[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 50, Volume 6] [Revised as of October 1, 2003] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 50CFR223.204] [Page 161-163] TITLE 50--WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PART 223--THREATENED MARINE AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES--Table of Contents Subpart B--Restrictions Applicable to Threatened Marine and Anadromous Species Sec. 223.204 Exceptions to prohibitions relating to anadromous fish. (a) The following exceptions to the prohibitions of Sec. 223.203(a) of this part apply to the Southern Oregon/Northern California Coast (SONCC) coho salmon. (1) Take of SONCC coho salmon within 3 miles (approximately 5 km) of the coast, and in the bay, estuarine or freshwater fisheries regulated under the sole authority of the State of Oregon is not prohibited, if the take results from a fisheries harvest program conducted in accordance with the Oregon Coastal Salmon Restoration Initiative of March 1997 (OCSRI). NMFS [[Page 162]] must have issued a written concurrence that the fisheries regulations are consistent with the OCSRI, using information provided through the April 1997 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the State of Oregon and NMFS. (2) Incidental take of SONCC coho salmon in ocean fisheries within 3 miles (approximately 5 km) of the coast that are regulated under the sole authority of the State of California is not prohibited, provided that the ocean salmon fishing regulations adopted by the California Fish and Game Commission and CDFG for recreational and commercial fisheries within 3 miles (approximately 5 km) of the coast are consistent with the Pacific Fishery Management Council's Fishery Management Plan for Ocean Salmon Fisheries and the annual ocean salmon fishing regulations issued by the Secretary of Commerce for the Federal EEZ. (3) Take of SONCC coho salmon in a hatchery program regulated under the sole authority of the State of Oregon is not prohibited, if the take results from a hatchery program conducted in accordance with the OCSRI, and the take is counted against the total allocation of harvest-related mortality as specified in the OCSRI. NMFS must have issued a written concurrence stating that the hatchery program is consistent with the OCSRI including the hatchery and genetic management plan adopted pursuant to the OCSRI, using information provided through the MOA. (4) Take of SONCC coho salmon in fisheries research and monitoring activities conducted in California and Oregon is not prohibited provided that: (i) Research and monitoring involving directed take of coho salmon is conducted by CDFG personnel (in California) and ODFW personnel (in Oregon); (ii) The CDFG and ODFW, respectively, provide NMFS with a list of all research and monitoring activities involving coho salmon directed take planned for the coming year for NMFS' review and approval. This report shall include an estimate of the total directed take that is anticipated, a description of the study design, including a justification for taking the species and a description of the techniques to be used, and a point of contact; (iii) The CDFG and ODFW, respectively, provide NMFS annually with the results of research and monitoring studies directed at SONCC coho salmon, including a report of the directed take resulting from the studies; (iv) The CDFG and ODFW, provide NMFS annually with a list of all research and monitoring studies permitted that may allow incidental take of listed coho salmon during the coming year and report the level of incidental take of listed coho salmon from the previous year's research and monitoring activities, for NMFS' review and approval. (v) The research and monitoring activities do not include the use of electrofishing in any body of water known or suspected to contain coho salmon. (5) Incidental take of the SONCC coho salmon in Oregon resulting from a habitat restoration activity is not prohibited, provided that: (i) The activity is conducted pursuant to a watershed action or restoration plan that has been affirmed by the state in writing as consistent with NMFS' approved state watershed plan guidelines set forth in Sec. 222.307(c) of this chapter. NMFS shall also concur in writing that the plan is consistent with the state watershed plan guidelines; or (ii) Until a watershed action or restoration plan is approved by both Oregon and NMFS as described in paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section, or until August 18, 1999, whichever occurs first, the ODFW has made a written finding that the activity is consistent with state restoration activity guidelines that NMFS has agreed, in writing, meet the standards set forth in Sec. 222.307(c) of this chapter. (6) Incidental take of the SONCC coho salmon in California resulting from a habitat restoration activity, as defined in paragraph (a)(6)(iii) of this section, is not prohibited, provided that California has a program in effect that NMFS finds will assure technically supported watershed assessments and coordinated long-term monitoring strategies for watershed protection plans and activities and: [[Page 163]] (i) The activity is conducted pursuant to a watershed protection plan that CDFG has affirmed, in writing, is consistent with NMFS' approved state watershed plan guidelines set forth in Sec. 222.307(c) of this chapter for California's Watershed Protection Program. NMFS must concur, in writing, that the plan is consistent with those guidelines; or (ii) Until a watershed protection or restoration plan is certified by the State of California and NMFS as described in paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this section, or until August 18, 1999, whichever occurs first, when NMFS has made a written finding that the activity is consistent with State of California conservation guidelines previously found to meet the standards set forth in Sec. 222.307(c) of this chapter by NMFS. [64 FR 14069, Mar. 23, 1999]