[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 21, Volume 1]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 21CFR56.109]

[Page 326-327]
 
                        TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGS
 
CHAPTER I--FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 
                                SERVICES
 
PART 56_INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS--Table of Contents
 
                 Subpart C_IRB Functions and Operations
 
Sec. 56.109  IRB review of research.

    (a) An IRB shall review and have authority to approve, require 
modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research 
activities covered by these regulations.
    (b) An IRB shall require that information given to subjects as part 
of informed consent is in accordance with Sec. 50.25. The IRB may 
require that information, in addition to that specifically mentioned in 
Sec. 50.25, be given to the subjects when in the IRB's judgment the 
information would meaningfully add to the protection of the rights and 
welfare of subjects.
    (c) An IRB shall require documentation of informed consent in 
accordance with Sec. 50.27 of this chapter, except as follows:
    (1) The IRB may, for some or all subjects, waive the requirement 
that the subject, or the subject's legally authorized representative, 
sign a written consent form if it finds that the research presents no 
more than minimal risk of harm to subjects and involves no procedures 
for which written consent is normally required outside the research 
context; or
    (2) The IRB may, for some or all subjects, find that the 
requirements in Sec. 50.24 of this chapter for an exception from 
informed consent for emergency research are met.
    (d) In cases where the documentation requirement is waived under 
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the IRB may require the investigator 
to provide subjects with a written statement regarding the research.
    (e) An IRB shall notify investigators and the institution in writing 
of its decision to approve or disapprove the proposed research activity, 
or of modifications required to secure IRB approval of the research 
activity. If the IRB decides to disapprove a research activity, it shall 
include in its written notification a statement of the reasons for its 
decision and give the investigator an opportunity to respond in person 
or in writing. For investigations involving an exception to informed 
consent under Sec. 50.24 of this chapter, an IRB shall promptly notify 
in writing the investigator and the sponsor of the research when an IRB 
determines that it cannot approve the research because it does not meet 
the criteria in the exception provided under Sec. 50.24(a) of this 
chapter or because of other relevant ethical concerns. The written 
notification shall include a statement of the reasons for the IRB's 
determination.
    (f) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by 
these regulations at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but 
not less than once per year, and shall have authority to observe or have 
a third party observe the consent process and the research.
    (g) An IRB shall provide in writing to the sponsor of research 
involving an exception to informed consent under Sec. 50.24 of this 
chapter a copy of information that has been publicly disclosed under 
Sec. 50.24(a)(7)(ii) and (a)(7)(iii) of this chapter. The IRB shall 
provide this information to the sponsor promptly so that the sponsor is 
aware that such disclosure has occurred. Upon receipt, the sponsor shall 
provide

[[Page 327]]

copies of the information disclosed to FDA.
    (h) When some or all of the subjects in a study are children, an IRB 
must determine that the research study is in compliance with part 50, 
subpart D of this chapter, at the time of its initial review of the 
research. When some or all of the subjects in a study that is ongoing on 
April 30, 2001 are children, an IRB must conduct a review of the 
research to determine compliance with part 50, subpart D of this 
chapter, either at the time of continuing review or, at the discretion 
of the IRB, at an earlier date.

[46 FR 8975, Jan. 27, 1981, as amended at 61 FR 51529, Oct. 2, 1996; 66 
FR 20599, Apr. 24, 2001]