[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 34, Volume 1]
[Revised as of July 1, 2003]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 34CFR222.23]

[Page 490-491]
 
                           TITLE 34--EDUCATION
 
              SECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 
PART 222--IMPACT AID PROGRAMS--Table of Contents
 
 Subpart B--Payments for Federal Property Under Section 8002 of the Act
 
Sec. 222.23  How does a local official determine the aggregate assessed 
value of eligible Federal property for the purpose of a local educational 
agency's 
          section 8002 payment?

    (a) The aggregate assessed value of eligible Federal property for 
the purpose of an LEA's section 8002 payment must be determined, by a 
local official responsible for assessing the value of real property 
located in the jurisdiction of the LEA for the purpose of levying a 
property tax, as follows:
    (1) The local official first determines a fair market value (FMV) 
for the eligible Federal property in each Federal installation or other 
federally owned property (e.g., Federal forest), based on the highest 
and best use of taxable properties adjacent to the eligible Federal 
property.
    (2) The local official then determines a section 8002 assessed value 
for each Federal installation or federally owned property by adjusting 
the FMV established in paragraph (a)(1) of this section by any 
percentage, ratio, index, or other factor that the official would use, 
if the eligible Federal property were taxable, to determine its assessed 
value for the purpose of generating local real property tax revenues for 
current expenditures. In making this adjustment, the official may assume 
that there was a transfer of ownership of the eligible Federal property 
for the year for which the section 8002 assessed value is being 
determined.
    (3) The local official then calculates the aggregate section 8002 
assessed value for all eligible Federal property in the LEA by adding 
the section 8002 assessed values for each different Federal installation 
or federally owned property determined in paragraph (a)(2) of this 
section.

    Example: Two different Federal properties are located within an LEA-
-a Federal forest, and a naval facility. Based upon the highest and best 
use of taxable properties adjacent to the eligible Federal property, the 
local assessor establishes a FMV for the Federal forest of $1 million 
(woodland), and a FMV for the naval facility of $3 million (50 percent 
residential and 50 percent commercial/industrial). Assessed values in 
that taxing jurisdiction are determined by multiplying the FMV of 
property by an assessment ratio--the assessment ratio for woodland 
property is 30 percent of FMV, for residential 60 percent of FMV, and 
for commercial 75 percent of FMV.
    To determine the section 8002 assessed value of the Federal forest, 
the assessor multiplies the FMV for that property ($1,000,000) by 30 
percent (the assessment ratio for woodland property), resulting in a 
section 8002 assessed value of $300,000.
    To determine the section 8002 assessed value for the naval facility, 
the assessor first must determine the portion of the total FMV 
attributable to each property type if that portion has not already been 
established. To make this determination for the residential portion, the 
assessor could multiply the total FMV ($3,000,000) for the naval 
facility by 50 percent (the portion of residential property), resulting 
in a $1.5 million FMV for the residential property. To determine a 
section 8002 assessed value for this residential portion, the assessor 
then would multiply the $1.5 million by 60 percent (assessment ratio for 
residential property), resulting in $900,000.
    Similarly, to determine the portion of the FMV for the naval 
facility attributable to the commercial/industrial property, the 
assessor could multiply the total FMV ($3,000,000) by 50 percent (the 
portion of commercial/industrial property), resulting in $1.5 million. 
To determine the section 8002 assessed value for this commercial/
industrial portion, the official then would multiply the $1.5 million by 
75 percent (the assessment ratio for commercial/industrial property), 
resulting in $1,025,000. The assessor then must add the section 8002 
assessed value figures for the residential portion ($900,000) and for 
the commercial/industrial portion ($1,025,000), resulting in a total 
section 8002 assessed value for the entire naval facility of $1,925,000.

[[Page 491]]

    Finally, the assessor determines the aggregate section 8002 assessed 
value for the LEA by adding the section 8002 assessed value for the 
Federal forest ($300,000), and the section 8002 assessed value for the 
naval facility ($1,925,000), resulting in an aggregate assessed value of 
$2,325,000.

    (b) For the purpose of this section, the terms listed below have the 
following meanings:
    (1) Adjacent means next to or close to the eligible Federal 
property. In most cases, this will be the closest taxable parcels.
    (2)(i) Highest and best use of a parcel of adjacent property means 
the FMV of that parcel determined based upon a ``highest and best use'' 
standard in accordance with State or local law or guidelines if 
available. To the extent that State or local law or guidelines are not 
available, ``highest and best use'' generally will be a reasonable fair 
market value based upon the current use of those properties. However, 
the local official may also consider the most developed and profitable 
use for which the adjacent taxable property is physically adaptable and 
for which there is a need or demand for that use in the near future.
    (ii) A local official may not base the ``highest and best use'' 
value of adjacent taxable property upon potential uses that are 
speculative or remote.
    (iii) If the taxable properties adjacent to the eligible Federal 
property have different highest and best uses, these different uses must 
enter into the local official's determination of the FMV of the eligible 
Federal property under paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

    Example: If a portion of a Federal installation to be valued has 
road or highway frontage with adjacent properties that are used for 
residential and commercial purposes, but the rest of the Federal 
installation is rural and vacant with adjacent properties that are 
agricultural, the local official must take into consideration the 
various uses of the adjacent properties (residential, commercial, and 
agricultural) in determining the FMV of the Federal property under 
paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7702)

[62 FR 35414, July 1, 1997]