[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 7, Volume 6] [Revised as of January 1, 2003] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 7CFR624.6] [Page 382-383] TITLE 7--AGRICULTURE CHAPTER VI--NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PART 624--EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION--Table of Contents Sec. 624.6 Eligible measures. (a) Eligibility. To be eligible for assistance a measure must-- (1) Retard runoff, prevent flooding, or prevent soil erosion; (2) Reduce threats to life or property resulting from a watershed emergency; (3) Be economically and environmentally defensible and sound from an engineering standpoint; (4) Be limited to the minimum that will reduce applicable threats to a level not to exceed that which existed before the impairment of the watershed; (5) Yield beneficial effects to more than one individual except in an exigency; and (6) Conform to rules and regulations published by NRCS for complying with Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands, and Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management. (b) Documentation. (1) When an exigency does not exist, the economic rationale of proposed measures must be submitted in appropriate detail with the request for funds. Generally, the expected value of imminent damages (amount of damages multiplied by the near-term probability of their occurrence) must exceed the cost of emergency measures. Information provided in the request for emergency funds to support economic defensibility of the measures must include but is not limited to-- (i) Number and extent of values at risk because of the watershed impairment; (ii) Estimated damages to the values at risk if the threat is realized; (iii) Events that must occur for the threat to be realized and the estimated probability of their occurrence both individually and collectively; and (iv) Estimates of the nature, extent, and cost of emergency measures to be constructed to relieve the threat. (2) In nonexigency situations, the state conservationist shall also submit adequate information to substantiate the environmental defensibility the emergency measures proposed for installation. This must include but is not limited to-- (i) Thorough descriptions of beneficial and adverse effects on environmental resources including fish and wildlife habitat; (ii) Descriptions of water quality and water conservation impacts as appropriate; and (iii) Analysis of effects on downstream water rights. The Chief shall issue instructions as are necessary to determine the economic and environmental defensibility of measures proposed for installation consistent with this rule. (c) Implementation. (1) When planning emergency measures, emphasis should [[Page 383]] be placed on measures that are the least expensive and most environmentally sound. The measures are to be accomplished by using the least damaging construction techniques and equipment that will retain as much of the existing characteristics of the channel and riparian habitat as possible. Emergency measure construction practices may include but are not limited to such things as seasonal construction, minimum clearing, reshaping soil, limiting excavation to one bank (on alternating sides where appropriate), and prompt revegetation of disturbed areas. (2) Measures needed to offset adverse impacts should be planned for installation concurrent with installation of the emergency measures. If they cannot be installed then, plans should be included to ensure their installation within 30 days. Cost sharing for these measures is at the same rate as for the original emergency construction. (3) An EWP team consisting of NRCS personnel from the National Office and the technical service center shall determine the eligibility of all permanent, enduring, or long-life measures or practices proposed for construction. The team shall determine the need for funds before any commitments are made. (4) Where lands under jurisdiction of FS are involved, the team will be assisted by FS representatives of the National Office and area or regional offices. The team shall also be available, at the request of the state conservationists, regional foresters, and area directors, to help determine the eligibility of other EWP measures or practices and to assist with administrative details. [46 FR 56577, Nov. 17, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 4448, Feb. 1, 1983]