[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 45, Volume 2]
[Revised as of October 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 45CFR260.34]

[Page 122-124]
 
                        TITLE 45--PUBLIC WELFARE
 
     CHAPTER II--OFFICE OF FAMILY ASSISTANCE (ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS), 
 
PART 260_GENERAL TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) PROVISIONS
--Table of Contents
 
        Subpart A_What Rules Generally Apply to the TANF Program?
 
Sec. 260.34  When do the Charitable Choice provisions of TANF apply?

    (a) These Charitable Choice provisions apply whenever a State or 
local government uses Federal TANF funds or expends State and local 
funds used to meet maintenance-of-effort (MOE) requirements of the TANF 
program to directly procure services and benefits from non-governmental 
organizations, or provides TANF beneficiaries with certificates, 
vouchers, or other forms of indirect disbursement redeemable from such 
organizations. For purposes of this section:
    (1) Direct funding or funds provided directly means that the 
government or an intermediate organization with the same duties as a 
governmental entity under this part selects the provider and purchases 
the needed services straight from the provider (e.g., via a contract or 
cooperative agreement).
    (2) Indirect funding or funds provided indirectly means placing the 
choice of service provider in the hands of the beneficiary, and then 
paying for the cost of that service through a voucher, certificate, or 
other similar means of payment.
    (b)(1) Religious organizations are eligible, on the same basis as 
any other organization, to participate in TANF as long as their Federal 
TANF or State MOE funded services are provided consistent with the 
Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment 
to the United States Constitution.
    (2) Neither the Federal government nor a State or local government 
in its use of Federal TANF or State MOE funds shall, in the selection of 
service providers, discriminate for or against an organization that 
applies to provide, or provides TANF services or benefits on the basis 
of the organization's religious character or affiliation.
    (c) No Federal TANF or State MOE funds provided directly to 
participating organizations may be expended for inherently religious 
activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization. 
If an organization conducts such activities, it must offer them 
separately, in time or location, from the programs or services for which 
it receives direct Federal TANF or State MOE funds under this part,

[[Page 123]]

and participation must be voluntary for the beneficiaries of those 
programs or services.
    (d) A religious organization that participates in the TANF program 
will retain its independence from Federal, State, and local governments 
and may continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, 
practice and expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does 
not expend Federal TANF or State MOE funds that it receives directly to 
support any inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious 
instruction, or proselytization. Among other things, faith-based 
organizations may use space in their facilities to provide TANF-funded 
services without removing religious art, icons, scriptures, or other 
symbols. In addition, a Federal TANF or State MOE funded religious 
organization retains the authority over its internal governance, and it 
may retain religious terms in its organization's name, select its board 
members on a religious basis, and include religious references in its 
organization's mission statements and other governing documents.
    (e) The participation of a religious organization in, or its receipt 
of funds from, a TANF program does not affect that organization's 
exemption provided under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-1 regarding employment 
practices.
    (f) A religious organization that receives Federal TANF or State MOE 
funds shall not, in providing program services or benefits, discriminate 
against a TANF applicant or recipient on the basis of religion, a 
religious belief, a refusal to hold a religious belief, or a refusal to 
actively participate in a religious practice.
    (g)(1) If an otherwise eligible TANF applicant or recipient objects 
to the religious character of a TANF service provider, the recipient is 
entitled to receive services from an alternative provider to which the 
individual has no religious objection. In such cases, the State or local 
agency must refer the individual to an alternative provider of services 
within a reasonable period of time, as defined by the State or local 
agency. That alternative provider must be reasonably accessible and have 
the capacity to provide comparable services to the individual. Such 
services shall have a value that is not less than the value of the 
services that the individual would have received from the program 
participant to which the individual had such objection, as defined by 
the State or local agency.
    (2) The alternative provider need not be a secular organization. It 
must simply be a provider to which the recipient has no religious 
objection. States may adopt reasonable definitions of the terms 
``reasonably accessible,'' ``a reasonable period of time,'' 
``comparable,'' ``capacity,'' and `` value that is not less than.'' We 
expect States to apply these terms in a fair and consistent manner.
    (3) The appropriate State or local governments that administer 
Federal TANF or State MOE funded programs shall ensure that notice of 
their right to alternative services is provided to applicants or 
recipients. The notice must clearly articulate the recipient's right to 
a referral and to services that reasonably meet the timeliness, 
capacity, accessibility, and equivalency requirements discussed above.
    (h) Religious organizations that receive Federal TANF and State MOE 
funds are subject to the same regulations as other non-governmental 
organizations to account, in accordance with generally accepted 
auditing/accounting principles, for the use of such funds. Religious 
organizations may keep Federal TANF and State MOE funds they receive for 
services segregated in a separate account from non-governmental funds. 
If religious organizations choose to segregate their funds in this 
manner, only the Federal TANF and State MOE funds are subject to audit 
by the government under the program.
    (i) This section applies whenever a State or local organization uses 
Federal TANF or State MOE funds to procure services and benefits from 
non-governmental organizations, or redeems certificates, vouchers, or 
other forms of disbursement from them whether with Federal funds, or 
State and local funds claimed to meet the MOE requirements of section 
409(a)(7) of the Social Security Act. Subject to the requirements of 
paragraph (j), when State or local funds are used to meet the TANF MOE 
requirements, the

[[Page 124]]

provisions apply irrespective of whether the State or local funds are 
commingled with Federal funds, segregated, or expended in separate State 
programs.
    (j) Preemption. Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
preempt any provision of a State constitution, or State statute that 
prohibits or restricts the expenditure of segregated or separate State 
funds in or by religious organizations.
    (k) If a non-governmental intermediate organization, acting under a 
contract or other agreement with a State or local government, is given 
the authority under the contract or agreement to select non-governmental 
organizations to provide Federal TANF or MOE funded services, the 
intermediate organization must ensure that there is compliance with the 
Charitable Choice statutory provisions and these regulations. The 
intermediate organization retains all other rights of a non-governmental 
organization under the Charitable Choice statute and regulations.
    (l) Any party which seeks to enforce its right under this section 
may assert a civil action for injunctive relief exclusively in an 
appropriate State court against the entity or agency that allegedly 
commits such violation.

[68 FR 56465, Sept. 30, 2003]