PART 1701--ORGANIZATION AND PURPOSE--Table of Contents Sec. 1701.9 Step-by-step development of Commission recommendations. The Commission itself selects the research projects to be undertaken and assigns the priority to be given among projects. In making its selection the Commission may consider exploratory research by the ACIR staff, the Commission members expertise, and any other information the Commission members have. Thereafter: [[Page 303]] (a) Working outline. An outline of the project is prepared by the one or more staff members assigned to it by the Executive Director. In addition, the Chairman in his or her discretion, may assign one or more Commission members to monitor the staff work. The working outline covers the issues to be dealt with and the research techniques to be used. This outline is sent to the Commission members and reviewed at a ``Thinkers'' Session. (b) Thinkers session. The participants at a Thinkers Session are selected by the staff, after seeking suggestions from Commission members. Participants are usually professors, researchers, and other experts who have a special knowledge and interest in the subject matter of the project. If Commission members have been assigned to oversee the work, every effort will be made to enable them to attend. Thinkers Sessions are held at times convenient to the participants and are usually held at the ACIR headquarters in Washington, but may be held elsewhere if necessary for the convenience of the participants. (c) Preliminary draft. Following the Thinkers Session, the working outline will be appropriately revised and the staff will conduct the research work and prepare a preliminary draft of the study that may include a range of possible legislative recommendations for Commission consideration. (d) Critics session. After being reviewed internally, the preliminary draft is subjected to review and criticism by an informal group of critics, some of whom may have been members of the thinkers group. The critics also provide expert knowledge and a diversity of substantive and philosophical viewpoints. Care is taken to include among the critics representatives of national associations of state and local officials, as well as of Congress and federal departments and agencies. If Commission members have been assigned to oversee the work, every effort is made to encourage them to attend any meeting of the critics. Participants in a critics session are selected by the staff after seeking suggestions from Commission members. Responses to the criticisms and suggestions presented at a critics meeting are determined by the staff. (e) Revision and submission to Commission. The draft report is then revised by the staff in light of criticisms and comments received both orally and in writing from critics, Commission members and others. A summary of the draft report, along with potential recommendations, is included in a ``Docket Book'' and transmitted to Commission members at least three weeks in advance of the meeting at which it is to be considered. To the maximum extent feasible, copies of the entire report are made available to all interested parties at least two weeks before the full Commission considers the study. (f) Advisory committee. In exceptional projects the Executive Director, or the Commission, may appoint a committee of advisors to help guide the research. The committee will consist of academics and practitioners who have special competence and interest in the subject under study and, particularly, who are familiar with the latest developments in the field. The committee advises the staff and the Commission on all phases of the research, from initiating the research design to developing proposed recommendations. The committee's activities supplement but do not replace thinkers and critics sessions. (g) Adoption of recommendations. The draft recommendations are then considered and separately voted upon by the Commission in meeting. Majority vote of those present is required for approval. Extensive amendments and new germane matter must be set forth in writing and be made available to each member attending the meeting before they can be voted upon. New matter determined to be non-germane by the Chairman is referred to the staff with instructions on how to deal with the material. (h) Dissent. Members are free to dissent from actions adopted by the Commission and may have that dissent registered in any of several ways. If requested, the names of dissenting members will be shown in the minutes of the meeting where the vote was taken. To the extent dissenting members feel the minutes fail to reflect adequately [[Page 304]] the nature of their dissent, they may, with Commission approval, have the minutes revised to present their viewpoint more fully. If a report is involved, the member may be listed as having dissented on a point at an appropriate location in the text of the report. In addition, if the member wishes, a statement of dissent may be included in the report at some appropriate place. On request, the staff will assist members in drafting explanatory dissent statements for inclusion in either the minutes or reports. (i) Informal action by the Commission--polling. The Chairman, on his own motion, may poll the membership of the Commission to determine the views of members on matters on the agenda of a regular or special meeting of the Commission but which were not considered by the Commission. Votes so obtained may either be by mail or by telephone, but if by telephone, they must be confirmed in writing. The result of any poll is reported in the Docket Book for the next session of the Commission for ratification. At that time it is subject to a motion to reconsider, but not at any later time.