[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 43, Volume 1]
[Revised as of October 1, 2002]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 43CFR11.32]

[Page 233-235]
 
                    TITLE 43--PUBLIC LANDS: INTERIOR
 
PART 11--NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS--Table of Contents
 
                    Subpart C--Assessment Plan Phase
 
Sec. 11.32  How does the authorized official develop the Assessment Plan?

    (a) Pre-development requirements. The authorized official shall 
fulfill the following requirements before developing an Assessment Plan.
    (1) Coordination. (i) If the authorized official's responsibility is 
shared with other natural resource trustees as a result of coexisting or 
contiguous natural resources or concurrent jurisdiction, the authorized 
official shall ensure that all other known affected natural resource 
trustees are notified that an Assessment Plan is being developed. This 
notification shall include the results of the Preassessment Screen 
Determination.
    (ii) Authorized officials from different agencies or Indian tribes 
are encouraged to cooperate and coordinate any assessments that involve 
coexisting or contiguous natural resources or concurrent jurisdiction. 
They may arrange to divide responsibility for implementing the 
assessment in any manner that is agreed to by all of the affected 
natural resource trustees with the following conditions:
    (A) A lead authorized official shall be designated to administer the 
assessment. The lead authorized official shall act as coordinator and 
contact regarding all aspects of the assessment and shall act as final 
arbitrator of disputes if consensus among the authorized officials 
cannot be reached regarding the development, implementation, or any 
other aspect of the Assessment Plan. The lead authorized official shall 
be designated by mutual agreement of all the natural resource trustees. 
If consensus cannot be reached as to the designation of the lead 
authorized official, the lead authorized official shall be designated in 
accordance with paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) (B), (C), or (D) of this section:
    (B) When the natural resources being assessed are located on lands 
or waters subject to the administrative jurisdiction of a Federal 
agency, a designated official of the Federal agency shall act as the 
lead authorized official.
    (C) When the natural resources being assessed, pursuant to section 
126(d) of CERCLA, are located on lands or waters of an Indian tribe, an 
official designated by the Indian tribe shall act as the lead authorized 
official.
    (D) For all other natural resources for which the State may assert 
trusteeship, a designated official of the State agency shall act as the 
lead authorized official.
    (iii) If there is a reasonable basis for dividing the assessment, 
the natural resource trustee may act independently and pursue separate 
assessments, actions, or claims so long as the claims do not overlap. In 
these instances, the natural resource trustees shall coordinate their 
efforts, particularly those concerning the sharing of data and the 
development of the Assessment Plans.
    (2) Identification and involvement of the potentially responsible 
party. (i) If the lead agency under the NCP for response actions at the 
site has not identified potentially responsible parties, the authorized 
official shall make reasonable efforts to identify any potentially 
responsible parties.
    (ii) In the event the number of potentially responsible parties is 
large or if

[[Page 234]]

some of the potentially responsible parties cannot be located, the 
authorized official may proceed against any one or more of the parties 
identified. The authorized official should use reasonable efforts to 
proceed against most known potentially responsible parties or at least 
against all those potentially responsible parties responsible for 
significant portions of the potential injury.
    (iii)(A) The authorized official shall send a Notice of Intent to 
Perform an Assessment to all identified potentially responsible parties. 
The Notice shall invite the participation of the potentially responsible 
party, or, if several parties are involved and if agreed to by the lead 
authorized official, a representative or representatives designated by 
the parties, in the development of the type and scope of the assessment 
and in the performance of the assessment. The Notice shall briefly 
describe, to the extent known, the site, vessel, or facility involved, 
the discharge of oil or release of hazardous substance of concern to the 
authorized official, and the resources potentially at risk. The Notice 
shall also contain a statement of authority for asserting trusteeship, 
or co-trusteeship, over those natural resources identified as 
potentially at risk.
    (B) The authorized official shall allow at least 30 calendar days, 
with reasonable extensions granted as appropriate, for the potentially 
responsible party or parties notified to respond to the Notice before 
proceeding with the development of the Assessment Plan or any other 
assessment actions.
    (b) Plan approval. The authorized official shall have final approval 
as to the appropriate methodologies to include in the Assessment Plan 
and any modifications to the Assessment Plan.
    (c) Public involvement in the Assessment Plan. (1) The authorized 
official must make the Assessment Plan available for review by any 
identified potentially responsible parties, other natural resource 
trustees, other affected Federal or State agencies or Indian tribes, and 
any other interested member of the public for a period of at least 30 
calendar days, with reasonable extensions granted as appropriate. The 
authorized official may not perform any type B procedures described in 
the Assessment Plan until after this review period.
    (2) Any comments concerning the Assessment Plan received from 
identified potentially responsible parties, other natural resource 
trustees, other affected Federal or State agencies or Indian tribes, and 
any other interested members of the public, together with responses to 
those comments, shall be included as part of the Report of Assessment, 
described in Sec. 11.90 of this part.
    (d) Plan implementation. At the option of the authorized official 
and if agreed to by any potentially responsible party, or parties acting 
jointly, the potentially responsible party or any other party under the 
direction, guidance, and monitoring of the authorized official may 
implement all or any part of the Assessment Plan finally approved by the 
authorized official. Any decision by the authorized official to allow or 
not allow implementation by the potentially responsible party shall be 
documented in the Assessment Plan.
    (e) Plan modification. (1) The Assessment Plan may be modified at 
any stage of the assessment as new information becomes available.
    (2)(i) Any modification to the Assessment Plan that in the judgment 
of the authorized official is significant shall be made available for 
review by any identified potentially responsible party, any other 
affected natural resource trustees, other affected Federal or State 
agencies or Indian tribes, and any other interested members of the 
public for a period of at least 30 calendar days, with reasonable 
extensions granted as appropriate, before tasks called for in the 
modified plan are begun.
    (ii) Any modification to the Assessment Plan that in the judgment of 
the authorized official is not significant shall be made available for 
review by any identified potentially responsible party, any other 
affected natural resource trustees, other affected Federal or State 
agencies or Indian tribes, and any other interested members of the 
public, but the implementation of such modification need not be delayed 
as a result of such review.

[[Page 235]]

    (f) Plan review. (1) After the Injury Determination phase is 
completed and before the Quantification phase is begun, the authorized 
official shall review the decisions incorporated in the Assessment Plan.
    (2) The purpose of this review is to ensure that the selection of 
methodologies for the Quantification and Damage Determination phases is 
consistent with the results of the Injury Determination phase, and that 
the use of such methodologies remains consistent with the requirements 
of reasonable cost, as that term is used in this part.
    (3) Paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this section do not apply to the 
use of a type A procedure.

[51 FR 27725, Aug. 1, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 5174, Feb. 22, 1988; 59 
FR 14282, Mar. 25, 1994; 61 FR 20609, May 7, 1996]