[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 47, Volume 3]
[Revised as of October 1, 2003]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 47CFR51.317]

[Page 34-35]
 
                       TITLE 47--TELECOMMUNICATION
 
        CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (CONTINUED)
 
PART 51_INTERCONNECTION--Table of Contents
 
  Subpart D_Additional Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers
 
Sec.  51.317  Standards for requiring the unbundling of network elements.

    (a) Proprietary network elements. A network element shall be 
considered to be proprietary if an incumbent LEC can demonstrate that it 
has invested resources to develop proprietary information or 
functionalities that are protected by patent, copyright or trade secret 
law. The Commission shall undertake the following analysis to determine 
whether a proprietary network element should be made available for 
purposes of section 251(c)(3) of the Act:
    (1) Determine whether access to the proprietary network element is 
``necessary.'' A network element is ``necessary'' if, taking into 
consideration the availability of alternative elements outside the 
incumbent LEC's network, including self-provisioning by a requesting 
carrier or acquiring an alternative from a third-party supplier, lack of 
access to the network element precludes a requesting telecommunications 
carrier from providing the services that it seeks to offer. If access is 
``necessary,'' then, subject to any consideration of the factors set 
forth under paragraph (c) of this section, the Commission may require 
the unbundling of such proprietary network element.
    (2) In the event that such access is not ``necessary,'' the 
Commission may require unbundling subject to any consideration of the 
factors set forth under paragraph (c) of this section if it is 
determined that:
    (i) The incumbent LEC has implemented only a minor modification to 
the network element in order to qualify for proprietary treatment;
    (ii) The information or functionality that is proprietary in nature 
does not differentiate the incumbent LEC's services from the requesting 
carrier's services; or
    (iii) Lack of access to such element would jeopardize the goals of 
the 1996 Act.
    (b) Non-proprietary network elements. The Commission shall undertake 
the following analysis to determine whether a non-proprietary network 
element should be made available for purposes of section 251(c)(3) of 
the Act:
    (1) Determine whether lack of access to a non-proprietary network 
element ``impairs'' a carrier's ability to provide the service it seeks 
to offer. A requesting carrier's ability to provide service is 
``impaired'' if, taking into consideration the availability of 
alternative elements outside the incumbent LEC's network, including 
self-provisioning by a requesting carrier or acquiring an alternative 
from a third-party supplier, lack of access to that element materially 
diminishes a requesting carrier's ability to provide the services it 
seeks to offer. The Commission will consider the totality of the 
circumstances to determine whether an alternative to the incumbent LEC's 
network element is available in such a manner that a requesting carrier 
can provide service using the alternative. If the Commission determines 
that lack of access to an element ``impairs'' a requesting carrier's 
ability to provide service, it may require the unbundling of that 
element, subject to any consideration of the factors set forth under 
section 51.317(c).
    (2) In considering whether lack of access to a network element 
materially diminishes a requesting carrier's ability to provide service, 
the Commission shall consider the extent to which alternatives in the 
market are available as a practical, economic, and operational matter. 
The Commission will rely upon the following factors to determine whether 
alternative network elements are available as a practical, economic, and 
operational matter:
    (i) Cost, including all costs that requesting carriers may incur 
when using the alternative element to provide the services it seeks to 
offer;
    (ii) Timeliness, including the time associated with entering a 
market as well as the time to expand service to more customers;
    (iii) Quality;
    (iv) Ubiquity, including whether the alternatives are available 
ubiquitously;
    (v) Impact on network operations.

[[Page 35]]

    (3) In determining whether to require the unbundling of any network 
element under this rule, the Commission may also consider the following 
additional factors:
    (i) Whether unbundling of a network element promotes the rapid 
introduction of competition;
    (ii) Whether unbundling of a network element promotes facilities-
based competition, investment, and innovation;
    (iii) Whether unbundling of a network element promotes reduced 
regulation;
    (iv) Whether unbundling of a network element provides certainty to 
requesting carriers regarding the availability of the element;
    (v) Whether unbundling of a network element is administratively 
practical to apply.
    (4) If an incumbent LEC is required to provide nondiscriminatory 
access to a network element in accordance with Sec.  51.311 and section 
251(c)(3) of the Act under Sec.  51.319 of this section or any 
applicable Commission Order, no state commission shall have authority to 
determine that such access is not required. A state commission must 
comply with the standards set forth in this Sec.  51.317 when 
considering whether to require the unbundling of additional network 
elements. With respect to any network element which a state commission 
has required to be unbundled under this Sec.  51.317, the state 
commission retains the authority to subsequently determine, in 
accordance with the requirements of this rule, that such network element 
need no longer be unbundled.

[65 FR 2551, Jan. 18, 2000]

    Effective Date Note: At 68 FR 52295, Sept. 2, 2003, Sec.  51.317 was 
revised, effective Oct. 2, 2003. For the convenience of the user, the 
revised text is set forth as follows:

Sec.  51.317  Standards for requiring the unbundling of network 
          elements.

    Proprietary network elements. A network element shall be considered 
to be proprietary if an incumbent LEC can demonstrate that it has 
invested resources to develop proprietary information or functionalities 
that are protected by patent, copyright or trade secret law. The 
Commission shall undertake the following analysis to determine whether a 
proprietary network element should be made available for purposes of 
section 251(c)(3) of the Act:
    (a) Determine whether access to the proprietary network element is 
``necessary.'' A network element is ``necessary'' if, taking into 
consideration the availability of alternative elements outside the 
incumbent LEC's network, including self-provisioning by a requesting 
telecommunications carrier or acquiring an alternative from a third-
party supplier, lack of access to the network element precludes a 
requesting telecommunications carrier from providing the services that 
it seeks to offer. If access is ``necessary,'' the Commission may 
require the unbundling of such proprietary network element.
    (b) In the event that such access is not ``necessary,'' the 
Commission may require unbundling if it is determined that:
    (1) The incumbent LEC has implemented only a minor modification to 
the network element in order to qualify for proprietary treatment;
    (2) The information or functionality that is proprietary in nature 
does not differentiate the incumbent LEC's services from the requesting 
telecommunications carrier's services; or
    (3) Lack of access to such element would jeopardize the goals of the 
Act.