[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 40, Volume 18]
[Revised as of July 1, 2002]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 40CFR131.7]

[Page 370-373]
 
                   TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT
 
         CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)
 
PART 131--WATER QUALITY STANDARDS--Table of Contents
 
                      Subpart A--General Provisions
 
Sec. 131.7  Dispute resolution mechanism.

    (a) Where disputes between States and Indian Tribes arise as a 
result of differing water quality standards on common bodies of water, 
the lead EPA Regional Administrator, as determined based upon OMB 
circular A-105, shall be responsible for acting in accordance with the 
provisions of this section.
    (b) The Regional Administrator shall attempt to resolve such 
disputes where:
    (1) The difference in water quality standards results in 
unreasonable consequences;
    (2) The dispute is between a State (as defined in Sec. 131.3(j) but 
exclusive of all Indian Tribes) and a Tribe which EPA has determined is 
eligible to the same extent as a State for purposes of water quality 
standards;
    (3) A reasonable effort to resolve the dispute without EPA 
involvement has been made;
    (4) The requested relief is consistent with the provisions of the 
Clean Water Act and other relevant law;
    (5) The differing State and Tribal water quality standards have been 
adopted pursuant to State and Tribal law and approved by EPA; and
    (6) A valid written request has been submitted by either the Tribe 
or the State.
    (c) Either a State or a Tribe may request EPA to resolve any dispute

[[Page 371]]

which satisfies the criteria of paragraph (b) of this section. Written 
requests for EPA involvement should be submitted to the lead Regional 
Administrator and must include:
    (1) A concise statement of the unreasonable consequences that are 
alleged to have arisen because of differing water quality standards;
    (2) A concise description of the actions which have been taken to 
resolve the dispute without EPA involvement;
    (3) A concise indication of the water quality standards provision 
which has resulted in the alleged unreasonable consequences;
    (4) Factual data to support the alleged unreasonable consequences; 
and
    (5) A statement of the relief sought from the alleged unreasonable 
consequences.
    (d) Where, in the Regional Administrator's judgment, EPA involvement 
is appropriate based on the factors of paragraph (b) of this section, 
the Regional Administrator shall, within 30 days, notify the parties in 
writing that he/she is initiating an EPA dispute resolution action and 
solicit their written response. The Regional Administrator shall also 
make reasonable efforts to ensure that other interested individuals or 
groups have notice of this action. Such efforts shall include but not be 
limited to the following:
    (1) Written notice to responsible Tribal and State Agencies, and 
other affected Federal agencies,
    (2) Notice to the specific individual or entity that is alleging 
that an unreasonable consequence is resulting from differing standards 
having been adopted on a common body of water,
    (3) Public notice in local newspapers, radio, and television, as 
appropriate,
    (4) Publication in trade journal newsletters, and
    (5) Other means as appropriate.
    (e) If in accordance with applicable State and Tribal law an Indian 
Tribe and State have entered into an agreement that resolves the dispute 
or establishes a mechanism for resolving a dispute, EPA shall defer to 
this agreement where it is consistent with the Clean Water Act and where 
it has been approved by EPA.
    (f) EPA dispute resolution actions shall be consistent with one or a 
combination of the following options:
    (1) Mediation. The Regional Administrator may appoint a mediator to 
mediate the dispute. Mediators shall be EPA employees, employees from 
other Federal agencies, or other individuals with appropriate 
qualifications.
    (i) Where the State and Tribe agree to participate in the dispute 
resolution process, mediation with the intent to establish Tribal-State 
agreements, consistent with Clean Water Act section 518(d), shall 
normally be pursued as a first effort.
    (ii) Mediators shall act as neutral facilitators whose function is 
to encourage communication and negotiation between all parties to the 
dispute.
    (iii) Mediators may establish advisory panels, to consist in part of 
representatives from the affected parties, to study the problem and 
recommend an appropriate solution.
    (iv) The procedure and schedule for mediation of individual disputes 
shall be determined by the mediator in consultation with the parties.
    (v) If formal public hearings are held in connection with the 
actions taken under this paragraph, Agency requirements at 40 CFR 25.5 
shall be followed.
    (2) Arbitration. Where the parties to the dispute agree to 
participate in the dispute resolution process, the Regional 
Administrator may appoint an arbitrator or arbitration panel to 
arbitrate the dispute. Arbitrators and panel members shall be EPA 
employees, employees from other Federal agencies, or other individuals 
with appropriate qualifications. The Regional administrator shall select 
as arbitrators and arbitration panel members individuals who are 
agreeable to all parties, are knowledgeable concerning the requirements 
of the water quality standards program, have a basic understanding of 
the political and economic interests of Tribes and States involved, and 
are expected to fulfill the duties fairly and impartially.
    (i) The arbitrator or arbitration panel shall conduct one or more 
private or public meetings with the parties and actively solicit 
information pertaining to the effects of differing water quality permit 
requirements on

[[Page 372]]

upstream and downstream dischargers, comparative risks to public health 
and the environment, economic impacts, present and historical water 
uses, the quality of the waters subject to such standards, and other 
factors relevant to the dispute, such as whether proposed water quality 
criteria are more stringent than necessary to support designated uses, 
more stringent than natural background water quality or whether 
designated uses are reasonable given natural background water quality.
    (ii) Following consideration of relevant factors as defined in 
paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section, the arbitrator or arbitration panel 
shall have the authority and responsibility to provide all parties and 
the Regional Administrator with a written recommendation for resolution 
of the dispute. Arbitration panel recommendations shall, in general, be 
reached by majority vote. However, where the parties agree to binding 
arbitration, or where required by the Regional Administrator, 
recommendations of such arbitration panels may be unanimous decisions. 
Where binding or non-binding arbitration panels cannot reach a unanimous 
recommendation after a reasonable period of time, the Regional 
Administrator may direct the panel to issue a non-binding decision by 
majority vote.
    (iii) The arbitrator or arbitration panel members may consult with 
EPA's Office of General Counsel on legal issues, but otherwise shall 
have no ex parte communications pertaining to the dispute. Federal 
employees who are arbitrators or arbitration panel members shall be 
neutral and shall not be predisposed for or against the position of any 
disputing party based on any Federal Trust responsibilities which their 
employers may have with respect to the Tribe. In addition, arbitrators 
or arbitration panel members who are Federal employees shall act 
independently from the normal hierarchy within their agency.
    (iv) The parties are not obligated to abide by the arbitrator's or 
arbitration panel's recommendation unless they voluntarily entered into 
a binding agreement to do so.
    (v) If a party to the dispute believes that the arbitrator or 
arbitration panel has recommended an action contrary to or inconsistent 
with the Clean Water Act, the party may appeal the arbitrator's 
recommendation to the Regional Administrator. The request for appeal 
must be in writing and must include a description of the statutory basis 
for altering the arbitrator's recommendation.
    (vi) The procedure and schedule for arbitration of individual 
disputes shall be determined by the arbitrator or arbitration panel in 
consultation with parties.
    (vii) If formal public hearings are held in connection with the 
actions taken under this paragraph, Agency requirements at 40 CFR 25.5 
shall be followed.
    (3) Dispute resolution default procedure. Where one or more parties 
(as defined in paragraph (g) of this section) refuse to participate in 
either the mediation or arbitration dispute resolution processes, the 
Regional Administrator may appoint a single official or panel to review 
available information pertaining to the dispute and to issue a written 
recommendation for resolving the dispute. Review officials shall be EPA 
employees, employees from other Federal agencies, or other individuals 
with appropriate qualifications. Review panels shall include appropriate 
members to be selected by the Regional Administrator in consultation 
with the participating parties. Recommendations of such review officials 
or panels shall, to the extent possible given the lack of participation 
by one or more parties, be reached in a manner identical to that for 
arbitration of disputes specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through 
(f)(2)(vii) of this section.
    (g) Definitions. For the purposes of this section:
    (1) Dispute Resolution Mechanism means the EPA mechanism established 
pursuant to the requirements of Clean Water Act section 518(e) for 
resolving unreasonable consequences that arise as a result of differing 
water quality standards that may be set by States and Indian Tribes 
located on common bodies of water.
    (2) Parties to a State-Tribal dispute include the State and the 
Tribe and may, at the discretion of the Regional

[[Page 373]]

Administrator, include an NPDES permittee, citizen, citizen group, or 
other affected entity.

[56 FR 64894, Dec. 12, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 64344, Dec. 14, 1994]