[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 8, Volume 1]
[Revised as of January 1, 2001]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 8CFR3.1]

[Page 11-15]
 
                     TITLE 8--ALIENS AND NATIONALITY
 
CHAPTER I--IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
 
PART 3--EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW--Table of Contents
 
                 Subpart A--Board of Immigration Appeals
 
Sec. 3.1  General authorities.


    (a)(1) Organization. There shall be in the Department of Justice a 
Board of Immigration Appeals, subject to the general supervision of the 
Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review. The Board shall 
consist of a Chairman, two Vice Chairmen, and eighteen other

[[Page 12]]

members. The Board Members shall exercise their independent judgment and 
discretion in the cases coming before the Board. A vacancy, or the 
absence or unavailability of a Board Member, shall not impair the right 
of the remaining members to exercise all the powers of the Board. The 
Director may in his discretion designate Immigration Judges, retired 
Board Members, retired Immigration Judges, and Administrative Law Judges 
employed within EOIR to act as temporary, additional Board Members for 
terms not to exceed six months. The Chairman may divide the Board into 
three-member panels and designate a Presiding Member of each panel. The 
Chairman may from time to time make changes in the composition of such 
panels and of Presiding Members. Each panel shall be empowered to decide 
cases by majority vote. A majority of the number of Board Members 
authorized to constitute a panel shall constitute a quorum for such 
panel. Each three-member panel may exercise the appropriate authority of 
the Board as set out in part 3 that is necessary for the adjudication of 
cases before it. In the case of an unopposed motion or a motion to 
withdraw an appeal pending before the Board, a single Board Member may 
exercise the appropriate authority of the Board as set out in part 3 
that is necessary for the adjudication of such motions before it. In 
addition, a single Board Member may exercise such authority in disposing 
of the following matters: a Service motion to remand an appeal from the 
denial of a visa petition where the Regional Service Center Director 
requests that the matter be remanded to the Service for further 
consideration of the appellant's arguments or evidence raised on appeal; 
a case where remand is required because of a defective or missing 
transcript; and other procedural or ministerial issues as provided by 
the Chairman. A motion to reconsider or to reopen a decision that was 
rendered by a single Board Member may be adjudicated by that Board 
Member.
    (2) Chairman. The Chairman shall direct, supervise, and establish 
internal operating procedures and policies of the Board. He shall 
designate a member of the Board to act as Chairman in his absence or 
unavailability. The Chairman shall be assisted in the performance of his 
duties by two Vice Chairmen.
    (3) Board Members. Board Members shall perform the quasi-judicial 
function of adjudicating cases coming before the Board.
    (4) En banc process--(i) Full Board en banc. A majority of the 
permanent Board Members shall constitute a quorum of the Board for 
purposes of convening the full Board en banc. The Board may on its own 
motion, by a majority vote of the permanent Board Members, or by 
direction of the Chairman, consider any case as the full Board en banc, 
or reconsider as the full Board en banc any case that has been 
considered or decided by a three-member panel or by a limited en banc 
panel.
    (ii) Limited en banc panels. The Board may on its own motion, by a 
majority vote of the permanent Board Members, or by direction of the 
Chairman, assign a case or group of cases for consideration by a limited 
en banc panel, or assign a case that has been considered or decided by a 
three-member panel for reconsideration by a limited en banc panel. Each 
limited en banc panel shall consist of nine members. Each limited en 
banc panel shall contain the Chairman or one of the Vice Chairmen (as 
decided by the Chairman). If the Chairman and Vice Chairman are all 
disqualified in a particular case, then the most senior permanent Board 
Member who is not disqualified shall sit on the limited en banc panel as 
the Presiding Board Member. If the Chairman and Vice Chairman are all 
unavailable to hear a case that has been assigned to a limited en banc 
panel, but the Chairman is not disqualified, then the Chairman shall 
designate a Presiding Board Member to sit on the limited en banc panel. 
If the Chairman is unavailable and disqualified, then one of the Vice 
Chairmen, if unavailable and not disqualified, shall designate a 
presiding Board Member to sit on the limited en banc panel. Where a case 
that has been considered or decided by a three-member panel is assigned 
for review by a limited en banc panel, the en banc panel shall contain 
all available permanent Board Members who considered or decided that 
case as part of a three-

[[Page 13]]

member panel. The remaining members of each limited en banc panel will 
be randomly selected from among the permanent Board Members. The 
decision reached by a limited en banc panel shall be considered as the 
final decision of the Board in the case, unless the Chairman or a 
majority of the permanent Board Members vote to decide to assign the 
case to a full en banc panel for reconsideration in accordance with 
paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section.
    (5) Precedents. By majority vote of the permanent Board Members, a 
decision of the Board, whether rendered by a three-member panel, a 
limited en banc panel, or by the entire Board sitting en banc, may be 
designated to serve as a Board precedent pursuant to paragraph (g) of 
this section.
    (6) Board staff. There shall also be attached to the Board such 
number of attorneys and other employees as the Deputy Attorney General, 
upon recommendation of the Director, shall from time to time direct.
    (7) Affirmance without opinion. (i) The Chairman may designate, from 
time-to-time, permanent Board Members who are authorized, acting alone, 
to affirm decisions of Immigration Judges and the Service without 
opinion. The Chairman may designate certain categories of cases as 
suitable for review pursuant to this paragraph.
    (ii) The single Board Member to whom a case is assigned may affirm 
the decision of the Service or the Immigration Judge, without opinion, 
if the Board Member determines that the result reached in the decision 
under review was correct; that any errors in the decision under review 
were harmless or nonmaterial; and that
    (A) The issue on appeal is squarely controlled by existing Board or 
federal court precedent and does not involve the application of 
precedent to a novel fact situation; or
    (B) The factual and legal questions raised on appeal are so 
insubstantial that three-Member review is not warranted.
    (iii) If the Board Member determines that the decision should be 
affirmed without opinion, the Board shall issue an order that reads as 
follows: ``The Board affirms, without opinion, the result of the 
decision below. The decision below is, therefore, the final agency 
determination. See 8 CFR 3.1(a)(7).'' An order affirming without 
opinion, issued under authority of this provision, shall not include 
further explanation or reasoning. Such an order approves the result 
reached in the decision below; it does not necessarily imply approval of 
all of the reasoning of that decision, but does signify the Board's 
conclusion that any errors in the decision of the Immigration Judge or 
the Service were harmless or nonmaterial.
    (iv) If the Board Member determines that the decision is not 
appropriate for affirmance without opinion, the case will be assigned to 
a three-Member panel for review and decision. The panel to which the 
case is assigned also has the authority to determine that a case should 
be affirmed without opinion.
    (b) Appellate jurisdiction. Appeals shall lie to the Board of 
Immigration Appeals from the following:
    (1) Decisions of Immigration Judges in exclusion cases, as provided 
in 8 CFR part 240, subpart D.
    (2) Decisions of Immigration Judges in deportation cases, as 
provided in 8 CFR part 240, subpart E, except that no appeal shall lie 
seeking review of a length of a period of voluntary departure granted by 
an Immigration Judge under section 244E of the Act as it existed prior 
to April 1, 1997.
    (3) Decisions of Immigration Judges in removal proceedings, as 
provided in 8 CFR part 240, except that no appeal shall lie seeking 
review of the length of a period of voluntary departure granted by an 
immigration judge under section 240B of the Act or part 240 of this 
chapter.
    (4) Decisions involving administrative fines and penalties, 
including mitigation thereof, as provided in part 280 of this chapter.
    (5) Decisions on petitions filed in accordance with section 204 of 
the act (except petitions to accord preference classifications under 
section 203(a)(3) or section 203(a)(6) of the act, or a petition on 
behalf of a child described in section 101(b)(1)(F) of the act), and 
decisions on requests for revalidation and decisions revoking the 
approval of such petitions, in accordance with section

[[Page 14]]

205 of the act, as provided in parts 204 and 205, respectively, of this 
chapter.
    (6) Decisions on applications for the exercise of the discretionary 
authority contained in section 212(d)(3) of the act as provided in part 
212 of this chapter.
    (7) Determinations relating to bond, parole, or detention of an 
alien as provided in 8 CFR part 236, subpart A.
    (8) Decisions of Immigration Judges in rescission of adjustment of 
status cases, as provided in part 246 of this chapter.
    (9) Decisions of Immigration Judges in asylum proceedings pursuant 
to Sec. 208.2(b) of this chapter.
    (10) Decisions of Immigration Judges relating to Temporary Protected 
Status as provided in 8 CFR part 244.
    (11) Decisions on applications from organizations or attorneys 
requesting to be included on a list of free legal services providers and 
decisions on removals therefrom pursuant to Sec. 3.65.
    (12) Decisions of Immigration Judges on applications for adjustment 
of status referred on a Notice of Certification (Form I-290C) to the 
Immigration Court in accordance with Secs. 245.13(n)(2) and 245.15(n)(3) 
of this chapter or remanded to the Immigration Court in accordance with 
Secs. 245.13(d)(2) and 245.15(e)(2) of this chapter.
    (13) Decisions of adjudicating officials in practitioner 
disciplinary proceedings as provided in subpart G of this part.
    (c) Jurisdiction by certification. The Commissioner, or any other 
duly authorized officer of the Service, any Immigration Judge, or the 
Board may in any case arising under paragraph (b) of this section 
certify such case to the Board. The Board in its discretion may review 
any such case by certification without regard to the provisions of 
Sec. 3.7 if it determines that the parties have already been given a 
fair opportunity to make representations before the Board regarding the 
case, including the opportunity request oral argument and to submit a 
brief.
    (d) Powers of the Board--(1) Generally. Subject to any specific 
limitation prescribed by this chapter, in considering and determining 
cases before it as provided in this part the Board shall exercise such 
discretion and authority conferred upon the Attorney General by law as 
is appropriate and necessary for the disposition of the case.
    (2) Summary dismissal of appeals--(i) Standards. The Board may 
summarily dismiss any appeal or portion of any appeal in any case in 
which:
    (A) The party concerned fails to specify the reasons for the appeal 
on Form EOIR-26 or Form EOIR-29 (Notices of Appeal) or other document 
filed therewith;
    (B) The only reason for the appeal specified by the party concerned 
involves a finding of fact or a conclusion of law that was conceded by 
that party at a prior proceeding;
    (C) The appeal is from an order that granted the party concerned the 
relief that had been requested;
    (D) The party concerned indicates on Form EOIR-26 or Form EOIR-29 
that he or she will file a brief or statement in support of the appeal 
and, thereafter, does not file such brief or statement, or reasonably 
explain his or her failure to do so, within the time set for filing;
    (E) The appeal does not fall within the Board's jurisdiction, or 
lies with the Immigration Judge rather than the Board;
    (F) The appeal is untimely, or barred by an affirmative waiver of 
the right of appeal that is clear on the record; or
    (G) The appeal fails to meet essential statutory or regulatory 
requirements or is expressly excluded by statute or regulation.
    (ii) Action by the Board. The Chairman may provide for the exercise 
of the appropriate authority of the Board to dismiss an appeal pursuant 
to paragraph (d)(2) of this section by a three-Member panel, or by a 
single Board Member. The Chairman may determine who from among the Board 
Members is authorized to exercise the authority under this paragraph and 
the designation may be changed by the Chairman as he deems appropriate. 
Except as provided in this part for review by the Board en banc or by 
the Attorney General, or for consideration of motions to reconsider or 
reopen, an order dismissing any appeal pursuant to this paragraph (d)(2) 
shall constitute the final decision of the Board. If the single

[[Page 15]]

Board Member to whom the case is assigned determines that the case is 
not appropriate for summary dismissal, the case will be assigned for 
review and decision pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.
    (iii) Disciplinary consequences. The filing by an attorney or 
representative accredited under Sec. 292.2(d) of this chapter of an 
appeal which is summarily dismissed under paragraph (d)(1-a)(i) of this 
section may constitute frivolous behavior under Sec. 292.3(a)(15) of 
this chapter. Summary dismissal of an appeal under paragraph (d)(1-a)(i) 
of this section does not limit the other grounds and procedures for 
disciplinary action against attorneys or representatives.
    (3) Rules of practice. The Board shall have authority, with the 
approval of the Director, EOIR, to prescribe rules governing proceedings 
before it. It shall also determine whether any organization and/or 
individual desiring to represent aliens in immigration proceedings meets 
the requirements as set forth in Sec. 292.2 of this chapter.
    (4) Rules of practices: Discipline of attorneys and representatives. 
The Board shall have authority, with the approval of the Director, EOIR, 
to prescribe rules governing proceedings before it. It shall also 
determine whether any organization desiring representation is of a kind 
described in Sec. 1.1(j) of this chapter, and shall regulate the conduct 
of attorneys, representatives of organizations, and others who appear in 
a representative capacity before the Board or the Service or any special 
Inquiry Officer.
    (e) Oral argument. When an appeal has been taken, request for oral 
argument if desired shall be included in the Notice of Appeal. Oral 
argument shall be heard at the discretion of the Board at such date and 
time as the Board shall fix. The Service may be represented before the 
Board by an officer of the Service designated by the Service.
    (f) Service of Board decisions. The decision of the Board shall be 
in writing and copies thereof shall be transmitted by the Board to the 
Service and a copy shall be served upon the alien or party affected as 
provided in part 292 of this chapter.
    (g) Decisions of the Board as precedents. Except as they may be 
modified or overruled by the Board or the Attorney General, decisions of 
the Board shall be binding on all officers and employees of the Service 
or Immigration Judges in the administration of the Act, and selected 
decisions designated by the Board shall serve as precedents in all 
proceedings involving the same issue or issues.
    (h) Referral of cases to the Attorney General. (1) The Board shall 
refer to the Attorney General for review of its decision all cases 
which:
    (i) The Attorney General directs the Board to refer to him.
    (ii) The Chairman or a majority of the Board believes should be 
referred to the Attorney General for review.
    (iii) The Commissioner requests be referred to the Attorney General 
for review.
    (2) In any case in which the Attorney General reviews the decision 
of the Board, the decision of the Attorney General shall be stated in 
writing and shall be transmitted to the Board for transmittal and 
service as provided in paragraph (f) of this section.

[23 FR 9117, Nov. 26, 1958]

    Editorial Notes: 1. For Federal Register citations affecting 
Sec. 3.1, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the 
Finding Aids section of the printed volume and on GPO Access.

    2. At 65 FR 39526, June 27, 2000, Sec. 3.1(d)(1-a)(ii) was amended 
by revising the reference to ``Sec. 292.3(a)(15)'' to read 
``Sec. 3.102(j)'', effective July 27, 2000. However, Sec. 3.1(d)(1-
a)(ii) does not exist.