[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 40, Volume 18]
[Revised as of July 1, 2002]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 40CFR123.44]

[Page 243-245]
 
                   TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT
 
         CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)
 
PART 123--STATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS--Table of Contents
 
          Subpart C--Transfer of Information and Permit Review
 
Sec. 123.44  EPA review of and objections to State permits.

    (a)(1) The Memorandum of Agreement shall provide a period of time 
(up to 90 days from receipt of proposed permits) to which the Regional 
Administrator may make general comments upon, objections to, or 
recommendations with respect to proposed permits. EPA reserves the right 
to take 90 days to supply specific grounds for objection, 
notwithstanding any shorter period specified in the Memorandum of 
Agreement, when a general objection is filed within the review period 
specified in the Memorandum of Agreement. The Regional Administrator 
shall send a copy of any comment, objection or recommendation to the 
permit applicant.
    (2) In the case of general permits, EPA shall have 90 days from the 
date of receipt of the proposed general permit to comment upon, object 
to or make recommendations with respect to the proposed general permit, 
and is not bound by any shorter time limits set by the Memorandum of 
Agreement for general comments, objections or recommendations.
    (b)(1) Within the period of time provided under the Memorandum of 
Agreement for making general comments upon, objections to or 
recommendations with respect to proposed permits, the Regional 
Administrator shall notify the State Director of any objection to 
issuance of a proposed permit (except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of 
this section for proposed general permits). This notification shall set 
forth in writing the general nature of the objection.
    (2) Within 90 days following receipt of a proposed permit to which 
he or she has objected under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, or in the 
case of general permits within 90 days after receipt of the proposed 
general permit, the Regional Administrator shall set forth in writing 
and transmit to the State Director:
    (i) A statement of the reasons for the objection (including the 
section of CWA or regulations that support the objection), and
    (ii) The actions that must be taken by the State Director to 
eliminate the objection (including the effluent limitations and 
conditions which the permit would include if it were issued by the 
Regional Administrator.)
    Note: Paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, in effect, modify any 
existing agreement between EPA and the State which provides less than 90 
days for EPA to supply the specific grounds for an objection. However, 
when an agreement provides for an EPA review period of less than 90 
days, EPA must file a general objection, in accordance with paragraph 
(b)(1) of this section within the time specified in the agreement. This 
general objection must be followed by a specific objection within the 
90-day period. This modification to MOA's allows EPA to provide detailed 
information concerning acceptable permit conditions, as required by 
section 402(d) of CWA. To avoid possible confusion, MOA's should be 
changed to reflect this arrangement.
    (c) The Regional Administrator's objection to the issuance of a 
proposed permit must be based upon one or more of the following grounds:
    (1) The permit fails to apply, or to ensure compliance with, any 
applicable requirement of this part;
    Note: For example, the Regional Administrator may object to a permit 
not requiring the achievement of required effluent limitations by 
applicable statutory deadlines.

[[Page 244]]

    (2) In the case of a proposed permit for which notification to the 
Administrator is required under section 402(b)(5) of CWA, the written 
recommendations of an affected State have not been accepted by the 
permitting State and the Regional Administrator finds the reasons for 
rejecting the recommendations are inadequate;
    (3) The procedures followed in connection with formulation of the 
proposed permit failed in a material respect to comply with procedures 
required by CWA or by regulations thereunder or by the Memorandum of 
Agreement;
    (4) Any finding made by the State Director in connection with the 
proposed permit misinterprets CWA or any guidelines or regulations under 
CWA, or misapplies them to the facts;
    (5) Any provisions of the proposed permit relating to the 
maintenance of records, reporting, monitoring, sampling, or the 
provision of any other information by the permittee are inadequate, in 
the judgment of the Regional Administrator, to assure compliance with 
permit conditions, including effluent standards and limitations or 
standards for sewage sludge use and disposal required by CWA, by the 
guidelines and regulations issued under CWA, or by the proposed permit;
    (6) In the case of any proposed permit with respect to which 
applicable effluent standards and limitations or standards for sewage 
sludge use and disposal under sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 318, 403, and 
405 of CWA have not yet been promulgated by the Agency, the proposed 
permit, in the judgment of the Regional Administrator, fails to carry 
out the provisions of CWA or of any regulations issued under CWA; the 
provisions of this paragraph apply to determinations made pursuant to 
Sec. 125.3(c)(2) in the absence of applicable guidelines, to best 
management practices under section 304(e) of CWA, which must be 
incorporated into permits as requirements under section 301, 306, 307, 
318, 403 or 405, and to sewage sludge use and disposal requirements 
developed on a case-by-case basis pursuant to section 405(d) of CWA, as 
the case may be;
    (7) Issuance of the proposed permit would in any other respect be 
outside the requirements of CWA, or regulations issued under CWA.
    (8) The effluent limits of a permit fail to satisfy the requirements 
of 40 CFR 122.44(d).
    (9) For a permit issued by a Great Lakes State or Tribe (as defined 
in 40 CFR 132.2), the permit does not satisfy the conditions promulgated 
by the State, Tribe, or EPA pursuant to 40 CFR part 132.
    (d) Prior to notifying the State Director of an objection based upon 
any of the grounds set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, the 
Regional Administrator:
    (1) Will consider all data transmitted pursuant to Sec. 123.43 (or, 
in the case of a sewage sludge management program, Sec. 501.21 of this 
chapter);
    (2) May, if the information provided is inadequate to determine 
whether the proposed permit meets the guidelines and requirements of 
CWA, request the State Director to transmit to the Regional 
Administrator the complete record of the permit proceedings before the 
State, or any portions of the record that the Regional Administrator 
determines are necessary for review. If this request is made within 30 
days of receipt of the State submittal under Sec. 123.43 (or, in the 
case of a sewage sludge management program, Sec. 501.21 of this 
chapter), it will constitute an interim objection to the issuance of the 
permit, and the full period of time specified in the Memorandum of 
Agreement for the Regional Administrator's review will recommence when 
the Regional Administrator has received such record or portions of the 
record; and
    (3) May, in his or her discretion, and to the extent feasible within 
the period of time available under the Memorandum of Agreement, afford 
to interested persons an opportunity to comment on the basis for the 
objection;
    (e) Within 90 days of receipt by the State Director of an objection 
by the Regional Administrator, the State or interstate agency or any 
interested person may request that a public hearing be held by the 
Regional Administrator on the objection. A public hearing in accordance 
with the procedures of Sec. 124.12 (c) and (d) of this chapter (or, in 
the case of a sewage sludge management program, Sec. 501.15(d)(7) of 
this

[[Page 245]]

chapter) will be held, and public notice provided in accordance with 
Sec. 124.10 of this chapter, (or, in the case of a sewage sludge 
management program, Sec. 501.15(d)(5) of this chapter), whenever 
requested by the State or the interstate agency which proposed the 
permit or if warranted by significant public interest based on requests 
received.
    (f) A public hearing held under paragraph (e) of this section shall 
be conducted by the Regional Administrator, and, at the Regional 
Administrator's discretion, with the assistance of an EPA panel 
designated by the Regional Administrator, in an orderly and expeditious 
manner.
    (g) Following the public hearing, the Regional Administrator shall 
reaffirm the original objection, modify the terms of the objection, or 
withdraw the objection, and shall notify the State of this decision.
    (h)(1) If no public hearing is held under paragraph (e) of this 
section and the State does not resubmit a permit revised to meet the 
Regional Administrator's objection within 90 days of receipt of the 
objection, the Regional Administrator may issue the permit in accordance 
with parts 121, 122 and 124 of this chapter and any other guidelines and 
requirements of CWA.
    (2) If a public hearing is held under paragraph (e) of this section, 
the Regional Administrator does not withdraw the objection, and the 
State does not resubmit a permit revised to meet the Regional 
Administrator's objection or modified objection within 30 days of the 
date of the Regional Administrator's notification under paragraph (g) of 
this section, the Regional Administrator may issue the permit in 
accordance with parts 121, 122 and 124 of this chapter and any other 
guidelines and requirements of CWA.
    (3) Exclusive authority to issue the permit passes to EPA when the 
times set out in this paragraph expire.
    (i) [Reserved]
    (j) The Regional Administrator may agree, in the Memorandum of 
Agreement under Sec. 123.24 (or, in the case of a sewage sludge 
management program, Sec. 501.14 of this chapter), to review draft 
permits rather than proposed permits. In such a case, a proposed permit 
need not be prepared by the State and transmitted to the Regional 
Administrator for review in accordance with this section unless the 
State proposes to issue a permit which differs from the draft permit 
reviewed by the Regional Administrator, the Regional Administrator has 
objected to the draft permit, or there is significant public comment.

[48 FR 14178, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 18785, May 2, 1989; 54 
FR 23896, June 2, 1989; 60 FR 15386, Mar. 23, 1995; 63 FR 45122, Aug. 
24, 1998; 65 FR 30910, May 15, 2000]

    Effective Date Note: At 65 FR 43661, July 13, 2000, Sec. 123.44 was 
amended by adding paragraph (k), effective 30 days after the date that 
Congress allows EPA to implement this regulation. At 66 FR 53048, Oct. 
18, 2001 this amendment was made effective April 30, 2003. For the 
convenience of the user, the added text is set forth as follows:

Sec. 123.44  EPA review of and objections to State permits.

                                * * * * *

    (k)(1) Where a State fails to submit a new draft or proposed permit 
to EPA within 90 days after the expiration of the existing permit, EPA 
may review the administratively-continued permit, using the procedure 
described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (h)(3) of this section, if:
    (i) The administratively-continued permit allows the discharge of 
pollutant(s) into a waterbody for which EPA has established or approved 
a TMDL and the permit is not consistent with an applicable wasteload 
allocation; or
    (ii) The administratively-continued permit allows the discharge of a 
pollutant(s) of concern into a waterbody that does not attain and 
maintain water quality standards and for which EPA has not established 
or approved a TMDL.
    (2) To review an expired and administratively-continued permit under 
this paragraph (k) EPA must give the State and the discharger at least 
90 days written notice of its intent to consider the expired permit as a 
proposed permit. At any time beginning 90 days after permit expiration, 
EPA may submit this notice.
    (3) If the State submits a draft or proposed permit for EPA review 
at any time before EPA issues the permit under paragraph (h) of this 
section, EPA will withdraw its notice of intent to take permit authority 
under this paragraph (k) and will evaluate the draft or proposed permit 
under this section.

[[Page 246]]