[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 30, Volume 2]
[Revised as of July 1, 2002]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 30CFR203.87]

[Page 33]
 
                       TITLE 30--MINERAL RESOURCES
 
                       DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 
PART 203--RELIEF OR REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATES--Table of Contents
 
               Subpart B--OCS Oil, Gas, and Sulfur General
 
Sec. 203.87  What is in an engineering report?

    This report defines the development plan and capital requirements 
for the economic evaluation and must contain the following elements.
    (a) A description of the development concept (e.g., tension leg 
platform, fixed platform, floater type, subsea tieback, etc.) which 
includes:
    (1) Its size along with basic design specifications and drawings; 
and
    (2) The construction schedule.
    (b) An identification of planned wells which includes:
    (1) The number;
    (2) The type (platform, subsea, vertical, deviated, horizontal);
    (3) The well depth;
    (4) The drilling schedule;
    (5) The kind of completion (single, dual, horizontal, etc.); and
    (6) The completion schedule.
    (c) A description of the production system equipment which includes:
    (1) The production capacity for oil and gas and a description of 
limiting component(s);
    (2) Any unusual problems (low gravity, paraffin, etc.);
    (3) All subsea structures;
    (4) All flowlines; and
    (5) Schedule for installing the production system.
    (d) A discussion of any plans for multi-phase development which 
includes the conceptual basis for developing in phases and goals or 
milestones required for starting later phases.
    (e) A set of development scenarios consisting of activity timing and 
scale associated with each of up to three production profiles 
(conservative, most likely, optimistic) provided in the production 
report for your field (Sec. 203.88). Each development scenario and 
production profile must denote the likely events should the field size 
turn out to be within a range represented by one of the three segments 
of the field size distribution. If you send in fewer than three 
scenarios, you must explain why fewer scenarios are more efficient 
across the whole field size distribution.

[63 FR 2618, Jan. 16, 1998, as amended at 67 FR 1880, Jan. 15, 2002]