[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 28, Volume 2]
[Revised as of July 1, 2003]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 28CFR91.62]

[Page 402-403]
 
                    TITLE 28--JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
 
              CHAPTER I--DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Continued)
 
PART 91--GRANTS FOR CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES--Table of Contents
 
  Subpart D--Environmental Impact Review Procedures for VOI/TIS Grant 
                                 Program
 
Sec. 91.62  Preparing an Environmental Assessment.

    (a) In general. An Environmental Assessment (EA) is a concise public 
document that provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining 
whether OJP should issue a Finding of No Significant Environmental 
Impact (FONSI) or prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). It is 
designed to help public officials make decisions that are based on an 
understanding of the human and physical environmental consequences of 
the proposed project and take actions, in the location and design of the 
project, that protect, restore and enhance the environment. Completing 
an EA requires considering all potential impacts associated with the 
construction of the correctional facility project, its operation and 
maintenance, any related projects including those off-site, and the 
attainment of the project's major objectives. The latter requires an 
analysis of the environmental impacts of any training and vocational 
activities to be conducted by the inmates.
    (b) Project planning and site selection. During the planning phase 
of the project, OJP and the grantee jointly define the project, explore 
the various alternatives and identify a proposed site for the 
construction or renovation project. In order to identify possible 
environmental concerns and reduce the likelihood of later opposition to 
the project, the grantee should involve other interested parties at this 
stage through public meetings which allow affected or interested parties 
to learn about the need for the action, the scope of the proposed 
action, and any alternatives being considered. These public meetings 
should also provide interested parties an opportunity to express 
comments or concerns about potential consequences of the action. 
Additionally, minority and low-income populations as well as Indian 
tribes that may be affected by the proposal should be consulted at this 
early stage. The grantee should obtain their views on proposed sites and 
mitigation measures as an important step in meeting the environmental 
justice goals of Executive Order 12898.
    (c) Draft environmental assessment. The grantee should prepare an EA 
after

[[Page 403]]

identifying the proposed site, but before reaching a final decision to 
proceed with the effort at that location. The grantee may prepare the EA 
or contract for the preparation of all or parts of the EA. In order to 
adequately assess all of the potential environmental impacts, a multi-
disciplinary team must be used to perform the environmental analysis. 
Any state or local environmental impact review requirements should also 
be incorporated into the EA process. The amount of analysis and detail 
provided must be commensurate with the magnitude of the expected impact. 
At a minimum, an EA should include a brief discussion of the need for 
the proposal, the alternatives considered, the environmental impacts of 
the proposed action and alternatives considered, and a list of agencies 
and persons consulted. VOI/TIS grant funds may be used to pay the costs 
of preparing the environmental assessment.
    (d) OJP's Review of the Draft EA. The Office of Justice Programs 
will review the EA for the following:
    (1) Has the need for the proposed action been established?
    (2) Have the relevant areas of environmental concern been 
identified?
    (3) Have other agencies with an interest been consulted?
    (4) Has the grantee provided opportunities for public involvement?
    (5) Have reasonable alternatives and mitigation measures been 
considered and implemented where possible, including the costs and 
resources to operate the facility?
    (6) Has a convincing case been made that the project as presently 
conceived will have only insignificant impacts on each of the identified 
areas of environmental concern?
    (7) Has the grantee adequately documented compliance with other 
related federal environmental laws and regulations as well as similar 
state and local environmental impact review requirements.
    (e) Draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or determination 
that EIS is required. If the EA satisfies all the factors in OJP's 
seven-part review set forth in the previous paragraph, OJP will issue a 
draft FONSI. If OJP's review of the EA results in a response of ``no'' 
to any of the questions, except question 6, then the EA is incomplete 
and will be returned for further work. If the only ``no'' is in response 
to question 6, then OJP will issue a determination requiring an EIS for 
that particular project at that site. Given the cost and time required 
to complete an EIS, the grantee may wish to explore another alternative 
site at this point.
    (f) Circulate EA and draft FONSI for public comment. The grantee 
must provide public notice of availability of a Finding of No 
Significant Impact. The notice must be timed so that interested agencies 
and the public have 30 days for review and comment on the draft EA.
    (g) Review comments and modify plans, as appropriate. The grantee 
must review any public or agency comments received as a result of review 
of the EA and draft FONSI, and should modify its plans, if appropriate. 
Modification may include modifying the project to mitigate the 
environmental impact of the proposed project, or abandoning the proposed 
site and selecting an alternative that will have a less significant 
impact on the environment. The grantee must submit the comments, 
responses to these comments, and any revisions to the proposed plan to 
OJP for review. If the grantee recommends proceeding with the project in 
light of adverse comments on the environmental impact, the grantee must 
include the rationale for its recommendation.
    (h) Final action on EA. Unless a significant environmental impact 
surfaces through the public comments or other means, OJP will issue the 
FONSI and authorize the grantee to begin the purchase of land, the 
bidding process, the development of final plans and specifications, and 
the construction work.