[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 40, Volume 28]
[Revised as of July 1, 2002]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 40CFR799.9365]
[Page 355-363]
TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED)
PART 799--IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE AND MIXTURE TESTING REQUIREMENTS--Table of Contents
Subpart H--Health Effects Test Guidelines
Sec. 799.9365 TSCA combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test.
(a) Scope--(1) Applicability. This section is intended to meet
testing requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (15
U.S.C. 2601).
(2) Source. The source material used in developing this TSCA test
guideline is the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
(OPPTS) harmonized test guideline 870.3650 (July 2000, final
guidelines). This source is available at the address in paragraph (h) of
this section.
(b) Purpose. (1) This screening test provides limited information on
systemic toxicity, neurotoxicity, and/or immunotoxicity following
repeated exposure over a limited time period. In addition, it can be
used to provide initial information on possible effects on male and
female reproductive performance such as gonadal function, mating
behavior, conception, development of the conceptus, and parturition. It
is not an alternative to, nor does it replace, the existing test
guidelines in Secs. 799.9370, 799.9380, 799.9620, and 799.9780 of this
part.
(2) This test does not provide complete information on all aspects
of reproduction and development. In particular, it offers only limited
means of detecting postnatal manifestations of prenatal exposure, or
effects that may be induced during postnatal exposure. Due (amongst
other reasons) to the selectivity of the end points, and the short
duration of the study, this method will not provide evidence for
definite claims of no reproduction/developmental effects.
(3) This test can be used to provide initial information either at
an early stage of assessing the toxicological properties of chemicals,
or chemicals of high concern. It can also be used as part of a set of
initial screening tests for existing chemicals for which little or no
toxicological information is available or when otherwise considered
relevant. It also can serve as an alternative to conducting two separate
screening tests for repeated dose toxicity as described in Sec. 799.9305
of this part and reproductive/developmental toxicity as described in
Sec. 799.9355 of this part.
(c) Definitions. The definitions in section 3 of TSCA and in 40 CFR
Part 792--Good Laboratory Practice Standards apply to this section. The
following definitions also apply to this section.
Dosage is a general term comprising dose, its frequency and the
duration of dosing.
Dose is the amount of test substance administered. Dose is expressed
as weight (g, gm) or as weight of test substance per unit weight of test
animal (e.g., mg/kg), or as constant dietary concentration (parts per
million (ppm)).
No-observed-effects level (NOEL) is the maximum dose used in a study
which produces no adverse effects. The NOEL is expressed in terms of the
weight of a test substance given daily per unit weight of test animal
(milligrams per kilogram per day).
(d) Principle of the test. (1) The test substance must be
administered in graduated doses to several groups of males and females.
Males should be dosed for a minimum of 4 weeks, up to and including the
day before scheduled sacrifice (this includes a minimum of 2 weeks prior
to mating, during the mating period and, approximately, 2 weeks post
mating). In view of the limited pre-mating dosing period in males,
fertility may not be a particularly sensitive indicator of testicular
toxicity. Therefore, a detailed histological examination of the testes
is essential. The combination of a pre-mating dosing period of 2 weeks
and subsequent mating/fertility observations with an overall dosing
period of at least 4 weeks, followed by detailed histopathology of the
male gonads, is considered sufficient to enable detection of the
majority of effects on male fertility and spermatogenesis.
(2) Females should be dosed throughout the study. This includes 2
weeks prior to mating (with the objective of covering at least two
complete oestrous cycles), the variable time to conception, the duration
of pregnancy and at least 4 days after delivery, up to and including the
day before scheduled sacrifice.
[[Page 356]]
(3) Duration of study, following acclimatization, is dependent on
the female performance and is approximately 54 days, (at least 14 days
pre-mating, (up to) 14 days mating, 22 days gestation, 4 days
lactation).
(4) During the period of administration, the animals are observed
closely each day for signs of toxicity. Animals which die or are
sacrificed during the test are necropsied and, at the conclusion of the
test, surviving animals are sacrificed and necropsied.
(e) Description of the method--(1) Selection of animal species. This
test guideline is designed for use with the rat. If other species are
used, appropriate modifications will be necessary. Strains with low
fecundity or well-known high incidence of developmental defects should
not be used. Healthy virgin animals, not subjected to previous
experimental procedures, should be used. The test animals should be
characterised as to species, strain, sex, weight and/or age. At the
commencement of the study the weight variation of animals used should be
minimal and not exceed [plusmn] 20% of the mean weight of each sex.
Where the study is conducted as a preliminary study to a long-term or a
full-generation study, preferably animals from the same strain and
source should be used in both studies.
(2) Housing and feeding conditions. (i) The temperature in the
experimental animal room should be 22 [deg]C ([plusmn] 3[deg]). The
relative humidity should be at least 30% and preferably not exceed 70%
other than during room cleaning. Lighting should be artificial, the
sequence being 12 hours light, 12 hours dark. For feeding, conventional
laboratory diets may be used with an unlimited supply of drinking water.
The choice of diet may be influenced by the need to ensure a suitable
admixture of a test substance when administered by this method.
(ii) Animals may be housed individually or be caged in small groups
of the same sex; for group caging, no more than five animals should be
housed per cage. Mating procedures should be carried out in cages
suitable for the purpose. Pregnant females should be caged individually
and provided with nesting materials.
(3) Preparation of the animals. Healthy young adult animals must be
randomised and assigned to the treatment groups and cages. Cages should
be arranged in such a way that possible effects due to cage placements
are minimized. The animals must be uniquely identified and kept in their
cages for at least 5 days prior to the start of the study to allow for
acclimatisation to the laboratory conditions.
(4) Preparation of doses. (i) It is recommended that the test
substance be administered orally unless other routes of administration
are considered more appropriate. When the oral route is selected, the
test compound is usually administered by gavage; however, alternatively,
test compounds may also be administered via the diet or drinking water.
(ii) Where necessary, the test substance is dissolved or suspended
in a suitable vehicle. It is recommended that, wherever possible, the
use of an aqueous solution/suspension be considered first, followed by
consideration of a solution/emulsion in oil (e.g., corn oil) and then by
possible solution in other vehicles. For non-aqueous vehicles the toxic
characteristics of the vehicle must be known. The stability of the test
substance in the vehicle should be determined.
(f) Procedure--(1) Number and sex of animals. It is recommended that
each group be started with at least 10 animals of each sex. Except in
the case of marked toxic effects, it is expected that this will provide
at least eight pregnant females per group which normally is the minimum
acceptable number of pregnant females per group. The objective is to
produce enough pregnancies and offspring to assure a meaningful
evaluation of the potential of the substance to affect fertility,
pregnancy, maternal and suckling behaviour, and growth and development
of the F1 offspring from conception to day 4 post-partum. If
interim sacrifices are planned, the number should be increased by the
number of animals scheduled to be sacrificed before the completion of
the study. Consideration should be given to an additional satellite
group of five animals per sex in the control and the top dose group for
[[Page 357]]
observation of reversibility, persistence or delayed occurrence of
systemic toxic effects, for at least 14 days post treatment. Animals of
the satellite groups must not be mated and, consequently, must not used
for the assessment of reproduction/developmental toxicity.
(2) Dosage. (i) Generally, at least three test groups and a control
group should be used. If there are no suitable general toxicity data
available, a range finding study may be performed to aid the
determination of the doses to be used. Except for treatment with the
test substance, animals in the control group should be handled in an
identical manner to the test group subjects. If a vehicle is used in
administering the test substance, the control group should receive the
vehicle in the highest volume used.
(ii) Dose levels should be selected taking into account any existing
toxicity and (toxico-) kinetic data available for the test compound or
related materials. It should also be taken into account that there may
be differences in sensitivity between pregnant and non-pregnant animals.
The highest dose level should be chosen with the aim of inducing toxic
effects but not death nor obvious suffering. Thereafter, a descending
sequence of dose levels should be selected with a view to demonstrating
any dosage related response and no adverse effects at the lowest dose
level. Two- to four-fold intervals are frequently optimum and addition
of a fourth test group is often preferable to using very large intervals
(e.g., more than a factor of 10) between dosages.
(3) Limit test. If an oral study at 1-dose level of at least 1000
mg/kg body weight/day or, for dietary administration, an equivalent
percentage in the diet, or drinking water (based upon body weight
determinations), using the procedures described for this study, produces
no observable toxic effects and if toxicity would not be expected based
upon data from structurally related compounds, then a full study using
several dose levels may not be considered necessary. The limit test
applies except when human exposure indicates the need for a higher dose
level to be used. For other types of administration, such as inhalation
or dermal application, the physical chemical properties of the test
substance often may dictate the maximum attainable exposure.
(4) Administration of doses. (i) The animals are dosed with the test
substance daily for 7 days a week. When the test substance is
administered by gavage, this should be done in a single dose to the
animals using a stomach tube or a suitable intubation cannula. The
maximum volume of liquid that can be administered at one time depends on
the size of the test animal. The volume should not exceed 1 ml/100 g
body weight, except in the case of aqueous solutions where 2 ml/100 g
body weight may be used. Except for irritating or corrosive substances
which will normally reveal exacerbated effects with higher
concentrations, variability in test volume should be minimized by
adjusting the concentration to ensure a constant volume at all dose
levels.
(ii) For substances administered via the diet or drinking water, it
is important to ensure that the quantities of the test substance
involved do not interfere with normal nutrition or water balance. When
the test substance is administered in the diet either a constant dietary
concentration (parts per million (ppm)) or a constant dose level in
terms of the animals' body weight may be used; the alternative used must
be specified. For a substance administered by gavage, the dose should be
given at similar times each day, and adjusted at least weekly to
maintain a constant dose level in terms of animal body weight.
(5) Experimental schedule. (i) Dosing of both sexes should begin 2
weeks prior to mating, after they have been acclimatized for at least 5
days. The study should be scheduled in such a way that mating begins
soon after the animals have attained full sexual maturity. This may vary
slightly for different strains of rats in different laboratories, e.g.,
Sprague Dawley rats 10 weeks of age, Wistar rats about 12 weeks of age.
Dams with offspring should be sacrificed on day 4 post-partum, or
shortly thereafter. In order to allow for overnight fasting of dams
prior to blood collection (if this option is preferred),
[[Page 358]]
dams and their offspring need not necessarily be sacrificed on the same
day. The day of birth (viz. when parturition is complete) is defined as
day 0 post-partum. Females showing no-evidence of copulation are
sacrificed 24-26 days after the last day of the mating period. Dosing is
continued in both sexes during the mating period. Males should further
be dosed after the mating period at least until the minimum total dosing
period of 28 days has been completed. They are then sacrificed, or,
alternatively, are retained and continued to be dosed for the possible
conduction of a second mating if considered appropriate.
(ii) Daily dosing of the parental females should continue throughout
pregnancy and at least up to, and including, day 3 post-partum or the
day before sacrifice. For studies where the test substance is
administered by inhalation or by the dermal route, dosing should be
continued at least up to, and including, day 19 of gestation.
(iii) Animals in a satellite group scheduled for follow-up
observations, if included, must not mated. They should be kept at least
for a further 14 days after the first scheduled sacrifice of dams,
without treatment to detect delayed occurrence, or persistence of, or
recovery from toxic effects.
(iv) The experimental schedule is given in the following figure 1.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15DE00.065
(6) Mating procedure. Normally, 1:1 (one male to one female) matings
should be used in this study. Exceptions can arise in the case of
occasional deaths of males. The female should be placed with the same
male until pregnancy occurs or 2 weeks have elapsed. Each morning the
females should be examined for the presence of sperm or a vaginal plug.
Day 0 of pregnancy is defined as the day a vaginal plug or sperm is
found. In case pairing was unsuccessful, re-mating of females with
proven males of the same group could be considered.
(7) Observations. (i) General clinical observations should be made
at least once a day, preferably at the same time(s) each day and
considering the peak period of anticipated effects after dosing. The
health condition of the animals should be recorded. At least twice daily
all animals must be observed for morbidity and mortality.
(ii) Once before the first exposure (to allow for within-subject
comparisons),
[[Page 359]]
and at least once a week thereafter, detailed clinical observations
should be made in all animals. These observations should be made outside
the home cage in a standard arena and preferably at the same time, each
day. They should be carefully recorded; preferably using scoring
systems, explicitly defined by the testing laboratory. Effort should be
made to ensure that variations in the test conditions are minimal and
that observations are preferably conducted by observers unaware of the
treatment. Signs noted should include, but not be limited to, changes in
skin, fur, eyes, mucous membranes, occurrence of secretions and
excretions and autonomic activity (e.g., lacrimation, piloerection,
pupil size, unusual respiratory pattern). Changes in gait, posture and
response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or tonic
movements, stereotypies (e.g., excessive grooming, repetitive circling),
difficult or prolonged parturition or bizarre behaviour (e.g., self-
mutilation, walking backwards) should also be recorded.
(iii) At one time during the study, sensory reactivity to stimuli of
different modalities (e.g., auditory, visual and proprioceptive stimuli)
assessment of grip strength and motor activity assessment should be
conducted in five males and five females, randomly selected from each
group. Further details of the procedures that could be followed are
given in the respective references. However, alternative procedures than
those referenced could also be used. In males, these functional
observations should be made towards the end of their dosing period,
shortly before scheduled sacrifice but before blood sampling for
hematology or clinical chemistry. Females should be in a physiologically
similar state during these functional tests and should preferably be
tested during lactation, shortly before scheduled sacrifice. In order to
avoid hypothermia of pups, dams should be removed from the pups for not
more than 30 to 40 minutes. Examples of procedures for observation are
described in the references in paragraphs (h)(3), (h)(4), (h)(5),
(h)(6), and (h)(7) of this section.
(iv) Functional observations made once towards the end of the study
may be omitted when the study is conducted as a preliminary study to a
subsequent subchronic (90-day) or long-term study. In that case, the
functional observations should be included in this follow-up study. On
the other hand, the availability of data on functional observations from
this repeated dose study may enhance the ability to select dose levels
for a subsequent subchronic or long-term study.
(v) Functional observations may also be omitted for groups that
otherwise reveal signs of toxicity to an extent that would significantly
interfere with the functional test performance.
(vi) The duration of gestation should be recorded and is calculated
from day 0 of pregnancy. Each litter should be examined as soon as
possible after delivery to establish the number and sex of pups,
stillbirths, live births, runts (pups that are significantly smaller
than corresponding control pups), and the presence of gross
abnormalities.
(vii) Live pups should be counted and sexed and litters weighed
within 24 hours of parturition (day 0 or 1 post-partum) and on day 4
post-partum. In addition to the observations on parental animals,
described by paragraphs (f)(7)(ii) and (f)(7)(iii) of this section, any
abnormal behaviour of the offspring should be recorded.
(8) Body weight and food/water consumption. (i) Males and females
should be weighed on the first day of dosing, at least weekly
thereafter, and at termination. During pregnancy, females should be
weighed on days 0, 7, 14 and 20 and within 24 hours of parturition (day
0 or 1 post-partum), and day 4 post-partum. These observations should be
reported individually for each adult animal.
(ii) During pre-mating, pregnancy and lactation, food consumption
should be measured at least weekly. The measurement of food consumption
during mating is optional. Water consumption during these periods should
also be measured, when the test substance is administered by that
medium.
(9) Hematology. (i) Once during the study, the following
hematological examinations should be made in five males and five females
randomly selected from each group: hematocrit, hemoglobin concentration,
erythrocyte
[[Page 360]]
count, total and differential leucocyte count, platelet count and a
measure of blood clotting time/potential.
(ii) Blood samples should be taken from a named site. Females should
be in a physiologically similar state during sampling. In order to avoid
practical difficulties related to the variability in the onset of
gestation, blood collection in females may be done at the end of the
pre-mating period as an alternative to sampling just prior to, or as
part of, the procedure for sacrificing the animals. Blood samples of
males should preferably be taken just prior to, or as part of, the
procedure for sacrificing the animals. Alternatively, blood collection
in males may also be done at the end of the pre-mating period when this
time point was preferred for females.
(iii) Blood samples should be stored under appropriate conditions.
(10) Clinical biochemistry. (i) Clinical biochemistry determinations
to investigate major toxic effects in tissues and, specifically, effects
on kidney and liver, should be performed on blood samples obtained from
the selected five males and five females of each group. Overnight
fasting of the animals prior to blood sampling is recommended\1\.
Investigations of plasma or serum must include sodium, potassium,
glucose, total cholesterol, urea, creatinine, total protein and albumin,
at least two enzymes indicative of hepatocellular effects (such as
alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and sorbitol
dehydrogenase) and bile acids. Measurements of additional enzymes (of
hepatic or other origin) may provide useful information under certain
circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For a number of measurements in serum and plasma, most notably
for glucose, overnight fasting would be preferable. The major reason for
this preference is that the increased variability which would inevitably
result from non-fasting, would tend to mask more subtle effects and make
interpretation difficult. On the other hand, however, overnight fasting
may interfere with the general metabolism of the (pregnant) animals,
disturbs lactation and nursing behaviour, and, particularly in feeding
studies, may disturb the daily exposure to the test substance. If
overnight fasting is adopted, clinical biochemical determinations should
be performed after the conduct of functional observations in week 4 of
the study.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Optionally, the following urinalysis determinations could be
performed in five randomly selected males of each group during the last
week of the study using timed urine volume collection; appearance,
volume, osmolality or specific gravity, pH, protein, glucose and blood
or blood cells.
(iii) In addition, studies to investigate serum markers of general
tissue damage should be considered. Other determinations that should be
carried out if the known properties of the test substance may, or are
suspected to, affect related metabolic profiles include calcium,
phosphate, fasting triglycerides and fasting glucose, specific hormones,
methemoglobin and cholinesterase. These need to be identified on a case-
by-case basis.
(iv) Overall, there is a need for a flexible approach, depending on
the observed and/or expected effect with a given compound.
(v) If historical baseline data are inadequate, consideration should
be given to determination of hematological and clinical biochemistry
variables before dosing commences.
(11) Pathology--(i) Gross necropsy. (A) All adult animals in the
study must be subjected to a full, detailed gross necropsy which
includes careful examination of the external surface of the body, all
orifices, and the cranial, thoracic and abdominal cavities and their
contents. Special attention should be paid to the organs of the
reproductive system. The number of implantation sites should be
recorded. Corpora lutea should be counted.
(B) The testes and epididymides of all adult males should be weighed
and the ovaries, testes, epididymides, accessory sex organs, and all
organs showing macroscopic lesions of all adult animals, should be
preserved.
(C) In addition, for five adult males and females, randomly selected
from each group, the liver, kidneys, adrenals, thymus, spleen, brain and
heart should be trimmed of any adherent tissue, as appropriate and their
wet weight taken as soon as possible after dissection to avoid drying.
Of the selected males and females, the following
[[Page 361]]
tissues should also be preserved in the most appropriate fixation medium
for both the type of tissue and the intended subsequent
histopathological examination: all gross lesions, brain (representative
regions including cerebrum, cerebellum and pons), spinal cord, stomach,
small and large intestines (including Peyer's patches), liver, kidneys,
adrenals, spleen, heart, thymus, thyroid, trachea and lungs (preserved
by inflation with fixative and then immersion), uterus, urinary bladder,
lymph nodes (preferably 1 lymph node covering the route of
administration and another one distant from the route of administration
to cover systemic effects), peripheral nerve (sciatic or tibial)
preferably in close proximity to the muscle, and a section of bone
marrow (or, alternatively, a fresh mounted marrow aspirate).
(D) Formalin fixation is not recommended for routine examination of
testes and epididymides. An acceptable method is the use of Bouin's
fixative for these tissues. The clinical and other findings may suggest
the need to examine additional tissues. Also, any organs considered
likely to be target organs based on the known properties of the test
substance should be preserved.
(E) Dead pups and pups sacrificed at day 4 post-partum, or shortly
thereafter, should, at least, be carefully examined externally for gross
abnormalities.
(ii) Histopathology. (A) Full histopathology should be conducted on
the preserved organs and tissues of the selected animals in the control
and high dose groups and all gross lesions. These examinations should be
extended to animals of other dosage groups if treatment-related changes
are observed in the high dose group.
(B) Detailed testicular histopathological examination (e.g., using
Bouin's fixative, paraffin embedding and transverse sections of 4-5
[plusmn]m thickness) should be conducted with special emphasis on stages
of spermatogenesis and histopathology interstitial testicular cell
structure. The evaluation should identify treatment-related effects such
as retained spermatids, missing germ cell layers or types,
multinucleated giant cells or sloughing of spermatogenic cells into the
lumen (the specifications for the evaluation are discussed in paragraph
(g)(2) of this section). Examination of the intact epididymis should
include the caput, corpus, and cauda, which can be accomplished by
evaluation of a longitudinal section. The epididymis should be evaluated
for leukocyte infiltration, change in prevalence of cell types, aberrant
cell types, and phagocytosis of sperm. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and
hematoxylin staining may be used for examination of the male
reproductive organs. Histopathological examination of the ovary should
detect qualitative depletion of the primordial follicle population.
(C) When a satellite group is used, histopathology should be
performed on tissues and organs identified as showing effects in the
treated groups.
(g) Data and reporting--(1) Data. Individual animal data should be
provided. Additionally, all data should be summarised in tabular form,
showing for each test group the number of animals at the start of the
test, the number of animals found dead during the test or sacrificed for
humane reasons, the time of any death or humane sacrifice, the number of
fertile animals, the number of pregnant females, the number of animals
showing signs of toxicity, a description of the signs of toxicity
observed, including time of onset, duration, and severity of any toxic
effects, the types of histopathological changes, and all relevant litter
data.
(2) Evaluation of results. (i) The findings of this toxicity study
should be evaluated in terms of the observed effects, necropsy and
microscopic findings. The evaluation will include the relationship
between the dose of the test substance and the presence or absence,
incidence and severity of abnormalities, including gross lesions,
identified target organs, infertility, clinical abnormalities, affected
reproductive and litter performance, body weight changes, effects on
mortality and any other toxic effects.
(ii) Because of the short period of treatment of the male, the
histopathology of the testes and epididymides must be considered along
with the fertility data, when assessing male reproduction effects. The
use of
[[Page 362]]
historic control data on reproduction/development (e.g. for litter size)
where available may also be useful as an aid to the interpretation of
the study.
(iii) When possible, numerical results should be evaluated by an
appropriate and general acceptable statistical method. The statistical
methods should be selected during the design of the study. Due to the
limited dimensions of the study, statistical analysis in the form of
tests for ``significance'' are of limited value for many endpoints,
especially reproductive endpoints. Some of the most widely used methods,
especially parametric tests for measures of central tendency, are
inappropriate. If statistical analyses are used then the method chosen
should be appropriate for the distribution of the variable examined and
be selected prior to the start of the study.
(3) Test report. The test report must include the following
information:
(i) Test substance:
(A) Physical nature and, where relevant, physicochemical properties.
(B) Identification data.
(ii) Vehicle (if appropriate): Justification for choice of vehicle,
if other than water.
(iii) Test animals:
(A) Species/strain used.
(B) Number, age and sex of animals.
(C) Source, housing conditions, diet, etc.
(D) Individual weights of animals at the start of the test.
(iv) Test conditions:
(A) Rationale for dose level selection.
(B) Details of test substance formulation/diet preparation, achieved
concentration, stability and homogeneity of the preparation.
(C) Details of the administration of the test substance.
(D) Conversion from diet/drinking water test substance concentration
(parts per mission (ppm)) to the actual dose (mg/kg body weight/day), if
applicable.
(E) Details of food and water quality.
(v) Results (toxic response data by sex and dose):
(A) Time of death during the study or whether animals survived to
termination.
(B) Nature, severity and duration of clinical observations (whether
reversible or not).
(C) Body weight/body weight change data.
(D) Food consumption and water consumption, if applicable.
(E) Sensory activity, grip strength and motor activity assessments.
(F) Hematological tests with relevant baseline values,
(G) Clinical biochemistry tests with relevant baseline values.
(H) Effects on reproduction, including information on mating/
precoital interval, fertility, fecundity and gestation duration.
(I) Effects on offspring, including number of pups born (live and
dead), sex ratio, postnatal growth (pup weights) and survival (litter
size), gross abnormalities and clinical observations during lactation.
(J) Body weight at termination and organ weight data for the
parental animals.
(K) Necropsy data, including number of implantations and number of
corpora lutea.
(L) Calculations of pre- and postimplantation loss.
(M) Detailed description of histopathological findings.
(N) Statistical treatment of results, where appropriate.
(vi) Discussion of results.
(vii) Conclusions.
(h) References. For additional background information on this test
guideline, the following references should be consulted. These
references are available for inspection at the TSCA Nonconfidential
Information Center, Rm. NE-B607, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M
St., NW., Washington, DC, 12 noon to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except legal holidays.
(1) Mitsumori, K., Kodama, Y., Uchida, O., Takada, K., Saito, M.
Naito, K., Tanaka, S., Kurokawa, Y., Usami, M., Kawashima, K., Yasuhara,
K., Toyoda, K., Onodera, H., Furukawa, F., Takahashi, M. and Hayashi,
Y., (1994). Confirmation Study, Using Nitro-Benzene, of the Combined
Repeat Dose and Reproductive/ Developmental Toxicity Test Protocol
Proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD). Journal of Toxicology and Science, 19:141-149.
(2) Tanaka, S., Kawashima, K., Naito, K., Usami, M., Nakadate, M.,
Imaida, K.,
[[Page 363]]
Takahashi, M., Hayashi, Y., Kurokawa, Y. and Tobe, M. (1992). Combined
Repeat Dose and Reproductive/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test
(OECD): Familiarization Using Cyclophosphamide. Fundamental and Applied
Toxicology, 18:89-95.
(3) Tupper D.E., Wallace R.B. (1980). Utility of the Neurologic
Examination in Rats. Acta Neurobiological Exposure, 40:999-1003.
(4) Gad S.C. (1982). A Neuromuscular Screen for Use in Industrial
Toxicology. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 9:691-704.
(5) Moser V.C., McDaniel K.M., Phillips P.M. (1991). Rat Strain and
Stock Comparisons Using a Functional Observational Battery: Baseline
Values and Effects of Amitraz. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology,
108:267-283.
(6) Meyer O.A., Tilson H.A., Byrd W.C., Riley M.T. (1979). A Method
for the Routine Assessment of Fore- and Hindlimb Grip Strength of Rats
and Mice. Neurobehavorial Toxicology, 1:233-236.
(7) Crofton K.M., Howard J.L., Moser V.C., Gill M.W., Reiter L.W.,
Tilson H.A., MacPhail R.C. (1991). Interlaboratory Comparison of Motor
Activity Experiments: Implication for Neurotoxicological Assessments.
Neurotoxicology and Teratology 13:599-609.
[65 FR 78793, Dec. 15, 2000]