[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 10, Volume 1]
[Revised as of January 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 10CFR50.44]

[Page 731-733]
 
                            TITLE 10--ENERGY
 
                CHAPTER I--NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
PART 50--DOMESTIC LICENSING OF PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION FACILITIES--Table 
of Contents
 
Sec. 50.44  Combustible gas control for nuclear power reactors.

    (a) Definitions.
    (1) Inerted atmosphere means a containment atmosphere with less than 
4 percent oxygen by volume.
    (2) Mixed atmosphere means that the concentration of combustible 
gases in any part of the containment is below a level that supports 
combustion or detonation that could cause loss of containment integrity.
    (b) Requirements for currently-licensed reactors. Each boiling or 
pressurized water nuclear power reactor with an operating license on 
October 16, 2003, except for those facilities for which the 
certifications required under Sec. 50.82(a)(1) have been submitted, 
must comply with the following requirements, as applicable:
    (1) Mixed atmosphere. All containments must have a capability for 
ensuring a mixed atmosphere.
    (2) Combustible gas control. (i) All boiling water reactors with 
Mark I or Mark II type containments must have an inerted atmosphere.
    (ii) All boiling water reactors with Mark III type containments and 
all pressurized water reactors with ice condenser containments must have 
the capability for controlling combustible gas generated from a metal-
water reaction involving 75 percent of the fuel cladding surrounding the 
active fuel region (excluding the cladding surrounding the plenum 
volume) so that there is no loss of containment structural integrity.
    (3) Equipment Survivability. All boiling water reactors with Mark 
III containments and all pressurized water reactors with ice condenser 
containments that do not rely upon an inerted atmosphere inside 
containment to control combustible gases must be able to establish and 
maintain safe shutdown and containment structural integrity with systems 
and components capable of performing their functions during and after 
exposure to the environmental conditions created by the burning of 
hydrogen. Environmental conditions caused by local detonations of 
hydrogen must also be included, unless such detonations can be shown 
unlikely to occur. The amount of hydrogen to be considered must be 
equivalent to that generated from a metal-water reaction involving 75 
percent of the fuel cladding surrounding the active fuel region 
(excluding the cladding surrounding the plenum volume).
    (4) Monitoring. (i) Equipment must be provided for monitoring oxygen 
in containments that use an inerted atmosphere for combustible gas 
control. Equipment for monitoring oxygen must be functional, reliable, 
and capable of continuously measuring the concentration of oxygen in the 
containment atmosphere following a significant beyond design-basis 
accident for combustible gas control and accident management, including 
emergency planning.
    (ii) Equipment must be provided for monitoring hydrogen in the 
containment. Equipment for monitoring hydrogen must be functional, 
reliable, and capable of continuously measuring the concentration of 
hydrogen in the containment atmosphere following a significant beyond 
design-basis accident for accident management, including emergency 
planning.

[[Page 732]]

    (5) Analyses. Each holder of an operating license for a boiling 
water reactor with a Mark III type of containment or for a pressurized 
water reactor with an ice condenser type of containment, shall perform 
an analysis that:
    (i) Provides an evaluation of the consequences of large amounts of 
hydrogen generated after the start of an accident (hydrogen resulting 
from the metal-water reaction of up to and including 75 percent of the 
fuel cladding surrounding the active fuel region, excluding the cladding 
surrounding the plenum volume) and include consideration of hydrogen 
control measures as appropriate;
    (ii) Includes the period of recovery from the degraded condition;
    (iii) Uses accident scenarios that are accepted by the NRC staff. 
These scenarios must be accompanied by sufficient supporting 
justification to show that they describe the behavior of the reactor 
system during and following an accident resulting in a degraded core.
    (iv) Supports the design of the hydrogen control system selected to 
meet the requirements of this section; and,
    (v) Demonstrates, for those reactors that do not rely upon an 
inerted atmosphere to comply with paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, 
that:
    (A) Containment structural integrity is maintained. Containment 
structural integrity must be demonstrated by use of an analytical 
technique that is accepted by the NRC staff in accordance with Sec. 
50.90. This demonstration must include sufficient supporting 
justification to show that the technique describes the containment 
response to the structural loads involved. This method could include the 
use of actual material properties with suitable margins to account for 
uncertainties in modeling, in material properties, in construction 
tolerances, and so on; and
    (B) Systems and components necessary to establish and maintain safe 
shutdown and to maintain containment integrity will be capable of 
performing their functions during and after exposure to the 
environmental conditions created by the burning of hydrogen, including 
local detonations, unless such detonations can be shown unlikely to 
occur.
    (c) Requirements for future water-cooled reactor applicants and 
licensees.\2\ The requirements in this paragraph apply to all water-
cooled reactor construction permits or operating licenses under this 
part, and to all water-cooled reactor design approvals, design 
certifications, combined licenses or manufacturing licenses under part 
52 of this chapter, any of which are issued after October 16, 2003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The requirements of this paragraph apply only to water-cooled 
reactor designs with characteristics (e.g., type and quantity of 
cladding materials) such that the potential for production of 
combustible gases is comparable to light water reactor designs licensed 
as of October 16, 2003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) Mixed atmosphere. All containments must have a capability for 
ensuring a mixed atmosphere during design-basis and significant beyond 
design-basis accidents.
    (2) Combustible gas control. All containments must have an inerted 
atmosphere, or must limit hydrogen concentrations in containment during 
and following an accident that releases an equivalent amount of hydrogen 
as would be generated from a 100 percent fuel clad-coolant reaction, 
uniformly distributed, to less than 10 percent (by volume) and maintain 
containment structural integrity and appropriate accident mitigating 
features.
    (3) Equipment Survivability. Containments that do not rely upon an 
inerted atmosphere to control combustible gases must be able to 
establish and maintain safe shutdown and containment structural 
integrity with systems and components capable of performing their 
functions during and after exposure to the environmental conditions 
created by the burning of hydrogen. Environmental conditions caused by 
local detonations of hydrogen must also be included, unless such 
detonations can be shown unlikely to occur. The amount of hydrogen to be 
considered must be equivalent to that generated from a fuel clad-coolant 
reaction involving 100 percent of the fuel cladding surrounding the 
active fuel region.
    (4) Monitoring. (i) Equipment must be provided for monitoring oxygen 
in containments that use an inerted atmosphere for combustible gas 
control.

[[Page 733]]

Equipment for monitoring oxygen must be functional, reliable, and 
capable of continuously measuring the concentration of oxygen in the 
containment atmosphere following a significant beyond design-basis 
accident for combustible gas control and accident management, including 
emergency planning.
    (ii) Equipment must be provided for monitoring hydrogen in the 
containment. Equipment for monitoring hydrogen must be functional, 
reliable, and capable of continuously measuring the concentration of 
hydrogen in the containment atmosphere following a significant beyond 
design-basis accident for accident management, including emergency 
planning.
    (5) Structural analysis. An applicant must perform an analysis that 
demonstrates containment structural integrity. This demonstration must 
use an analytical technique that is accepted by the NRC and include 
sufficient supporting justification to show that the technique describes 
the containment response to the structural loads involved. The analysis 
must address an accident that releases hydrogen generated from 100 
percent fuel clad-coolant reaction accompanied by hydrogen burning. 
Systems necessary to ensure containment integrity must also be 
demonstrated to perform their function under these conditions.
    (d) Requirements for future non water-cooled reactor applicants and 
licensees and certain water-cooled reactor applicants and licensees. The 
requirements in this paragraph apply to all construction permits and 
operating licenses under this part, and to all design approvals, design 
certifications, combined licenses, or manufacturing licenses under part 
52 of this chapter, for non water-cooled reactors and water-cooled 
reactors that do not fall within the description in paragraph (c), 
footnote 1 of this section, any of which are issued after October 16, 
2003. Applications subject to this paragraph must include:
    (1) Information addressing whether accidents involving combustible 
gases are technically relevant for their design, and
    (2) If accidents involving combustible gases are found to be 
technically relevant, information (including a design-specific 
probabilistic risk assessment) demonstrating that the safety impacts of 
combustible gases during design-basis and significant beyond design-
basis accidents have been addressed to ensure adequate protection of 
public health and safety and common defense and security.

[68 FR 54141, Sept. 16, 2003]