[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 5, Volume 2, Parts 700 to 1199]
[Revised as of January 1, 2001]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 5CFR731.701]

[Page 27-32]
 
                    TITLE 5--ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
 
          CHAPTER I--OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT (Continued)
 
PART 731--SUITABILITY--Table of Contents
 
                      Subpart G--Savings Provision
 
Sec. 731.701  Savings provision.


    No provision of these regulations shall be applied in such a way as 
to affect any administrative proceeding pending at the effective date of 
such provision. An administrative proceeding is deemed to be pending 
from the date of the ``notice of proposed action'' described in 
Sec. 731.303 of this part.

    Effective Date Note: At 65 FR 82243, Dec. 28, 2000, part 731 was 
revised, effective Jan. 29, 2001. For the convenience of the user, the 
revised text is set forth as follows:


PART 731--SUITABILITY

                            Subpart A--Scope

Sec.
731.101  Purpose.
731.102  Implementation.
731.103  Delegation to agencies.
731.104  Appointments subject to investigation.
731.105  Authority to take suitability actions.
731.106  Designation of public trust positions and investigative 
          requirements.

                  Subpart B--Suitability Determinations

731.201  Standard.
731.202  Criteria.
731.203  Actions by OPM and other agencies.
731.204  Debarment by OPM.
731.205  Debarment by agencies.

              Subpart C--OPM Suitability Action Procedures

731.301  Scope.
731.302  Notice of proposed action.
731.303  Answer.
731.304  Decision.

             Subpart D--Agency Suitability Action Procedures

731.401  Scope.
731.402  Notice of proposed action.
731.403  Answer.
731.404  Decision.

         Subpart E--Appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board

731.501  Appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

                      Subpart F--Savings Provision

731.601  Savings provision.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1302, 3301, 7301, 7701; E.O. 10577, 3 CFR 1954-
1958 Comp., p. 218; E.O. 12731, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306., 5 CFR, part 
5.

                            Subpart A--Scope

Sec. 731.101  Purpose.

    (a) The purpose of this part is to establish criteria and procedures 
for making determinations of suitability for employment in positions in 
the competitive service and for career appointment in the Senior 
Executive Service (hereinafter in this part, ``competitive service'') 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3301 and Executive Order 10577 (3 CFR, 1954-1958 
Comp., p. 218). Section 3301 of title 5, United States Code, directs 
consideration of ``age, health, character, knowledge, and ability for 
the employment sought.'' Executive Order 10577 directs OPM to examine 
``suitability'' for competitive Federal employment. This part concerns 
only determinations of ``suitability'' based on an individual's 
character or conduct that may have an impact on the integrity or 
efficiency of the service. Determinations made under this part are 
distinct from determinations of eligibility for assignment to, or 
retention in, sensitive national security positions made under Executive 
Order 10450 (3 CFR, 1949-1953 Comp., p. 936), Executive Order 12968, or 
similar authorities.
    (b) Definitions. In this part:
    Applicant. A person being considered for employment.
    Appointee. A person who has entered on duty and is in the first year 
of a subject to investigation appointment (as defined in Sec. 731.104).
    Employee. A person who has completed the first year of a subject to 
investigation appointment.
    Material. A ``material'' statement is one that is capable of 
influencing, or has a natural tendency to affect, an official decision.

Sec. 731.102  Implementation.

    (a) An investigation conducted for the purpose of determining 
suitability under this part may not be used for any other purpose except 
as provided in a Privacy Act system

[[Page 28]]

of records notice published by the agency conducting the investigation.
    (b) Under OMB Circular No. A-130 Revised, issued February 8, 1996, 
the Director of OPM is to establish policies for Federal personnel 
associated with the design, operation, or use of Federal automated 
information systems. Agencies are to implement and maintain a program to 
ensure that adequate protection is provided for all automated 
information systems. Agency programs should be consistent with 
government-wide policies and procedures issued by OPM. The Computer 
Security Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-235) provides additional 
requirements for Federal automated information systems.
    (c) Policies, procedures, criteria, and guidance for the 
implementation of this part shall be set forth in OPM issuances. OPM may 
revoke an agency's delegation to adjudicate suitability under this part 
if an agency fails to conform to OPM issuances.

Sec. 731.103  Delegation to agencies.

    (a) OPM delegates to the heads of agencies limited authority for 
adjudicating suitability in cases involving applicants for and 
appointees to competitive service positions in the agency (including 
limited, agency-specific debarment authority under Sec. 731.205). OPM 
retains jurisdiction in all competitive service cases involving evidence 
of material, intentional false statement or deception or fraud in 
examination or appointment. Agencies must refer these cases to OPM for 
adjudication, or contact OPM for prior approval if the agency wants to 
take action under its own authority (5 CFR part 315 or 5 CFR part 752). 
Also, this delegation does not include cases involving refusal to 
furnish testimony as required by Sec. 5.4 of this chapter, title, or 
passover requests involving preference eligibles who are 30 percent or 
more compensably disabled which must be referred to OPM for 
adjudication, as provided under Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public 
Law 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111 et seq. (Codified as amended in scattered 
sections of 5 U.S.C.)
    (b) Any adjudication by an agency acting under delegated authority 
from OPM which indicates that an extended general, across agency lines, 
debarment by OPM under Sec. 731.204(a) may be an appropriate action 
should be referred to OPM for debarment consideration if not favorably 
adjudicated by the agency. Referral should be made prior to any proposed 
action, but after sufficient resolution of the suitability issue(s) 
through subject contact or investigation to determine if an extended 
general debarment period appears warranted.
    (c) Agencies exercising authority under this part by delegation from 
OPM must show by policies and records that reasonable methods are used 
to ensure adherence to regulations, standards, and quality control 
procedures established by OPM.
    (d) Before making any applicant suitability determination, the 
agency should first ensure the applicant is eligible for the position, 
among the best qualified, and/or within reach of selection. Because 
suitability issues may not be disclosed until late in the application/ 
appointment process, only the best qualified should require a 
suitability determination, with appropriate procedures followed and 
appeal rights provided, if suitability issues would form the only basis 
for elimination from further consideration.
    (e) When an agency, exercising authority under this part by 
delegation from OPM, makes an adjudicative decision under this part, or 
changes a tentative favorable placement decision to an unfavorable 
decision, based on an OPM report of investigation or upon an 
investigation conducted pursuant to OPM-delegated authority, the agency 
should:
    (1) Ensure that the records used in making the decision are 
accurate, relevant, timely, and complete to the extent reasonably 
necessary to ensure fairness to the individual in any determination;
    (2) Ensure that all applicable administrative procedural 
requirements provided by law, the regulations in this part, and OPM 
policy guidance have been observed;
    (3) Consider all available information in reaching its final 
decision, except information furnished by a non-corroborated 
confidential source. Information furnished by a non-corroborated 
confidential source can only be used for limited purposes, such as lead 
information or in interrogatories to a subject if the identity of the 
source is not compromised in any way; and
    (4) Keep any record of the agency action as required by OPM in its 
supplemental guidance.
    (f) Paragraph (a) of this section notwithstanding, OPM may exercise 
its jurisdiction under this part in any case when it, in its discretion, 
deems necessary.
    (g) Any applicant or appointee who is found unsuitable by any agency 
acting under delegated authority from OPM under this part may appeal the 
adverse suitability decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board under 
the Board's regulations.

Sec. 731.104  Appointments subject to investigation.

    (a) To establish a person's suitability for employment, appointments 
to positions in the competitive service require the person to undergo an 
investigation by OPM or by an agency with delegated authority from OPM 
to conduct investigations. Certain appointments do not require 
investigation. Except when required because of risk level changes, a 
person in the competitive service who has undergone a suitability 
investigation need not undergo another one simply because the person has 
been:

[[Page 29]]

    (1) Promoted;
    (2) Demoted;
    (3) Reassigned;
    (4) Converted from career-conditional to career tenure;
    (5) Appointed or converted to an appointment if the person has been 
serving continuously with the agency for at least 1 year in one or more 
positions under an appointment subject to investigation; and
    (6) Transferred, provided the individual has served continuously for 
at least 1 year in a position subject to investigation.
    (b)(1) OPM or an agency with delegated suitability authority may 
investigate and take a suitability action against an applicant, 
appointee, or employee in accordance with Sec. 731.105. There is no time 
limit on the authority of OPM or an agency with delegated suitability 
authority to conduct an investigation of an applicant who has been 
appointed to a position.
    (2) An employee does not have to serve a new probationary or trial 
period merely because his or her appointment is subject to investigation 
under this section. An employee's probationary or trial period is not 
extended because his or her appointment is subject to investigation 
under this section.
    (3) The subject to investigation condition also does not eliminate 
the need to conduct investigations required under Sec. 731.106 for 
public trust positions.

Sec. 731.105  Authority to take suitability actions.

    (a) OPM may take a suitability action under this part against an 
applicant or appointee based on any of the criteria of Sec. 731.202;
    (b) An agency, exercising delegated authority, may take a 
suitability action under this part against an applicant or appointee 
based on the criteria of Sec. 731.202 subject to the agency limitations 
prescribed in Sec. 731.103;
    (c) OPM may take a suitability action under this part against an 
employee only in cases involving material, intentional false statement 
or deception or fraud in examination or appointment, or refusal to 
furnish testimony as required by Sec. 5.4 of this title, or statutory or 
regulatory bar. A statement may be a material statement even if an 
agency does not rely upon it.
    (d) An agency may not take a suitability action against an employee 
under this part. Nothing in this part precludes, or is intended to 
preclude, an agency from taking an adverse action against an employee 
under the procedures and standards of part 752 of this title or 
terminating a probationary employee under the procedures of part 315 of 
this title.

Sec. 731.106  Designation of public trust positions and investigative 
          requirements.

    (a) Risk designation. Agency heads shall designate every competitive 
service position within the agency at a high, moderate, or low risk 
level as determined by the position's potential for adverse impact to 
the efficiency and integrity of the service. OPM will provide an example 
of a risk designation system for agency use in supplemental guidance.
    (b) Public Trust positions. Positions at the high or moderate risk 
levels would normally be designated as ``Public Trust'' positions. Such 
positions may involve policy making, major program responsibility, 
public safety and health, law enforcement duties, fiduciary 
responsibilities, or other duties demanding a significant degree of 
public trust; and positions involving access to or operation or control 
of financial records, with a significant risk for causing damage or 
realizing personal gain.
    (c) Investigative requirements. Persons receiving an appointment 
made subject to investigation under this part must undergo a background 
investigation. Minimum investigative requirements correlating to risk 
levels will be established in supplemental guidance provided by OPM. 
Investigations should be initiated before appointment or, at most, 
within 14 calendar days of placement in the position.
    (d) Suitability reinvestigations. Agencies, relying on authorities 
such as the Computer Security Act of 1987 and OMB Circular No. A-130 
Revised (issued February 8, 1996), may require incumbents of certain 
public trust positions to undergo periodic reinvestigations. The 
appropriate level of any reinvestigation will be determined by the 
agency, but may be based on supplemental guidance provided by OPM.
    (e) Risk level changes. If an individual experiences a change in 
position risk level (moves to a higher risk level position, or the risk 
level of the position itself is changed) the individual may encumber or 
remain in the position. Any upgrade investigation required for the new 
risk level should be initiated within 14 calendar days after the move or 
the new designation is final.
    (f) Any suitability investigation completed by an agency under 
provisions of paragraphs (d) or (e) of this section must be adjudicated 
by the employing agency. The subject's employment status will determine 
the applicable agency authority and procedures to be followed in any 
action taken.

                  Subpart B--Suitability Determinations

Sec. 731.201  Standard.

    Subject to subpart A of this part, an applicant, appointee, or 
employee may be denied Federal employment or removed from a position 
only when the action will protect the

[[Page 30]]

integrity or promote the efficiency of the service.

Sec. 731.202  Criteria.

    (a) General. In determining whether its action will protect the 
integrity or promote the efficiency of the service, OPM, or an agency to 
which OPM has delegated authority, shall make its determination on the 
basis of the specific factors in paragraph (b) of this section, with 
appropriate consideration given to the additional considerations 
outlined in paragraph (c) of this section.
    (b) Specific factors. When making a determination under paragraph 
(a) of this section, the following may be considered a basis for finding 
an individual unsuitable:
    (1) Misconduct or negligence in employment;
    (2) Criminal or dishonest conduct;
    (3) Material, intentional false statement or deception or fraud in 
examination or appointment;
    (4) Refusal to furnish testimony as required by Sec. 5.4 of this 
title;
    (5) Alcohol abuse of a nature and duration which suggests that the 
applicant or appointee would be prevented from performing the duties of 
the position in question, or would constitute a direct threat to the 
property or safety of others;
    (6) Illegal use of narcotics, drugs, or other controlled substances, 
without evidence of substantial rehabilitation;
    (7) Knowing and willful engagement in acts or activities designed to 
overthrow the U.S. Government by force;
    (8) Any statutory or regulatory bar which prevents the lawful 
employment of the person involved in the position in question.
    (c) Additional considerations. In making a determination under 
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, OPM and agencies shall consider 
the following additional considerations to the extent they deem them 
pertinent to the individual case:
    (1) The nature of the position for which the person is applying or 
in which the person is employed;
    (2) The nature and seriousness of the conduct;
    (3) The circumstances surrounding the conduct;
    (4) The recency of the conduct;
    (5) The age of the person involved at the time of the conduct;
    (6) Contributing societal conditions; and
    (7) The absence or presence of rehabilitation or efforts toward 
rehabilitation.

Sec. 731.203  Actions by OPM and other agencies.

    (a) List of actions. For purposes of this part, an action is one or 
more of the following:
    (1) Cancellation of eligibility;
    (2) Denial of appointment;
    (3) Removal;
    (4) Cancellation of reinstatement eligibility;
    (5) Debarment.
    (b) An applicant's eligibility may be cancelled, an applicant may be 
denied employment, or an appointee may be removed when OPM or an agency 
exercising delegated authority under this part finds that the applicant 
or appointee is unsuitable for the reasons cited in Sec. 731.202 subject 
to the agency limitations of Sec. 731.103(a).
    (c) OPM may require that an employee be removed on the basis of a 
material, intentional false statement, or deception or fraud in 
examination or appointment; or refusal to furnish testimony; or a 
statutory or regulatory bar. OPM may also cancel any reinstatement 
eligibility obtained as a result of false statement, deception or fraud 
in the examination or appointment process.
    (d) An action to remove an appointee or employee for suitability 
reasons under this part is not an action under parts 752 or 315 of this 
title. Where behavior covered by this part may also form the basis for a 
part 752 or 315 action, agencies may use part 315 or 752, as 
appropriate, instead of this part.
    (e) Agencies are required to report to OPM all unfavorable 
adjudicative actions taken under this part, and all actions based on an 
OPM investigation.

Sec. 731.204  Debarment by OPM.

    (a) When OPM finds a person unsuitable for any reason listed in 
Sec. 731.202, OPM, in its discretion, may deny that person examination 
for, and appointment to, a competitive service position for a period of 
not more than 3 years from the date of determination of unsuitability.
    (b) On expiration of a period of debarment, OPM or an agency may 
redetermine a person's suitability for appointment in accordance with 
the procedures of this part.
    (c) OPM, in its sole discretion, determines the duration of any 
period of debarment imposed under this section.

Sec. 731.205  Debarment by agencies.

    (a) Subject to the provisions of Sec. 731.103, when an agency finds 
an applicant or appointee unsuitable for reasons listed in Sec. 731.202, 
the agency may deny that person examination for, and appointment to, 
all, or specific,, positions within the agency for a period of not more 
than 1 year from the date of determination of unsuitability.
    (b) On expiration of a period of agency debarment, the agency may 
redetermine a person's suitability for appointment by the agency, in 
accordance with the procedures of this part.
    (c) The agency is responsible for enforcing the period of debarment 
and taking appropriate action should the individual apply or be 
inappropriately appointed during the debarment period. This does not 
limit OPM's

[[Page 31]]

ability to exercise jurisdiction and take an action if it deems 
appropriate.
    (d) The agency, in its sole discretion, determines the duration of 
any period of debarment imposed under this section.

              Subpart C--OPM Suitability Action Procedures

Sec. 731.301  Scope.

    (a) Coverage. This subpart sets forth the procedures to be followed 
when OPM proposes to take, or instructs an agency to take, a final 
suitability action against an applicant, appointee or employee.
    (b) Definition. In this subpart, days means calendar days.

Sec. 731.302  Notice of proposed action.

    (a) OPM shall notify the applicant, appointee, or employee 
(hereinafter, the ``respondent'') in writing of the proposed action and 
of the charges against the respondent (including the availability for 
review, upon request, of the materials relied upon). The notice shall 
state the specific reasons for the proposed action and that the 
respondent has the right to answer the notice in writing. If the 
respondent is an employee, the notice shall further state that the 
employee may also make an oral answer, as specified in Sec. 731.303(a). 
The notice shall further inform the respondent of the time limits for 
response as well as the address to which such response should be made.
    (b) The notice of proposed action shall be served upon the 
respondent by being mailed or hand delivered to the respondent's last 
known residence, and/or duty station, no less than 30 days prior to the 
effective date of the proposed action. If the respondent is employed in 
the competitive service on the date the notice is served, the respondent 
shall be entitled to be retained in a pay status during the notice 
period.
    (c) OPM shall send a copy of this notice to any employing agency 
that is involved.

Sec. 731.303  Answer.

    (a) Respondent's answer. A respondent may answer the charges in 
writing and furnish documentation and/or affidavits in support of the 
response. A respondent who is an employee may also answer orally. The 
respondent may be represented by a representative of the respondent's 
choice, and such representative shall be designated in writing. To be 
timely, a written answer shall be made no more than 30 days after the 
date of the notice of proposed action. In the event an employee requests 
to make an oral answer, the request must be made within this 30 day time 
frame, and OPM shall determine the time and place thereof, and shall 
consider any answer the respondent makes in reaching a decision.
    (b) Agency's answer. An employing agency may also answer the notice 
of proposed action. The time limit for filing an answer is 30 days from 
the date of the notice. OPM shall consider any answer the agency makes 
in reaching a decision.

Sec. 731.304  Decision.

    The decision shall be in writing, dated, and inform the respondent 
of the reasons for the decision. The employing agency shall remove the 
appointee or employee from the rolls within 5 work days of receipt of 
OPM's final decision. The respondent shall also be informed that an 
adverse decision can be appealed in accordance with subpart DE of this 
part. OPM shall also notify the respondent's employing agency of its 
decision.

             Subpart D--Agency Suitability Action Procedures

Sec. 731.401  Scope.

    (a) Coverage. This subpart sets forth the procedures to be followed 
when an agency proposes to take a final suitability action against an 
applicant or appointee.
    (b) Definition. In this subpart, days mean calendar days.

Sec. 731.402  Notice of proposed action.

    The agency shall provide the applicant or appointee (hereinafter, 
the ``respondent'') reasonable notice in writing of the proposed action 
and of the charges against the respondent (including the availability 
for review, upon request, of the materials relied upon). The notice 
shall state the specific reasons for the proposed action, and that the 
respondent has the right to answer the notice in writing. The notice 
shall inform the respondent of the time limits for response as well as 
the address to which such response should be made. If the respondent is 
employed in the competitive service on the date the notice is served, 
the respondent shall be entitled to be retained in a pay status during 
the notice period.

Sec. 731.403  Answer.

    A respondent may answer the charges in writing and furnish 
documentation and/or affidavits in support of the response.

Sec. 731.404  Decision.

    The decision shall be in writing, dated, and inform the respondent 
of the reasons for the decision. The respondent shall also be informed 
that an adverse decision can be appealed in accordance with subpart E of 
this part. The employing agency shall remove an appointee from the rolls 
within 5 work days of their final decision.

[[Page 32]]

         Subpart E--Appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board

Sec. 731.501  Appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

    (a) Appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board. An individual who 
has been found unsuitable for employment may appeal the determination to 
the Merit Systems Protection Board. If the Board finds that one or more 
charges are supported by a preponderance of the evidence, it shall 
affirm the determination. If the Board sustains fewer than all the 
charges, the Board shall remand the case to OPM or the agency to 
determine whether the action taken is still appropriate based on the 
sustained charge(s). This determination of whether the action taken is 
appropriate shall be final without any further appeal to the Board.
    (b) Appeal procedures. The procedures for filing an appeal with the 
Board are found at part 1201 of this chapter.

                      Subpart F--Savings Provision

Sec. 731.601  Savings provision.

    No provision of the regulations in this part shall be applied in 
such a way as to affect any administrative proceeding pending on January 
29, 2001. An administrative proceeding is deemed to be pending from the 
date of the agency or OPM ``notice of proposed action'' described in 
Sec. 731.402.