[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 7]
[Revised as of April 1, 2003]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.501(c)(9)-4]

[Page 25-26]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1--INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.501(c)(9)-4  Voluntary employees' beneficiary associations; inurement.

    (a) General rule. No part of the net earnings of an employees' 
association may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or 
individual other than through the payment of benefits permitted by 
Sec. 1.501(c)(9)-3. The disposition of property to, or the performance 
of services for, a person for less than the greater of fair market value 
or cost (including indirect costs) to the association, other than as a 
life, sick, accident or other permissible benefit, constitutes 
prohibited inurement. Generally, the payment of unreasonable 
compensation to the trustees or employees of the association, or the 
purchase of insurance or services for amounts in excess of their fair 
market value from a company in which one or more of the association's 
trustees, officers or fiduciaries has an interest, will constitute 
prohibited inurement. Whether prohibited inurement has occurred is a 
question to be determined with regard to all of the facts and 
circumstances, taking into account the guidelines set forth in this 
section. The guidelines and examples contained in this section are not 
an exhaustive list of the activities that may constitute prohibited 
inurement, or the persons to whom the association's earnings could 
impermissibly inure. See Sec. 1.501(a)-1(c).
    (b) Disproportionate benefits. For purposes of subsection (a), the 
payment to any member of disproportionate benefits, where such payment 
is not pursuant to objective and nondiscriminatory standards, will not 
be considered a benefit within the meaning of Sec. 1.501(c)(9)-3 even 
though the benefit otherwise is one of the type permitted by that 
section. For example, the payment to highly compensated personnel of 
benefits that are disproportionate in relation to benefits received by 
other members of the association will constitute prohibited inurement. 
Also, the payment to similarly situated employees of benefits that 
differ in kind or amount will constitute prohibited inurement unless the 
difference can be justified on the basis of objective and reasonable 
standards adopted by the association or on the basis of standards

[[Page 26]]

adopted pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. In 
general, benefits paid pursuant to standards or subject to conditions 
that do not provide for disproportionate benefits to officers, 
shareholders, or highly compensated employees will not be considered 
disproportionate. See Sec. 1.501(c)(9)-2(a) (2) and (3).
    (c) Rebates. The rebate of excess insurance premiums, based on the 
mortality or morbidity experience of the insurer to which the premiums 
were paid, to the person or persons whose contributions were applied to 
such premiums, does not constitute prohibited inurement. A voluntary 
employees' beneficiary association may also make administrative 
adjustments strictly incidental to the provision of benefits to its 
members.
    (d) Termination of plan or dissolution of association. It will not 
constitute prohibited inurement if, on termination of a plan established 
by an employer and funded through an association described in section 
501(c)(9), any assets remaining in the association, after satisfaction 
of all liabilities to existing beneficiaries of the plan, are applied to 
provide, either directly or through the purchase of insurance, life, 
sick, accident or other benefits within the meaning of Sec. 1.501(c)(9)-
3 pursuant to criteria that do not provide for disproportionate benefits 
to officers, shareholders, or highly compensated employees of the 
employer. See Sec. 1.501(c)(9)-2(a)(2). Similarly, a distribution to 
members upon the dissolution of the association will not constitute 
prohibited inurement if the amount distributed to members are determined 
pursuant to to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement or on the 
basis of objective and reasonable standards which do not result in 
either unequal payments to similarly situated members or in 
disproportionate payments to officers, shareholders, or highly 
compensated employees of an employer contributing to or otherwise 
funding the employees' association. Except as otherwise provided in the 
first sentence of this paragraph, if the association's corporate 
charter, articles of association, trust instrument, or other written 
instrument by which the association was created, as amended from time to 
time, provides that on dissolution its assets will be distributed to its 
members' contributing employers, or if in the absence of such provision 
the law of the state in which the association was created provides for 
such distribution to the contributing employers, the association is not 
described in section 501(c)(9).
    (e) Example. The provisions of this section may be illustrated by 
the following example:

    Example. Employees A, B and C, members of the X voluntary employees' 
beneficiary association, are unemployed. They receive unemployment 
benefits from X. Those to A include an amount in addition to those 
provided to B and C, to provide for A's retraining. B has been found 
pursuant to objective and reasonable standards not to qualify for the 
retraining program. C, although eligible for retraining benefits has 
declined. X's additional payment to A for retraining does not constitute 
prohibited inurement.

[T.D. 7750, 46 FR 1725, Jan. 7, 1981]