[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 15, Volume 3]
[Revised as of January 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 15CFR930.36]

[Page 248-249]
 
                  TITLE 15--COMMERCE AND FOREIGN TRADE
 
CHAPTER IX--NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT 
                               OF COMMERCE
 
PART 930_FEDERAL CONSISTENCY WITH APPROVED COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS--Table 
of Contents
 
           Subpart C_Consistency for Federal Agency Activities
 
Sec. 930.36  Consistency determinations for proposed activities.

    (a) Federal agencies shall review their proposed Federal agency 
activities which affect any coastal use or resource in order to develop 
consistency determinations which indicate whether such activities will 
be undertaken in a manner consistent to the maximum extent practicable 
with the enforceable policies of approved management programs. Federal 
agencies should consult with State agencies at an early stage in the 
development of the proposed activity in order to assess whether such 
activities will be consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the 
enforceable policies of such programs.
    (b) Timing of consistency determinations. (1) Federal agencies shall 
provide State agencies with a consistency determination at the earliest 
practicable time in the planning or reassessment of the activity. A 
consistency determination should be prepared following development of 
sufficient information to reasonably determine the consistency of the 
activity with the management program, but before the Federal agency 
reaches a significant point of decisionmaking in its review process, 
i.e., while the Federal agency has the ability to modify the activity. 
The consistency determination shall be provided to State agencies at 
least 90 days before final approval of the Federal agency activity 
unless both the Federal agency and the State agency agree to an 
alternative notification schedule.
    (2) Federal and State agencies may mutually agree upon procedures 
for extending the notification requirement beyond 90 days for activities 
requiring a substantial review period, and for shortening the 
notification period for activities requiring a less extensive review 
period, provided that public participation requirements are met.
    (c) General consistency determinations. In cases where Federal 
agencies will be performing repeated activity other than a development 
project (e.g., ongoing maintenance, waste disposal) which cumulatively 
has an effect upon any coastal use or resource, the Federal agency may 
develop a general consistency determination, thereby avoiding the 
necessity of issuing separate consistency determinations for each 
incremental action controlled by the major activity. A Federal agency 
may provide a State agency with a general consistency determination only 
in situations where the incremental actions are repetitive and do not 
affect any coastal use or resource when performed separately. A Federal 
agency and State agency may mutually agree on a general consistency 
determination for de minimis activities (see Sec. 930.33(a)(3)) or any 
other repetitive activity or category of activity(ies). If a Federal 
agency issues a general consistency determination, it shall thereafter 
periodically consult with the State agency to discuss the manner in 
which the incremental actions are being undertaken.
    (d) Phased consistency determinations. In cases where the Federal 
agency has sufficient information to determine the consistency of a 
proposed development project or other activity from planning to 
completion, the Federal agency shall provide the State agency with one 
consistency determination for the entire activity or development 
project. In cases where federal decisions related to a proposed 
development project or other activity will be made in phases based upon 
developing information that was not available at the time of the 
original consistency determination, with each subsequent phase subject 
to Federal agency discretion to implement alternative decisions based 
upon such information (e.g., planning, siting, and design decisions), a 
consistency determination will be required for each major decision. In 
cases of phased decisionmaking, Federal agencies shall ensure that the 
development project or

[[Page 249]]

other activity continues to be consistent to the maximum extent 
practicable with the management program.
    (e) National or regional consistency determinations. (1) A Federal 
agency may provide States with consistency determinations for Federal 
agency activities that are national or regional in scope (e.g., 
rulemaking, national plans), and that affect any coastal use or resource 
of more than one State. Many States share common coastal management 
issues and have similar enforceable policies, e.g., protection of a 
particular coastal resource. The Federal agency's national or regional 
consistency determination should, at a minimum, address the common 
denominator of these policies, i.e., the common coastal effects and 
management issues, and thereby address different States' policies with 
one discussion and determination. If a Federal agency decides not to use 
this section, it must issue consistency determinations to each State 
agency pursuant to Sec. 930.39.
    (2) Federal agency activities with coastal effects shall be 
consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable 
policies of each State's management program. Thus, the Federal agency's 
national or regional consistency determination shall contain sections 
that would apply to individual States to address coastal effects and 
enforceable policies unique to particular States, if common coastal 
effects and enforceable policies cannot be addressed under paragraph 
(e)(1). Early coordination with coastal States will enable the Federal 
agency to identify particular coastal management concerns and policies. 
In addition, the Federal agency could address the concerns of each 
affected State by providing for State conditions for the proposed 
activity. Further, the consistency determination could identify the 
coordination efforts and describe how the Federal agency responded to 
State agency concerns.