[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 40, Volume 18]
[Revised as of July 1, 2002]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 40CFR124.8]

[Page 264-265]
 
                   TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT
 
         CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)
 
PART 124--PROCEDURES FOR DECISIONMAKING--Table of Contents
 
                 Subpart A--General Program Requirements
 
Sec. 124.8  Fact sheet.

    (Applicable to State programs, see Secs. 123.25 (NPDES), 145.11 
(UIC), 233.26 (404), and 271.14 (RCRA).)
    (a) A fact sheet shall be prepared for every draft permit for a 
major HWM, UIC, 404, or NPDES facility or activity, for every Class I 
sludge management facility, for every 404 and NPDES general permit 
(Secs. 237.37 and 122.28), for every NPDES draft permit that 
incorporates a variance or requires an explanation under Sec. 124.56(b), 
for every draft permit that includes a sewage sludge land application 
plan under 40 CFR 501.15(a)(2)(ix), and for every draft permit which the 
Director finds is the subject of wide-spread public interest or raises 
major issues. The fact sheet shall briefly set forth the principal facts 
and the significant factual, legal, methodological and policy questions 
considered in preparing the draft permit. The Director shall send this 
fact sheet to the applicant and, on request, to any other person.
    (b) The fact sheet shall include, when applicable:
    (1) A brief description of the type of facility or activity which is 
the subject of the draft permit;
    (2) The type and quantity of wastes, fluids, or pollutants which are 
proposed to be or are being treated, stored, disposed of, injected, 
emitted, or discharged.
    (3) For a PSD permit, the degree of increment consumption expected 
to result from operation of the facility or activity.
    (4) A brief summary of the basis for the draft permit conditions 
including references to applicable statutory or regulatory provisions 
and appropriate supporting references to the administrative record 
required by Sec. 124.9 (for EPA-issued permits);
    (5) Reasons why any requested variances or alternatives to required 
standards do or do not appear justified;
    (6) A description of the procedures for reaching a final decision on 
the draft permit including:
    (i) The beginning and ending dates of the comment period under 
Sec. 124.10 and the address where comments will be received;
    (ii) Procedures for requesting a hearing and the nature of that 
hearing; and
    (iii) Any other procedures by which the public may participate in 
the final decision.
    (7) Name and telephone number of a person to contact for additional 
information.
    (8) For NPDES permits, provisions satisfying the requirements of 
Sec. 124.56.
    (9) Justification for waiver of any application requirements under 
Sec. 122.21(j) or (q) of this chapter.

[48 FR 14264, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 18786, May 2, 1989; 64 
FR 42470, Aug. 4, 1999]

    Effective Date Note: At 65 FR 43661, July 13, 2000, Sec. 124.8 was 
amended by adding paragraphs (b)(4)(i) and (b)(4)(ii), effective 30 days 
after the date that Congress allows EPA to implement this regulation. At 
66 FR 53048, Oct. 18, 2001 this amendment was made effective April 30, 
2003. For the convenience of the user, the added text is set forth as 
follows:

Sec. 124.8  Fact sheet.

                                * * * * *

[[Page 265]]

    (b) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (i) In cases where a TMDL has not been established for an impaired 
waterbody, an explanation of how permit limits and/or conditions were 
derived for all pollutants in the discharger's effluent for which the 
waterbody is impaired; and
    (ii) In cases where a TMDL has been established for an impaired 
waterbody, any TMDL that has been established for a pollutant contained 
in the discharger's effluent; the applicable wasteload allocation 
derived for the pollutant in the TMDL for that discharger; and an 
explanation of how permit limits for the pollutant of concern were 
derived as well as how those limits are consistent with the applicable 
wasteload allocation.

                                * * * * *